-use ln::chan_utils::{HTLCOutputInCommitment, TxCreationKeys, ChannelPublicKeys};
-use ln::msgs;
-use chain::keysinterface::{ChannelKeys, InMemoryChannelKeys};
+// This file is Copyright its original authors, visible in version control
+// history.
+//
+// This file is licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 <LICENSE-APACHE
+// or http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0> or the MIT license
+// <LICENSE-MIT or http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT>, at your option.
+// You may not use this file except in accordance with one or both of these
+// licenses.
-use std::cmp;
-use std::sync::Mutex;
+use crate::ln::channel::{ANCHOR_OUTPUT_VALUE_SATOSHI, MIN_CHAN_DUST_LIMIT_SATOSHIS};
+use crate::ln::chan_utils::{HTLCOutputInCommitment, ChannelPublicKeys, HolderCommitmentTransaction, CommitmentTransaction, ChannelTransactionParameters, TrustedCommitmentTransaction, ClosingTransaction};
+use crate::ln::{chan_utils, msgs, PaymentPreimage};
+use crate::chain::keysinterface::{Sign, InMemorySigner, BaseSign};
-use bitcoin::blockdata::transaction::Transaction;
-use bitcoin::blockdata::script::Script;
+use crate::prelude::*;
+use core::cmp;
+use crate::sync::{Mutex, Arc};
+#[cfg(test)] use crate::sync::MutexGuard;
-use secp256k1;
-use secp256k1::key::{SecretKey, PublicKey};
-use secp256k1::{Secp256k1, Signature};
+use bitcoin::blockdata::transaction::{Transaction, EcdsaSighashType};
+use bitcoin::util::sighash;
-/// Enforces some rules on ChannelKeys calls. Eventually we will probably want to expose a variant
-/// of this which would essentially be what you'd want to run on a hardware wallet.
-pub struct EnforcingChannelKeys {
- pub inner: InMemoryChannelKeys,
- commitment_number_obscure_and_last: Mutex<(Option<u64>, u64)>,
+use bitcoin::secp256k1;
+use bitcoin::secp256k1::{SecretKey, PublicKey};
+use bitcoin::secp256k1::{Secp256k1, ecdsa::Signature};
+#[cfg(anchors)]
+use crate::util::events::HTLCDescriptor;
+use crate::util::ser::{Writeable, Writer};
+use crate::io::Error;
+
+/// Initial value for revoked commitment downward counter
+pub const INITIAL_REVOKED_COMMITMENT_NUMBER: u64 = 1 << 48;
+
+/// An implementation of Sign that enforces some policy checks. The current checks
+/// are an incomplete set. They include:
+///
+/// - When signing, the holder transaction has not been revoked
+/// - When revoking, the holder transaction has not been signed
+/// - The holder commitment number is monotonic and without gaps
+/// - The revoked holder commitment number is monotonic and without gaps
+/// - There is at least one unrevoked holder transaction at all times
+/// - The counterparty commitment number is monotonic and without gaps
+/// - The pre-derived keys and pre-built transaction in CommitmentTransaction were correctly built
+///
+/// Eventually we will probably want to expose a variant of this which would essentially
+/// be what you'd want to run on a hardware wallet.
+///
+/// Note that counterparty signatures on the holder transaction are not checked, but it should
+/// be in a complete implementation.
+///
+/// Note that before we do so we should ensure its serialization format has backwards- and
+/// forwards-compatibility prefix/suffixes!
+#[derive(Clone)]
+pub struct EnforcingSigner {
+ pub inner: InMemorySigner,
+ /// Channel state used for policy enforcement
+ pub state: Arc<Mutex<EnforcementState>>,
+ pub disable_revocation_policy_check: bool,
}
-impl EnforcingChannelKeys {
- pub fn new(inner: InMemoryChannelKeys) -> Self {
+impl EnforcingSigner {
+ /// Construct an EnforcingSigner
+ pub fn new(inner: InMemorySigner) -> Self {
+ let state = Arc::new(Mutex::new(EnforcementState::new()));
Self {
inner,
- commitment_number_obscure_and_last: Mutex::new((None, 0)),
+ state,
+ disable_revocation_policy_check: false
}
}
-}
-impl EnforcingChannelKeys {
- fn check_keys<T: secp256k1::Signing + secp256k1::Verification>(&self, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<T>,
- keys: &TxCreationKeys) {
- let revocation_base = PublicKey::from_secret_key(secp_ctx, &self.inner.revocation_base_key);
- let payment_base = PublicKey::from_secret_key(secp_ctx, &self.inner.payment_base_key);
- let htlc_base = PublicKey::from_secret_key(secp_ctx, &self.inner.htlc_base_key);
+ /// Construct an EnforcingSigner with externally managed storage
+ ///
+ /// Since there are multiple copies of this struct for each channel, some coordination is needed
+ /// so that all copies are aware of enforcement state. A pointer to this state is provided
+ /// here, usually by an implementation of KeysInterface.
