use ln::features::{ChannelFeatures, InvoiceFeatures, NodeFeatures};
use ln::msgs::{DecodeError, ErrorAction, LightningError, MAX_VALUE_MSAT};
use routing::scoring::Score;
-use routing::network_graph::{NetworkGraph, NodeId, RoutingFees};
+use routing::network_graph::{DirectedChannelInfoWithUpdate, EffectiveCapacity, NetworkGraph, NodeId, RoutingFees};
use util::ser::{Writeable, Readable};
use util::logger::{Level, Logger};
/// given path is variable, keeping the length of any path to less than 20 should currently
/// ensure it is viable.
pub paths: Vec<Vec<RouteHop>>,
- /// The `payee` parameter passed to [`find_route`].
+ /// The `payment_params` parameter passed to [`find_route`].
/// This is used by `ChannelManager` to track information which may be required for retries,
/// provided back to you via [`Event::PaymentPathFailed`].
///
/// [`Event::PaymentPathFailed`]: crate::util::events::Event::PaymentPathFailed
- pub payee: Option<Payee>,
+ pub payment_params: Option<PaymentParameters>,
}
pub(crate) trait RoutePath {
}
}
write_tlv_fields!(writer, {
- (1, self.payee, option),
+ (1, self.payment_params, option),
});
Ok(())
}
}
paths.push(hops);
}
- let mut payee = None;
+ let mut payment_params = None;
read_tlv_fields!(reader, {
- (1, payee, option),
+ (1, payment_params, option),
});
- Ok(Route { paths, payee })
+ Ok(Route { paths, payment_params })
}
}
-/// Parameters needed to find a [`Route`] for paying a [`Payee`].
+/// Parameters needed to find a [`Route`].
///
/// Passed to [`find_route`] and also provided in [`Event::PaymentPathFailed`] for retrying a failed
/// payment path.
/// [`Event::PaymentPathFailed`]: crate::util::events::Event::PaymentPathFailed
#[derive(Clone, Debug)]
pub struct RouteParameters {
- /// The recipient of the failed payment path.
- pub payee: Payee,
+ /// The parameters of the failed payment path.
+ pub payment_params: PaymentParameters,
/// The amount in msats sent on the failed payment path.
pub final_value_msat: u64,
}
impl_writeable_tlv_based!(RouteParameters, {
- (0, payee, required),
+ (0, payment_params, required),
(2, final_value_msat, required),
(4, final_cltv_expiry_delta, required),
});
/// The recipient of a payment.
#[derive(Clone, Debug, Hash, PartialEq, Eq)]
-pub struct Payee {
+pub struct PaymentParameters {
/// The node id of the payee.
- pub pubkey: PublicKey,
+ pub payee_pubkey: PublicKey,
/// Features supported by the payee.
///
pub max_total_cltv_expiry_delta: u32,
}
-impl_writeable_tlv_based!(Payee, {
- (0, pubkey, required),
+impl_writeable_tlv_based!(PaymentParameters, {
+ (0, payee_pubkey, required),
(1, max_total_cltv_expiry_delta, (default_value, DEFAULT_MAX_TOTAL_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA)),
(2, features, option),
(4, route_hints, vec_type),
(6, expiry_time, option),
});
-impl Payee {
+impl PaymentParameters {
/// Creates a payee with the node id of the given `pubkey`.
- pub fn from_node_id(pubkey: PublicKey) -> Self {
+ pub fn from_node_id(payee_pubkey: PublicKey) -> Self {
Self {
- pubkey,
+ payee_pubkey,
features: None,
route_hints: vec![],
expiry_time: None,
}
/// Creates a payee with the node id of the given `pubkey` to use for keysend payments.
- pub fn for_keysend(pubkey: PublicKey) -> Self {
- Self::from_node_id(pubkey).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::for_keysend())
+ pub fn for_keysend(payee_pubkey: PublicKey) -> Self {
+ Self::from_node_id(payee_pubkey).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::for_keysend())
}
/// Includes the payee's features.
}
}
-struct DummyDirectionalChannelInfo {
- cltv_expiry_delta: u32,
- htlc_minimum_msat: u64,
- htlc_maximum_msat: Option<u64>,
- fees: RoutingFees,
+/// A wrapper around the various hop representations.
+///
+/// Used to construct a [`PathBuildingHop`] and to estimate [`EffectiveCapacity`].
+#[derive(Clone, Debug)]
+enum CandidateRouteHop<'a> {
+ /// A hop from the payer, where the outbound liquidity is known.
+ FirstHop {
+ details: &'a ChannelDetails,
+ },
+ /// A hop found in the [`NetworkGraph`], where the channel capacity may or may not be known.
+ PublicHop {
+ info: DirectedChannelInfoWithUpdate<'a>,
+ short_channel_id: u64,
+ },
+ /// A hop to the payee found in the payment invoice, though not necessarily a direct channel.
+ PrivateHop {
+ hint: &'a RouteHintHop,
+ }
+}
+
+impl<'a> CandidateRouteHop<'a> {
+ fn short_channel_id(&self) -> u64 {
+ match self {
+ CandidateRouteHop::FirstHop { details } => details.short_channel_id.unwrap(),
+ CandidateRouteHop::PublicHop { short_channel_id, .. } => *short_channel_id,
+ CandidateRouteHop::PrivateHop { hint } => hint.short_channel_id,
+ }
+ }
+
+ // NOTE: This may alloc memory so avoid calling it in a hot code path.
+ fn features(&self) -> ChannelFeatures {
+ match self {
+ CandidateRouteHop::FirstHop { details } => details.counterparty.features.to_context(),
+ CandidateRouteHop::PublicHop { info, .. } => info.channel().features.clone(),
+ CandidateRouteHop::PrivateHop { .. } => ChannelFeatures::empty(),
+ }
+ }
+
+ fn cltv_expiry_delta(&self) -> u32 {
+ match self {
+ CandidateRouteHop::FirstHop { .. } => 0,
+ CandidateRouteHop::PublicHop { info, .. } => info.direction().cltv_expiry_delta as u32,
+ CandidateRouteHop::PrivateHop { hint } => hint.cltv_expiry_delta as u32,
+ }
+ }
+
+ fn htlc_minimum_msat(&self) -> u64 {
+ match self {
+ CandidateRouteHop::FirstHop { .. } => 0,
+ CandidateRouteHop::PublicHop { info, .. } => info.direction().htlc_minimum_msat,
+ CandidateRouteHop::PrivateHop { hint } => hint.htlc_minimum_msat.unwrap_or(0),
+ }
+ }
+
+ fn fees(&self) -> RoutingFees {
+ match self {
+ CandidateRouteHop::FirstHop { .. } => RoutingFees {
+ base_msat: 0, proportional_millionths: 0,
+ },
+ CandidateRouteHop::PublicHop { info, .. } => info.direction().fees,
+ CandidateRouteHop::PrivateHop { hint } => hint.fees,
+ }
+ }
+
+ fn effective_capacity(&self) -> EffectiveCapacity {
+ match self {
+ CandidateRouteHop::FirstHop { details } => EffectiveCapacity::ExactLiquidity {
+ liquidity_msat: details.outbound_capacity_msat,
+ },
+ CandidateRouteHop::PublicHop { info, .. } => info.effective_capacity(),
+ CandidateRouteHop::PrivateHop { .. } => EffectiveCapacity::Infinite,
+ }
+ }
}
/// It's useful to keep track of the hops associated with the fees required to use them,
/// so that we can choose cheaper paths (as per Dijkstra's algorithm).
/// Fee values should be updated only in the context of the whole path, see update_value_and_recompute_fees.
/// These fee values are useful to choose hops as we traverse the graph "payee-to-payer".
-#[derive(Clone, Debug)]
+#[derive(Clone)]
struct PathBuildingHop<'a> {
- // The RouteHintHop fields which will eventually be used if this hop is used in a final Route.
- // Note that node_features is calculated separately after our initial graph walk.
+ // Note that this should be dropped in favor of loading it from CandidateRouteHop, but doing so
+ // is a larger refactor and will require careful performance analysis.
node_id: NodeId,
- short_channel_id: u64,
- channel_features: &'a ChannelFeatures,
+ candidate: CandidateRouteHop<'a>,
fee_msat: u64,
- cltv_expiry_delta: u32,
/// Minimal fees required to route to the source node of the current hop via any of its inbound channels.
src_lowest_inbound_fees: RoutingFees,
- /// Fees of the channel used in this hop.
- channel_fees: RoutingFees,
/// All the fees paid *after* this channel on the way to the destination
next_hops_fee_msat: u64,
- /// Fee paid for the use of the current channel (see channel_fees).
+ /// Fee paid for the use of the current channel (see candidate.fees()).
/// The value will be actually deducted from the counterparty balance on the previous link.
hop_use_fee_msat: u64,
/// Used to compare channels when choosing the for routing.
/// an estimated cost of reaching this hop.
/// Might get stale when fees are recomputed. Primarily for internal use.
total_fee_msat: u64,
- /// This is useful for update_value_and_recompute_fees to make sure
- /// we don't fall below the minimum. Should not be updated manually and
- /// generally should not be accessed.
