use ln::channelmanager::ChannelDetails;
use ln::features::{ChannelFeatures, InvoiceFeatures, NodeFeatures};
use ln::msgs::{DecodeError, ErrorAction, LightningError, MAX_VALUE_MSAT};
-use routing::network_graph::{NetworkGraph, RoutingFees};
+use routing::scoring::Score;
+use routing::network_graph::{NetworkGraph, NodeId, RoutingFees};
use util::ser::{Writeable, Readable};
-use util::logger::Logger;
+use util::logger::{Level, Logger};
-use std::cmp;
-use std::collections::{HashMap, BinaryHeap};
-use std::ops::Deref;
+use io;
+use prelude::*;
+use alloc::collections::BinaryHeap;
+use core::cmp;
+use core::ops::Deref;
/// A hop in a route
-#[derive(Clone, PartialEq)]
+#[derive(Clone, Debug, Hash, PartialEq, Eq)]
pub struct RouteHop {
/// The node_id of the node at this hop.
pub pubkey: PublicKey,
pub cltv_expiry_delta: u32,
}
-/// (C-not exported)
-impl Writeable for Vec<RouteHop> {
- fn write<W: ::util::ser::Writer>(&self, writer: &mut W) -> Result<(), ::std::io::Error> {
- (self.len() as u8).write(writer)?;
- for hop in self.iter() {
- hop.pubkey.write(writer)?;
- hop.node_features.write(writer)?;
- hop.short_channel_id.write(writer)?;
- hop.channel_features.write(writer)?;
- hop.fee_msat.write(writer)?;
- hop.cltv_expiry_delta.write(writer)?;
- }
- Ok(())
- }
-}
-
-/// (C-not exported)
-impl Readable for Vec<RouteHop> {
- fn read<R: ::std::io::Read>(reader: &mut R) -> Result<Vec<RouteHop>, DecodeError> {
- let hops_count: u8 = Readable::read(reader)?;
- let mut hops = Vec::with_capacity(hops_count as usize);
- for _ in 0..hops_count {
- hops.push(RouteHop {
- pubkey: Readable::read(reader)?,
- node_features: Readable::read(reader)?,
- short_channel_id: Readable::read(reader)?,
- channel_features: Readable::read(reader)?,
- fee_msat: Readable::read(reader)?,
- cltv_expiry_delta: Readable::read(reader)?,
- });
- }
- Ok(hops)
- }
-}
+impl_writeable_tlv_based!(RouteHop, {
+ (0, pubkey, required),
+ (2, node_features, required),
+ (4, short_channel_id, required),
+ (6, channel_features, required),
+ (8, fee_msat, required),
+ (10, cltv_expiry_delta, required),
+});
/// A route directs a payment from the sender (us) to the recipient. If the recipient supports MPP,
/// it can take multiple paths. Each path is composed of one or more hops through the network.
-#[derive(Clone, PartialEq)]
+#[derive(Clone, Hash, PartialEq, Eq)]
pub struct Route {
/// The list of routes taken for a single (potentially-)multi-part payment. The pubkey of the
/// last RouteHop in each path must be the same.
/// given path is variable, keeping the length of any path to less than 20 should currently
/// ensure it is viable.
pub paths: Vec<Vec<RouteHop>>,
+ /// The `payee` parameter passed to [`find_route`].
+ /// This is used by `ChannelManager` to track information which may be required for retries,
+ /// provided back to you via [`Event::PaymentPathFailed`].
+ ///
+ /// [`Event::PaymentPathFailed`]: crate::util::events::Event::PaymentPathFailed
+ pub payee: Option<Payee>,
+}
+
+pub(crate) trait RoutePath {
+ /// Gets the fees for a given path, excluding any excess paid to the recipient.
+ fn get_path_fees(&self) -> u64;
+}
+impl RoutePath for Vec<RouteHop> {
+ fn get_path_fees(&self) -> u64 {
+ // Do not count last hop of each path since that's the full value of the payment
+ self.split_last().map(|(_, path_prefix)| path_prefix).unwrap_or(&[])
+ .iter().map(|hop| &hop.fee_msat)
+ .sum()
+ }
+}
+
+impl Route {
+ /// Returns the total amount of fees paid on this [`Route`].
+ ///
+ /// This doesn't include any extra payment made to the recipient, which can happen in excess of
+ /// the amount passed to [`find_route`]'s `params.final_value_msat`.
+ pub fn get_total_fees(&self) -> u64 {
+ self.paths.iter().map(|path| path.get_path_fees()).sum()
+ }
+
+ /// Returns the total amount paid on this [`Route`], excluding the fees.
+ pub fn get_total_amount(&self) -> u64 {
+ return self.paths.iter()
+ .map(|path| path.split_last().map(|(hop, _)| hop.fee_msat).unwrap_or(0))
+ .sum();
+ }
}
+const SERIALIZATION_VERSION: u8 = 1;
+const MIN_SERIALIZATION_VERSION: u8 = 1;
+
impl Writeable for Route {
- fn write<W: ::util::ser::Writer>(&self, writer: &mut W) -> Result<(), ::std::io::Error> {
+ fn write<W: ::util::ser::Writer>(&self, writer: &mut W) -> Result<(), io::Error> {
+ write_ver_prefix!(writer, SERIALIZATION_VERSION, MIN_SERIALIZATION_VERSION);
(self.paths.len() as u64).write(writer)?;
for hops in self.paths.iter() {
- hops.write(writer)?;
+ (hops.len() as u8).write(writer)?;
+ for hop in hops.iter() {
+ hop.write(writer)?;
+ }
}
+ write_tlv_fields!(writer, {
+ (1, self.payee, option),
+ });
Ok(())
}
}
impl Readable for Route {
- fn read<R: ::std::io::Read>(reader: &mut R) -> Result<Route, DecodeError> {
+ fn read<R: io::Read>(reader: &mut R) -> Result<Route, DecodeError> {
+ let _ver = read_ver_prefix!(reader, SERIALIZATION_VERSION);
let path_count: u64 = Readable::read(reader)?;
let mut paths = Vec::with_capacity(cmp::min(path_count, 128) as usize);
for _ in 0..path_count {
- paths.push(Readable::read(reader)?);
+ let hop_count: u8 = Readable::read(reader)?;
+ let mut hops = Vec::with_capacity(hop_count as usize);
+ for _ in 0..hop_count {
+ hops.push(Readable::read(reader)?);
+ }
+ paths.push(hops);
}
- Ok(Route { paths })
+ let mut payee = None;
+ read_tlv_fields!(reader, {
+ (1, payee, option),
+ });
+ Ok(Route { paths, payee })
}
}
-/// A channel descriptor which provides a last-hop route to get_route
-#[derive(Clone)]
-pub struct RouteHint {
+/// Parameters needed to find a [`Route`] for paying a [`Payee`].
+///
+/// Passed to [`find_route`] and also provided in [`Event::PaymentPathFailed`] for retrying a failed
+/// payment path.
+///
+/// [`Event::PaymentPathFailed`]: crate::util::events::Event::PaymentPathFailed
+#[derive(Clone, Debug)]
+pub struct RouteParameters {
+ /// The recipient of the failed payment path.
+ pub payee: Payee,
+
+ /// The amount in msats sent on the failed payment path.
+ pub final_value_msat: u64,
+
+ /// The CLTV on the final hop of the failed payment path.
+ pub final_cltv_expiry_delta: u32,
+}
+
+impl_writeable_tlv_based!(RouteParameters, {
+ (0, payee, required),
+ (2, final_value_msat, required),
+ (4, final_cltv_expiry_delta, required),
+});
+
+/// The recipient of a payment.
+#[derive(Clone, Debug, Hash, PartialEq, Eq)]
+pub struct Payee {
+ /// The node id of the payee.
+ pub pubkey: PublicKey,
+
+ /// Features supported by the payee.
+ ///
+ /// May be set from the payee's invoice or via [`for_keysend`]. May be `None` if the invoice
+ /// does not contain any features.
+ ///
+ /// [`for_keysend`]: Self::for_keysend
+ pub features: Option<InvoiceFeatures>,
+
+ /// Hints for routing to the payee, containing channels connecting the payee to public nodes.
+ pub route_hints: Vec<RouteHint>,
+
+ /// Expiration of a payment to the payee, in seconds relative to the UNIX epoch.
+ pub expiry_time: Option<u64>,
+}
+
+impl_writeable_tlv_based!(Payee, {
+ (0, pubkey, required),
+ (2, features, option),
+ (4, route_hints, vec_type),
+ (6, expiry_time, option),
+});
+
+impl Payee {
+ /// Creates a payee with the node id of the given `pubkey`.
+ pub fn from_node_id(pubkey: PublicKey) -> Self {
+ Self {
+ pubkey,
+ features: None,
+ route_hints: vec![],
+ expiry_time: None,
+ }
+ }
+
+ /// Creates a payee with the node id of the given `pubkey` to use for keysend payments.
+ pub fn for_keysend(pubkey: PublicKey) -> Self {
+ Self::from_node_id(pubkey).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::for_keysend())
+ }
+
+ /// Includes the payee's features.
+ ///
+ /// (C-not exported) since bindings don't support move semantics
+ pub fn with_features(self, features: InvoiceFeatures) -> Self {
+ Self { features: Some(features), ..self }
+ }
+
+ /// Includes hints for routing to the payee.
+ ///
+ /// (C-not exported) since bindings don't support move semantics
+ pub fn with_route_hints(self, route_hints: Vec<RouteHint>) -> Self {
+ Self { route_hints, ..self }
+ }
+
+ /// Includes a payment expiration in seconds relative to the UNIX epoch.
+ ///
+ /// (C-not exported) since bindings don't support move semantics
+ pub fn with_expiry_time(self, expiry_time: u64) -> Self {
+ Self { expiry_time: Some(expiry_time), ..self }
+ }
+}
+
+/// A list of hops along a payment path terminating with a channel to the recipient.
+#[derive(Clone, Debug, Hash, Eq, PartialEq)]
+pub struct RouteHint(pub Vec<RouteHintHop>);
+
+
+impl Writeable for RouteHint {
+ fn write<W: ::util::ser::Writer>(&self, writer: &mut W) -> Result<(), io::Error> {
+ (self.0.len() as u64).write(writer)?;
+ for hop in self.0.iter() {
+ hop.write(writer)?;
+ }
+ Ok(())
+ }
+}
+
+impl Readable for RouteHint {
+ fn read<R: io::Read>(reader: &mut R) -> Result<Self, DecodeError> {
+ let hop_count: u64 = Readable::read(reader)?;
+ let mut hops = Vec::with_capacity(cmp::min(hop_count, 16) as usize);
+ for _ in 0..hop_count {
+ hops.push(Readable::read(reader)?);
+ }
+ Ok(Self(hops))
+ }
+}
+
+/// A channel descriptor for a hop along a payment path.
+#[derive(Clone, Debug, Hash, Eq, PartialEq)]
+pub struct RouteHintHop {
/// The node_id of the non-target end of the route
pub src_node_id: PublicKey,
/// The short_channel_id of this channel
pub htlc_maximum_msat: Option<u64>,
}
+impl_writeable_tlv_based!(RouteHintHop, {
+ (0, src_node_id, required),
+ (1, htlc_minimum_msat, option),
+ (2, short_channel_id, required),
+ (3, htlc_maximum_msat, option),
+ (4, fees, required),
+ (6, cltv_expiry_delta, required),
+});
+
#[derive(Eq, PartialEq)]
struct RouteGraphNode {
- pubkey: PublicKey,
+ node_id: NodeId,
lowest_fee_to_peer_through_node: u64,
lowest_fee_to_node: u64,
// The maximum value a yet-to-be-constructed payment path might flow through this node.
/// The effective htlc_minimum_msat at this hop. If a later hop on the path had a higher HTLC
/// minimum, we use it, plus the fees required at each earlier hop to meet it.
path_htlc_minimum_msat: u64,
+ /// All penalties incurred from this hop on the way to the destination, as calculated using
+ /// channel scoring.
+ path_penalty_msat: u64,
}
impl cmp::Ord for RouteGraphNode {
fn cmp(&self, other: &RouteGraphNode) -> cmp::Ordering {
- let other_score = cmp::max(other.lowest_fee_to_peer_through_node, other.path_htlc_minimum_msat);
- let self_score = cmp::max(self.lowest_fee_to_peer_through_node, self.path_htlc_minimum_msat);
- other_score.cmp(&self_score).then_with(|| other.pubkey.serialize().cmp(&self.pubkey.serialize()))
+ let other_score = cmp::max(other.lowest_fee_to_peer_through_node, other.path_htlc_minimum_msat)
+ .checked_add(other.path_penalty_msat)
+ .unwrap_or_else(|| u64::max_value());
+ let self_score = cmp::max(self.lowest_fee_to_peer_through_node, self.path_htlc_minimum_msat)
+ .checked_add(self.path_penalty_msat)
+ .unwrap_or_else(|| u64::max_value());
+ other_score.cmp(&self_score).then_with(|| other.node_id.cmp(&self.node_id))
}
}
/// so that we can choose cheaper paths (as per Dijkstra's algorithm).
/// Fee values should be updated only in the context of the whole path, see update_value_and_recompute_fees.
/// These fee values are useful to choose hops as we traverse the graph "payee-to-payer".
-#[derive(Clone)]
-struct PathBuildingHop {
- /// Hop-specific details unrelated to the path during the routing phase,
- /// but rather relevant to the LN graph.
- route_hop: RouteHop,
+#[derive(Clone, Debug)]
+struct PathBuildingHop<'a> {
+ // The RouteHintHop fields which will eventually be used if this hop is used in a final Route.
+ // Note that node_features is calculated separately after our initial graph walk.
+ node_id: NodeId,
+ short_channel_id: u64,
+ channel_features: &'a ChannelFeatures,
+ fee_msat: u64,
+ cltv_expiry_delta: u32,
+
/// Minimal fees required to route to the source node of the current hop via any of its inbound channels.
src_lowest_inbound_fees: RoutingFees,
/// Fees of the channel used in this hop.
/// A mirror of the same field in RouteGraphNode. Note that this is only used during the graph
/// walk and may be invalid thereafter.
path_htlc_minimum_msat: u64,
+ /// All penalties incurred from this channel on the way to the destination, as calculated using
+ /// channel scoring.
+ path_penalty_msat: u64,
+ /// If we've already processed a node as the best node, we shouldn't process it again. Normally
+ /// we'd just ignore it if we did as all channels would have a higher new fee, but because we
+ /// may decrease the amounts in use as we walk the graph, the actual calculated fee may
+ /// decrease as well. Thus, we have to explicitly track which nodes have been processed and
+ /// avoid processing them again.
+ was_processed: bool,
+ #[cfg(any(test, feature = "fuzztarget"))]
+ // In tests, we apply further sanity checks on cases where we skip nodes we already processed
+ // to ensure it is specifically in cases where the fee has gone down because of a decrease in
+ // value_contribution_msat, which requires tracking it here. See comments below where it is
+ // used for more info.
+ value_contribution_msat: u64,
}
// Instantiated with a list of hops with correct data in them collected during path finding,
// an instance of this struct should be further modified only via given methods.
#[derive(Clone)]
-struct PaymentPath {
- hops: Vec<PathBuildingHop>,
+struct PaymentPath<'a> {
+ hops: Vec<(PathBuildingHop<'a>, NodeFeatures)>,
}
-impl PaymentPath {
-
+impl<'a> PaymentPath<'a> {
// TODO: Add a value_msat field to PaymentPath and use it instead of this function.
fn get_value_msat(&self) -> u64 {
- self.hops.last().unwrap().route_hop.fee_msat
+ self.hops.last().unwrap().0.fee_msat
}
fn get_total_fee_paid_msat(&self) -> u64 {
}
let mut result = 0;
// Can't use next_hops_fee_msat because it gets outdated.