+ pub fn new_with_revoked(inner: InMemorySigner, state: Arc<Mutex<EnforcementState>>, disable_revocation_policy_check: bool) -> Self {
+ Self {
+ inner,
+ state,
+ disable_revocation_policy_check
+ }
+ }
- let remote_points = self.inner.remote_channel_pubkeys.as_ref().unwrap();
+ pub fn opt_anchors(&self) -> bool { self.inner.opt_anchors() }
- let keys_expected = TxCreationKeys::new(secp_ctx,
- &keys.per_commitment_point,
- &remote_points.delayed_payment_basepoint,
- &remote_points.htlc_basepoint,
- &revocation_base,
- &payment_base,
- &htlc_base).unwrap();
- if keys != &keys_expected { panic!("derived different per-tx keys") }
+ #[cfg(test)]
+ pub fn get_enforcement_state(&self) -> MutexGuard<EnforcementState> {
+ self.state.lock().unwrap()
}
}
-impl ChannelKeys for EnforcingChannelKeys {
- fn funding_key(&self) -> &SecretKey { self.inner.funding_key() }
- fn revocation_base_key(&self) -> &SecretKey { self.inner.revocation_base_key() }
- fn payment_base_key(&self) -> &SecretKey { self.inner.payment_base_key() }
- fn delayed_payment_base_key(&self) -> &SecretKey { self.inner.delayed_payment_base_key() }
- fn htlc_base_key(&self) -> &SecretKey { self.inner.htlc_base_key() }
- fn commitment_seed(&self) -> &[u8; 32] { self.inner.commitment_seed() }
+impl BaseSign for EnforcingSigner {
+ fn get_per_commitment_point(&self, idx: u64, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<secp256k1::All>) -> PublicKey {
+ self.inner.get_per_commitment_point(idx, secp_ctx)
+ }
+
+ fn release_commitment_secret(&self, idx: u64) -> [u8; 32] {
+ {
+ let mut state = self.state.lock().unwrap();
+ assert!(idx == state.last_holder_revoked_commitment || idx == state.last_holder_revoked_commitment - 1, "can only revoke the current or next unrevoked commitment - trying {}, last revoked {}", idx, state.last_holder_revoked_commitment);
+ assert!(idx > state.last_holder_commitment, "cannot revoke the last holder commitment - attempted to revoke {} last commitment {}", idx, state.last_holder_commitment);
+ state.last_holder_revoked_commitment = idx;
+ }
+ self.inner.release_commitment_secret(idx)
+ }
+
+ fn validate_holder_commitment(&self, holder_tx: &HolderCommitmentTransaction, _preimages: Vec<PaymentPreimage>) -> Result<(), ()> {
+ let mut state = self.state.lock().unwrap();
+ let idx = holder_tx.commitment_number();
+ assert!(idx == state.last_holder_commitment || idx == state.last_holder_commitment - 1, "expecting to validate the current or next holder commitment - trying {}, current {}", idx, state.last_holder_commitment);
+ state.last_holder_commitment = idx;
+ Ok(())
+ }
+
+ fn pubkeys(&self) -> &ChannelPublicKeys { self.inner.pubkeys() }
+ fn channel_keys_id(&self) -> [u8; 32] { self.inner.channel_keys_id() }
- fn sign_remote_commitment<T: secp256k1::Signing + secp256k1::Verification>(&self, channel_value_satoshis: u64, feerate_per_kw: u64, commitment_tx: &Transaction, keys: &TxCreationKeys, htlcs: &[&HTLCOutputInCommitment], to_self_delay: u16, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<T>) -> Result<(Signature, Vec<Signature>), ()> {
- if commitment_tx.input.len() != 1 { panic!("lightning commitment transactions have a single input"); }
- self.check_keys(secp_ctx, keys);
- let obscured_commitment_transaction_number = (commitment_tx.lock_time & 0xffffff) as u64 | ((commitment_tx.input[0].sequence as u64 & 0xffffff) << 3*8);
+ fn sign_counterparty_commitment(&self, commitment_tx: &CommitmentTransaction, preimages: Vec<PaymentPreimage>, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<secp256k1::All>) -> Result<(Signature, Vec<Signature>), ()> {
+ self.verify_counterparty_commitment_tx(commitment_tx, secp_ctx);
{
- let mut commitment_data = self.commitment_number_obscure_and_last.lock().unwrap();
- if commitment_data.0.is_none() {
- commitment_data.0 = Some(obscured_commitment_transaction_number ^ commitment_data.1);
+ let mut state = self.state.lock().unwrap();
+ let actual_commitment_number = commitment_tx.commitment_number();
+ let last_commitment_number = state.last_counterparty_commitment;
+ // These commitment numbers are backwards counting. We expect either the same as the previously encountered,
+ // or the next one.