- htlc_minimum_msat: u64,
/// A mirror of the same field in RouteGraphNode. Note that this is only used during the graph
/// walk and may be invalid thereafter.
path_htlc_minimum_msat: u64,
/// decrease as well. Thus, we have to explicitly track which nodes have been processed and
/// avoid processing them again.
was_processed: bool,
- #[cfg(any(test, feature = "fuzztarget"))]
+ #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
// In tests, we apply further sanity checks on cases where we skip nodes we already processed
// to ensure it is specifically in cases where the fee has gone down because of a decrease in
// value_contribution_msat, which requires tracking it here. See comments below where it is
value_contribution_msat: u64,
}
+impl<'a> core::fmt::Debug for PathBuildingHop<'a> {
+ fn fmt(&self, f: &mut core::fmt::Formatter) -> Result<(), core::fmt::Error> {
+ f.debug_struct("PathBuildingHop")
+ .field("node_id", &self.node_id)
+ .field("short_channel_id", &self.candidate.short_channel_id())
+ .field("total_fee_msat", &self.total_fee_msat)
+ .field("next_hops_fee_msat", &self.next_hops_fee_msat)
+ .field("hop_use_fee_msat", &self.hop_use_fee_msat)
+ .field("total_fee_msat - (next_hops_fee_msat + hop_use_fee_msat)", &(&self.total_fee_msat - (&self.next_hops_fee_msat + &self.hop_use_fee_msat)))
+ .field("path_penalty_msat", &self.path_penalty_msat)
+ .field("path_htlc_minimum_msat", &self.path_htlc_minimum_msat)
+ .field("cltv_expiry_delta", &self.candidate.cltv_expiry_delta())
+ .finish()
+ }
+}
+
// Instantiated with a list of hops with correct data in them collected during path finding,
// an instance of this struct should be further modified only via given methods.
#[derive(Clone)]
// set it too high just to maliciously take more fees by exploiting this
// match htlc_minimum_msat logic.
let mut cur_hop_transferred_amount_msat = total_fee_paid_msat + value_msat;
- if let Some(extra_fees_msat) = cur_hop.htlc_minimum_msat.checked_sub(cur_hop_transferred_amount_msat) {
+ if let Some(extra_fees_msat) = cur_hop.candidate.htlc_minimum_msat().checked_sub(cur_hop_transferred_amount_msat) {
// Note that there is a risk that *previous hops* (those closer to us, as we go
// payee->our_node here) would exceed their htlc_maximum_msat or available balance.
//
// Irrelevant for the first hop, as it doesn't have the previous hop, and the use of
// this channel is free for us.
if i != 0 {
- if let Some(new_fee) = compute_fees(cur_hop_transferred_amount_msat, cur_hop.channel_fees) {
+ if let Some(new_fee) = compute_fees(cur_hop_transferred_amount_msat, cur_hop.candidate.fees()) {
cur_hop.hop_use_fee_msat = new_fee;
total_fee_paid_msat += new_fee;
} else {
/// [`ChannelManager::list_usable_channels`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::list_usable_channels
/// [`Event::PaymentPathFailed`]: crate::util::events::Event::PaymentPathFailed
pub fn find_route<L: Deref, S: Score>(
- our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, params: &RouteParameters, network: &NetworkGraph,
+ our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, route_params: &RouteParameters, network: &NetworkGraph,
first_hops: Option<&[&ChannelDetails]>, logger: L, scorer: &S
) -> Result<Route, LightningError>
where L::Target: Logger {
get_route(
- our_node_pubkey, ¶ms.payee, network, first_hops, params.final_value_msat,
- params.final_cltv_expiry_delta, logger, scorer
+ our_node_pubkey, &route_params.payment_params, network, first_hops, route_params.final_value_msat,
+ route_params.final_cltv_expiry_delta, logger, scorer
)
}
pub(crate) fn get_route<L: Deref, S: Score>(
- our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, payee: &Payee, network: &NetworkGraph,
- first_hops: Option<&[&ChannelDetails]>, final_value_msat: u64, final_cltv_expiry_delta: u32,
+ our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, payment_params: &PaymentParameters, network: &NetworkGraph,
+ first_hops: Option<&[&ChannelDetails]>, final_value_msat: u64, final_cltv_expiry_delta: u32,
logger: L, scorer: &S
) -> Result<Route, LightningError>
where L::Target: Logger {
- let payee_node_id = NodeId::from_pubkey(&payee.pubkey);
+ let payee_node_id = NodeId::from_pubkey(&payment_params.payee_pubkey);
let our_node_id = NodeId::from_pubkey(&our_node_pubkey);
if payee_node_id == our_node_id {
return Err(LightningError{err: "Cannot send a payment of 0 msat".to_owned(), action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError});
}
- for route in payee.route_hints.iter() {
+ for route in payment_params.route_hints.iter() {
for hop in &route.0 {
- if hop.src_node_id == payee.pubkey {
+ if hop.src_node_id == payment_params.payee_pubkey {
return Err(LightningError{err: "Route hint cannot have the payee as the source.".to_owned(), action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError});
}
}
let network_graph = network.read_only();
let network_channels = network_graph.channels();
let network_nodes = network_graph.nodes();
- let dummy_directional_info = DummyDirectionalChannelInfo { // used for first_hops routes
- cltv_expiry_delta: 0,
- htlc_minimum_msat: 0,
- htlc_maximum_msat: None,
- fees: RoutingFees {
- base_msat: 0,
- proportional_millionths: 0,
- }
- };
// Allow MPP only if we have a features set from somewhere that indicates the payee supports
// it. If the payee supports it they're supposed to include it in the invoice, so that should
// work reliably.
- let allow_mpp = if let Some(features) = &payee.features {
+ let allow_mpp = if let Some(features) = &payment_params.features {
features.supports_basic_mpp()
} else if let Some(node) = network_nodes.get(&payee_node_id) {
if let Some(node_info) = node.announcement_info.as_ref() {
node_info.features.supports_basic_mpp()
} else { false }
} else { false };
- log_trace!(logger, "Searching for a route from payer {} to payee {} {} MPP", our_node_pubkey,
- payee.pubkey, if allow_mpp { "with" } else { "without" });
+ log_trace!(logger, "Searching for a route from payer {} to payee {} {} MPP and {} first hops {}overriding the network graph", our_node_pubkey,
+ payment_params.payee_pubkey, if allow_mpp { "with" } else { "without" },
+ first_hops.map(|hops| hops.len()).unwrap_or(0), if first_hops.is_some() { "" } else { "not " });
// Step (1).
// Prepare the data we'll use for payee-to-payer search by
// inserting first hops suggested by the caller as targets.
// Our search will then attempt to reach them while traversing from the payee node.
- let mut first_hop_targets: HashMap<_, Vec<(_, ChannelFeatures, _, NodeFeatures)>> =
+ let mut first_hop_targets: HashMap<_, Vec<&ChannelDetails>> =
HashMap::with_capacity(if first_hops.is_some() { first_hops.as_ref().unwrap().len() } else { 0 });
if let Some(hops) = first_hops {
for chan in hops {
- let short_channel_id = chan.short_channel_id.expect("first_hops should be filled in with usable channels, not pending ones");
+ if chan.short_channel_id.is_none() {
+ panic!("first_hops should be filled in with usable channels, not pending ones");
+ }
if chan.counterparty.node_id == *our_node_pubkey {
return Err(LightningError{err: "First hop cannot have our_node_pubkey as a destination.".to_owned(), action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError});
}
- first_hop_targets.entry(NodeId::from_pubkey(&chan.counterparty.node_id)).or_insert(Vec::new())
- .push((short_channel_id, chan.counterparty.features.to_context(), chan.outbound_capacity_msat, chan.counterparty.features.to_context()));
+ first_hop_targets
+ .entry(NodeId::from_pubkey(&chan.counterparty.node_id))
+ .or_insert(Vec::new())
+ .push(chan);
}
if first_hop_targets.is_empty() {
return Err(LightningError{err: "Cannot route when there are no outbound routes away from us".to_owned(), action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError});
}
}
- let empty_channel_features = ChannelFeatures::empty();
-
// The main heap containing all candidate next-hops sorted by their score (max(A* fee,
// htlc_minimum)). Ideally this would be a heap which allowed cheap score reduction instead of
// adding duplicate entries when we find a better path to a given node.
// - when we want to stop looking for new paths.
let mut already_collected_value_msat = 0;
- log_trace!(logger, "Building path from {} (payee) to {} (us/payer) for value {} msat.", payee.pubkey, our_node_pubkey, final_value_msat);
+ log_trace!(logger, "Building path from {} (payee) to {} (us/payer) for value {} msat.", payment_params.payee_pubkey, our_node_pubkey, final_value_msat);
macro_rules! add_entry {
- // Adds entry which goes from $src_node_id to $dest_node_id
- // over the channel with id $chan_id with fees described in
- // $directional_info.
+ // Adds entry which goes from $src_node_id to $dest_node_id over the $candidate hop.
// $next_hops_fee_msat represents the fees paid for using all the channels *after* this one,
// since that value has to be transferred over this channel.
// Returns whether this channel caused an update to `targets`.