- for (i, hop) in self.hops.iter().enumerate() {
+ for (i, (hop, _)) in self.hops.iter().enumerate() {
if i != self.hops.len() - 1 {
- result += hop.route_hop.fee_msat;
+ result += hop.fee_msat;
}
}
return result;
// If the amount transferred by the path is updated, the fees should be adjusted. Any other way
// to change fees may result in an inconsistency.
//
- // Sometimes we call this function right after constructing a path which has inconsistent
- // (in terms of reaching htlc_minimum_msat), so that this function puts the fees in order.
- // In that case we call it on the "same" amount we initially allocated for this path, and which
- // could have been reduced on the way. In that case, there is also a risk of exceeding
- // available_liquidity inside this function, because the function is unaware of this bound.
- // In our specific recomputation cases where we never increase the value the risk is pretty low.
- // This function, however, does not support arbitrarily increasing the value being transferred,
- // and the exception will be triggered.
+ // Sometimes we call this function right after constructing a path which is inconsistent in
+ // that it the value being transferred has decreased while we were doing path finding, leading
+ // to the fees being paid not lining up with the actual limits.
+ //
+ // Note that this function is not aware of the available_liquidity limit, and thus does not
+ // support increasing the value being transferred.
fn update_value_and_recompute_fees(&mut self, value_msat: u64) {
- assert!(value_msat <= self.hops.last().unwrap().route_hop.fee_msat);
+ assert!(value_msat <= self.hops.last().unwrap().0.fee_msat);
let mut total_fee_paid_msat = 0 as u64;
for i in (0..self.hops.len()).rev() {
// htlc_minimum_msat of the current channel. Last hop is handled separately.
let mut cur_hop_fees_msat = 0;
if !last_hop {
- cur_hop_fees_msat = self.hops.get(i + 1).unwrap().hop_use_fee_msat;
+ cur_hop_fees_msat = self.hops.get(i + 1).unwrap().0.hop_use_fee_msat;
}
- let mut cur_hop = self.hops.get_mut(i).unwrap();
+ let mut cur_hop = &mut self.hops.get_mut(i).unwrap().0;
cur_hop.next_hops_fee_msat = total_fee_paid_msat;
// Overpay in fees if we can't save these funds due to htlc_minimum_msat.
// We try to account for htlc_minimum_msat in scoring (add_entry!), so that nodes don't
if last_hop {
// Final hop is a special case: it usually has just value_msat (by design), but also
// it still could overpay for the htlc_minimum_msat.
- cur_hop.route_hop.fee_msat = cur_hop_transferred_amount_msat;
+ cur_hop.fee_msat = cur_hop_transferred_amount_msat;
} else {
// Propagate updated fees for the use of the channels to one hop back, where they
// will be actually paid (fee_msat). The last hop is handled above separately.
- cur_hop.route_hop.fee_msat = cur_hop_fees_msat;
+ cur_hop.fee_msat = cur_hop_fees_msat;
}
// Fee for the use of the current hop which will be deducted on the previous hop.
}
}
-/// Gets a route from us (payer) to the given target node (payee).
+/// Finds a route from us (payer) to the given target node (payee).
///
-/// If the payee provided features in their invoice, they should be provided via payee_features.
+/// If the payee provided features in their invoice, they should be provided via `params.payee`.
/// Without this, MPP will only be used if the payee's features are available in the network graph.
///
-/// Extra routing hops between known nodes and the target will be used if they are included in
-/// last_hops.
+/// Private routing paths between a public node and the target may be included in `params.payee`.
+///
+/// If some channels aren't announced, it may be useful to fill in `first_hops` with the results
+/// from [`ChannelManager::list_usable_channels`]. If it is filled in, the view of our local
+/// channels from [`NetworkGraph`] will be ignored, and only those in `first_hops` will be used.
+///
+/// The fees on channels from us to the next hop are ignored as they are assumed to all be equal.
+/// However, the enabled/disabled bit on such channels as well as the `htlc_minimum_msat` /
+/// `htlc_maximum_msat` *are* checked as they may change based on the receiving node.
///
-/// If some channels aren't announced, it may be useful to fill in a first_hops with the
-/// results from a local ChannelManager::list_usable_channels() call. If it is filled in, our
-/// view of our local channels (from net_graph_msg_handler) will be ignored, and only those
-/// in first_hops will be used.
+/// # Note
///
-/// Panics if first_hops contains channels without short_channel_ids
-/// (ChannelManager::list_usable_channels will never include such channels).
+/// May be used to re-compute a [`Route`] when handling a [`Event::PaymentPathFailed`]. Any
+/// adjustments to the [`NetworkGraph`] and channel scores should be made prior to calling this
+/// function.
///
-/// The fees on channels from us to next-hops are ignored (as they are assumed to all be
-/// equal), however the enabled/disabled bit on such channels as well as the
-/// htlc_minimum_msat/htlc_maximum_msat *are* checked as they may change based on the receiving node.
-pub fn get_route<L: Deref>(our_node_id: &PublicKey, network: &NetworkGraph, payee: &PublicKey, payee_features: Option<InvoiceFeatures>, first_hops: Option<&[&ChannelDetails]>,
- last_hops: &[&RouteHint], final_value_msat: u64, final_cltv: u32, logger: L) -> Result<Route, LightningError> where L::Target: Logger {
- // TODO: Obviously *only* using total fee cost sucks. We should consider weighting by
- // uptime/success in using a node in the past.
- if *payee == *our_node_id {
+/// # Panics
+///
+/// Panics if first_hops contains channels without short_channel_ids;
+/// [`ChannelManager::list_usable_channels`] will never include such channels.
+///
+/// [`ChannelManager::list_usable_channels`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::list_usable_channels
+/// [`Event::PaymentPathFailed`]: crate::util::events::Event::PaymentPathFailed
+pub fn find_route<L: Deref, S: Score>(
+ our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, params: &RouteParameters, network: &NetworkGraph,
+ first_hops: Option<&[&ChannelDetails]>, logger: L, scorer: &S
+) -> Result<Route, LightningError>
+where L::Target: Logger {
+ get_route(
+ our_node_pubkey, ¶ms.payee, network, first_hops, params.final_value_msat,
+ params.final_cltv_expiry_delta, logger, scorer
+ )
+}
+
+pub(crate) fn get_route<L: Deref, S: Score>(
+ our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, payee: &Payee, network: &NetworkGraph,
+ first_hops: Option<&[&ChannelDetails]>, final_value_msat: u64, final_cltv_expiry_delta: u32,
+ logger: L, scorer: &S
+) -> Result<Route, LightningError>
+where L::Target: Logger {
+ let payee_node_id = NodeId::from_pubkey(&payee.pubkey);
+ let our_node_id = NodeId::from_pubkey(&our_node_pubkey);
+
+ if payee_node_id == our_node_id {
return Err(LightningError{err: "Cannot generate a route to ourselves".to_owned(), action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError});
}
return Err(LightningError{err: "Cannot send a payment of 0 msat".to_owned(), action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError});
}
- for last_hop in last_hops {
- if last_hop.src_node_id == *payee {
- return Err(LightningError{err: "Last hop cannot have a payee as a source.".to_owned(), action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError});
+ for route in payee.route_hints.iter() {
+ for hop in &route.0 {
+ if hop.src_node_id == payee.pubkey {
+ return Err(LightningError{err: "Route hint cannot have the payee as the source.".to_owned(), action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError});
+ }
}
}
// to use as the A* heuristic beyond just the cost to get one node further than the current
// one.
+ let network_graph = network.read_only();
+ let network_channels = network_graph.channels();
+ let network_nodes = network_graph.nodes();
let dummy_directional_info = DummyDirectionalChannelInfo { // used for first_hops routes
cltv_expiry_delta: 0,
htlc_minimum_msat: 0,
}
};
- let mut targets = BinaryHeap::new(); //TODO: Do we care about switching to eg Fibbonaci heap?
- let mut dist = HashMap::with_capacity(network.get_nodes().len());
-
- // During routing, if we ignore a path due to an htlc_minimum_msat limit, we set this,
- // indicating that we may wish to try again with a higher value, potentially paying to meet an
- // htlc_minimum with extra fees while still finding a cheaper path.
- let mut hit_minimum_limit;
-
- // When arranging a route, we select multiple paths so that we can make a multi-path payment.
- // We start with a path_value of the exact amount we want, and if that generates a route we may
- // return it immediately. Otherwise, we don't stop searching for paths until we have 3x the
- // amount we want in total across paths, selecting the best subset at the end.
- const ROUTE_CAPACITY_PROVISION_FACTOR: u64 = 3;
- let recommended_value_msat = final_value_msat * ROUTE_CAPACITY_PROVISION_FACTOR as u64;
- let mut path_value_msat = final_value_msat;
-
// Allow MPP only if we have a features set from somewhere that indicates the payee supports
// it. If the payee supports it they're supposed to include it in the invoice, so that should
// work reliably.
- let allow_mpp = if let Some(features) = &payee_features {
+ let allow_mpp = if let Some(features) = &payee.features {
features.supports_basic_mpp()
- } else if let Some(node) = network.get_nodes().get(&payee) {
+ } else if let Some(node) = network_nodes.get(&payee_node_id) {
if let Some(node_info) = node.announcement_info.as_ref() {
node_info.features.supports_basic_mpp()
} else { false }
} else { false };
+ log_trace!(logger, "Searching for a route from payer {} to payee {} {} MPP", our_node_pubkey,
+ payee.pubkey, if allow_mpp { "with" } else { "without" });
// Step (1).
// Prepare the data we'll use for payee-to-payer search by
// inserting first hops suggested by the caller as targets.
// Our search will then attempt to reach them while traversing from the payee node.
- let mut first_hop_targets = HashMap::with_capacity(if first_hops.is_some() { first_hops.as_ref().unwrap().len() } else { 0 });
+ let mut first_hop_targets: HashMap<_, Vec<(_, ChannelFeatures, _, NodeFeatures)>> =
+ HashMap::with_capacity(if first_hops.is_some() { first_hops.as_ref().unwrap().len() } else { 0 });
if let Some(hops) = first_hops {
for chan in hops {
let short_channel_id = chan.short_channel_id.expect("first_hops should be filled in with usable channels, not pending ones");
- if chan.remote_network_id == *our_node_id {
- return Err(LightningError{err: "First hop cannot have our_node_id as a destination.".to_owned(), action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError});
+ if chan.counterparty.node_id == *our_node_pubkey {
+ return Err(LightningError{err: "First hop cannot have our_node_pubkey as a destination.".to_owned(), action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError});
}
- first_hop_targets.insert(chan.remote_network_id, (short_channel_id, chan.counterparty_features.clone(), chan.outbound_capacity_msat));
+ first_hop_targets.entry(NodeId::from_pubkey(&chan.counterparty.node_id)).or_insert(Vec::new())
+ .push((short_channel_id, chan.counterparty.features.to_context(), chan.outbound_capacity_msat, chan.counterparty.features.to_context()));
}
if first_hop_targets.is_empty() {
return Err(LightningError{err: "Cannot route when there are no outbound routes away from us".to_owned(), action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError});
}
}
+ let empty_channel_features = ChannelFeatures::empty();
+
+ // The main heap containing all candidate next-hops sorted by their score (max(A* fee,
+ // htlc_minimum)). Ideally this would be a heap which allowed cheap score reduction instead of
+ // adding duplicate entries when we find a better path to a given node.
+ let mut targets = BinaryHeap::new();
+
+ // Map from node_id to information about the best current path to that node, including feerate
+ // information.
+ let mut dist = HashMap::with_capacity(network_nodes.len());
+
+ // During routing, if we ignore a path due to an htlc_minimum_msat limit, we set this,
+ // indicating that we may wish to try again with a higher value, potentially paying to meet an
+ // htlc_minimum with extra fees while still finding a cheaper path.
+ let mut hit_minimum_limit;
+
+ // When arranging a route, we select multiple paths so that we can make a multi-path payment.
+ // We start with a path_value of the exact amount we want, and if that generates a route we may
+ // return it immediately. Otherwise, we don't stop searching for paths until we have 3x the
+ // amount we want in total across paths, selecting the best subset at the end.
+ const ROUTE_CAPACITY_PROVISION_FACTOR: u64 = 3;
+ let recommended_value_msat = final_value_msat * ROUTE_CAPACITY_PROVISION_FACTOR as u64;
+ let mut path_value_msat = final_value_msat;
+
// We don't want multiple paths (as per MPP) share liquidity of the same channels.
// This map allows paths to be aware of the channel use by other paths in the same call.
// This would help to make a better path finding decisions and not "overbook" channels.
// It is unaware of the directions (except for `outbound_capacity_msat` in `first_hops`).
- let mut bookkeeped_channels_liquidity_available_msat = HashMap::new();
+ let mut bookkeeped_channels_liquidity_available_msat = HashMap::with_capacity(network_nodes.len());
// Keeping track of how much value we already collected across other paths. Helps to decide:
// - how much a new path should be transferring (upper bound);
// - when we want to stop looking for new paths.
let mut already_collected_value_msat = 0;
+ log_trace!(logger, "Building path from {} (payee) to {} (us/payer) for value {} msat.", payee.pubkey, our_node_pubkey, final_value_msat);
+
macro_rules! add_entry {
// Adds entry which goes from $src_node_id to $dest_node_id
// over the channel with id $chan_id with fees described in
// $directional_info.
// $next_hops_fee_msat represents the fees paid for using all the channel *after* this one,
// since that value has to be transferred over this channel.
+ // Returns whether this channel caused an update to `targets`.
( $chan_id: expr, $src_node_id: expr, $dest_node_id: expr, $directional_info: expr, $capacity_sats: expr, $chan_features: expr, $next_hops_fee_msat: expr,
- $next_hops_value_contribution: expr, $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat: expr ) => {
+ $next_hops_value_contribution: expr, $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat: expr, $next_hops_path_penalty_msat: expr ) => { {
+ // We "return" whether we updated the path at the end, via this:
+ let mut did_add_update_path_to_src_node = false;
// Channels to self should not be used. This is more of belt-and-suspenders, because in
// practice these cases should be caught earlier:
// - for regular channels at channel announcement (TODO)
// might violate htlc_minimum_msat on the hops which are next along the
// payment path (upstream to the payee). To avoid that, we recompute path
// path fees knowing the final path contribution after constructing it.