+ assert!(last_commitment_number == actual_commitment_number || last_commitment_number - 1 == actual_commitment_number, "{} doesn't come after {}", actual_commitment_number, last_commitment_number);
+ // Ensure that the counterparty doesn't get more than two broadcastable commitments -
+ // the last and the one we are trying to sign
+ assert!(actual_commitment_number >= state.last_counterparty_revoked_commitment - 2, "cannot sign a commitment if second to last wasn't revoked - signing {} revoked {}", actual_commitment_number, state.last_counterparty_revoked_commitment);
+ state.last_counterparty_commitment = cmp::min(last_commitment_number, actual_commitment_number)
+ }
+
+ Ok(self.inner.sign_counterparty_commitment(commitment_tx, preimages, secp_ctx).unwrap())
+ }
+
+ fn validate_counterparty_revocation(&self, idx: u64, _secret: &SecretKey) -> Result<(), ()> {
+ let mut state = self.state.lock().unwrap();
+ assert!(idx == state.last_counterparty_revoked_commitment || idx == state.last_counterparty_revoked_commitment - 1, "expecting to validate the current or next counterparty revocation - trying {}, current {}", idx, state.last_counterparty_revoked_commitment);
+ state.last_counterparty_revoked_commitment = idx;
+ Ok(())
+ }
+
+ fn sign_holder_commitment_and_htlcs(&self, commitment_tx: &HolderCommitmentTransaction, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<secp256k1::All>) -> Result<(Signature, Vec<Signature>), ()> {
+ let trusted_tx = self.verify_holder_commitment_tx(commitment_tx, secp_ctx);
+ let commitment_txid = trusted_tx.txid();
+ let holder_csv = self.inner.counterparty_selected_contest_delay();
+
+ let state = self.state.lock().unwrap();
+ let commitment_number = trusted_tx.commitment_number();
+ if state.last_holder_revoked_commitment - 1 != commitment_number && state.last_holder_revoked_commitment - 2 != commitment_number {
+ if !self.disable_revocation_policy_check {
+ panic!("can only sign the next two unrevoked commitment numbers, revoked={} vs requested={} for {}",
+ state.last_holder_revoked_commitment, commitment_number, self.inner.commitment_seed[0])
}
- let commitment_number = obscured_commitment_transaction_number ^ commitment_data.0.unwrap();
- assert!(commitment_number == commitment_data.1 || commitment_number == commitment_data.1 + 1);
- commitment_data.1 = cmp::max(commitment_number, commitment_data.1)
}
- Ok(self.inner.sign_remote_commitment(channel_value_satoshis, feerate_per_kw, commitment_tx, keys, htlcs, to_self_delay, secp_ctx).unwrap())
+ for (this_htlc, sig) in trusted_tx.htlcs().iter().zip(&commitment_tx.counterparty_htlc_sigs) {
+ assert!(this_htlc.transaction_output_index.is_some());
+ let keys = trusted_tx.keys();
+ let htlc_tx = chan_utils::build_htlc_transaction(&commitment_txid, trusted_tx.feerate_per_kw(), holder_csv, &this_htlc, self.opt_anchors(), false, &keys.broadcaster_delayed_payment_key, &keys.revocation_key);
+
+ let htlc_redeemscript = chan_utils::get_htlc_redeemscript(&this_htlc, self.opt_anchors(), &keys);
+
+ let sighash_type = if self.opt_anchors() {
+ EcdsaSighashType::SinglePlusAnyoneCanPay
+ } else {
+ EcdsaSighashType::All
+ };
+ let sighash = hash_to_message!(
+ &sighash::SighashCache::new(&htlc_tx).segwit_signature_hash(
+ 0, &htlc_redeemscript, this_htlc.amount_msat / 1000, sighash_type,
+ ).unwrap()[..]