- ( $chan_id: expr, $src_node_id: expr, $dest_node_id: expr, $directional_info: expr, $capacity_sats: expr, $chan_features: expr, $next_hops_fee_msat: expr,
- $next_hops_value_contribution: expr, $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat: expr, $next_hops_path_penalty_msat: expr, $next_hops_cltv_delta: expr ) => { {
+ ( $candidate: expr, $src_node_id: expr, $dest_node_id: expr, $next_hops_fee_msat: expr,
+ $next_hops_value_contribution: expr, $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat: expr,
+ $next_hops_path_penalty_msat: expr, $next_hops_cltv_delta: expr ) => { {
// We "return" whether we updated the path at the end, via this:
let mut did_add_update_path_to_src_node = false;
// Channels to self should not be used. This is more of belt-and-suspenders, because in
// practice these cases should be caught earlier:
// - for regular channels at channel announcement (TODO)
// - for first and last hops early in get_route
- if $src_node_id != $dest_node_id.clone() {
- let available_liquidity_msat = bookkept_channels_liquidity_available_msat.entry($chan_id.clone()).or_insert_with(|| {
- let mut initial_liquidity_available_msat = None;
- if let Some(capacity_sats) = $capacity_sats {
- initial_liquidity_available_msat = Some(capacity_sats * 1000);
- }
-
- if let Some(htlc_maximum_msat) = $directional_info.htlc_maximum_msat {
- if let Some(available_msat) = initial_liquidity_available_msat {
- initial_liquidity_available_msat = Some(cmp::min(available_msat, htlc_maximum_msat));
- } else {
- initial_liquidity_available_msat = Some(htlc_maximum_msat);
- }
- }
-
- match initial_liquidity_available_msat {
- Some(available_msat) => available_msat,
- // We assume channels with unknown balance have
- // a capacity of 0.0025 BTC (or 250_000 sats).
- None => 250_000 * 1000
- }
- });
+ if $src_node_id != $dest_node_id {
+ let short_channel_id = $candidate.short_channel_id();
+ let available_liquidity_msat = bookkept_channels_liquidity_available_msat
+ .entry(short_channel_id)
+ .or_insert_with(|| $candidate.effective_capacity().as_msat());
// It is tricky to substract $next_hops_fee_msat from available liquidity here.
// It may be misleading because we might later choose to reduce the value transferred
// Verify the liquidity offered by this channel complies to the minimal contribution.
let contributes_sufficient_value = available_value_contribution_msat >= minimal_value_contribution_msat;
-
// Do not consider candidates that exceed the maximum total cltv expiry limit.
- let max_total_cltv_expiry_delta = payee.max_total_cltv_expiry_delta;
+ let max_total_cltv_expiry_delta = payment_params.max_total_cltv_expiry_delta;
let hop_total_cltv_delta = ($next_hops_cltv_delta as u32)
- .checked_add($directional_info.cltv_expiry_delta as u32)
+ .checked_add($candidate.cltv_expiry_delta())
.unwrap_or(u32::max_value());
let doesnt_exceed_cltv_delta_limit = hop_total_cltv_delta <= max_total_cltv_expiry_delta;
None => unreachable!(),
};
#[allow(unused_comparisons)] // $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat is 0 in some calls so rustc complains
- let over_path_minimum_msat = amount_to_transfer_over_msat >= $directional_info.htlc_minimum_msat &&
+ let over_path_minimum_msat = amount_to_transfer_over_msat >= $candidate.htlc_minimum_msat() &&
amount_to_transfer_over_msat >= $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat;
// If HTLC minimum is larger than the amount we're going to transfer, we shouldn't
// might violate htlc_minimum_msat on the hops which are next along the
// payment path (upstream to the payee). To avoid that, we recompute
// path fees knowing the final path contribution after constructing it.
- let path_htlc_minimum_msat = compute_fees($next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, $directional_info.fees)
+ let path_htlc_minimum_msat = compute_fees($next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, $candidate.fees())
.and_then(|fee_msat| fee_msat.checked_add($next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat))
- .map(|fee_msat| cmp::max(fee_msat, $directional_info.htlc_minimum_msat))
+ .map(|fee_msat| cmp::max(fee_msat, $candidate.htlc_minimum_msat()))
.unwrap_or_else(|| u64::max_value());
let hm_entry = dist.entry($src_node_id);
let old_entry = hm_entry.or_insert_with(|| {
- // If there was previously no known way to access
- // the source node (recall it goes payee-to-payer) of $chan_id, first add
- // a semi-dummy record just to compute the fees to reach the source node.
- // This will affect our decision on selecting $chan_id
+ // If there was previously no known way to access the source node
+ // (recall it goes payee-to-payer) of short_channel_id, first add a
+ // semi-dummy record just to compute the fees to reach the source node.
+ // This will affect our decision on selecting short_channel_id
// as a way to reach the $dest_node_id.
- let mut fee_base_msat = u32::max_value();
- let mut fee_proportional_millionths = u32::max_value();
+ let mut fee_base_msat = 0;
+ let mut fee_proportional_millionths = 0;
if let Some(Some(fees)) = network_nodes.get(&$src_node_id).map(|node| node.lowest_inbound_channel_fees) {
fee_base_msat = fees.base_msat;
fee_proportional_millionths = fees.proportional_millionths;
}
PathBuildingHop {
node_id: $dest_node_id.clone(),
- short_channel_id: 0,
- channel_features: $chan_features,
+ candidate: $candidate.clone(),
fee_msat: 0,
- cltv_expiry_delta: 0,
src_lowest_inbound_fees: RoutingFees {
base_msat: fee_base_msat,
proportional_millionths: fee_proportional_millionths,
},
- channel_fees: $directional_info.fees,
next_hops_fee_msat: u64::max_value(),
hop_use_fee_msat: u64::max_value(),
total_fee_msat: u64::max_value(),
- htlc_minimum_msat: $directional_info.htlc_minimum_msat,
path_htlc_minimum_msat,
path_penalty_msat: u64::max_value(),
was_processed: false,
- #[cfg(any(test, feature = "fuzztarget"))]
+ #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
value_contribution_msat,
}
});
#[allow(unused_mut)] // We only use the mut in cfg(test)
let mut should_process = !old_entry.was_processed;
- #[cfg(any(test, feature = "fuzztarget"))]
+ #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
{
// In test/fuzzing builds, we do extra checks to make sure the skipping
// of already-seen nodes only happens in cases we expect (see below).
// Ignore hop_use_fee_msat for channel-from-us as we assume all channels-from-us
// will have the same effective-fee
if $src_node_id != our_node_id {
- match compute_fees(amount_to_transfer_over_msat, $directional_info.fees) {
+ match compute_fees(amount_to_transfer_over_msat, $candidate.fees()) {
// max_value means we'll always fail
// the old_entry.total_fee_msat > total_fee_msat check
None => total_fee_msat = u64::max_value(),
}
let path_penalty_msat = $next_hops_path_penalty_msat.checked_add(
- scorer.channel_penalty_msat($chan_id.clone(), amount_to_transfer_over_msat, Some(*available_liquidity_msat),
+ scorer.channel_penalty_msat(short_channel_id, amount_to_transfer_over_msat, *available_liquidity_msat,
&$src_node_id, &$dest_node_id)).unwrap_or_else(|| u64::max_value());
let new_graph_node = RouteGraphNode {
node_id: $src_node_id,
path_penalty_msat,
};
- // Update the way of reaching $src_node_id with the given $chan_id (from $dest_node_id),
+ // Update the way of reaching $src_node_id with the given short_channel_id (from $dest_node_id),
// if this way is cheaper than the already known
// (considering the cost to "reach" this channel from the route destination,
// the cost of using this channel,
old_entry.hop_use_fee_msat = hop_use_fee_msat;
old_entry.total_fee_msat = total_fee_msat;
old_entry.node_id = $dest_node_id.clone();
- old_entry.short_channel_id = $chan_id.clone();
- old_entry.channel_features = $chan_features;
+ old_entry.candidate = $candidate.clone();
old_entry.fee_msat = 0; // This value will be later filled with hop_use_fee_msat of the following channel
- old_entry.cltv_expiry_delta = $directional_info.cltv_expiry_delta as u32;
- old_entry.channel_fees = $directional_info.fees;
- old_entry.htlc_minimum_msat = $directional_info.htlc_minimum_msat;
old_entry.path_htlc_minimum_msat = path_htlc_minimum_msat;
old_entry.path_penalty_msat = path_penalty_msat;
- #[cfg(any(test, feature = "fuzztarget"))]
+ #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
{
old_entry.value_contribution_msat = value_contribution_msat;
}
did_add_update_path_to_src_node = true;
} else if old_entry.was_processed && new_cost < old_cost {
- #[cfg(any(test, feature = "fuzztarget"))]
+ #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))]
{
// If we're skipping processing a node which was previously
// processed even though we found another path to it with a
if !skip_node {
if let Some(first_channels) = first_hop_targets.get(&$node_id) {
- for (ref first_hop, ref features, ref outbound_capacity_msat, _) in first_channels {
- add_entry!(first_hop, our_node_id, $node_id, dummy_directional_info, Some(outbound_capacity_msat / 1000), features, $fee_to_target_msat, $next_hops_value_contribution, $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, $next_hops_path_penalty_msat, $next_hops_cltv_delta);
+ for details in first_channels {
+ let candidate = CandidateRouteHop::FirstHop { details };
+ add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id, $node_id, $fee_to_target_msat, $next_hops_value_contribution, $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, $next_hops_path_penalty_msat, $next_hops_cltv_delta);
}
}
for chan_id in $node.channels.iter() {
let chan = network_channels.get(chan_id).unwrap();
if !chan.features.requires_unknown_bits() {
- if chan.node_one == $node_id {
- // ie $node is one, ie next hop in A* is two, via the two_to_one channel
- if first_hops.is_none() || chan.node_two != our_node_id {
- if let Some(two_to_one) = chan.two_to_one.as_ref() {
- if two_to_one.enabled {
- add_entry!(chan_id, chan.node_two, chan.node_one, two_to_one, chan.capacity_sats, &chan.features, $fee_to_target_msat, $next_hops_value_contribution, $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, $next_hops_path_penalty_msat, $next_hops_cltv_delta);
- }
- }
- }
- } else {
- if first_hops.is_none() || chan.node_one != our_node_id{
- if let Some(one_to_two) = chan.one_to_two.as_ref() {
- if one_to_two.enabled {
- add_entry!(chan_id, chan.node_one, chan.node_two, one_to_two, chan.capacity_sats, &chan.features, $fee_to_target_msat, $next_hops_value_contribution, $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, $next_hops_path_penalty_msat, $next_hops_cltv_delta);
- }
+ let (directed_channel, source) =
+ chan.as_directed_to(&$node_id).expect("inconsistent NetworkGraph");
+ if first_hops.is_none() || *source != our_node_id {
+ if let Some(direction) = directed_channel.direction() {
+ if direction.enabled {
+ let candidate = CandidateRouteHop::PublicHop {
+ info: directed_channel.with_update().unwrap(),
+ short_channel_id: *chan_id,
+ };
+ add_entry!(candidate, *source, $node_id, $fee_to_target_msat, $next_hops_value_contribution, $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, $next_hops_path_penalty_msat, $next_hops_cltv_delta);
}
}
}
// If first hop is a private channel and the only way to reach the payee, this is the only
// place where it could be added.