- let path_htlc_minimum_msat = match compute_fees($next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, $directional_info.fees)
- .map(|fee_msat| fee_msat.checked_add($next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat)) {
- Some(Some(value_msat)) => cmp::max(value_msat, $directional_info.htlc_minimum_msat),
- _ => u64::max_value()
- };
- let hm_entry = dist.entry(&$src_node_id);
+ let path_htlc_minimum_msat = compute_fees($next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, $directional_info.fees)
+ .and_then(|fee_msat| fee_msat.checked_add($next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat))
+ .map(|fee_msat| cmp::max(fee_msat, $directional_info.htlc_minimum_msat))
+ .unwrap_or_else(|| u64::max_value());
+ let hm_entry = dist.entry($src_node_id);
let old_entry = hm_entry.or_insert_with(|| {
// If there was previously no known way to access
// the source node (recall it goes payee-to-payer) of $chan_id, first add
// as a way to reach the $dest_node_id.
let mut fee_base_msat = u32::max_value();
let mut fee_proportional_millionths = u32::max_value();
- if let Some(Some(fees)) = network.get_nodes().get(&$src_node_id).map(|node| node.lowest_inbound_channel_fees) {
+ if let Some(Some(fees)) = network_nodes.get(&$src_node_id).map(|node| node.lowest_inbound_channel_fees) {
fee_base_msat = fees.base_msat;
fee_proportional_millionths = fees.proportional_millionths;
}
PathBuildingHop {
- route_hop: RouteHop {
- pubkey: $dest_node_id.clone(),
- node_features: NodeFeatures::empty(),
- short_channel_id: 0,
- channel_features: $chan_features.clone(),
- fee_msat: 0,
- cltv_expiry_delta: 0,
- },
+ node_id: $dest_node_id.clone(),
+ short_channel_id: 0,
+ channel_features: $chan_features,
+ fee_msat: 0,
+ cltv_expiry_delta: 0,
src_lowest_inbound_fees: RoutingFees {
base_msat: fee_base_msat,
proportional_millionths: fee_proportional_millionths,
total_fee_msat: u64::max_value(),
htlc_minimum_msat: $directional_info.htlc_minimum_msat,
path_htlc_minimum_msat,
+ path_penalty_msat: u64::max_value(),
+ was_processed: false,
+ #[cfg(any(test, feature = "fuzztarget"))]
+ value_contribution_msat,
}
});
- let mut hop_use_fee_msat = 0;
- let mut total_fee_msat = $next_hops_fee_msat;
-
- // Ignore hop_use_fee_msat for channel-from-us as we assume all channels-from-us
- // will have the same effective-fee
- if $src_node_id != *our_node_id {
- match compute_fees(amount_to_transfer_over_msat, $directional_info.fees) {
- // max_value means we'll always fail
- // the old_entry.total_fee_msat > total_fee_msat check
- None => total_fee_msat = u64::max_value(),
- Some(fee_msat) => {
- hop_use_fee_msat = fee_msat;
- total_fee_msat += hop_use_fee_msat;
- if let Some(prev_hop_fee_msat) = compute_fees(total_fee_msat + amount_to_transfer_over_msat,
- old_entry.src_lowest_inbound_fees) {
- if let Some(incremented_total_fee_msat) = total_fee_msat.checked_add(prev_hop_fee_msat) {
- total_fee_msat = incremented_total_fee_msat;
- }
- else {
- // max_value means we'll always fail
- // the old_entry.total_fee_msat > total_fee_msat check
- total_fee_msat = u64::max_value();
- }
- } else {
- // max_value means we'll always fail
- // the old_entry.total_fee_msat > total_fee_msat check
- total_fee_msat = u64::max_value();
+ #[allow(unused_mut)] // We only use the mut in cfg(test)
+ let mut should_process = !old_entry.was_processed;
+ #[cfg(any(test, feature = "fuzztarget"))]
+ {
+ // In test/fuzzing builds, we do extra checks to make sure the skipping
+ // of already-seen nodes only happens in cases we expect (see below).
+ if !should_process { should_process = true; }
+ }
+
+ if should_process {
+ let mut hop_use_fee_msat = 0;
+ let mut total_fee_msat = $next_hops_fee_msat;
+
+ // Ignore hop_use_fee_msat for channel-from-us as we assume all channels-from-us
+ // will have the same effective-fee
+ if $src_node_id != our_node_id {
+ match compute_fees(amount_to_transfer_over_msat, $directional_info.fees) {
+ // max_value means we'll always fail
+ // the old_entry.total_fee_msat > total_fee_msat check
+ None => total_fee_msat = u64::max_value(),
+ Some(fee_msat) => {
+ hop_use_fee_msat = fee_msat;
+ total_fee_msat += hop_use_fee_msat;
+ // When calculating the lowest inbound fees to a node, we
+ // calculate fees here not based on the actual value we think
+ // will flow over this channel, but on the minimum value that
+ // we'll accept flowing over it. The minimum accepted value
+ // is a constant through each path collection run, ensuring
+ // consistent basis. Otherwise we may later find a
+ // different path to the source node that is more expensive,
+ // but which we consider to be cheaper because we are capacity
+ // constrained and the relative fee becomes lower.
+ match compute_fees(minimal_value_contribution_msat, old_entry.src_lowest_inbound_fees)
+ .map(|a| a.checked_add(total_fee_msat)) {
+ Some(Some(v)) => {
+ total_fee_msat = v;
+ },
+ _ => {
+ total_fee_msat = u64::max_value();
+ }
+ };
}
}
}
- }
- let new_graph_node = RouteGraphNode {
- pubkey: $src_node_id,
- lowest_fee_to_peer_through_node: total_fee_msat,
- lowest_fee_to_node: $next_hops_fee_msat as u64 + hop_use_fee_msat,
- value_contribution_msat: value_contribution_msat,
- path_htlc_minimum_msat,
- };
-
- // Update the way of reaching $src_node_id with the given $chan_id (from $dest_node_id),
- // if this way is cheaper than the already known
- // (considering the cost to "reach" this channel from the route destination,
- // the cost of using this channel,
- // and the cost of routing to the source node of this channel).
- // Also, consider that htlc_minimum_msat_difference, because we might end up
- // paying it. Consider the following exploit:
- // we use 2 paths to transfer 1.5 BTC. One of them is 0-fee normal 1 BTC path,
- // and for the other one we picked a 1sat-fee path with htlc_minimum_msat of
- // 1 BTC. Now, since the latter is more expensive, we gonna try to cut it
- // by 0.5 BTC, but then match htlc_minimum_msat by paying a fee of 0.5 BTC
- // to this channel.
- // Ideally the scoring could be smarter (e.g. 0.5*htlc_minimum_msat here),
- // but it may require additional tracking - we don't want to double-count
- // the fees included in $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, but also
- // can't use something that may decrease on future hops.
- let old_cost = cmp::max(old_entry.total_fee_msat, old_entry.path_htlc_minimum_msat);
- let new_cost = cmp::max(total_fee_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat);
-
- if new_cost < old_cost {
- targets.push(new_graph_node);
- old_entry.next_hops_fee_msat = $next_hops_fee_msat;
- old_entry.hop_use_fee_msat = hop_use_fee_msat;
- old_entry.total_fee_msat = total_fee_msat;
- old_entry.route_hop = RouteHop {
- pubkey: $dest_node_id.clone(),
- node_features: NodeFeatures::empty(),
- short_channel_id: $chan_id.clone(),
- channel_features: $chan_features.clone(),
- fee_msat: 0, // This value will be later filled with hop_use_fee_msat of the following channel
- cltv_expiry_delta: $directional_info.cltv_expiry_delta as u32,
+ let path_penalty_msat = $next_hops_path_penalty_msat.checked_add(
+ scorer.channel_penalty_msat($chan_id.clone(), amount_to_transfer_over_msat, Some(*available_liquidity_msat),
+ &$src_node_id, &$dest_node_id)).unwrap_or_else(|| u64::max_value());
+ let new_graph_node = RouteGraphNode {
+ node_id: $src_node_id,
+ lowest_fee_to_peer_through_node: total_fee_msat,
+ lowest_fee_to_node: $next_hops_fee_msat as u64 + hop_use_fee_msat,
+ value_contribution_msat: value_contribution_msat,
+ path_htlc_minimum_msat,
+ path_penalty_msat,
};
- old_entry.channel_fees = $directional_info.fees;
- old_entry.htlc_minimum_msat = $directional_info.htlc_minimum_msat;
- old_entry.path_htlc_minimum_msat = path_htlc_minimum_msat;
+
+ // Update the way of reaching $src_node_id with the given $chan_id (from $dest_node_id),
+ // if this way is cheaper than the already known
+ // (considering the cost to "reach" this channel from the route destination,
+ // the cost of using this channel,
+ // and the cost of routing to the source node of this channel).
+ // Also, consider that htlc_minimum_msat_difference, because we might end up
+ // paying it. Consider the following exploit:
+ // we use 2 paths to transfer 1.5 BTC. One of them is 0-fee normal 1 BTC path,
+ // and for the other one we picked a 1sat-fee path with htlc_minimum_msat of
+ // 1 BTC. Now, since the latter is more expensive, we gonna try to cut it
+ // by 0.5 BTC, but then match htlc_minimum_msat by paying a fee of 0.5 BTC
+ // to this channel.
+ // Ideally the scoring could be smarter (e.g. 0.5*htlc_minimum_msat here),
+ // but it may require additional tracking - we don't want to double-count
+ // the fees included in $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, but also
+ // can't use something that may decrease on future hops.
+ let old_cost = cmp::max(old_entry.total_fee_msat, old_entry.path_htlc_minimum_msat)
+ .checked_add(old_entry.path_penalty_msat)
+ .unwrap_or_else(|| u64::max_value());
+ let new_cost = cmp::max(total_fee_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat)
+ .checked_add(path_penalty_msat)
+ .unwrap_or_else(|| u64::max_value());
+
+ if !old_entry.was_processed && new_cost < old_cost {
+ targets.push(new_graph_node);
+ old_entry.next_hops_fee_msat = $next_hops_fee_msat;
+ old_entry.hop_use_fee_msat = hop_use_fee_msat;
+ old_entry.total_fee_msat = total_fee_msat;
+ old_entry.node_id = $dest_node_id.clone();
+ old_entry.short_channel_id = $chan_id.clone();
+ old_entry.channel_features = $chan_features;
+ old_entry.fee_msat = 0; // This value will be later filled with hop_use_fee_msat of the following channel
+ old_entry.cltv_expiry_delta = $directional_info.cltv_expiry_delta as u32;
+ old_entry.channel_fees = $directional_info.fees;
+ old_entry.htlc_minimum_msat = $directional_info.htlc_minimum_msat;
+ old_entry.path_htlc_minimum_msat = path_htlc_minimum_msat;
+ old_entry.path_penalty_msat = path_penalty_msat;
+ #[cfg(any(test, feature = "fuzztarget"))]
+ {
+ old_entry.value_contribution_msat = value_contribution_msat;
+ }
+ did_add_update_path_to_src_node = true;
+ } else if old_entry.was_processed && new_cost < old_cost {
+ #[cfg(any(test, feature = "fuzztarget"))]
+ {
+ // If we're skipping processing a node which was previously
+ // processed even though we found another path to it with a
+ // cheaper fee, check that it was because the second path we
+ // found (which we are processing now) has a lower value
+ // contribution due to an HTLC minimum limit.
+ //
+ // e.g. take a graph with two paths from node 1 to node 2, one
+ // through channel A, and one through channel B. Channel A and
+ // B are both in the to-process heap, with their scores set by
+ // a higher htlc_minimum than fee.
+ // Channel A is processed first, and the channels onwards from
+ // node 1 are added to the to-process heap. Thereafter, we pop
+ // Channel B off of the heap, note that it has a much more
+ // restrictive htlc_maximum_msat, and recalculate the fees for
+ // all of node 1's channels using the new, reduced, amount.
+ //
+ // This would be bogus - we'd be selecting a higher-fee path
+ // with a lower htlc_maximum_msat instead of the one we'd
+ // already decided to use.
+ debug_assert!(path_htlc_minimum_msat < old_entry.path_htlc_minimum_msat);
+ debug_assert!(
+ value_contribution_msat + path_penalty_msat <
+ old_entry.value_contribution_msat + old_entry.path_penalty_msat
+ );
+ }
+ }
}
}
}
}
- };
+ did_add_update_path_to_src_node
+ } }
}
+ let empty_node_features = NodeFeatures::empty();
// Find ways (channels with destination) to reach a given node and store them
// in the corresponding data structures (routing graph etc).
// $fee_to_target_msat represents how much it costs to reach to this node from the payee,
// meaning how much will be paid in fees after this node (to the best of our knowledge).
// This data can later be helpful to optimize routing (pay lower fees).
macro_rules! add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node {
- ( $node: expr, $node_id: expr, $fee_to_target_msat: expr, $next_hops_value_contribution: expr, $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat: expr ) => {
- if first_hops.is_some() {
- if let Some(&(ref first_hop, ref features, ref outbound_capacity_msat)) = first_hop_targets.get(&$node_id) {
- add_entry!(first_hop, *our_node_id, $node_id, dummy_directional_info, Some(outbound_capacity_msat / 1000), features.to_context(), $fee_to_target_msat, $next_hops_value_contribution, $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat);
+ ( $node: expr, $node_id: expr, $fee_to_target_msat: expr, $next_hops_value_contribution: expr, $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat: expr, $next_hops_path_penalty_msat: expr ) => {
+ let skip_node = if let Some(elem) = dist.get_mut(&$node_id) {
+ let was_processed = elem.was_processed;
+ elem.was_processed = true;
+ was_processed
+ } else {
+ // Entries are added to dist in add_entry!() when there is a channel from a node.
+ // Because there are no channels from payee, it will not have a dist entry at this point.
+ // If we're processing any other node, it is always be the result of a channel from it.
+ assert_eq!($node_id, payee_node_id);
+ false
+ };
+
+ if !skip_node {
+ if let Some(first_channels) = first_hop_targets.get(&$node_id) {
+ for (ref first_hop, ref features, ref outbound_capacity_msat, _) in first_channels {
+ add_entry!(first_hop, our_node_id, $node_id, dummy_directional_info, Some(outbound_capacity_msat / 1000), features, $fee_to_target_msat, $next_hops_value_contribution, $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, $next_hops_path_penalty_msat);
+ }
}
- }
- let features;
- if let Some(node_info) = $node.announcement_info.as_ref() {
- features = node_info.features.clone();
- } else {
- features = NodeFeatures::empty();
- }
+ let features = if let Some(node_info) = $node.announcement_info.as_ref() {
+ &node_info.features
+ } else {
+ &empty_node_features
+ };
- if !features.requires_unknown_bits() {
- for chan_id in $node.channels.iter() {
- let chan = network.get_channels().get(chan_id).unwrap();
- if !chan.features.requires_unknown_bits() {
- if chan.node_one == *$node_id {
- // ie $node is one, ie next hop in A* is two, via the two_to_one channel
- if first_hops.is_none() || chan.node_two != *our_node_id {
- if let Some(two_to_one) = chan.two_to_one.as_ref() {
- if two_to_one.enabled {
- add_entry!(chan_id, chan.node_two, chan.node_one, two_to_one, chan.capacity_sats, chan.features, $fee_to_target_msat, $next_hops_value_contribution, $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat);
+ if !features.requires_unknown_bits() {
+ for chan_id in $node.channels.iter() {
+ let chan = network_channels.get(chan_id).unwrap();
+ if !chan.features.requires_unknown_bits() {
+ if chan.node_one == $node_id {
+ // ie $node is one, ie next hop in A* is two, via the two_to_one channel
+ if first_hops.is_none() || chan.node_two != our_node_id {
+ if let Some(two_to_one) = chan.two_to_one.as_ref() {
+ if two_to_one.enabled {
+ add_entry!(chan_id, chan.node_two, chan.node_one, two_to_one, chan.capacity_sats, &chan.features, $fee_to_target_msat, $next_hops_value_contribution, $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, $next_hops_path_penalty_msat);
+ }
}
}
- }
- } else {
- if first_hops.is_none() || chan.node_one != *our_node_id {
- if let Some(one_to_two) = chan.one_to_two.as_ref() {
- if one_to_two.enabled {
- add_entry!(chan_id, chan.node_one, chan.node_two, one_to_two, chan.capacity_sats, chan.features, $fee_to_target_msat, $next_hops_value_contribution, $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat);
+ } else {
+ if first_hops.is_none() || chan.node_one != our_node_id{
+ if let Some(one_to_two) = chan.one_to_two.as_ref() {
+ if one_to_two.enabled {
+ add_entry!(chan_id, chan.node_one, chan.node_two, one_to_two, chan.capacity_sats, &chan.features, $fee_to_target_msat, $next_hops_value_contribution, $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, $next_hops_path_penalty_msat);
+ }
}
}
-
}
}
}
// If first hop is a private channel and the only way to reach the payee, this is the only
// place where it could be added.
- if first_hops.is_some() {
- if let Some(&(ref first_hop, ref features, ref outbound_capacity_msat)) = first_hop_targets.get(&payee) {
- add_entry!(first_hop, *our_node_id, payee, dummy_directional_info, Some(outbound_capacity_msat / 1000), features.to_context(), 0, path_value_msat, 0);
+ if let Some(first_channels) = first_hop_targets.get(&payee_node_id) {
+ for (ref first_hop, ref features, ref outbound_capacity_msat, _) in first_channels {
+ let added = add_entry!(first_hop, our_node_id, payee_node_id, dummy_directional_info, Some(outbound_capacity_msat / 1000), features, 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0u64);
+ log_trace!(logger, "{} direct route to payee via SCID {}", if added { "Added" } else { "Skipped" }, first_hop);
}
}
// Add the payee as a target, so that the payee-to-payer
// search algorithm knows what to start with.