+ );
+ secp_ctx.verify_ecdsa(&sighash, sig, &keys.countersignatory_htlc_key).unwrap();
+ }
+
+ Ok(self.inner.sign_holder_commitment_and_htlcs(commitment_tx, secp_ctx).unwrap())
}
- fn sign_closing_transaction<T: secp256k1::Signing>(&self, channel_value_satoshis: u64, channel_funding_redeemscript: &Script, closing_tx: &Transaction, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<T>) -> Result<Signature, ()> {
- Ok(self.inner.sign_closing_transaction(channel_value_satoshis, channel_funding_redeemscript, closing_tx, secp_ctx).unwrap())
+ #[cfg(any(test,feature = "unsafe_revoked_tx_signing"))]
+ fn unsafe_sign_holder_commitment_and_htlcs(&self, commitment_tx: &HolderCommitmentTransaction, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<secp256k1::All>) -> Result<(Signature, Vec<Signature>), ()> {
+ Ok(self.inner.unsafe_sign_holder_commitment_and_htlcs(commitment_tx, secp_ctx).unwrap())
}
- fn sign_channel_announcement<T: secp256k1::Signing>(&self, msg: &msgs::UnsignedChannelAnnouncement, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<T>) -> Result<Signature, ()> {
- self.inner.sign_channel_announcement(msg, secp_ctx)
+ fn sign_justice_revoked_output(&self, justice_tx: &Transaction, input: usize, amount: u64, per_commitment_key: &SecretKey, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<secp256k1::All>) -> Result<Signature, ()> {
+ Ok(self.inner.sign_justice_revoked_output(justice_tx, input, amount, per_commitment_key, secp_ctx).unwrap())
}
- fn set_remote_channel_pubkeys(&mut self, channel_pubkeys: &ChannelPublicKeys) {
- self.inner.set_remote_channel_pubkeys(channel_pubkeys)
+ fn sign_justice_revoked_htlc(&self, justice_tx: &Transaction, input: usize, amount: u64, per_commitment_key: &SecretKey, htlc: &HTLCOutputInCommitment, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<secp256k1::All>) -> Result<Signature, ()> {
+ Ok(self.inner.sign_justice_revoked_htlc(justice_tx, input, amount, per_commitment_key, htlc, secp_ctx).unwrap())
+ }
+
+ #[cfg(anchors)]
+ fn sign_holder_htlc_transaction(
+ &self, htlc_tx: &Transaction, input: usize, htlc_descriptor: &HTLCDescriptor,
+ secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<secp256k1::All>
+ ) -> Result<Signature, ()> {
+ let per_commitment_point = self.get_per_commitment_point(htlc_descriptor.per_commitment_number, secp_ctx);
+ assert_eq!(htlc_tx.input[input], htlc_descriptor.unsigned_tx_input());
+ assert_eq!(htlc_tx.output[input], htlc_descriptor.tx_output(&per_commitment_point, secp_ctx));
+ Ok(self.inner.sign_holder_htlc_transaction(htlc_tx, input, htlc_descriptor, secp_ctx).unwrap())
+ }
+
+ fn sign_counterparty_htlc_transaction(&self, htlc_tx: &Transaction, input: usize, amount: u64, per_commitment_point: &PublicKey, htlc: &HTLCOutputInCommitment, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<secp256k1::All>) -> Result<Signature, ()> {
+ Ok(self.inner.sign_counterparty_htlc_transaction(htlc_tx, input, amount, per_commitment_point, htlc, secp_ctx).unwrap())
+ }
+
+ fn sign_closing_transaction(&self, closing_tx: &ClosingTransaction, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<secp256k1::All>) -> Result<Signature, ()> {
+ closing_tx.verify(self.inner.funding_outpoint().into_bitcoin_outpoint())
+ .expect("derived different closing transaction");
+ Ok(self.inner.sign_closing_transaction(closing_tx, secp_ctx).unwrap())
+ }
+
+ fn sign_holder_anchor_input(
+ &self, anchor_tx: &Transaction, input: usize, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<secp256k1::All>,
+ ) -> Result<Signature, ()> {
+ debug_assert!(MIN_CHAN_DUST_LIMIT_SATOSHIS > ANCHOR_OUTPUT_VALUE_SATOSHI);
+ // As long as our minimum dust limit is enforced and is greater than our anchor output
+ // value, an anchor output can only have an index within [0, 1].