if let Some(first_channels) = first_hop_targets.get(&payee_node_id) {
- for (ref first_hop, ref features, ref outbound_capacity_msat, _) in first_channels {
- let added = add_entry!(first_hop, our_node_id, payee_node_id, dummy_directional_info, Some(outbound_capacity_msat / 1000), features, 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0u64, 0);
- log_trace!(logger, "{} direct route to payee via SCID {}", if added { "Added" } else { "Skipped" }, first_hop);
+ for details in first_channels {
+ let candidate = CandidateRouteHop::FirstHop { details };
+ let added = add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0u64, 0);
+ log_trace!(logger, "{} direct route to payee via SCID {}", if added { "Added" } else { "Skipped" }, candidate.short_channel_id());
}
}
// If a caller provided us with last hops, add them to routing targets. Since this happens
// earlier than general path finding, they will be somewhat prioritized, although currently
// it matters only if the fees are exactly the same.
- for route in payee.route_hints.iter().filter(|route| !route.0.is_empty()) {
+ for route in payment_params.route_hints.iter().filter(|route| !route.0.is_empty()) {
let first_hop_in_route = &(route.0)[0];
let have_hop_src_in_graph =
// Only add the hops in this route to our candidate set if either
// We start building the path from reverse, i.e., from payee
// to the first RouteHintHop in the path.
let hop_iter = route.0.iter().rev();
- let prev_hop_iter = core::iter::once(&payee.pubkey).chain(
+ let prev_hop_iter = core::iter::once(&payment_params.payee_pubkey).chain(
route.0.iter().skip(1).rev().map(|hop| &hop.src_node_id));
let mut hop_used = true;
let mut aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat: u64 = 0;
let mut aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta: u32 = 0;
for (idx, (hop, prev_hop_id)) in hop_iter.zip(prev_hop_iter).enumerate() {
- // BOLT 11 doesn't allow inclusion of features for the last hop hints, which
- // really sucks, cause we're gonna need that eventually.
- let hop_htlc_minimum_msat: u64 = hop.htlc_minimum_msat.unwrap_or(0);
-
- let directional_info = DummyDirectionalChannelInfo {
- cltv_expiry_delta: hop.cltv_expiry_delta as u32,
- htlc_minimum_msat: hop_htlc_minimum_msat,
- htlc_maximum_msat: hop.htlc_maximum_msat,
- fees: hop.fees,
- };
-
- // We want a value of final_value_msat * ROUTE_CAPACITY_PROVISION_FACTOR but we
- // need it to increment at each hop by the fee charged at later hops. Further,
- // we need to ensure we round up when we divide to get satoshis.
- let channel_cap_msat = final_value_msat
- .checked_mul(ROUTE_CAPACITY_PROVISION_FACTOR).and_then(|v| v.checked_add(aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat))
- .unwrap_or(u64::max_value());
- let channel_cap_sat = match channel_cap_msat.checked_add(999) {
- None => break, // We overflowed above, just ignore this route hint
- Some(val) => Some(val / 1000),
- };
-
- let src_node_id = NodeId::from_pubkey(&hop.src_node_id);
- let dest_node_id = NodeId::from_pubkey(&prev_hop_id);
+ let source = NodeId::from_pubkey(&hop.src_node_id);
+ let target = NodeId::from_pubkey(&prev_hop_id);
+ let candidate = network_channels
+ .get(&hop.short_channel_id)
+ .and_then(|channel| channel.as_directed_to(&target))
+ .and_then(|(channel, _)| channel.with_update())
+ .map(|info| CandidateRouteHop::PublicHop {
+ info,
+ short_channel_id: hop.short_channel_id,
+ })
+ .unwrap_or_else(|| CandidateRouteHop::PrivateHop { hint: hop });
+ let capacity_msat = candidate.effective_capacity().as_msat();
aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat = aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat
- .checked_add(scorer.channel_penalty_msat(hop.short_channel_id, final_value_msat, None, &src_node_id, &dest_node_id))
+ .checked_add(scorer.channel_penalty_msat(hop.short_channel_id, final_value_msat, capacity_msat, &source, &target))
.unwrap_or_else(|| u64::max_value());
aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta = aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta
.checked_add(hop.cltv_expiry_delta as u32)
.unwrap_or_else(|| u32::max_value());
- // We assume that the recipient only included route hints for routes which had
- // sufficient value to route `final_value_msat`. Note that in the case of "0-value"
- // invoices where the invoice does not specify value this may not be the case, but
- // better to include the hints than not.
- if !add_entry!(hop.short_channel_id, src_node_id, dest_node_id, directional_info, channel_cap_sat, &empty_channel_features, aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat, aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta) {
+ if !add_entry!(candidate, source, target, aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat, aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta) {
// If this hop was not used then there is no use checking the preceding hops
// in the RouteHint. We can break by just searching for a direct channel between
// last checked hop and first_hop_targets
// Searching for a direct channel between last checked hop and first_hop_targets
if let Some(first_channels) = first_hop_targets.get(&NodeId::from_pubkey(&prev_hop_id)) {
- for (ref first_hop, ref features, ref outbound_capacity_msat, _) in first_channels {
- add_entry!(first_hop, our_node_id , NodeId::from_pubkey(&prev_hop_id), dummy_directional_info, Some(outbound_capacity_msat / 1000), features, aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat, aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta);
+ for details in first_channels {
+ let candidate = CandidateRouteHop::FirstHop { details };
+ add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id, NodeId::from_pubkey(&prev_hop_id), aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat, aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta);
}
}
.map_or(None, |inc| inc.checked_add(aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat));
aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat = if let Some(val) = hops_fee { val } else { break; };
+ let hop_htlc_minimum_msat = candidate.htlc_minimum_msat();
let hop_htlc_minimum_msat_inc = if let Some(val) = compute_fees(aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, hop.fees) { val } else { break; };
let hops_path_htlc_minimum = aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat
.checked_add(hop_htlc_minimum_msat_inc);
// always assumes that the third argument is a node to which we have a
// path.
if let Some(first_channels) = first_hop_targets.get(&NodeId::from_pubkey(&hop.src_node_id)) {
- for (ref first_hop, ref features, ref outbound_capacity_msat, _) in first_channels {
- add_entry!(first_hop, our_node_id , NodeId::from_pubkey(&hop.src_node_id), dummy_directional_info, Some(outbound_capacity_msat / 1000), features, aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat, aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta);
+ for details in first_channels {
+ let candidate = CandidateRouteHop::FirstHop { details };
+ add_entry!(candidate, our_node_id, NodeId::from_pubkey(&hop.src_node_id), aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat, aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta);
}
}
}
'path_walk: loop {
let mut features_set = false;
if let Some(first_channels) = first_hop_targets.get(&ordered_hops.last().unwrap().0.node_id) {
- for (scid, _, _, ref features) in first_channels {
- if *scid == ordered_hops.last().unwrap().0.short_channel_id {
- ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().1 = features.clone();
+ for details in first_channels {
+ if details.short_channel_id.unwrap() == ordered_hops.last().unwrap().0.candidate.short_channel_id() {
+ ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().1 = details.counterparty.features.to_context();
features_set = true;
break;
}
ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().1 = NodeFeatures::empty();
}
} else {
- // We should be able to fill in features for everything except the last
- // hop, if the last hop was provided via a BOLT 11 invoice (though we
- // should be able to extend it further as BOLT 11 does have feature
- // flags for the last hop node itself).
- assert!(ordered_hops.last().unwrap().0.node_id == payee_node_id);
+ // We can fill in features for everything except hops which were
+ // provided via the invoice we're paying. We could guess based on the
+ // recipient's features but for now we simply avoid guessing at all.
}
}
// so that fees paid for a HTLC forwarding on the current channel are
// associated with the previous channel (where they will be subtracted).
ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().0.fee_msat = new_entry.hop_use_fee_msat;
- ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().0.cltv_expiry_delta = new_entry.cltv_expiry_delta;
ordered_hops.push((new_entry.clone(), NodeFeatures::empty()));
}
ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().0.fee_msat = value_contribution_msat;
ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().0.hop_use_fee_msat = 0;
- ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().0.cltv_expiry_delta = final_cltv_expiry_delta;
- log_trace!(logger, "Found a path back to us from the target with {} hops contributing up to {} msat: {:?}",
- ordered_hops.len(), value_contribution_msat, ordered_hops);
+ log_trace!(logger, "Found a path back to us from the target with {} hops contributing up to {} msat: \n {:#?}",
+ ordered_hops.len(), value_contribution_msat, ordered_hops.iter().map(|h| &(h.0)).collect::<Vec<&PathBuildingHop>>());
let mut payment_path = PaymentPath {hops: ordered_hops};
// on the same liquidity in future paths.
let mut prevented_redundant_path_selection = false;
for (payment_hop, _) in payment_path.hops.iter() {
- let channel_liquidity_available_msat = bookkept_channels_liquidity_available_msat.get_mut(&payment_hop.short_channel_id).unwrap();
+ let channel_liquidity_available_msat = bookkept_channels_liquidity_available_msat.get_mut(&payment_hop.candidate.short_channel_id()).unwrap();
let mut spent_on_hop_msat = value_contribution_msat;
let next_hops_fee_msat = payment_hop.next_hops_fee_msat;
spent_on_hop_msat += next_hops_fee_msat;
// If we weren't capped by hitting a liquidity limit on a channel in the path,
// we'll probably end up picking the same path again on the next iteration.
// Decrease the available liquidity of a hop in the middle of the path.
- let victim_scid = payment_path.hops[(payment_path.hops.len() - 1) / 2].0.short_channel_id;
+ let victim_scid = payment_path.hops[(payment_path.hops.len() - 1) / 2].0.candidate.short_channel_id();
log_trace!(logger, "Disabling channel {} for future path building iterations to avoid duplicates.", victim_scid);
let victim_liquidity = bookkept_channels_liquidity_available_msat.get_mut(&victim_scid).unwrap();
*victim_liquidity = 0;
// Now, substract the overpaid value from the most-expensive path.
// TODO: this could also be optimized by also sorting by feerate_per_sat_routed,
// so that the sender pays less fees overall. And also htlc_minimum_msat.
- cur_route.sort_by_key(|path| { path.hops.iter().map(|hop| hop.0.channel_fees.proportional_millionths as u64).sum::<u64>() });
+ cur_route.sort_by_key(|path| { path.hops.iter().map(|hop| hop.0.candidate.fees().proportional_millionths as u64).sum::<u64>() });
let expensive_payment_path = cur_route.first_mut().unwrap();
// We already dropped all the small channels above, meaning all the
// remaining channels are larger than remaining overpaid_value_msat.
drawn_routes.sort_by_key(|paths| paths.iter().map(|path| path.get_total_fee_paid_msat()).sum::<u64>());
let mut selected_paths = Vec::<Vec<Result<RouteHop, LightningError>>>::new();
for payment_path in drawn_routes.first().unwrap() {
- selected_paths.push(payment_path.hops.iter().map(|(payment_hop, node_features)| {
+ let mut path = payment_path.hops.iter().map(|(payment_hop, node_features)| {
Ok(RouteHop {
pubkey: PublicKey::from_slice(payment_hop.node_id.as_slice()).map_err(|_| LightningError{err: format!("Public key {:?} is invalid", &payment_hop.node_id), action: ErrorAction::IgnoreAndLog(Level::Trace)})?,
node_features: node_features.clone(),
- short_channel_id: payment_hop.short_channel_id,
- channel_features: payment_hop.channel_features.clone(),
+ short_channel_id: payment_hop.candidate.short_channel_id(),
+ channel_features: payment_hop.candidate.features(),
fee_msat: payment_hop.fee_msat,
- cltv_expiry_delta: payment_hop.cltv_expiry_delta,
+ cltv_expiry_delta: payment_hop.candidate.cltv_expiry_delta(),
})
- }).collect());
+ }).collect::<Vec<_>>();
+ // Propagate the cltv_expiry_delta one hop backwards since the delta from the current hop is
+ // applicable for the previous hop.
+ path.iter_mut().rev().fold(final_cltv_expiry_delta, |prev_cltv_expiry_delta, hop| {
+ core::mem::replace(&mut hop.as_mut().unwrap().cltv_expiry_delta, prev_cltv_expiry_delta)
+ });
+ selected_paths.push(path);
}
- if let Some(features) = &payee.features {
+ if let Some(features) = &payment_params.features {
for path in selected_paths.iter_mut() {
if let Ok(route_hop) = path.last_mut().unwrap() {
route_hop.node_features = features.to_context();
let route = Route {
paths: selected_paths.into_iter().map(|path| path.into_iter().collect()).collect::<Result<Vec<_>, _>>()?,
- payee: Some(payee.clone()),
+ payment_params: Some(payment_params.clone()),
};
- log_info!(logger, "Got route to {}: {}", payee.pubkey, log_route!(route));
+ log_info!(logger, "Got route to {}: {}", payment_params.payee_pubkey, log_route!(route));
Ok(route)
}
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
- use routing::scoring::Score;
+ use routing::scoring::{ProbabilisticScorer, ProbabilisticScoringParameters, Score};
use routing::network_graph::{NetworkGraph, NetGraphMsgHandler, NodeId};
- use routing::router::{get_route, Payee, Route, RouteHint, RouteHintHop, RouteHop, RoutingFees};
+ use routing::router::{get_route, PaymentParameters, Route, RouteHint, RouteHintHop, RouteHop, RoutingFees};
use chain::transaction::OutPoint;
use ln::features::{ChannelFeatures, InitFeatures, InvoiceFeatures, NodeFeatures};
use ln::msgs::{ErrorAction, LightningError, OptionalField, UnsignedChannelAnnouncement, ChannelAnnouncement, RoutingMessageHandler,
fn get_nodes(secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<All>) -> (SecretKey, PublicKey, Vec<SecretKey>, Vec<PublicKey>) {
let privkeys: Vec<SecretKey> = (2..10).map(|i| {
- SecretKey::from_slice(&hex::decode(format!("{:02}", i).repeat(32)).unwrap()[..]).unwrap()
+ SecretKey::from_slice(&hex::decode(format!("{:02x}", i).repeat(32)).unwrap()[..]).unwrap()
}).collect();
let pubkeys = privkeys.iter().map(|secret| PublicKey::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, secret)).collect();
fn simple_route_test() {
let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
- let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]);
- let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[2]);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
// Simple route to 2 via 1
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 0, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 0, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send a payment of 0 msat");
} else { panic!(); }
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]);
fn invalid_first_hop_test() {
let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
- let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]);
- let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[2]);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
// Simple route to 2 via 1
let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(2), our_id, InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), 100000)];
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "First hop cannot have our_node_pubkey as a destination.");
} else { panic!(); }
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
}
fn htlc_minimum_test() {
let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
- let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]);
- let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[2]);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
// Simple route to 2 via 1
});
// Not possible to send 199_999_999, because the minimum on channel=2 is 200_000_000.
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 199_999_999, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 199_999_999, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a path to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
});
// A payment above the minimum should pass
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 199_999_999, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 199_999_999, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
}
fn htlc_minimum_overpay_test() {
let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
- let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
- let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[2]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
// A route to node#2 via two paths.
// One path allows transferring 35-40 sats, another one also allows 35-40 sats.
excess_data: Vec::new()
});
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
// Overpay fees to hit htlc_minimum_msat.
let overpaid_fees = route.paths[0][0].fee_msat + route.paths[1][0].fee_msat;
// TODO: this could be better balanced to overpay 10k and not 15k.
excess_data: Vec::new()
});
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
// Fine to overpay for htlc_minimum_msat if it allows us to save fee.
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].short_channel_id, 12);
let fees = route.paths[0][0].fee_msat;
assert_eq!(fees, 5_000);
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
// Not fine to overpay for htlc_minimum_msat if it requires paying more than fee on
// the other channel.
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
fn disable_channels_test() {
let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
- let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]);
- let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[2]);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
// // Disable channels 4 and 12 by flags=2
update_channel(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &privkeys[1], UnsignedChannelUpdate {
});
// If all the channels require some features we don't understand, route should fail
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a path to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
// If we specify a channel to node7, that overrides our local channel view and that gets used
let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(42), nodes[7].clone(), InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), 250_000_000)];
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[7]);
fn disable_node_test() {
let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (_, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
- let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]);
- let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[2]);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
// Disable nodes 1, 2, and 8 by requiring unknown feature bits
let unknown_features = NodeFeatures::known().set_unknown_feature_required();
add_or_update_node(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &privkeys[7], unknown_features.clone(), 1);
// If all nodes require some features we don't understand, route should fail
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a path to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
// If we specify a channel to node7, that overrides our local channel view and that gets used
let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(42), nodes[7].clone(), InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), 250_000_000)];
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[7]);
fn our_chans_test() {
let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
- let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
// Route to 1 via 2 and 3 because our channel to 1 is disabled
- let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[0]);
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[0]);
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 3);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].channel_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(3));
// If we specify a channel to node7, that overrides our local channel view and that gets used
- let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]);
+ let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[2]);
let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(42), nodes[7].clone(), InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), 250_000_000)];
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[7]);
fn partial_route_hint_test() {
let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
- let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
// Simple test across 2, 3, 5, and 4 via a last_hop channel
// Tests the behaviour when the RouteHint contains a suboptimal hop.
let mut invalid_last_hops = last_hops_multi_private_channels(&nodes);
invalid_last_hops.push(invalid_last_hop);
{
- let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(invalid_last_hops);
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(invalid_last_hops);
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Route hint cannot have the payee as the source.");
} else { panic!(); }
}
- let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops_multi_private_channels(&nodes));
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops_multi_private_channels(&nodes));
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 5);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]);
fn ignores_empty_last_hops_test() {
let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
- let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(empty_last_hop(&nodes));
- let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(empty_last_hop(&nodes));
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
// Test handling of an empty RouteHint passed in Invoice.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 5);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly
}
- fn multi_hint_last_hops(nodes: &Vec<PublicKey>) -> Vec<RouteHint> {
+ /// Builds a trivial last-hop hint that passes through the two nodes given, with channel 0xff00
+ /// and 0xff01.