- match network.get_nodes().get(payee) {
+ match network_nodes.get(&payee_node_id) {
// The payee is not in our network graph, so nothing to add here.
// There is still a chance of reaching them via last_hops though,
// so don't yet fail the payment here.
// If not, targets.pop() will not even let us enter the loop in step 2.
None => {},
Some(node) => {
- add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, payee, 0, path_value_msat, 0);
+ add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0u64);
},
}
- // Step (1).
+ // Step (2).
// If a caller provided us with last hops, add them to routing targets. Since this happens
// earlier than general path finding, they will be somewhat prioritized, although currently
// it matters only if the fees are exactly the same.
- for hop in last_hops.iter() {
+ for route in payee.route_hints.iter().filter(|route| !route.0.is_empty()) {
+ let first_hop_in_route = &(route.0)[0];
let have_hop_src_in_graph =
- if let Some(&(ref first_hop, ref features, ref outbound_capacity_msat)) = first_hop_targets.get(&hop.src_node_id) {
- // If this hop connects to a node with which we have a direct channel, ignore
- // the network graph and add both the hop and our direct channel to
- // the candidate set.
- //
- // Currently there are no channel-context features defined, so we are a
- // bit lazy here. In the future, we should pull them out via our
- // ChannelManager, but there's no reason to waste the space until we
- // need them.
- add_entry!(first_hop, *our_node_id , hop.src_node_id, dummy_directional_info, Some(outbound_capacity_msat / 1000), features.to_context(), 0, path_value_msat, 0);
- true
- } else {
- // In any other case, only add the hop if the source is in the regular network
- // graph:
- network.get_nodes().get(&hop.src_node_id).is_some()
- };
+ // Only add the hops in this route to our candidate set if either
+ // we have a direct channel to the first hop or the first hop is
+ // in the regular network graph.
+ first_hop_targets.get(&NodeId::from_pubkey(&first_hop_in_route.src_node_id)).is_some() ||
+ network_nodes.get(&NodeId::from_pubkey(&first_hop_in_route.src_node_id)).is_some();
if have_hop_src_in_graph {
- // BOLT 11 doesn't allow inclusion of features for the last hop hints, which
- // really sucks, cause we're gonna need that eventually.
- let last_hop_htlc_minimum_msat: u64 = match hop.htlc_minimum_msat {
- Some(htlc_minimum_msat) => htlc_minimum_msat,
- None => 0
- };
- let directional_info = DummyDirectionalChannelInfo {
- cltv_expiry_delta: hop.cltv_expiry_delta as u32,
- htlc_minimum_msat: last_hop_htlc_minimum_msat,
- htlc_maximum_msat: hop.htlc_maximum_msat,
- fees: hop.fees,
- };
- add_entry!(hop.short_channel_id, hop.src_node_id, payee, directional_info, None::<u64>, ChannelFeatures::empty(), 0, path_value_msat, 0);
+ // We start building the path from reverse, i.e., from payee
+ // to the first RouteHintHop in the path.
+ let hop_iter = route.0.iter().rev();
+ let prev_hop_iter = core::iter::once(&payee.pubkey).chain(
+ route.0.iter().skip(1).rev().map(|hop| &hop.src_node_id));
+ let mut hop_used = true;
+ let mut aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat: u64 = 0;
+ let mut aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat: u64 = 0;
+ let mut aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat: u64 = 0;
+
+ for (idx, (hop, prev_hop_id)) in hop_iter.zip(prev_hop_iter).enumerate() {
+ // BOLT 11 doesn't allow inclusion of features for the last hop hints, which
+ // really sucks, cause we're gonna need that eventually.
+ let hop_htlc_minimum_msat: u64 = hop.htlc_minimum_msat.unwrap_or(0);
+
+ let directional_info = DummyDirectionalChannelInfo {
+ cltv_expiry_delta: hop.cltv_expiry_delta as u32,
+ htlc_minimum_msat: hop_htlc_minimum_msat,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: hop.htlc_maximum_msat,
+ fees: hop.fees,
+ };
+
+ // We want a value of final_value_msat * ROUTE_CAPACITY_PROVISION_FACTOR but we
+ // need it to increment at each hop by the fee charged at later hops. Further,
+ // we need to ensure we round up when we divide to get satoshis.
+ let channel_cap_msat = final_value_msat
+ .checked_mul(ROUTE_CAPACITY_PROVISION_FACTOR).and_then(|v| v.checked_add(aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat))
+ .unwrap_or(u64::max_value());
+ let channel_cap_sat = match channel_cap_msat.checked_add(999) {
+ None => break, // We overflowed above, just ignore this route hint
+ Some(val) => Some(val / 1000),
+ };
+
+ let src_node_id = NodeId::from_pubkey(&hop.src_node_id);
+ let dest_node_id = NodeId::from_pubkey(&prev_hop_id);
+ aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat = aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat
+ .checked_add(scorer.channel_penalty_msat(hop.short_channel_id, final_value_msat, None, &src_node_id, &dest_node_id))
+ .unwrap_or_else(|| u64::max_value());
+
+ // We assume that the recipient only included route hints for routes which had
+ // sufficient value to route `final_value_msat`. Note that in the case of "0-value"
+ // invoices where the invoice does not specify value this may not be the case, but
+ // better to include the hints than not.
+ if !add_entry!(hop.short_channel_id, src_node_id, dest_node_id, directional_info, channel_cap_sat, &empty_channel_features, aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat) {
+ // If this hop was not used then there is no use checking the preceding hops
+ // in the RouteHint. We can break by just searching for a direct channel between
+ // last checked hop and first_hop_targets
+ hop_used = false;
+ }
+
+ // Searching for a direct channel between last checked hop and first_hop_targets
+ if let Some(first_channels) = first_hop_targets.get(&NodeId::from_pubkey(&prev_hop_id)) {
+ for (ref first_hop, ref features, ref outbound_capacity_msat, _) in first_channels {
+ add_entry!(first_hop, our_node_id , NodeId::from_pubkey(&prev_hop_id), dummy_directional_info, Some(outbound_capacity_msat / 1000), features, aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat);
+ }
+ }
+
+ if !hop_used {
+ break;
+ }
+
+ // In the next values of the iterator, the aggregate fees already reflects
+ // the sum of value sent from payer (final_value_msat) and routing fees
+ // for the last node in the RouteHint. We need to just add the fees to
+ // route through the current node so that the preceeding node (next iteration)
+ // can use it.
+ let hops_fee = compute_fees(aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat + final_value_msat, hop.fees)
+ .map_or(None, |inc| inc.checked_add(aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat));
+ aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat = if let Some(val) = hops_fee { val } else { break; };
+
+ let hop_htlc_minimum_msat_inc = if let Some(val) = compute_fees(aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, hop.fees) { val } else { break; };
+ let hops_path_htlc_minimum = aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat
+ .checked_add(hop_htlc_minimum_msat_inc);
+ aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat = if let Some(val) = hops_path_htlc_minimum { cmp::max(hop_htlc_minimum_msat, val) } else { break; };
+
+ if idx == route.0.len() - 1 {
+ // The last hop in this iterator is the first hop in
+ // overall RouteHint.
+ // If this hop connects to a node with which we have a direct channel,
+ // ignore the network graph and, if the last hop was added, add our
+ // direct channel to the candidate set.
+ //
+ // Note that we *must* check if the last hop was added as `add_entry`
+ // always assumes that the third argument is a node to which we have a
+ // path.
+ if let Some(first_channels) = first_hop_targets.get(&NodeId::from_pubkey(&hop.src_node_id)) {
+ for (ref first_hop, ref features, ref outbound_capacity_msat, _) in first_channels {
+ add_entry!(first_hop, our_node_id , NodeId::from_pubkey(&hop.src_node_id), dummy_directional_info, Some(outbound_capacity_msat / 1000), features, aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
}
}
+ log_trace!(logger, "Starting main path collection loop with {} nodes pre-filled from first/last hops.", targets.len());
+
// At this point, targets are filled with the data from first and
// last hops communicated by the caller, and the payment receiver.
let mut found_new_path = false;
- // Step (2).
+ // Step (3).
// If this loop terminates due the exhaustion of targets, two situations are possible:
// - not enough outgoing liquidity:
// 0 < already_collected_value_msat < final_value_msat
// Both these cases (and other cases except reaching recommended_value_msat) mean that
// paths_collection will be stopped because found_new_path==false.
// This is not necessarily a routing failure.
- 'path_construction: while let Some(RouteGraphNode { pubkey, lowest_fee_to_node, value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat, .. }) = targets.pop() {
+ 'path_construction: while let Some(RouteGraphNode { node_id, lowest_fee_to_node, value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat, path_penalty_msat, .. }) = targets.pop() {
// Since we're going payee-to-payer, hitting our node as a target means we should stop
// traversing the graph and arrange the path out of what we found.
- if pubkey == *our_node_id {
+ if node_id == our_node_id {
let mut new_entry = dist.remove(&our_node_id).unwrap();
- let mut ordered_hops = vec!(new_entry.clone());
+ let mut ordered_hops = vec!((new_entry.clone(), NodeFeatures::empty()));
'path_walk: loop {
- if let Some(&(_, ref features, _)) = first_hop_targets.get(&ordered_hops.last().unwrap().route_hop.pubkey) {
- ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().route_hop.node_features = features.to_context();
- } else if let Some(node) = network.get_nodes().get(&ordered_hops.last().unwrap().route_hop.pubkey) {
- if let Some(node_info) = node.announcement_info.as_ref() {
- ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().route_hop.node_features = node_info.features.clone();
+ let mut features_set = false;
+ if let Some(first_channels) = first_hop_targets.get(&ordered_hops.last().unwrap().0.node_id) {
+ for (scid, _, _, ref features) in first_channels {
+ if *scid == ordered_hops.last().unwrap().0.short_channel_id {
+ ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().1 = features.clone();
+ features_set = true;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ if !features_set {
+ if let Some(node) = network_nodes.get(&ordered_hops.last().unwrap().0.node_id) {
+ if let Some(node_info) = node.announcement_info.as_ref() {
+ ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().1 = node_info.features.clone();
+ } else {
+ ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().1 = NodeFeatures::empty();
+ }
} else {
- ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().route_hop.node_features = NodeFeatures::empty();
+ // We should be able to fill in features for everything except the last
+ // hop, if the last hop was provided via a BOLT 11 invoice (though we
+ // should be able to extend it further as BOLT 11 does have feature
+ // flags for the last hop node itself).
+ assert!(ordered_hops.last().unwrap().0.node_id == payee_node_id);
}
- } else {
- // We should be able to fill in features for everything except the last
- // hop, if the last hop was provided via a BOLT 11 invoice (though we
- // should be able to extend it further as BOLT 11 does have feature
- // flags for the last hop node itself).
- assert!(ordered_hops.last().unwrap().route_hop.pubkey == *payee);
}
// Means we succesfully traversed from the payer to the payee, now
// save this path for the payment route. Also, update the liquidity
// remaining on the used hops, so that we take them into account
// while looking for more paths.
- if ordered_hops.last().unwrap().route_hop.pubkey == *payee {
+ if ordered_hops.last().unwrap().0.node_id == payee_node_id {
break 'path_walk;
}
- new_entry = match dist.remove(&ordered_hops.last().unwrap().route_hop.pubkey) {
+ new_entry = match dist.remove(&ordered_hops.last().unwrap().0.node_id) {
Some(payment_hop) => payment_hop,
// We can't arrive at None because, if we ever add an entry to targets,
// we also fill in the entry in dist (see add_entry!).
// We "propagate" the fees one hop backward (topologically) here,
// so that fees paid for a HTLC forwarding on the current channel are
// associated with the previous channel (where they will be subtracted).
- ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().route_hop.fee_msat = new_entry.hop_use_fee_msat;
- ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().route_hop.cltv_expiry_delta = new_entry.route_hop.cltv_expiry_delta;
- ordered_hops.push(new_entry.clone());
+ ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().0.fee_msat = new_entry.hop_use_fee_msat;
+ ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().0.cltv_expiry_delta = new_entry.cltv_expiry_delta;
+ ordered_hops.push((new_entry.clone(), NodeFeatures::empty()));
}
- ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().route_hop.fee_msat = value_contribution_msat;
- ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().hop_use_fee_msat = 0;
- ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().route_hop.cltv_expiry_delta = final_cltv;
+ ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().0.fee_msat = value_contribution_msat;
+ ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().0.hop_use_fee_msat = 0;
+ ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().0.cltv_expiry_delta = final_cltv_expiry_delta;
+
+ log_trace!(logger, "Found a path back to us from the target with {} hops contributing up to {} msat: {:?}",
+ ordered_hops.len(), value_contribution_msat, ordered_hops);
let mut payment_path = PaymentPath {hops: ordered_hops};
// Remember that we used these channels so that we don't rely
// on the same liquidity in future paths.
let mut prevented_redundant_path_selection = false;
- for payment_hop in payment_path.hops.iter() {
- let channel_liquidity_available_msat = bookkeeped_channels_liquidity_available_msat.get_mut(&payment_hop.route_hop.short_channel_id).unwrap();
+ for (payment_hop, _) in payment_path.hops.iter() {
+ let channel_liquidity_available_msat = bookkeeped_channels_liquidity_available_msat.get_mut(&payment_hop.short_channel_id).unwrap();
let mut spent_on_hop_msat = value_contribution_msat;
let next_hops_fee_msat = payment_hop.next_hops_fee_msat;
spent_on_hop_msat += next_hops_fee_msat;
- if *channel_liquidity_available_msat < spent_on_hop_msat {
- // This should not happen because we do recompute fees right before,
- // trying to avoid cases when a hop is not usable due to the fee situation.
- break 'path_construction;
- }
if spent_on_hop_msat == *channel_liquidity_available_msat {
// If this path used all of this channel's available liquidity, we know
// this path will not be selected again in the next loop iteration.
// If we weren't capped by hitting a liquidity limit on a channel in the path,
// we'll probably end up picking the same path again on the next iteration.
// Decrease the available liquidity of a hop in the middle of the path.
- let victim_liquidity = bookkeeped_channels_liquidity_available_msat.get_mut(
- &payment_path.hops[(payment_path.hops.len() - 1) / 2].route_hop.short_channel_id).unwrap();
+ let victim_scid = payment_path.hops[(payment_path.hops.len() - 1) / 2].0.short_channel_id;
+ log_trace!(logger, "Disabling channel {} for future path building iterations to avoid duplicates.", victim_scid);
+ let victim_liquidity = bookkeeped_channels_liquidity_available_msat.get_mut(&victim_scid).unwrap();
*victim_liquidity = 0;
}
break 'path_construction;
}
+ // If we found a path back to the payee, we shouldn't try to process it again. This is
+ // the equivalent of the `elem.was_processed` check in
+ // add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!() (see comment there for more info).
+ if node_id == payee_node_id { continue 'path_construction; }
+
// Otherwise, since the current target node is not us,
// keep "unrolling" the payment graph from payee to payer by
// finding a way to reach the current target from the payer side.
- match network.get_nodes().get(&pubkey) {
+ match network_nodes.get(&node_id) {
None => {},
Some(node) => {
- add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, &pubkey, lowest_fee_to_node, value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat);
+ add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, node_id, lowest_fee_to_node, value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat, path_penalty_msat);
},
}
}
break 'paths_collection;
}
- // Step (3).
+ // Step (4).
// Stop either when the recommended value is reached or if no new path was found in this
// iteration.