+ assert!(anchor_tx.input[input].previous_output.vout == 0 || anchor_tx.input[input].previous_output.vout == 1);
+ self.inner.sign_holder_anchor_input(anchor_tx, input, secp_ctx)
+ }
+
+ fn sign_channel_announcement_with_funding_key(
+ &self, msg: &msgs::UnsignedChannelAnnouncement, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<secp256k1::All>
+ ) -> Result<Signature, ()> {
+ self.inner.sign_channel_announcement_with_funding_key(msg, secp_ctx)
+ }
+
+ fn provide_channel_parameters(&mut self, channel_parameters: &ChannelTransactionParameters) {
+ self.inner.provide_channel_parameters(channel_parameters)
}
}
+impl Sign for EnforcingSigner {}
-impl_writeable!(EnforcingChannelKeys, 0, {
- inner,
- commitment_number_obscure_and_last
-});
+impl Writeable for EnforcingSigner {
+ fn write<W: Writer>(&self, writer: &mut W) -> Result<(), Error> {
+ // EnforcingSigner has two fields - `inner` ([`InMemorySigner`]) and `state`
+ // ([`EnforcementState`]). `inner` is serialized here and deserialized by
+ // [`SignerProvider::read_chan_signer`]. `state` is managed by [`SignerProvider`]
+ // and will be serialized as needed by the implementation of that trait.
+ self.inner.write(writer)?;
+ Ok(())
+ }
+}
+
+impl EnforcingSigner {
+ fn verify_counterparty_commitment_tx<'a, T: secp256k1::Signing + secp256k1::Verification>(&self, commitment_tx: &'a CommitmentTransaction, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<T>) -> TrustedCommitmentTransaction<'a> {
+ commitment_tx.verify(&self.inner.get_channel_parameters().as_counterparty_broadcastable(),
+ self.inner.counterparty_pubkeys(), self.inner.pubkeys(), secp_ctx)
+ .expect("derived different per-tx keys or built transaction")
+ }
+
+ fn verify_holder_commitment_tx<'a, T: secp256k1::Signing + secp256k1::Verification>(&self, commitment_tx: &'a CommitmentTransaction, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<T>) -> TrustedCommitmentTransaction<'a> {
+ commitment_tx.verify(&self.inner.get_channel_parameters().as_holder_broadcastable(),
+ self.inner.pubkeys(), self.inner.counterparty_pubkeys(), secp_ctx)
+ .expect("derived different per-tx keys or built transaction")
+ }
+}
+
+/// The state used by [`EnforcingSigner`] in order to enforce policy checks
+///
+/// This structure is maintained by KeysInterface since we may have multiple copies of
+/// the signer and they must coordinate their state.
+#[derive(Clone)]
+pub struct EnforcementState {
+ /// The last counterparty commitment number we signed, backwards counting
+ pub last_counterparty_commitment: u64,
+ /// The last counterparty commitment they revoked, backwards counting
+ pub last_counterparty_revoked_commitment: u64,
+ /// The last holder commitment number we revoked, backwards counting
+ pub last_holder_revoked_commitment: u64,
+ /// The last validated holder commitment number, backwards counting
+ pub last_holder_commitment: u64,
+}
+
+impl EnforcementState {
+ /// Enforcement state for a new channel
+ pub fn new() -> Self {
+ EnforcementState {
+ last_counterparty_commitment: INITIAL_REVOKED_COMMITMENT_NUMBER,
+ last_counterparty_revoked_commitment: INITIAL_REVOKED_COMMITMENT_NUMBER,
+ last_holder_revoked_commitment: INITIAL_REVOKED_COMMITMENT_NUMBER,
+ last_holder_commitment: INITIAL_REVOKED_COMMITMENT_NUMBER,
+ }
+ }
+}