+ fn multi_hop_last_hops_hint(hint_hops: [PublicKey; 2]) -> Vec<RouteHint> {
let zero_fees = RoutingFees {
base_msat: 0,
proportional_millionths: 0,
};
vec![RouteHint(vec![RouteHintHop {
- src_node_id: nodes[2],
- short_channel_id: 5,
+ src_node_id: hint_hops[0],
+ short_channel_id: 0xff00,
fees: RoutingFees {
base_msat: 100,
proportional_millionths: 0,
htlc_minimum_msat: None,
htlc_maximum_msat: None,
}, RouteHintHop {
- src_node_id: nodes[3],
- short_channel_id: 8,
+ src_node_id: hint_hops[1],
+ short_channel_id: 0xff01,
fees: zero_fees,
cltv_expiry_delta: (8 << 4) | 1,
htlc_minimum_msat: None,
htlc_maximum_msat: None,
- }]), RouteHint(vec![RouteHintHop {
- src_node_id: nodes[5],
- short_channel_id: 10,
- fees: zero_fees,
- cltv_expiry_delta: (10 << 4) | 1,
- htlc_minimum_msat: None,
- htlc_maximum_msat: None,
}])]
}
fn multi_hint_last_hops_test() {
let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (_, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
- let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(multi_hint_last_hops(&nodes));
- let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
- // Test through channels 2, 3, 5, 8.
+ let last_hops = multi_hop_last_hops_hint([nodes[2], nodes[3]]);
+ let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops.clone());
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
+ // Test through channels 2, 3, 0xff00, 0xff01.
// Test shows that multiple hop hints are considered.
// Disabling channels 6 & 7 by flags=2
excess_data: Vec::new()
});
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 4);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].channel_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(4));
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].pubkey, nodes[3]);
- assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].short_channel_id, 5);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].short_channel_id, last_hops[0].0[0].short_channel_id);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].fee_msat, 0);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].cltv_expiry_delta, 129);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].node_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(4));
- assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new());
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly
+
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].pubkey, nodes[6]);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].short_channel_id, last_hops[0].0[1].short_channel_id);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].fee_msat, 100);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].cltv_expiry_delta, 42);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].node_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly
+ }
+
+ #[test]
+ fn private_multi_hint_last_hops_test() {
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (_, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+
+ let non_announced_privkey = SecretKey::from_slice(&hex::decode(format!("{:02x}", 0xf0).repeat(32)).unwrap()[..]).unwrap();
+ let non_announced_pubkey = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, &non_announced_privkey);
+
+ let last_hops = multi_hop_last_hops_hint([nodes[2], non_announced_pubkey]);
+ let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops.clone());
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
+ // Test through channels 2, 3, 0xff00, 0xff01.
+ // Test shows that multiple hop hints are considered.
+
+ // Disabling channels 6 & 7 by flags=2
+ update_channel(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &privkeys[2], UnsignedChannelUpdate {
+ chain_hash: genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash(),
+ short_channel_id: 6,
+ timestamp: 2,
+ flags: 2, // to disable
+ cltv_expiry_delta: 0,
+ htlc_minimum_msat: 0,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: OptionalField::Absent,
+ fee_base_msat: 0,
+ fee_proportional_millionths: 0,
+ excess_data: Vec::new()
+ });
+ update_channel(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &privkeys[2], UnsignedChannelUpdate {
+ chain_hash: genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash(),
+ short_channel_id: 7,
+ timestamp: 2,
+ flags: 2, // to disable
+ cltv_expiry_delta: 0,
+ htlc_minimum_msat: 0,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: OptionalField::Absent,
+ fee_base_msat: 0,
+ fee_proportional_millionths: 0,
+ excess_data: Vec::new()
+ });
+
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 4);
+
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].short_channel_id, 2);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].fee_msat, 200);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].cltv_expiry_delta, 65);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].node_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(2));
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].channel_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(2));
+
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].pubkey, nodes[2]);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].short_channel_id, 4);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].fee_msat, 100);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].cltv_expiry_delta, 81);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].node_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(3));
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].channel_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(4));
+
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].pubkey, non_announced_pubkey);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].short_channel_id, last_hops[0].0[0].short_channel_id);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].fee_msat, 0);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].cltv_expiry_delta, 129);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].node_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].pubkey, nodes[6]);
- assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].short_channel_id, 8);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].short_channel_id, last_hops[0].0[1].short_channel_id);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].fee_msat, 100);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].cltv_expiry_delta, 42);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].node_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
fn last_hops_with_public_channel_test() {
let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
- let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops_with_public_channel(&nodes));
- let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops_with_public_channel(&nodes));
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
// This test shows that public routes can be present in the invoice
// which would be handled in the same manner.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 5);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]);
// If we have a peer in the node map, we'll use their features here since we don't have
// a way of figuring out their features from the invoice:
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].node_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(4));
- assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new());
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].channel_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(11));
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].pubkey, nodes[6]);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].short_channel_id, 8);
fn our_chans_last_hop_connect_test() {
let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
- let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
// Simple test with outbound channel to 4 to test that last_hops and first_hops connect
let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(42), nodes[3].clone(), InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), 250_000_000)];
let mut last_hops = last_hops(&nodes);
- let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops.clone());
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops.clone());
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[3]);
last_hops[0].0[0].fees.base_msat = 1000;
// Revert to via 6 as the fee on 8 goes up
- let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops);
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops);
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 4);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly
// ...but still use 8 for larger payments as 6 has a variable feerate
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 2000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 2000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 5);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]);
htlc_minimum_msat: None,
htlc_maximum_msat: last_hop_htlc_max,
}]);
- let payee = Payee::from_node_id(target_node_id).with_route_hints(vec![last_hops]);
+ let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(target_node_id).with_route_hints(vec![last_hops]);
let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(42), middle_node_id, InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), outbound_capacity_msat)];
- let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
- get_route(&source_node_id, &payee, &NetworkGraph::new(genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash()), Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), route_val, 42, &test_utils::TestLogger::new(), &scorer)
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
+ get_route(&source_node_id, &payment_params, &NetworkGraph::new(genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash()), Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), route_val, 42, &test_utils::TestLogger::new(), &scorer)
}
#[test]
let (secp_ctx, network_graph, mut net_graph_msg_handler, chain_monitor, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
- let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
- let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
+ let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[2]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
// We will use a simple single-path route from
// our node to node2 via node0: channels {1, 3}.
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
- &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 250_000_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 250_000_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route an exact amount we have should be fine.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 250_000_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 250_000_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
let path = route.paths.last().unwrap();
assert_eq!(path.len(), 2);
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
- &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 200_000_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 200_000_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route an exact amount we have should be fine.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 200_000_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 200_000_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
let path = route.paths.last().unwrap();
assert_eq!(path.len(), 2);
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
- &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 15_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 15_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route an exact amount we have should be fine.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 15_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 15_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
let path = route.paths.last().unwrap();
assert_eq!(path.len(), 2);
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
- &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 15_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 15_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route an exact amount we have should be fine.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 15_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 15_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
let path = route.paths.last().unwrap();
assert_eq!(path.len(), 2);
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
- &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 10_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 10_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route an exact amount we have should be fine.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 10_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 10_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
let path = route.paths.last().unwrap();
assert_eq!(path.len(), 2);
// one of the latter hops is limited.
let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
- let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
- let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[3]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
+ let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[3]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
// Path via {node7, node2, node4} is channels {12, 13, 6, 11}.
// {12, 13, 11} have the capacities of 100, {6} has a capacity of 50.
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
- &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route 49 sats (just a bit below the capacity).
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 49_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 49_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
for path in &route.paths {
{
// Attempt to route an exact amount is also fine
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
for path in &route.paths {
fn ignore_fee_first_hop_test() {
let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
- let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
- let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
+ let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[2]);
// Path via node0 is channels {1, 3}. Limit them to 100 and 50 sats (total limit 50).
update_channel(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &our_privkey, UnsignedChannelUpdate {
});
{
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
for path in &route.paths {
fn simple_mpp_route_test() {
let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
- let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
- let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
+ let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[2]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
// We need a route consisting of 3 paths:
// From our node to node2 via node0, node7, node1 (three paths one hop each).
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
- &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 300_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 300_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route 250 sats (just a bit below the capacity).
// Our algorithm should provide us with these 3 paths.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 250_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 250_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 3);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
for path in &route.paths {
{
// Attempt to route an exact amount is also fine
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 290_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 290_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 3);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
for path in &route.paths {
fn long_mpp_route_test() {
let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
- let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
- let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[3]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
+ let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[3]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
// We need a route consisting of 3 paths:
// From our node to node3 via {node0, node2}, {node7, node2, node4} and {node7, node2}.
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
- &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 350_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 350_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route 300 sats (exact amount we can route).