// In the latter case, making another path finding attempt won't help,
// because we deterministically terminated the search due to low liquidity.
if already_collected_value_msat >= recommended_value_msat || !found_new_path {
+ log_trace!(logger, "Have now collected {} msat (seeking {} msat) in paths. Last path loop {} a new path.",
+ already_collected_value_msat, recommended_value_msat, if found_new_path { "found" } else { "did not find" });
break 'paths_collection;
} else if found_new_path && already_collected_value_msat == final_value_msat && payment_paths.len() == 1 {
// Further, if this was our first walk of the graph, and we weren't limited by an
// potentially allowing us to pay fees to meet the htlc_minimum on the new path while
// still keeping a lower total fee than this path.
if !hit_minimum_limit {
+ log_trace!(logger, "Collected exactly our payment amount on the first pass, without hitting an htlc_minimum_msat limit, exiting.");
break 'paths_collection;
}
+ log_trace!(logger, "Collected our payment amount on the first pass, but running again to collect extra paths with a potentially higher limit.");
path_value_msat = recommended_value_msat;
}
}
- // Step (4).
+ // Step (5).
if payment_paths.len() == 0 {
return Err(LightningError{err: "Failed to find a path to the given destination".to_owned(), action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError});
}
let mut cur_route = Vec::<PaymentPath>::new();
let mut aggregate_route_value_msat = 0;
- // Step (5).
+ // Step (6).
// TODO: real random shuffle
// Currently just starts with i_th and goes up to i-1_th in a looped way.
let cur_payment_paths = [&payment_paths[i..], &payment_paths[..i]].concat();
- // Step (6).
+ // Step (7).
for payment_path in cur_payment_paths {
cur_route.push(payment_path.clone());
aggregate_route_value_msat += payment_path.get_value_msat();
assert!(cur_route.len() > 0);
- // Step (7).
+ // Step (8).
// Now, substract the overpaid value from the most-expensive path.
// TODO: this could also be optimized by also sorting by feerate_per_sat_routed,
// so that the sender pays less fees overall. And also htlc_minimum_msat.
- cur_route.sort_by_key(|path| { path.hops.iter().map(|hop| hop.channel_fees.proportional_millionths as u64).sum::<u64>() });
+ cur_route.sort_by_key(|path| { path.hops.iter().map(|hop| hop.0.channel_fees.proportional_millionths as u64).sum::<u64>() });
let expensive_payment_path = cur_route.first_mut().unwrap();
// We already dropped all the small channels above, meaning all the
// remaining channels are larger than remaining overpaid_value_msat.
drawn_routes.push(cur_route);
}
- // Step (8).
+ // Step (9).
// Select the best route by lowest total fee.
drawn_routes.sort_by_key(|paths| paths.iter().map(|path| path.get_total_fee_paid_msat()).sum::<u64>());
- let mut selected_paths = Vec::<Vec<RouteHop>>::new();
+ let mut selected_paths = Vec::<Vec<Result<RouteHop, LightningError>>>::new();
for payment_path in drawn_routes.first().unwrap() {
- selected_paths.push(payment_path.hops.iter().map(|payment_hop| payment_hop.route_hop.clone()).collect());
+ selected_paths.push(payment_path.hops.iter().map(|(payment_hop, node_features)| {
+ Ok(RouteHop {
+ pubkey: PublicKey::from_slice(payment_hop.node_id.as_slice()).map_err(|_| LightningError{err: format!("Public key {:?} is invalid", &payment_hop.node_id), action: ErrorAction::IgnoreAndLog(Level::Trace)})?,
+ node_features: node_features.clone(),
+ short_channel_id: payment_hop.short_channel_id,
+ channel_features: payment_hop.channel_features.clone(),
+ fee_msat: payment_hop.fee_msat,
+ cltv_expiry_delta: payment_hop.cltv_expiry_delta,
+ })
+ }).collect());
}
- if let Some(features) = &payee_features {
+ if let Some(features) = &payee.features {
for path in selected_paths.iter_mut() {
- path.last_mut().unwrap().node_features = features.to_context();
+ if let Ok(route_hop) = path.last_mut().unwrap() {
+ route_hop.node_features = features.to_context();
+ }
}
}
- let route = Route { paths: selected_paths };
- log_trace!(logger, "Got route: {}", log_route!(route));
+ let route = Route {
+ paths: selected_paths.into_iter().map(|path| path.into_iter().collect()).collect::<Result<Vec<_>, _>>()?,
+ payee: Some(payee.clone()),
+ };
+ log_info!(logger, "Got route to {}: {}", payee.pubkey, log_route!(route));
Ok(route)
}
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
- use routing::router::{get_route, RouteHint, RoutingFees};
- use routing::network_graph::{NetworkGraph, NetGraphMsgHandler};
+ use routing::scoring::Score;
+ use routing::network_graph::{NetworkGraph, NetGraphMsgHandler, NodeId};
+ use routing::router::{get_route, Payee, Route, RouteHint, RouteHintHop, RouteHop, RoutingFees};
+ use chain::transaction::OutPoint;
use ln::features::{ChannelFeatures, InitFeatures, InvoiceFeatures, NodeFeatures};
use ln::msgs::{ErrorAction, LightningError, OptionalField, UnsignedChannelAnnouncement, ChannelAnnouncement, RoutingMessageHandler,
NodeAnnouncement, UnsignedNodeAnnouncement, ChannelUpdate, UnsignedChannelUpdate};
use ln::channelmanager;
use util::test_utils;
use util::ser::Writeable;
+ #[cfg(c_bindings)]
+ use util::ser::Writer;
use bitcoin::hashes::sha256d::Hash as Sha256dHash;
use bitcoin::hashes::Hash;
use bitcoin::secp256k1::key::{PublicKey,SecretKey};
use bitcoin::secp256k1::{Secp256k1, All};
- use std::sync::Arc;
+ use prelude::*;
+ use sync::{self, Arc};
+
+ fn get_channel_details(short_channel_id: Option<u64>, node_id: PublicKey,
+ features: InitFeatures, outbound_capacity_msat: u64) -> channelmanager::ChannelDetails {
+ channelmanager::ChannelDetails {
+ channel_id: [0; 32],
+ counterparty: channelmanager::ChannelCounterparty {
+ features,
+ node_id,
+ unspendable_punishment_reserve: 0,
+ forwarding_info: None,
+ },
+ funding_txo: Some(OutPoint { txid: bitcoin::Txid::from_slice(&[0; 32]).unwrap(), index: 0 }),
+ short_channel_id,
+ channel_value_satoshis: 0,
+ user_channel_id: 0,
+ balance_msat: 0,
+ outbound_capacity_msat,
+ inbound_capacity_msat: 42,
+ unspendable_punishment_reserve: None,
+ confirmations_required: None,
+ force_close_spend_delay: None,
+ is_outbound: true, is_funding_locked: true,
+ is_usable: true, is_public: true,
+ }
+ }
// Using the same keys for LN and BTC ids
- fn add_channel(net_graph_msg_handler: &NetGraphMsgHandler<Arc<test_utils::TestChainSource>, Arc<test_utils::TestLogger>>, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<All>, node_1_privkey: &SecretKey,
- node_2_privkey: &SecretKey, features: ChannelFeatures, short_channel_id: u64) {
+ fn add_channel(
+ net_graph_msg_handler: &NetGraphMsgHandler<Arc<NetworkGraph>, Arc<test_utils::TestChainSource>, Arc<test_utils::TestLogger>>,
+ secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<All>, node_1_privkey: &SecretKey, node_2_privkey: &SecretKey, features: ChannelFeatures, short_channel_id: u64
+ ) {
let node_id_1 = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, node_1_privkey);
let node_id_2 = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, node_2_privkey);
};
}
- fn update_channel(net_graph_msg_handler: &NetGraphMsgHandler<Arc<test_utils::TestChainSource>, Arc<test_utils::TestLogger>>, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<All>, node_privkey: &SecretKey, update: UnsignedChannelUpdate) {
+ fn update_channel(
+ net_graph_msg_handler: &NetGraphMsgHandler<Arc<NetworkGraph>, Arc<test_utils::TestChainSource>, Arc<test_utils::TestLogger>>,
+ secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<All>, node_privkey: &SecretKey, update: UnsignedChannelUpdate
+ ) {
let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&update.encode()[..])[..]);
let valid_channel_update = ChannelUpdate {
signature: secp_ctx.sign(&msghash, node_privkey),
};
}
- fn add_or_update_node(net_graph_msg_handler: &NetGraphMsgHandler<Arc<test_utils::TestChainSource>, Arc<test_utils::TestLogger>>, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<All>, node_privkey: &SecretKey,
- features: NodeFeatures, timestamp: u32) {
+ fn add_or_update_node(
+ net_graph_msg_handler: &NetGraphMsgHandler<Arc<NetworkGraph>, Arc<test_utils::TestChainSource>, Arc<test_utils::TestLogger>>,
+ secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<All>, node_privkey: &SecretKey, features: NodeFeatures, timestamp: u32
+ ) {
let node_id = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, node_privkey);
let unsigned_announcement = UnsignedNodeAnnouncement {
features,
}
}
- fn build_graph() -> (Secp256k1<All>, NetGraphMsgHandler<std::sync::Arc<test_utils::TestChainSource>, std::sync::Arc<crate::util::test_utils::TestLogger>>, std::sync::Arc<test_utils::TestChainSource>, std::sync::Arc<test_utils::TestLogger>) {
+ fn build_graph() -> (
+ Secp256k1<All>,
+ sync::Arc<NetworkGraph>,
+ NetGraphMsgHandler<sync::Arc<NetworkGraph>, sync::Arc<test_utils::TestChainSource>, sync::Arc<crate::util::test_utils::TestLogger>>,
+ sync::Arc<test_utils::TestChainSource>,
+ sync::Arc<test_utils::TestLogger>,
+ ) {
let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
let logger = Arc::new(test_utils::TestLogger::new());
let chain_monitor = Arc::new(test_utils::TestChainSource::new(Network::Testnet));
- let net_graph_msg_handler = NetGraphMsgHandler::new(genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash(), None, Arc::clone(&logger));
- // Build network from our_id to node7:
+ let network_graph = Arc::new(NetworkGraph::new(genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash()));
+ let net_graph_msg_handler = NetGraphMsgHandler::new(Arc::clone(&network_graph), None, Arc::clone(&logger));
+ // Build network from our_id to node6:
//
// -1(1)2- node0 -1(3)2-
// / \
// \ /
// -1(7)2- node5 -1(10)2-
//
+ // Channels 5, 8, 9 and 10 are private channels.
+ //
// chan5 1-to-2: enabled, 100 msat fee
// chan5 2-to-1: enabled, 0 fee
//
add_or_update_node(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &privkeys[5], NodeFeatures::from_le_bytes(id_to_feature_flags(6)), 0);
- (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, chain_monitor, logger)
+ (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, chain_monitor, logger)
}
#[test]
fn simple_route_test() {
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
// Simple route to 2 via 1
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, None, &Vec::new(), 0, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 0, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send a payment of 0 msat");
} else { panic!(); }
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, None, &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]);
#[test]
fn invalid_first_hop_test() {
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
// Simple route to 2 via 1
- let our_chans = vec![channelmanager::ChannelDetails {
- channel_id: [0; 32],
- short_channel_id: Some(2),
- remote_network_id: our_id,
- counterparty_features: InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]),
- channel_value_satoshis: 100000,
- user_id: 0,
- outbound_capacity_msat: 100000,
- inbound_capacity_msat: 100000,
- is_live: true,
- counterparty_forwarding_info: None,
- }];
-
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) {
- assert_eq!(err, "First hop cannot have our_node_id as a destination.");
+ let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(2), our_id, InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), 100000)];
+
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ assert_eq!(err, "First hop cannot have our_node_pubkey as a destination.");
} else { panic!(); }
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, None, &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
}
#[test]
fn htlc_minimum_test() {
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
// Simple route to 2 via 1
});
// Not possible to send 199_999_999, because the minimum on channel=2 is 200_000_000.
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, None, &Vec::new(), 199_999_999, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 199_999_999, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a path to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
});
// A payment above the minimum should pass
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, None, &Vec::new(), 199_999_999, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 199_999_999, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
}
#[test]
fn htlc_minimum_overpay_test() {
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
// A route to node#2 via two paths.
// One path allows transferring 35-40 sats, another one also allows 35-40 sats.
excess_data: Vec::new()
});
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
// Overpay fees to hit htlc_minimum_msat.
let overpaid_fees = route.paths[0][0].fee_msat + route.paths[1][0].fee_msat;
// TODO: this could be better balanced to overpay 10k and not 15k.
excess_data: Vec::new()
});
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
// Fine to overpay for htlc_minimum_msat if it allows us to save fee.
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].short_channel_id, 12);
let fees = route.paths[0][0].fee_msat;
assert_eq!(fees, 5_000);
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
// Not fine to overpay for htlc_minimum_msat if it requires paying more than fee on
// the other channel.
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
#[test]
fn disable_channels_test() {
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
// // Disable channels 4 and 12 by flags=2
update_channel(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &privkeys[1], UnsignedChannelUpdate {
});
// If all the channels require some features we don't understand, route should fail
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, None, &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a path to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
// If we specify a channel to node7, that overrides our local channel view and that gets used
- let our_chans = vec![channelmanager::ChannelDetails {
- channel_id: [0; 32],
- short_channel_id: Some(42),
- remote_network_id: nodes[7].clone(),
- counterparty_features: InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]),
- channel_value_satoshis: 0,
- user_id: 0,
- outbound_capacity_msat: 250_000_000,
- inbound_capacity_msat: 0,
- is_live: true,
- counterparty_forwarding_info: None,
- }];
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(42), nodes[7].clone(), InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), 250_000_000)];
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[7]);
#[test]
fn disable_node_test() {
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (_, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
// Disable nodes 1, 2, and 8 by requiring unknown feature bits
- let mut unknown_features = NodeFeatures::known();
- unknown_features.set_required_unknown_bits();
+ let unknown_features = NodeFeatures::known().set_unknown_feature_required();
add_or_update_node(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &privkeys[0], unknown_features.clone(), 1);
add_or_update_node(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &privkeys[1], unknown_features.clone(), 1);
add_or_update_node(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &privkeys[7], unknown_features.clone(), 1);
// If all nodes require some features we don't understand, route should fail
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, None, &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a path to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
// If we specify a channel to node7, that overrides our local channel view and that gets used
- let our_chans = vec![channelmanager::ChannelDetails {
- channel_id: [0; 32],
- short_channel_id: Some(42),
- remote_network_id: nodes[7].clone(),
- counterparty_features: InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]),
- channel_value_satoshis: 0,
- user_id: 0,
- outbound_capacity_msat: 250_000_000,
- inbound_capacity_msat: 0,
- is_live: true,
- counterparty_forwarding_info: None,
- }];
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(42), nodes[7].clone(), InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), 250_000_000)];
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[7]);
#[test]
fn our_chans_test() {
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
// Route to 1 via 2 and 3 because our channel to 1 is disabled
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[0], None, None, &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[0]);
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 3);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].channel_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(3));
// If we specify a channel to node7, that overrides our local channel view and that gets used
- let our_chans = vec![channelmanager::ChannelDetails {
- channel_id: [0; 32],
- short_channel_id: Some(42),
- remote_network_id: nodes[7].clone(),
- counterparty_features: InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]),
- channel_value_satoshis: 0,
- user_id: 0,
- outbound_capacity_msat: 250_000_000,
- inbound_capacity_msat: 0,
- is_live: true,
- counterparty_forwarding_info: None,
- }];
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]);
+ let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(42), nodes[7].clone(), InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), 250_000_000)];
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[7]);
base_msat: 0,
proportional_millionths: 0,
};
- vec!(RouteHint {
- src_node_id: nodes[3].clone(),
+ vec![RouteHint(vec![RouteHintHop {
+ src_node_id: nodes[3],
+ short_channel_id: 8,
+ fees: zero_fees,
+ cltv_expiry_delta: (8 << 8) | 1,
+ htlc_minimum_msat: None,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: None,
+ }
+ ]), RouteHint(vec![RouteHintHop {
+ src_node_id: nodes[4],
+ short_channel_id: 9,
+ fees: RoutingFees {
+ base_msat: 1001,
+ proportional_millionths: 0,
+ },
+ cltv_expiry_delta: (9 << 8) | 1,
+ htlc_minimum_msat: None,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: None,
+ }]), RouteHint(vec![RouteHintHop {
+ src_node_id: nodes[5],
+ short_channel_id: 10,
+ fees: zero_fees,
+ cltv_expiry_delta: (10 << 8) | 1,
+ htlc_minimum_msat: None,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: None,
+ }])]
+ }
+
+ fn last_hops_multi_private_channels(nodes: &Vec<PublicKey>) -> Vec<RouteHint> {
+ let zero_fees = RoutingFees {
+ base_msat: 0,
+ proportional_millionths: 0,
+ };
+ vec![RouteHint(vec![RouteHintHop {
+ src_node_id: nodes[2],
+ short_channel_id: 5,
+ fees: RoutingFees {
+ base_msat: 100,
+ proportional_millionths: 0,
+ },
+ cltv_expiry_delta: (5 << 8) | 1,
+ htlc_minimum_msat: None,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: None,
+ }, RouteHintHop {
+ src_node_id: nodes[3],
short_channel_id: 8,
fees: zero_fees,
cltv_expiry_delta: (8 << 8) | 1,
htlc_minimum_msat: None,
htlc_maximum_msat: None,
- }, RouteHint {
- src_node_id: nodes[4].clone(),
+ }
+ ]), RouteHint(vec![RouteHintHop {
+ src_node_id: nodes[4],
short_channel_id: 9,
fees: RoutingFees {
base_msat: 1001,
cltv_expiry_delta: (9 << 8) | 1,
htlc_minimum_msat: None,
htlc_maximum_msat: None,
- }, RouteHint {
- src_node_id: nodes[5].clone(),
+ }]), RouteHint(vec![RouteHintHop {
+ src_node_id: nodes[5],
short_channel_id: 10,
fees: zero_fees,
cltv_expiry_delta: (10 << 8) | 1,
htlc_minimum_msat: None,
htlc_maximum_msat: None,
- })
+ }])]
}
#[test]
- fn last_hops_test() {
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ fn partial_route_hint_test() {
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
// Simple test across 2, 3, 5, and 4 via a last_hop channel
+ // Tests the behaviour when the RouteHint contains a suboptimal hop.