// Our algorithm should provide us with these 3 paths, 100 sats each.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 300_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 300_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 3);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
fn mpp_cheaper_route_test() {
let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
- let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
- let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[3]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
+ let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[3]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
// This test checks that if we have two cheaper paths and one more expensive path,
// so that liquidity-wise any 2 of 3 combination is sufficient,
{
// Now, attempt to route 180 sats.
// Our algorithm should provide us with these 2 paths.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 180_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 180_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 2);
let mut total_value_transferred_msat = 0;
// if the fee is not properly accounted for, the behavior is different.
let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
- let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
- let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[3]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
+ let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[3]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
// We need a route consisting of 2 paths:
// From our node to node3 via {node0, node2} and {node7, node2, node4}.
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
- &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 210_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 210_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route 200 sats (exact amount we can route).
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 200_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 200_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 2);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
// This bug appeared in production in some specific channel configurations.
let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
- let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
- let payee = Payee::from_node_id(PublicKey::from_slice(&[02; 33]).unwrap()).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known())
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
+ let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(PublicKey::from_slice(&[02; 33]).unwrap()).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known())
.with_route_hints(vec![RouteHint(vec![RouteHintHop {
src_node_id: nodes[2],
short_channel_id: 42,
// Get a route for 100 sats and check that we found the MPP route no problem and didn't
// overpay at all.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 2);
// Paths are somewhat randomly ordered, but:
// * the first is channel 2 (1 msat fee) -> channel 4 -> channel 42
// path finding we realize that we found more capacity than we need.
let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
- let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
- let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
+ let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[2]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
// We need a route consisting of 3 paths:
// From our node to node2 via node0, node7, node1 (three paths one hop each).
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
- &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 150_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 150_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route 125 sats (just a bit below the capacity of 3 channels).
// Our algorithm should provide us with these 3 paths.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 125_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 125_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 3);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
for path in &route.paths {
{
// Attempt to route without the last small cheap channel
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 90_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 90_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 2);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
for path in &route.paths {
let network_graph = Arc::new(NetworkGraph::new(genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash()));
let net_graph_msg_handler = NetGraphMsgHandler::new(Arc::clone(&network_graph), None, Arc::clone(&logger));
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
- let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
- let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[6]);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
+ let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[6]);
add_channel(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &our_privkey, &privkeys[1], ChannelFeatures::from_le_bytes(id_to_feature_flags(6)), 6);
update_channel(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &our_privkey, UnsignedChannelUpdate {
{
// Now ensure the route flows simply over nodes 1 and 4 to 6.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 10_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 10_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 3);
// we calculated fees on a higher value, resulting in us ignoring such paths.
let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
- let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
- let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
+ let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[2]);
// We modify the graph to set the htlc_maximum of channel 2 to below the value we wish to
// send.
{
// Now, attempt to route 90 sats, which is exactly 90 sats at the last hop, plus the
// 200% fee charged channel 13 in the 1-to-2 direction.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 90_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 90_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
// resulting in us thinking there is no possible path, even if other paths exist.
let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
- let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
- let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
+ let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[2]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
// We modify the graph to set the htlc_minimum of channel 2 and 4 as needed - channel 2
// gets an htlc_maximum_msat of 80_000 and channel 4 an htlc_minimum_msat of 90_000. We
// Now, attempt to route 90 sats, hitting the htlc_minimum on channel 4, but
// overshooting the htlc_maximum on channel 2. Thus, we should pick the (absurdly
// expensive) channels 12-13 path.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 90_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 90_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let logger = Arc::new(test_utils::TestLogger::new());
let network_graph = NetworkGraph::new(genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash());
- let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
- let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[0]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
+ let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[0]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
{
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, Some(&[
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, Some(&[
&get_channel_details(Some(3), nodes[0], InitFeatures::known(), 200_000),
&get_channel_details(Some(2), nodes[0], InitFeatures::known(), 10_000),
]), 100_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].fee_msat, 100_000);
}
{
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, Some(&[
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, Some(&[
&get_channel_details(Some(3), nodes[0], InitFeatures::known(), 50_000),
&get_channel_details(Some(2), nodes[0], InitFeatures::known(), 50_000),
]), 100_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
fn prefers_shorter_route_with_higher_fees() {
let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
- let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops(&nodes));
+ let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops(&nodes));
// Without penalizing each hop 100 msats, a longer path with lower fees is chosen.
- let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
let route = get_route(
- &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42,
+ &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42,
Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer
).unwrap();
let path = route.paths[0].iter().map(|hop| hop.short_channel_id).collect::<Vec<_>>();
// Applying a 100 msat penalty to each hop results in taking channels 7 and 10 to nodes[6]
// from nodes[2] rather than channel 6, 11, and 8, even though the longer path is cheaper.
- let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(100);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(100);
let route = get_route(
- &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42,
+ &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42,
Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer
).unwrap();
let path = route.paths[0].iter().map(|hop| hop.short_channel_id).collect::<Vec<_>>();
fn write<W: Writer>(&self, _w: &mut W) -> Result<(), ::io::Error> { unimplemented!() }
}
impl Score for BadChannelScorer {
- fn channel_penalty_msat(&self, short_channel_id: u64, _send_amt: u64, _chan_amt: Option<u64>, _source: &NodeId, _target: &NodeId) -> u64 {
+ fn channel_penalty_msat(&self, short_channel_id: u64, _send_amt: u64, _capacity_msat: u64, _source: &NodeId, _target: &NodeId) -> u64 {
if short_channel_id == self.short_channel_id { u64::max_value() } else { 0 }
}
}
impl Score for BadNodeScorer {
- fn channel_penalty_msat(&self, _short_channel_id: u64, _send_amt: u64, _chan_amt: Option<u64>, _source: &NodeId, target: &NodeId) -> u64 {
+ fn channel_penalty_msat(&self, _short_channel_id: u64, _send_amt: u64, _capacity_msat: u64, _source: &NodeId, target: &NodeId) -> u64 {
if *target == self.node_id { u64::max_value() } else { 0 }
}
fn avoids_routing_through_bad_channels_and_nodes() {
let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
- let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops(&nodes));
+ let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops(&nodes));
// A path to nodes[6] exists when no penalties are applied to any channel.
- let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
let route = get_route(
- &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42,
+ &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42,
Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer
).unwrap();
let path = route.paths[0].iter().map(|hop| hop.short_channel_id).collect::<Vec<_>>();
// A different path to nodes[6] exists if channel 6 cannot be routed over.
let scorer = BadChannelScorer { short_channel_id: 6 };
let route = get_route(
- &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42,
+ &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42,
Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer
).unwrap();
let path = route.paths[0].iter().map(|hop| hop.short_channel_id).collect::<Vec<_>>();
// A path to nodes[6] does not exist if nodes[2] cannot be routed through.
let scorer = BadNodeScorer { node_id: NodeId::from_pubkey(&nodes[2]) };
match get_route(
- &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42,
+ &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42,
Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer
) {
Err(LightningError { err, .. } ) => {
short_channel_id: 0, fee_msat: 225, cltv_expiry_delta: 0
},
]],
- payee: None,
+ payment_params: None,
};
assert_eq!(route.get_total_fees(), 250);
short_channel_id: 0, fee_msat: 150, cltv_expiry_delta: 0
},
]],
- payee: None,
+ payment_params: None,
};
assert_eq!(route.get_total_fees(), 200);
// In an earlier version of `Route::get_total_fees` and `Route::get_total_amount`, they
// would both panic if the route was completely empty. We test to ensure they return 0
// here, even though its somewhat nonsensical as a route.
- let route = Route { paths: Vec::new(), payee: None };
+ let route = Route { paths: Vec::new(), payment_params: None };
assert_eq!(route.get_total_fees(), 0);
assert_eq!(route.get_total_amount(), 0);
let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
- let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
// Make sure that generally there is at least one route available
let feasible_max_total_cltv_delta = 1008;
- let feasible_payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops(&nodes))
+ let feasible_payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops(&nodes))
.with_max_total_cltv_expiry_delta(feasible_max_total_cltv_delta);
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &feasible_payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &feasible_payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
let path = route.paths[0].iter().map(|hop| hop.short_channel_id).collect::<Vec<_>>();
assert_ne!(path.len(), 0);
// But not if we exclude all paths on the basis of their accumulated CLTV delta
let fail_max_total_cltv_delta = 23;
- let fail_payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops(&nodes))
+ let fail_payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops(&nodes))
.with_max_total_cltv_expiry_delta(fail_max_total_cltv_delta);
- match get_route(&our_id, &fail_payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer)
+ match get_route(&our_id, &fail_payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer)
{
Err(LightningError { err, .. } ) => {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a path to the given destination");
},
};
let graph = NetworkGraph::read(&mut d).unwrap();
- let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
// First, get 100 (source, destination) pairs for which route-getting actually succeeds...
let mut seed = random_init_seed() as usize;
let src = &PublicKey::from_slice(nodes.keys().skip(seed % nodes.len()).next().unwrap().as_slice()).unwrap();
seed = seed.overflowing_mul(0xdeadbeef).0;
let dst = PublicKey::from_slice(nodes.keys().skip(seed % nodes.len()).next().unwrap().as_slice()).unwrap();
- let payee = Payee::from_node_id(dst);
+ let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(dst);
let amt = seed as u64 % 200_000_000;
- if get_route(src, &payee, &graph, None, amt, 42, &test_utils::TestLogger::new(), &scorer).is_ok() {
+ let params = ProbabilisticScoringParameters::default();
+ let scorer = ProbabilisticScorer::new(params, &graph);
+ if get_route(src, &payment_params, &graph, None, amt, 42, &test_utils::TestLogger::new(), &scorer).is_ok() {
continue 'load_endpoints;
}
}
},
};
let graph = NetworkGraph::read(&mut d).unwrap();
- let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
// First, get 100 (source, destination) pairs for which route-getting actually succeeds...