+ // RouteHint may be partially used by the algo to build the best path.
- // First check that lst hop can't have its source as the payee.
- let invalid_last_hop = RouteHint {
+ // First check that last hop can't have its source as the payee.
+ let invalid_last_hop = RouteHint(vec![RouteHintHop {
src_node_id: nodes[6],
short_channel_id: 8,
fees: RoutingFees {
cltv_expiry_delta: (8 << 8) | 1,
htlc_minimum_msat: None,
htlc_maximum_msat: None,
- };
+ }]);
- let mut invalid_last_hops = last_hops(&nodes);
+ let mut invalid_last_hops = last_hops_multi_private_channels(&nodes);
invalid_last_hops.push(invalid_last_hop);
{
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[6], None, None, &invalid_last_hops.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) {
- assert_eq!(err, "Last hop cannot have a payee as a source.");
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(invalid_last_hops);
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ assert_eq!(err, "Route hint cannot have the payee as the source.");
} else { panic!(); }
}
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[6], None, None, &last_hops(&nodes).iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops_multi_private_channels(&nodes));
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 5);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly
}
- #[test]
- fn our_chans_last_hop_connect_test() {
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
- let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
-
- // Simple test with outbound channel to 4 to test that last_hops and first_hops connect
- let our_chans = vec![channelmanager::ChannelDetails {
- channel_id: [0; 32],
- short_channel_id: Some(42),
- remote_network_id: nodes[3].clone(),
- counterparty_features: InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]),
- channel_value_satoshis: 0,
- user_id: 0,
- outbound_capacity_msat: 250_000_000,
- inbound_capacity_msat: 0,
- is_live: true,
- counterparty_forwarding_info: None,
- }];
- let mut last_hops = last_hops(&nodes);
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[6], None, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), &last_hops.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
- assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
+ fn empty_last_hop(nodes: &Vec<PublicKey>) -> Vec<RouteHint> {
+ let zero_fees = RoutingFees {
+ base_msat: 0,
+ proportional_millionths: 0,
+ };
+ vec![RouteHint(vec![RouteHintHop {
+ src_node_id: nodes[3],
+ short_channel_id: 8,
+ fees: zero_fees,
+ cltv_expiry_delta: (8 << 8) | 1,
+ htlc_minimum_msat: None,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: None,
+ }]), RouteHint(vec![
- assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[3]);
- assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].short_channel_id, 42);
- assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].fee_msat, 0);
- assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].cltv_expiry_delta, (8 << 8) | 1);
- assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].node_features.le_flags(), &vec![0b11]);
- assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // No feature flags will meet the relevant-to-channel conversion
+ ]), RouteHint(vec![RouteHintHop {
+ src_node_id: nodes[5],
+ short_channel_id: 10,
+ fees: zero_fees,
+ cltv_expiry_delta: (10 << 8) | 1,
+ htlc_minimum_msat: None,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: None,
+ }])]
+ }
- assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].pubkey, nodes[6]);
- assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].short_channel_id, 8);
- assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].fee_msat, 100);
- assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].cltv_expiry_delta, 42);
- assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].node_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
- assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly
+ #[test]
+ fn ignores_empty_last_hops_test() {
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(empty_last_hop(&nodes));
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
- last_hops[0].fees.base_msat = 1000;
+ // Test handling of an empty RouteHint passed in Invoice.
- // Revert to via 6 as the fee on 8 goes up
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[6], None, None, &last_hops.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
- assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 4);
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 5);
+
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].short_channel_id, 2);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].fee_msat, 100);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].cltv_expiry_delta, (4 << 8) | 1);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].node_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(2));
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].channel_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(2));
+
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].pubkey, nodes[2]);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].short_channel_id, 4);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].fee_msat, 0);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].cltv_expiry_delta, (6 << 8) | 1);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].node_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(3));
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].channel_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(4));
+
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].pubkey, nodes[4]);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].short_channel_id, 6);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].fee_msat, 0);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].cltv_expiry_delta, (11 << 8) | 1);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].node_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(5));
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].channel_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(6));
+
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].pubkey, nodes[3]);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].short_channel_id, 11);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].fee_msat, 0);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].cltv_expiry_delta, (8 << 8) | 1);
+ // If we have a peer in the node map, we'll use their features here since we don't have
+ // a way of figuring out their features from the invoice:
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].node_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(4));
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].channel_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(11));
+
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].pubkey, nodes[6]);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].short_channel_id, 8);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].fee_msat, 100);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].cltv_expiry_delta, 42);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].node_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly
+ }
+
+ fn multi_hint_last_hops(nodes: &Vec<PublicKey>) -> Vec<RouteHint> {
+ let zero_fees = RoutingFees {
+ base_msat: 0,
+ proportional_millionths: 0,
+ };
+ vec![RouteHint(vec![RouteHintHop {
+ src_node_id: nodes[2],
+ short_channel_id: 5,
+ fees: RoutingFees {
+ base_msat: 100,
+ proportional_millionths: 0,
+ },
+ cltv_expiry_delta: (5 << 8) | 1,
+ htlc_minimum_msat: None,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: None,
+ }, RouteHintHop {
+ src_node_id: nodes[3],
+ short_channel_id: 8,
+ fees: zero_fees,
+ cltv_expiry_delta: (8 << 8) | 1,
+ htlc_minimum_msat: None,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: None,
+ }]), RouteHint(vec![RouteHintHop {
+ src_node_id: nodes[5],
+ short_channel_id: 10,
+ fees: zero_fees,
+ cltv_expiry_delta: (10 << 8) | 1,
+ htlc_minimum_msat: None,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: None,
+ }])]
+ }
+
+ #[test]
+ fn multi_hint_last_hops_test() {
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (_, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(multi_hint_last_hops(&nodes));
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ // Test through channels 2, 3, 5, 8.
+ // Test shows that multiple hop hints are considered.
+
+ // Disabling channels 6 & 7 by flags=2
+ update_channel(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &privkeys[2], UnsignedChannelUpdate {
+ chain_hash: genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash(),
+ short_channel_id: 6,
+ timestamp: 2,
+ flags: 2, // to disable
+ cltv_expiry_delta: 0,
+ htlc_minimum_msat: 0,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: OptionalField::Absent,
+ fee_base_msat: 0,
+ fee_proportional_millionths: 0,
+ excess_data: Vec::new()
+ });
+ update_channel(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &privkeys[2], UnsignedChannelUpdate {
+ chain_hash: genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash(),
+ short_channel_id: 7,
+ timestamp: 2,
+ flags: 2, // to disable
+ cltv_expiry_delta: 0,
+ htlc_minimum_msat: 0,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: OptionalField::Absent,
+ fee_base_msat: 0,
+ fee_proportional_millionths: 0,
+ excess_data: Vec::new()
+ });
+
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 4);
+
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].short_channel_id, 2);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].fee_msat, 200);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].cltv_expiry_delta, 1025);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].node_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(2));
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].channel_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(2));
+
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].pubkey, nodes[2]);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].short_channel_id, 4);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].fee_msat, 100);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].cltv_expiry_delta, 1281);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].node_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(3));
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].channel_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(4));
+
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].pubkey, nodes[3]);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].short_channel_id, 5);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].fee_msat, 0);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].cltv_expiry_delta, 2049);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].node_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(4));
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new());
+
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].pubkey, nodes[6]);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].short_channel_id, 8);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].fee_msat, 100);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].cltv_expiry_delta, 42);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].node_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly
+ }
+
+ fn last_hops_with_public_channel(nodes: &Vec<PublicKey>) -> Vec<RouteHint> {
+ let zero_fees = RoutingFees {
+ base_msat: 0,
+ proportional_millionths: 0,
+ };
+ vec![RouteHint(vec![RouteHintHop {
+ src_node_id: nodes[4],
+ short_channel_id: 11,
+ fees: zero_fees,
+ cltv_expiry_delta: (11 << 8) | 1,
+ htlc_minimum_msat: None,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: None,
+ }, RouteHintHop {
+ src_node_id: nodes[3],
+ short_channel_id: 8,
+ fees: zero_fees,
+ cltv_expiry_delta: (8 << 8) | 1,
+ htlc_minimum_msat: None,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: None,
+ }]), RouteHint(vec![RouteHintHop {
+ src_node_id: nodes[4],
+ short_channel_id: 9,
+ fees: RoutingFees {
+ base_msat: 1001,
+ proportional_millionths: 0,
+ },
+ cltv_expiry_delta: (9 << 8) | 1,
+ htlc_minimum_msat: None,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: None,
+ }]), RouteHint(vec![RouteHintHop {
+ src_node_id: nodes[5],
+ short_channel_id: 10,
+ fees: zero_fees,
+ cltv_expiry_delta: (10 << 8) | 1,
+ htlc_minimum_msat: None,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: None,
+ }])]
+ }
+
+ #[test]
+ fn last_hops_with_public_channel_test() {
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops_with_public_channel(&nodes));
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ // This test shows that public routes can be present in the invoice
+ // which would be handled in the same manner.
+
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 5);
+
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].short_channel_id, 2);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].fee_msat, 100);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].cltv_expiry_delta, (4 << 8) | 1);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].node_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(2));
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].channel_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(2));
+
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].pubkey, nodes[2]);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].short_channel_id, 4);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].fee_msat, 0);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].cltv_expiry_delta, (6 << 8) | 1);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].node_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(3));
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].channel_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(4));
+
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].pubkey, nodes[4]);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].short_channel_id, 6);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].fee_msat, 0);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].cltv_expiry_delta, (11 << 8) | 1);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].node_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(5));
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].channel_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(6));
+
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].pubkey, nodes[3]);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].short_channel_id, 11);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].fee_msat, 0);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].cltv_expiry_delta, (8 << 8) | 1);
+ // If we have a peer in the node map, we'll use their features here since we don't have
+ // a way of figuring out their features from the invoice:
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].node_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(4));
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new());
+
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].pubkey, nodes[6]);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].short_channel_id, 8);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].fee_msat, 100);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].cltv_expiry_delta, 42);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].node_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly
+ }
+
+ #[test]
+ fn our_chans_last_hop_connect_test() {
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+
+ // Simple test with outbound channel to 4 to test that last_hops and first_hops connect
+ let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(42), nodes[3].clone(), InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), 250_000_000)];
+ let mut last_hops = last_hops(&nodes);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops.clone());
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
+
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[3]);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].short_channel_id, 42);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].fee_msat, 0);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].cltv_expiry_delta, (8 << 8) | 1);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].node_features.le_flags(), &vec![0b11]);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // No feature flags will meet the relevant-to-channel conversion
+
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].pubkey, nodes[6]);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].short_channel_id, 8);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].fee_msat, 100);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].cltv_expiry_delta, 42);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].node_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly
+
+ last_hops[0].0[0].fees.base_msat = 1000;
+
+ // Revert to via 6 as the fee on 8 goes up
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops);
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 4);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].short_channel_id, 2);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly
// ...but still use 8 for larger payments as 6 has a variable feerate
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[6], None, None, &last_hops.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(), 2000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 2000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 5);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly
}
- #[test]
- fn unannounced_path_test() {
- // We should be able to send a payment to a destination without any help of a routing graph
- // if we have a channel with a common counterparty that appears in the first and last hop
- // hints.
+ fn do_unannounced_path_test(last_hop_htlc_max: Option<u64>, last_hop_fee_prop: u32, outbound_capacity_msat: u64, route_val: u64) -> Result<Route, LightningError> {
let source_node_id = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&Secp256k1::new(), &SecretKey::from_slice(&hex::decode(format!("{:02}", 41).repeat(32)).unwrap()[..]).unwrap());
let middle_node_id = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&Secp256k1::new(), &SecretKey::from_slice(&hex::decode(format!("{:02}", 42).repeat(32)).unwrap()[..]).unwrap());
let target_node_id = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&Secp256k1::new(), &SecretKey::from_slice(&hex::decode(format!("{:02}", 43).repeat(32)).unwrap()[..]).unwrap());
// If we specify a channel to a middle hop, that overrides our local channel view and that gets used
- let last_hops = vec![RouteHint {
+ let last_hops = RouteHint(vec![RouteHintHop {
src_node_id: middle_node_id,
short_channel_id: 8,
fees: RoutingFees {
base_msat: 1000,
- proportional_millionths: 0,
+ proportional_millionths: last_hop_fee_prop,
},
cltv_expiry_delta: (8 << 8) | 1,
htlc_minimum_msat: None,
- htlc_maximum_msat: None,
- }];
- let our_chans = vec![channelmanager::ChannelDetails {
- channel_id: [0; 32],
- short_channel_id: Some(42),
- remote_network_id: middle_node_id,
- counterparty_features: InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]),
- channel_value_satoshis: 100000,
- user_id: 0,
- outbound_capacity_msat: 100000,
- inbound_capacity_msat: 100000,
- is_live: true,
- counterparty_forwarding_info: None,
- }];
- let route = get_route(&source_node_id, &NetworkGraph::new(genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash()), &target_node_id, None, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), &last_hops.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(), 100, 42, Arc::new(test_utils::TestLogger::new())).unwrap();
+ htlc_maximum_msat: last_hop_htlc_max,
+ }]);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(target_node_id).with_route_hints(vec![last_hops]);
+ let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(42), middle_node_id, InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), outbound_capacity_msat)];
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ get_route(&source_node_id, &payee, &NetworkGraph::new(genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash()), Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), route_val, 42, &test_utils::TestLogger::new(), &scorer)
+ }
+
+ #[test]
+ fn unannounced_path_test() {
+ // We should be able to send a payment to a destination without any help of a routing graph
+ // if we have a channel with a common counterparty that appears in the first and last hop
+ // hints.
+ let route = do_unannounced_path_test(None, 1, 2000000, 1000000).unwrap();
+ let middle_node_id = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&Secp256k1::new(), &SecretKey::from_slice(&hex::decode(format!("{:02}", 42).repeat(32)).unwrap()[..]).unwrap());
+ let target_node_id = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&Secp256k1::new(), &SecretKey::from_slice(&hex::decode(format!("{:02}", 43).repeat(32)).unwrap()[..]).unwrap());
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, middle_node_id);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].short_channel_id, 42);
- assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].fee_msat, 1000);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].fee_msat, 1001);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].cltv_expiry_delta, (8 << 8) | 1);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].node_features.le_flags(), &[0b11]);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].channel_features.le_flags(), &[0; 0]); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].pubkey, target_node_id);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].short_channel_id, 8);
- assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].fee_msat, 100);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].fee_msat, 1000000);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].cltv_expiry_delta, 42);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].node_features.le_flags(), &[0; 0]); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].channel_features.le_flags(), &[0; 0]); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly
}
+ #[test]
+ fn overflow_unannounced_path_test_liquidity_underflow() {
+ // Previously, when we had a last-hop hint connected directly to a first-hop channel, where
+ // the last-hop had a fee which overflowed a u64, we'd panic.
+ // This was due to us adding the first-hop from us unconditionally, causing us to think
+ // we'd built a path (as our node is in the "best candidate" set), when we had not.
+ // In this test, we previously hit a subtraction underflow due to having less available
+ // liquidity at the last hop than 0.
+ assert!(do_unannounced_path_test(Some(21_000_000_0000_0000_000), 0, 21_000_000_0000_0000_000, 21_000_000_0000_0000_000).is_err());
+ }
+
+ #[test]
+ fn overflow_unannounced_path_test_feerate_overflow() {
+ // This tests for the same case as above, except instead of hitting a subtraction
+ // underflow, we hit a case where the fee charged at a hop overflowed.
+ assert!(do_unannounced_path_test(Some(21_000_000_0000_0000_000), 50000, 21_000_000_0000_0000_000, 21_000_000_0000_0000_000).is_err());
+ }
+
#[test]
fn available_amount_while_routing_test() {
// Tests whether we choose the correct available channel amount while routing.
- let (secp_ctx, mut net_graph_msg_handler, chain_monitor, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, mut net_graph_msg_handler, chain_monitor, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
// We will use a simple single-path route from
// our node to node2 via node0: channels {1, 3}.
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 250_000_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
+ &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 250_000_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route an exact amount we have should be fine.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 250_000_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 250_000_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
let path = route.paths.last().unwrap();
assert_eq!(path.len(), 2);
});
// Now, limit the first_hop by the outbound_capacity_msat of 200_000 sats.
- let our_chans = vec![channelmanager::ChannelDetails {
- channel_id: [0; 32],
- short_channel_id: Some(42),
- remote_network_id: nodes[0].clone(),
- counterparty_features: InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]),
- channel_value_satoshis: 0,
- user_id: 0,
- outbound_capacity_msat: 200_000_000,
- inbound_capacity_msat: 0,
- is_live: true,
- counterparty_forwarding_info: None,
- }];
+ let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(42), nodes[0].clone(), InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), 200_000_000)];
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), &Vec::new(), 200_000_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
+ &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 200_000_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route an exact amount we have should be fine.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), &Vec::new(), 200_000_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 200_000_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
let path = route.paths.last().unwrap();
assert_eq!(path.len(), 2);
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 15_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
+ &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 15_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route an exact amount we have should be fine.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 15_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 15_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
let path = route.paths.last().unwrap();
assert_eq!(path.len(), 2);
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 15_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
+ &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 15_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route an exact amount we have should be fine.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 15_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 15_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
let path = route.paths.last().unwrap();
assert_eq!(path.len(), 2);
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 10_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
+ &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 10_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route an exact amount we have should be fine.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 10_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 10_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
let path = route.paths.last().unwrap();
assert_eq!(path.len(), 2);
fn available_liquidity_last_hop_test() {
// Check that available liquidity properly limits the path even when only
// one of the latter hops is limited.
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[3]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
// Path via {node7, node2, node4} is channels {12, 13, 6, 11}.
// {12, 13, 11} have the capacities of 100, {6} has a capacity of 50.
});
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[3],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
+ &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route 49 sats (just a bit below the capacity).
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[3],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 49_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 49_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
for path in &route.paths {
{
// Attempt to route an exact amount is also fine
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[3],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
for path in &route.paths {
#[test]
fn ignore_fee_first_hop_test() {
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]);
// Path via node0 is channels {1, 3}. Limit them to 100 and 50 sats (total limit 50).
update_channel(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &our_privkey, UnsignedChannelUpdate {
});
{
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, None, &Vec::new(), 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
for path in &route.paths {
#[test]
fn simple_mpp_route_test() {
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
// We need a route consisting of 3 paths:
// From our node to node2 via node0, node7, node1 (three paths one hop each).
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(),
- &nodes[2], Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 300_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
+ &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 300_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route 250 sats (just a bit below the capacity).
// Our algorithm should provide us with these 3 paths.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 250_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 250_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 3);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
for path in &route.paths {
{
// Attempt to route an exact amount is also fine
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 290_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 290_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 3);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
for path in &route.paths {
#[test]
fn long_mpp_route_test() {
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[3]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
// We need a route consisting of 3 paths:
// From our node to node3 via {node0, node2}, {node7, node2, node4} and {node7, node2}.
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[3],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 350_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
+ &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 350_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route 300 sats (exact amount we can route).
// Our algorithm should provide us with these 3 paths, 100 sats each.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[3],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 300_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 300_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 3);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
#[test]
fn mpp_cheaper_route_test() {
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[3]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
// This test checks that if we have two cheaper paths and one more expensive path,
// so that liquidity-wise any 2 of 3 combination is sufficient,
{
// Now, attempt to route 180 sats.
// Our algorithm should provide us with these 2 paths.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[3],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 180_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 180_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 2);
let mut total_value_transferred_msat = 0;
// This test makes sure that MPP algorithm properly takes into account
// fees charged on the channels, by making the fees impactful:
// if the fee is not properly accounted for, the behavior is different.
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[3]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
// We need a route consisting of 2 paths:
// From our node to node3 via {node0, node2} and {node7, node2, node4}.
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[3],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 210_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
+ &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 210_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route 200 sats (exact amount we can route).
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[3],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 200_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 200_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 2);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
total_amount_paid_msat += path.last().unwrap().fee_msat;
}
assert_eq!(total_amount_paid_msat, 200_000);
+ assert_eq!(route.get_total_fees(), 150_000);
}
+ }
+
+ #[test]
+ fn mpp_with_last_hops() {
+ // Previously, if we tried to send an MPP payment to a destination which was only reachable
+ // via a single last-hop route hint, we'd fail to route if we first collected routes
+ // totaling close but not quite enough to fund the full payment.
+ //
+ // This was because we considered last-hop hints to have exactly the sought payment amount
+ // instead of the amount we were trying to collect, needlessly limiting our path searching
+ // at the very first hop.
+ //
+ // Specifically, this interacted with our "all paths must fund at least 5% of total target"
+ // criterion to cause us to refuse all routes at the last hop hint which would be considered
+ // to only have the remaining to-collect amount in available liquidity.
+ //
+ // This bug appeared in production in some specific channel configurations.
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(PublicKey::from_slice(&[02; 33]).unwrap()).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known())
+ .with_route_hints(vec![RouteHint(vec![RouteHintHop {
+ src_node_id: nodes[2],
+ short_channel_id: 42,
+ fees: RoutingFees { base_msat: 0, proportional_millionths: 0 },
+ cltv_expiry_delta: 42,
+ htlc_minimum_msat: None,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: None,
+ }])]);
+
+ // Keep only two paths from us to nodes[2], both with a 99sat HTLC maximum, with one with
+ // no fee and one with a 1msat fee. Previously, trying to route 100 sats to nodes[2] here
+ // would first use the no-fee route and then fail to find a path along the second route as
+ // we think we can only send up to 1 additional sat over the last-hop but refuse to as its
+ // under 5% of our payment amount.
+ update_channel(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &our_privkey, UnsignedChannelUpdate {
+ chain_hash: genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash(),
+ short_channel_id: 1,
+ timestamp: 2,
+ flags: 0,
+ cltv_expiry_delta: u16::max_value(),
+ htlc_minimum_msat: 0,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: OptionalField::Present(99_000),
+ fee_base_msat: u32::max_value(),
+ fee_proportional_millionths: u32::max_value(),
+ excess_data: Vec::new()
+ });
+ update_channel(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &our_privkey, UnsignedChannelUpdate {
+ chain_hash: genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash(),
+ short_channel_id: 2,
+ timestamp: 2,
+ flags: 0,
+ cltv_expiry_delta: u16::max_value(),
+ htlc_minimum_msat: 0,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: OptionalField::Present(99_000),
+ fee_base_msat: u32::max_value(),
+ fee_proportional_millionths: u32::max_value(),
+ excess_data: Vec::new()
+ });
+ update_channel(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &privkeys[1], UnsignedChannelUpdate {
+ chain_hash: genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash(),
+ short_channel_id: 4,
+ timestamp: 2,
+ flags: 0,
+ cltv_expiry_delta: (4 << 8) | 1,
+ htlc_minimum_msat: 0,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: OptionalField::Absent,
+ fee_base_msat: 1,
+ fee_proportional_millionths: 0,
+ excess_data: Vec::new()
+ });
+ update_channel(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &privkeys[7], UnsignedChannelUpdate {
+ chain_hash: genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash(),
+ short_channel_id: 13,
+ timestamp: 2,
+ flags: 0|2, // Channel disabled
+ cltv_expiry_delta: (13 << 8) | 1,
+ htlc_minimum_msat: 0,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: OptionalField::Absent,
+ fee_base_msat: 0,
+ fee_proportional_millionths: 2000000,
+ excess_data: Vec::new()
+ });
+ // Get a route for 100 sats and check that we found the MPP route no problem and didn't
+ // overpay at all.
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 2);
+ // Paths are somewhat randomly ordered, but:
+ // * the first is channel 2 (1 msat fee) -> channel 4 -> channel 42
+ // * the second is channel 1 (0 fee, but 99 sat maximum) -> channel 3 -> channel 42
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].short_channel_id, 2);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].fee_msat, 1);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].fee_msat, 1_000);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[1][0].short_channel_id, 1);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[1][0].fee_msat, 0);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[1][2].fee_msat, 99_000);
+ assert_eq!(route.get_total_fees(), 1);
+ assert_eq!(route.get_total_amount(), 100_000);
}
#[test]
fn drop_lowest_channel_mpp_route_test() {
// This test checks that low-capacity channel is dropped when after
// path finding we realize that we found more capacity than we need.
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
// We need a route consisting of 3 paths:
// From our node to node2 via node0, node7, node1 (three paths one hop each).
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 150_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
+ &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 150_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route 125 sats (just a bit below the capacity of 3 channels).
// Our algorithm should provide us with these 3 paths.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 125_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 125_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 3);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
for path in &route.paths {
{
// Attempt to route without the last small cheap channel
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 90_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 90_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 2);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
for path in &route.paths {
// "previous hop" being set to node 3, creating a loop in the path.
let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
let logger = Arc::new(test_utils::TestLogger::new());
- let net_graph_msg_handler = NetGraphMsgHandler::new(genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash(), None, Arc::clone(&logger));
+ let network_graph = Arc::new(NetworkGraph::new(genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash()));
+ let net_graph_msg_handler = NetGraphMsgHandler::new(Arc::clone(&network_graph), None, Arc::clone(&logger));
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[6]);
add_channel(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &our_privkey, &privkeys[1], ChannelFeatures::from_le_bytes(id_to_feature_flags(6)), 6);
update_channel(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &our_privkey, UnsignedChannelUpdate {
{
// Now ensure the route flows simply over nodes 1 and 4 to 6.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[6], None, None, &Vec::new(), 10_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 10_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 3);
// Test that if, while walking the graph, we find a hop that has exactly enough liquidity
// for us, including later hop fees, we take it. In the first version of our MPP algorithm
// we calculated fees on a higher value, resulting in us ignoring such paths.
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]);
// We modify the graph to set the htlc_maximum of channel 2 to below the value we wish to
// send.
{
// Now, attempt to route 90 sats, which is exactly 90 sats at the last hop, plus the
// 200% fee charged channel 13 in the 1-to-2 direction.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, None, &Vec::new(), 90_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 90_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
// htlc_maximum_msat, we don't end up undershooting a later htlc_minimum_msat. In the
// initial version of MPP we'd accept such routes but reject them while recalculating fees,
// resulting in us thinking there is no possible path, even if other paths exist.
- let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
// We modify the graph to set the htlc_minimum of channel 2 and 4 as needed - channel 2
// gets an htlc_maximum_msat of 80_000 and channel 4 an htlc_minimum_msat of 90_000. We
// Now, attempt to route 90 sats, hitting the htlc_minimum on channel 4, but
// overshooting the htlc_maximum on channel 2. Thus, we should pick the (absurdly
// expensive) channels 12-13 path.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 90_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 90_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].channel_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(13));
}
}
+
+ #[test]
+ fn multiple_direct_first_hops() {
+ // Previously we'd only ever considered one first hop path per counterparty.
+ // However, as we don't restrict users to one channel per peer, we really need to support
+ // looking at all first hop paths.
+ // Here we test that we do not ignore all-but-the-last first hop paths per counterparty (as
+ // we used to do by overwriting the `first_hop_targets` hashmap entry) and that we can MPP
+ // route over multiple channels with the same first hop.
+ let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
+ let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let logger = Arc::new(test_utils::TestLogger::new());
+ let network_graph = NetworkGraph::new(genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash());
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[0]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
+
+ {
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, Some(&[
+ &get_channel_details(Some(3), nodes[0], InitFeatures::known(), 200_000),
+ &get_channel_details(Some(2), nodes[0], InitFeatures::known(), 10_000),
+ ]), 100_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 1);
+
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[0]);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].short_channel_id, 3);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].fee_msat, 100_000);
+ }
+ {
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, Some(&[
+ &get_channel_details(Some(3), nodes[0], InitFeatures::known(), 50_000),
+ &get_channel_details(Some(2), nodes[0], InitFeatures::known(), 50_000),
+ ]), 100_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 2);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 1);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[1].len(), 1);
+
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[0]);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].short_channel_id, 3);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].fee_msat, 50_000);
+
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[1][0].pubkey, nodes[0]);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[1][0].short_channel_id, 2);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[1][0].fee_msat, 50_000);
+ }
+ }
+
+ #[test]
+ fn prefers_shorter_route_with_higher_fees() {
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops(&nodes));
+
+ // Without penalizing each hop 100 msats, a longer path with lower fees is chosen.
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ let route = get_route(
+ &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42,
+ Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer
+ ).unwrap();
+ let path = route.paths[0].iter().map(|hop| hop.short_channel_id).collect::<Vec<_>>();
+
+ assert_eq!(route.get_total_fees(), 100);
+ assert_eq!(route.get_total_amount(), 100);
+ assert_eq!(path, vec![2, 4, 6, 11, 8]);
+
+ // Applying a 100 msat penalty to each hop results in taking channels 7 and 10 to nodes[6]
+ // from nodes[2] rather than channel 6, 11, and 8, even though the longer path is cheaper.