let mut seed = random_init_seed() as usize;
let src = &PublicKey::from_slice(nodes.keys().skip(seed % nodes.len()).next().unwrap().as_slice()).unwrap();
seed = seed.overflowing_mul(0xdeadbeef).0;
let dst = PublicKey::from_slice(nodes.keys().skip(seed % nodes.len()).next().unwrap().as_slice()).unwrap();
- let payee = Payee::from_node_id(dst).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
+ let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(dst).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
let amt = seed as u64 % 200_000_000;
- if get_route(src, &payee, &graph, None, amt, 42, &test_utils::TestLogger::new(), &scorer).is_ok() {
+ let params = ProbabilisticScoringParameters::default();
+ let scorer = ProbabilisticScorer::new(params, &graph);
+ if get_route(src, &payment_params, &graph, None, amt, 42, &test_utils::TestLogger::new(), &scorer).is_ok() {
continue 'load_endpoints;
}
}
}
}
-#[cfg(all(test, feature = "unstable", not(feature = "no-std")))]
+#[cfg(all(test, feature = "_bench_unstable", not(feature = "no-std")))]
mod benches {
use super::*;
- use routing::scoring::Scorer;
+ use bitcoin::hashes::Hash;
+ use bitcoin::secp256k1::{PublicKey, Secp256k1, SecretKey};
+ use chain::transaction::OutPoint;
+ use ln::channelmanager::{ChannelCounterparty, ChannelDetails};
+ use ln::features::{InitFeatures, InvoiceFeatures};
+ use routing::scoring::{FixedPenaltyScorer, ProbabilisticScorer, ProbabilisticScoringParameters, Scorer};
use util::logger::{Logger, Record};
use test::Bencher;
fn log(&self, _record: &Record) {}
}
- #[bench]
- fn generate_routes(bench: &mut Bencher) {
+ fn read_network_graph() -> NetworkGraph {
let mut d = test_utils::get_route_file().unwrap();
- let graph = NetworkGraph::read(&mut d).unwrap();
- let nodes = graph.read_only().nodes().clone();
- let scorer = Scorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ NetworkGraph::read(&mut d).unwrap()
+ }
- // First, get 100 (source, destination) pairs for which route-getting actually succeeds...
- let mut path_endpoints = Vec::new();
- let mut seed: usize = 0xdeadbeef;
- 'load_endpoints: for _ in 0..100 {
- loop {
- seed *= 0xdeadbeef;
- let src = PublicKey::from_slice(nodes.keys().skip(seed % nodes.len()).next().unwrap().as_slice()).unwrap();
- seed *= 0xdeadbeef;
- let dst = PublicKey::from_slice(nodes.keys().skip(seed % nodes.len()).next().unwrap().as_slice()).unwrap();
- let payee = Payee::from_node_id(dst);
- let amt = seed as u64 % 1_000_000;
- if get_route(&src, &payee, &graph, None, amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}, &scorer).is_ok() {
- path_endpoints.push((src, dst, amt));
- continue 'load_endpoints;
- }
- }
+ fn payer_pubkey() -> PublicKey {
+ let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
+ PublicKey::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, &SecretKey::from_slice(&[42; 32]).unwrap())
+ }
+
+ #[inline]
+ fn first_hop(node_id: PublicKey) -> ChannelDetails {
+ ChannelDetails {
+ channel_id: [0; 32],
+ counterparty: ChannelCounterparty {
+ features: InitFeatures::known(),
+ node_id,
+ unspendable_punishment_reserve: 0,
+ forwarding_info: None,
+ },
+ funding_txo: Some(OutPoint {
+ txid: bitcoin::Txid::from_slice(&[0; 32]).unwrap(), index: 0
+ }),
+ short_channel_id: Some(1),
+ channel_value_satoshis: 10_000_000,
+ user_channel_id: 0,
+ balance_msat: 10_000_000,
+ outbound_capacity_msat: 10_000_000,
+ inbound_capacity_msat: 0,
+ unspendable_punishment_reserve: None,
+ confirmations_required: None,
+ force_close_spend_delay: None,
+ is_outbound: true,
+ is_funding_locked: true,
+ is_usable: true,
+ is_public: true,
}
+ }
- // ...then benchmark finding paths between the nodes we learned.
- let mut idx = 0;
- bench.iter(|| {
- let (src, dst, amt) = path_endpoints[idx % path_endpoints.len()];
- let payee = Payee::from_node_id(dst);
- assert!(get_route(&src, &payee, &graph, None, amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}, &scorer).is_ok());
- idx += 1;
- });
+ #[bench]
+ fn generate_routes_with_zero_penalty_scorer(bench: &mut Bencher) {
+ let network_graph = read_network_graph();
+ let scorer = FixedPenaltyScorer::with_penalty(0);
+ generate_routes(bench, &network_graph, scorer, InvoiceFeatures::empty());
}
#[bench]
- fn generate_mpp_routes(bench: &mut Bencher) {
- let mut d = test_utils::get_route_file().unwrap();
- let graph = NetworkGraph::read(&mut d).unwrap();
+ fn generate_mpp_routes_with_zero_penalty_scorer(bench: &mut Bencher) {
+ let network_graph = read_network_graph();
+ let scorer = FixedPenaltyScorer::with_penalty(0);
+ generate_routes(bench, &network_graph, scorer, InvoiceFeatures::known());
+ }
+
+ #[bench]
+ fn generate_routes_with_default_scorer(bench: &mut Bencher) {
+ let network_graph = read_network_graph();
+ let scorer = Scorer::default();
+ generate_routes(bench, &network_graph, scorer, InvoiceFeatures::empty());
+ }
+
+ #[bench]
+ fn generate_mpp_routes_with_default_scorer(bench: &mut Bencher) {
+ let network_graph = read_network_graph();
+ let scorer = Scorer::default();
+ generate_routes(bench, &network_graph, scorer, InvoiceFeatures::known());
+ }
+
+ #[bench]
+ fn generate_routes_with_probabilistic_scorer(bench: &mut Bencher) {
+ let network_graph = read_network_graph();
+ let params = ProbabilisticScoringParameters::default();
+ let scorer = ProbabilisticScorer::new(params, &network_graph);
+ generate_routes(bench, &network_graph, scorer, InvoiceFeatures::empty());
+ }
+
+ #[bench]
+ fn generate_mpp_routes_with_probabilistic_scorer(bench: &mut Bencher) {
+ let network_graph = read_network_graph();
+ let params = ProbabilisticScoringParameters::default();
+ let scorer = ProbabilisticScorer::new(params, &network_graph);
+ generate_routes(bench, &network_graph, scorer, InvoiceFeatures::known());
+ }
+
+ fn generate_routes<S: Score>(
+ bench: &mut Bencher, graph: &NetworkGraph, mut scorer: S, features: InvoiceFeatures
+ ) {
let nodes = graph.read_only().nodes().clone();
- let scorer = Scorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ let payer = payer_pubkey();
// First, get 100 (source, destination) pairs for which route-getting actually succeeds...
- let mut path_endpoints = Vec::new();
+ let mut routes = Vec::new();
+ let mut route_endpoints = Vec::new();
let mut seed: usize = 0xdeadbeef;
'load_endpoints: for _ in 0..100 {
loop {
let src = PublicKey::from_slice(nodes.keys().skip(seed % nodes.len()).next().unwrap().as_slice()).unwrap();
seed *= 0xdeadbeef;
let dst = PublicKey::from_slice(nodes.keys().skip(seed % nodes.len()).next().unwrap().as_slice()).unwrap();
- let payee = Payee::from_node_id(dst).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
+ let params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(dst).with_features(features.clone());
+ let first_hop = first_hop(src);
let amt = seed as u64 % 1_000_000;
- if get_route(&src, &payee, &graph, None, amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}, &scorer).is_ok() {
- path_endpoints.push((src, dst, amt));
+ if let Ok(route) = get_route(&payer, ¶ms, &graph, Some(&[&first_hop]), amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}, &scorer) {
+ routes.push(route);
+ route_endpoints.push((first_hop, params, amt));
continue 'load_endpoints;
}
}
}
+ // ...and seed the scorer with success and failure data...
+ for route in routes {
+ let amount = route.get_total_amount();
+ if amount < 250_000 {
+ for path in route.paths {
+ scorer.payment_path_successful(&path.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>());
+ }
+ } else if amount > 750_000 {
+ for path in route.paths {
+ let short_channel_id = path[path.len() / 2].short_channel_id;
+ scorer.payment_path_failed(&path.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(), short_channel_id);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
// ...then benchmark finding paths between the nodes we learned.
let mut idx = 0;
bench.iter(|| {
- let (src, dst, amt) = path_endpoints[idx % path_endpoints.len()];
- let payee = Payee::from_node_id(dst).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
- assert!(get_route(&src, &payee, &graph, None, amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}, &scorer).is_ok());
+ let (first_hop, params, amt) = &route_endpoints[idx % route_endpoints.len()];
+ assert!(get_route(&payer, params, &graph, Some(&[first_hop]), *amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}, &scorer).is_ok());
idx += 1;
});
}
projects / rust-lightning / blobdiff