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(100);
+ let route = get_route(
+ &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42,
+ Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer
+ ).unwrap();
+ let path = route.paths[0].iter().map(|hop| hop.short_channel_id).collect::<Vec<_>>();
+
+ assert_eq!(route.get_total_fees(), 300);
+ assert_eq!(route.get_total_amount(), 100);
+ assert_eq!(path, vec![2, 4, 7, 10]);
+ }
+
+ struct BadChannelScorer {
+ short_channel_id: u64,
+ }
+
+ #[cfg(c_bindings)]
+ impl Writeable for BadChannelScorer {
+ fn write<W: Writer>(&self, _w: &mut W) -> Result<(), ::io::Error> { unimplemented!() }
+ }
+ impl Score for BadChannelScorer {
+ fn channel_penalty_msat(&self, short_channel_id: u64, _send_amt: u64, _chan_amt: Option<u64>, _source: &NodeId, _target: &NodeId) -> u64 {
+ if short_channel_id == self.short_channel_id { u64::max_value() } else { 0 }
+ }
+
+ fn payment_path_failed(&mut self, _path: &[&RouteHop], _short_channel_id: u64) {}
+ fn payment_path_successful(&mut self, _path: &[&RouteHop]) {}
+ }
+
+ struct BadNodeScorer {
+ node_id: NodeId,
+ }
+
+ #[cfg(c_bindings)]
+ impl Writeable for BadNodeScorer {
+ fn write<W: Writer>(&self, _w: &mut W) -> Result<(), ::io::Error> { unimplemented!() }
+ }
+
+ impl Score for BadNodeScorer {
+ fn channel_penalty_msat(&self, _short_channel_id: u64, _send_amt: u64, _chan_amt: Option<u64>, _source: &NodeId, target: &NodeId) -> u64 {
+ if *target == self.node_id { u64::max_value() } else { 0 }
+ }
+
+ fn payment_path_failed(&mut self, _path: &[&RouteHop], _short_channel_id: u64) {}
+ fn payment_path_successful(&mut self, _path: &[&RouteHop]) {}
+ }
+
+ #[test]
+ fn avoids_routing_through_bad_channels_and_nodes() {
+ let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph();
+ let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops(&nodes));
+
+ // A path to nodes[6] exists when no penalties are applied to any channel.
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+ let route = get_route(
+ &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42,
+ Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer
+ ).unwrap();
+ let path = route.paths[0].iter().map(|hop| hop.short_channel_id).collect::<Vec<_>>();
+
+ assert_eq!(route.get_total_fees(), 100);
+ assert_eq!(route.get_total_amount(), 100);
+ assert_eq!(path, vec![2, 4, 6, 11, 8]);
+
+ // A different path to nodes[6] exists if channel 6 cannot be routed over.
+ let scorer = BadChannelScorer { short_channel_id: 6 };
+ let route = get_route(
+ &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42,
+ Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer
+ ).unwrap();
+ let path = route.paths[0].iter().map(|hop| hop.short_channel_id).collect::<Vec<_>>();
+
+ assert_eq!(route.get_total_fees(), 300);
+ assert_eq!(route.get_total_amount(), 100);
+ assert_eq!(path, vec![2, 4, 7, 10]);
+
+ // A path to nodes[6] does not exist if nodes[2] cannot be routed through.
+ let scorer = BadNodeScorer { node_id: NodeId::from_pubkey(&nodes[2]) };
+ match get_route(
+ &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42,
+ Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer
+ ) {
+ Err(LightningError { err, .. } ) => {
+ assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a path to the given destination");
+ },
+ Ok(_) => panic!("Expected error"),
+ }
+ }
+
+ #[test]
+ fn total_fees_single_path() {
+ let route = Route {
+ paths: vec![vec![
+ RouteHop {
+ pubkey: PublicKey::from_slice(&hex::decode("02eec7245d6b7d2ccb30380bfbe2a3648cd7a942653f5aa340edcea1f283686619").unwrap()[..]).unwrap(),
+ channel_features: ChannelFeatures::empty(), node_features: NodeFeatures::empty(),
+ short_channel_id: 0, fee_msat: 100, cltv_expiry_delta: 0
+ },
+ RouteHop {
+ pubkey: PublicKey::from_slice(&hex::decode("0324653eac434488002cc06bbfb7f10fe18991e35f9fe4302dbea6d2353dc0ab1c").unwrap()[..]).unwrap(),
+ channel_features: ChannelFeatures::empty(), node_features: NodeFeatures::empty(),
+ short_channel_id: 0, fee_msat: 150, cltv_expiry_delta: 0
+ },
+ RouteHop {
+ pubkey: PublicKey::from_slice(&hex::decode("027f31ebc5462c1fdce1b737ecff52d37d75dea43ce11c74d25aa297165faa2007").unwrap()[..]).unwrap(),
+ channel_features: ChannelFeatures::empty(), node_features: NodeFeatures::empty(),
+ short_channel_id: 0, fee_msat: 225, cltv_expiry_delta: 0
+ },
+ ]],
+ payee: None,
+ };
+
+ assert_eq!(route.get_total_fees(), 250);
+ assert_eq!(route.get_total_amount(), 225);
+ }
+
+ #[test]
+ fn total_fees_multi_path() {
+ let route = Route {
+ paths: vec![vec![
+ RouteHop {
+ pubkey: PublicKey::from_slice(&hex::decode("02eec7245d6b7d2ccb30380bfbe2a3648cd7a942653f5aa340edcea1f283686619").unwrap()[..]).unwrap(),
+ channel_features: ChannelFeatures::empty(), node_features: NodeFeatures::empty(),
+ short_channel_id: 0, fee_msat: 100, cltv_expiry_delta: 0
+ },
+ RouteHop {
+ pubkey: PublicKey::from_slice(&hex::decode("0324653eac434488002cc06bbfb7f10fe18991e35f9fe4302dbea6d2353dc0ab1c").unwrap()[..]).unwrap(),
+ channel_features: ChannelFeatures::empty(), node_features: NodeFeatures::empty(),
+ short_channel_id: 0, fee_msat: 150, cltv_expiry_delta: 0
+ },
+ ],vec![
+ RouteHop {
+ pubkey: PublicKey::from_slice(&hex::decode("02eec7245d6b7d2ccb30380bfbe2a3648cd7a942653f5aa340edcea1f283686619").unwrap()[..]).unwrap(),
+ channel_features: ChannelFeatures::empty(), node_features: NodeFeatures::empty(),
+ short_channel_id: 0, fee_msat: 100, cltv_expiry_delta: 0
+ },
+ RouteHop {
+ pubkey: PublicKey::from_slice(&hex::decode("0324653eac434488002cc06bbfb7f10fe18991e35f9fe4302dbea6d2353dc0ab1c").unwrap()[..]).unwrap(),
+ channel_features: ChannelFeatures::empty(), node_features: NodeFeatures::empty(),
+ short_channel_id: 0, fee_msat: 150, cltv_expiry_delta: 0
+ },
+ ]],
+ payee: None,
+ };
+
+ assert_eq!(route.get_total_fees(), 200);
+ assert_eq!(route.get_total_amount(), 300);
+ }
+
+ #[test]
+ fn total_empty_route_no_panic() {
+ // In an earlier version of `Route::get_total_fees` and `Route::get_total_amount`, they
+ // would both panic if the route was completely empty. We test to ensure they return 0
+ // here, even though its somewhat nonsensical as a route.
+ let route = Route { paths: Vec::new(), payee: None };
+
+ assert_eq!(route.get_total_fees(), 0);
+ assert_eq!(route.get_total_amount(), 0);
+ }
+
+ #[cfg(not(feature = "no-std"))]
+ pub(super) fn random_init_seed() -> u64 {
+ // Because the default HashMap in std pulls OS randomness, we can use it as a (bad) RNG.
+ use core::hash::{BuildHasher, Hasher};
+ let seed = std::collections::hash_map::RandomState::new().build_hasher().finish();
+ println!("Using seed of {}", seed);
+ seed
+ }
+ #[cfg(not(feature = "no-std"))]
+ use util::ser::Readable;
+
+ #[test]
+ #[cfg(not(feature = "no-std"))]
+ fn generate_routes() {
+ let mut d = match super::test_utils::get_route_file() {
+ Ok(f) => f,
+ Err(e) => {
+ eprintln!("{}", e);
+ return;
+ },
+ };
+ let graph = NetworkGraph::read(&mut d).unwrap();
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+
+ // First, get 100 (source, destination) pairs for which route-getting actually succeeds...
+ let mut seed = random_init_seed() as usize;
+ let nodes = graph.read_only().nodes().clone();
+ 'load_endpoints: for _ in 0..10 {
+ loop {
+ seed = seed.overflowing_mul(0xdeadbeef).0;
+ let src = &PublicKey::from_slice(nodes.keys().skip(seed % nodes.len()).next().unwrap().as_slice()).unwrap();
+ seed = seed.overflowing_mul(0xdeadbeef).0;
+ let dst = PublicKey::from_slice(nodes.keys().skip(seed % nodes.len()).next().unwrap().as_slice()).unwrap();
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(dst);
+ let amt = seed as u64 % 200_000_000;
+ if get_route(src, &payee, &graph, None, amt, 42, &test_utils::TestLogger::new(), &scorer).is_ok() {
+ continue 'load_endpoints;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ #[test]
+ #[cfg(not(feature = "no-std"))]
+ fn generate_routes_mpp() {
+ let mut d = match super::test_utils::get_route_file() {
+ Ok(f) => f,
+ Err(e) => {
+ eprintln!("{}", e);
+ return;
+ },
+ };
+ let graph = NetworkGraph::read(&mut d).unwrap();
+ let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
+
+ // First, get 100 (source, destination) pairs for which route-getting actually succeeds...
+ let mut seed = random_init_seed() as usize;
+ let nodes = graph.read_only().nodes().clone();
+ 'load_endpoints: for _ in 0..10 {
+ loop {
+ seed = seed.overflowing_mul(0xdeadbeef).0;
+ let src = &PublicKey::from_slice(nodes.keys().skip(seed % nodes.len()).next().unwrap().as_slice()).unwrap();
+ seed = seed.overflowing_mul(0xdeadbeef).0;
+ let dst = PublicKey::from_slice(nodes.keys().skip(seed % nodes.len()).next().unwrap().as_slice()).unwrap();
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(dst).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
+ let amt = seed as u64 % 200_000_000;
+ if get_route(src, &payee, &graph, None, amt, 42, &test_utils::TestLogger::new(), &scorer).is_ok() {
+ continue 'load_endpoints;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
}
-#[cfg(all(test, feature = "unstable"))]
+#[cfg(all(test, not(feature = "no-std")))]
+pub(crate) mod test_utils {
+ use std::fs::File;
+ /// Tries to open a network graph file, or panics with a URL to fetch it.
+ pub(crate) fn get_route_file() -> Result<std::fs::File, &'static str> {
+ let res = File::open("net_graph-2021-05-31.bin") // By default we're run in RL/lightning
+ .or_else(|_| File::open("lightning/net_graph-2021-05-31.bin")) // We may be run manually in RL/
+ .or_else(|_| { // Fall back to guessing based on the binary location
+ // path is likely something like .../rust-lightning/target/debug/deps/lightning-...
+ let mut path = std::env::current_exe().unwrap();
+ path.pop(); // lightning-...
+ path.pop(); // deps
+ path.pop(); // debug
+ path.pop(); // target
+ path.push("lightning");
+ path.push("net_graph-2021-05-31.bin");
+ eprintln!("{}", path.to_str().unwrap());
+ File::open(path)
+ })
+ .map_err(|_| "Please fetch https://bitcoin.ninja/ldk-net_graph-v0.0.15-2021-05-31.bin and place it at lightning/net_graph-2021-05-31.bin");
+ #[cfg(require_route_graph_test)]
+ return Ok(res.unwrap());
+ #[cfg(not(require_route_graph_test))]
+ return res;
+ }
+}
+
+#[cfg(all(test, feature = "unstable", not(feature = "no-std")))]
mod benches {
use super::*;
+ use routing::scoring::Scorer;
use util::logger::{Logger, Record};
- use std::fs::File;
use test::Bencher;
struct DummyLogger {}
#[bench]
fn generate_routes(bench: &mut Bencher) {
- let mut d = File::open("net_graph-2021-02-12.bin").expect("Please fetch https://bitcoin.ninja/ldk-net_graph-879e309c128-2020-02-12.bin and place it at lightning/net_graph-2021-02-12.bin");
+ let mut d = test_utils::get_route_file().unwrap();
let graph = NetworkGraph::read(&mut d).unwrap();
+ let nodes = graph.read_only().nodes().clone();
+ let scorer = Scorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
// First, get 100 (source, destination) pairs for which route-getting actually succeeds...
let mut path_endpoints = Vec::new();
'load_endpoints: for _ in 0..100 {
loop {
seed *= 0xdeadbeef;
- let src = graph.get_nodes().keys().skip(seed % graph.get_nodes().len()).next().unwrap();
+ let src = PublicKey::from_slice(nodes.keys().skip(seed % nodes.len()).next().unwrap().as_slice()).unwrap();
seed *= 0xdeadbeef;
- let dst = graph.get_nodes().keys().skip(seed % graph.get_nodes().len()).next().unwrap();
+ let dst = PublicKey::from_slice(nodes.keys().skip(seed % nodes.len()).next().unwrap().as_slice()).unwrap();
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(dst);
let amt = seed as u64 % 1_000_000;
- if get_route(src, &graph, dst, None, None, &[], amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}).is_ok() {
+ if get_route(&src, &payee, &graph, None, amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}, &scorer).is_ok() {
path_endpoints.push((src, dst, amt));
continue 'load_endpoints;
}
let mut idx = 0;
bench.iter(|| {
let (src, dst, amt) = path_endpoints[idx % path_endpoints.len()];
- assert!(get_route(src, &graph, dst, None, None, &[], amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}).is_ok());
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(dst);
+ assert!(get_route(&src, &payee, &graph, None, amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}, &scorer).is_ok());
idx += 1;
});
}
#[bench]
fn generate_mpp_routes(bench: &mut Bencher) {
- let mut d = File::open("net_graph-2021-02-12.bin").expect("Please fetch https://bitcoin.ninja/ldk-net_graph-879e309c128-2020-02-12.bin and place it at lightning/net_graph-2021-02-12.bin");
+ let mut d = test_utils::get_route_file().unwrap();
let graph = NetworkGraph::read(&mut d).unwrap();
+ let nodes = graph.read_only().nodes().clone();
+ let scorer = Scorer::with_fixed_penalty(0);
// First, get 100 (source, destination) pairs for which route-getting actually succeeds...
let mut path_endpoints = Vec::new();
'load_endpoints: for _ in 0..100 {
loop {
seed *= 0xdeadbeef;
- let src = graph.get_nodes().keys().skip(seed % graph.get_nodes().len()).next().unwrap();
+ let src = PublicKey::from_slice(nodes.keys().skip(seed % nodes.len()).next().unwrap().as_slice()).unwrap();
seed *= 0xdeadbeef;
- let dst = graph.get_nodes().keys().skip(seed % graph.get_nodes().len()).next().unwrap();
+ let dst = PublicKey::from_slice(nodes.keys().skip(seed % nodes.len()).next().unwrap().as_slice()).unwrap();
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(dst).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
let amt = seed as u64 % 1_000_000;
- if get_route(src, &graph, dst, Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &[], amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}).is_ok() {
+ if get_route(&src, &payee, &graph, None, amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}, &scorer).is_ok() {
path_endpoints.push((src, dst, amt));
continue 'load_endpoints;
}
let mut idx = 0;
bench.iter(|| {
let (src, dst, amt) = path_endpoints[idx % path_endpoints.len()];
- assert!(get_route(src, &graph, dst, Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &[], amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}).is_ok());
+ let payee = Payee::from_node_id(dst).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
+ assert!(get_route(&src, &payee, &graph, None, amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}, &scorer).is_ok());
idx += 1;
});
}
projects / rust-lightning / blobdiff