Allow BaseSign validation functions to return an Err
[rust-lightning] / lightning / src / util / enforcing_trait_impls.rs
index 26f9d87bba9bc40c03d6f5439c4828d500be0be3..b7dfe767057836cdd59dd61c5bae32d88c362c6a 100644 (file)
@@ -13,7 +13,8 @@ use chain::keysinterface::{Sign, InMemorySigner, BaseSign};
 
 use prelude::*;
 use core::cmp;
-use std::sync::{Mutex, Arc};
+use sync::{Mutex, Arc};
+#[cfg(test)] use sync::MutexGuard;
 
 use bitcoin::blockdata::transaction::{Transaction, SigHashType};
 use bitcoin::util::bip143;
@@ -21,9 +22,8 @@ use bitcoin::util::bip143;
 use bitcoin::secp256k1;
 use bitcoin::secp256k1::key::{SecretKey, PublicKey};
 use bitcoin::secp256k1::{Secp256k1, Signature};
-use util::ser::{Writeable, Writer, Readable};
-use std::io::Error;
-use ln::msgs::DecodeError;
+use util::ser::{Writeable, Writer};
+use io::Error;
 
 /// Initial value for revoked commitment downward counter
 pub const INITIAL_REVOKED_COMMITMENT_NUMBER: u64 = 1 << 48;
@@ -34,31 +34,34 @@ pub const INITIAL_REVOKED_COMMITMENT_NUMBER: u64 = 1 << 48;
 /// - When signing, the holder transaction has not been revoked
 /// - When revoking, the holder transaction has not been signed
 /// - The holder commitment number is monotonic and without gaps
+/// - The revoked holder commitment number is monotonic and without gaps
+/// - There is at least one unrevoked holder transaction at all times
 /// - The counterparty commitment number is monotonic and without gaps
 /// - The pre-derived keys and pre-built transaction in CommitmentTransaction were correctly built
 ///
 /// Eventually we will probably want to expose a variant of this which would essentially
 /// be what you'd want to run on a hardware wallet.
 ///
+/// Note that counterparty signatures on the holder transaction are not checked, but it should
+/// be in a complete implementation.
+///
 /// Note that before we do so we should ensure its serialization format has backwards- and
 /// forwards-compatibility prefix/suffixes!
 #[derive(Clone)]
 pub struct EnforcingSigner {
        pub inner: InMemorySigner,
-       /// The last counterparty commitment number we signed, backwards counting
-       pub last_commitment_number: Arc<Mutex<Option<u64>>>,
-       /// The last holder commitment number we revoked, backwards counting
-       pub revoked_commitment: Arc<Mutex<u64>>,
+       /// Channel state used for policy enforcement
+       pub state: Arc<Mutex<EnforcementState>>,
        pub disable_revocation_policy_check: bool,
 }
 
 impl EnforcingSigner {
        /// Construct an EnforcingSigner
        pub fn new(inner: InMemorySigner) -> Self {
+               let state = Arc::new(Mutex::new(EnforcementState::new()));
                Self {
                        inner,
-                       last_commitment_number: Arc::new(Mutex::new(None)),
-                       revoked_commitment: Arc::new(Mutex::new(INITIAL_REVOKED_COMMITMENT_NUMBER)),
+                       state,
                        disable_revocation_policy_check: false
                }
        }
@@ -66,16 +69,20 @@ impl EnforcingSigner {
        /// Construct an EnforcingSigner with externally managed storage
        ///
        /// Since there are multiple copies of this struct for each channel, some coordination is needed
-       /// so that all copies are aware of revocations.  A pointer to this state is provided here, usually
-       /// by an implementation of KeysInterface.
-       pub fn new_with_revoked(inner: InMemorySigner, revoked_commitment: Arc<Mutex<u64>>, disable_revocation_policy_check: bool) -> Self {
+       /// so that all copies are aware of enforcement state.  A pointer to this state is provided
+       /// here, usually by an implementation of KeysInterface.
+       pub fn new_with_revoked(inner: InMemorySigner, state: Arc<Mutex<EnforcementState>>, disable_revocation_policy_check: bool) -> Self {
                Self {
                        inner,
-                       last_commitment_number: Arc::new(Mutex::new(None)),
-                       revoked_commitment,
+                       state,
                        disable_revocation_policy_check
                }
        }
+
+       #[cfg(test)]
+       pub fn get_enforcement_state(&self) -> MutexGuard<EnforcementState> {
+               self.state.lock().unwrap()
+       }
 }
 
 impl BaseSign for EnforcingSigner {
@@ -85,13 +92,22 @@ impl BaseSign for EnforcingSigner {
 
        fn release_commitment_secret(&self, idx: u64) -> [u8; 32] {
                {
-                       let mut revoked = self.revoked_commitment.lock().unwrap();
-                       assert!(idx == *revoked || idx == *revoked - 1, "can only revoke the current or next unrevoked commitment - trying {}, revoked {}", idx, *revoked);
-                       *revoked = idx;
+                       let mut state = self.state.lock().unwrap();
+                       assert!(idx == state.last_holder_revoked_commitment || idx == state.last_holder_revoked_commitment - 1, "can only revoke the current or next unrevoked commitment - trying {}, last revoked {}", idx, state.last_holder_revoked_commitment);
+                       assert!(idx > state.last_holder_commitment, "cannot revoke the last holder commitment - attempted to revoke {} last commitment {}", idx, state.last_holder_commitment);
+                       state.last_holder_revoked_commitment = idx;
                }
                self.inner.release_commitment_secret(idx)
        }
 
+       fn validate_holder_commitment(&self, holder_tx: &HolderCommitmentTransaction) -> Result<(), ()> {
+               let mut state = self.state.lock().unwrap();
+               let idx = holder_tx.commitment_number();
+               assert!(idx == state.last_holder_commitment || idx == state.last_holder_commitment - 1, "expecting to validate the current or next holder commitment - trying {}, current {}", idx, state.last_holder_commitment);
+               state.last_holder_commitment = idx;
+               Ok(())
+       }
+
        fn pubkeys(&self) -> &ChannelPublicKeys { self.inner.pubkeys() }
        fn channel_keys_id(&self) -> [u8; 32] { self.inner.channel_keys_id() }
 
@@ -99,29 +115,39 @@ impl BaseSign for EnforcingSigner {
                self.verify_counterparty_commitment_tx(commitment_tx, secp_ctx);
 
                {
-                       let mut last_commitment_number_guard = self.last_commitment_number.lock().unwrap();
+                       let mut state = self.state.lock().unwrap();
                        let actual_commitment_number = commitment_tx.commitment_number();
-                       let last_commitment_number = last_commitment_number_guard.unwrap_or(actual_commitment_number);
+                       let last_commitment_number = state.last_counterparty_commitment;
                        // These commitment numbers are backwards counting.  We expect either the same as the previously encountered,
                        // or the next one.
                        assert!(last_commitment_number == actual_commitment_number || last_commitment_number - 1 == actual_commitment_number, "{} doesn't come after {}", actual_commitment_number, last_commitment_number);
-                       *last_commitment_number_guard = Some(cmp::min(last_commitment_number, actual_commitment_number))
+                       // Ensure that the counterparty doesn't get more than two broadcastable commitments -
+                       // the last and the one we are trying to sign
+                       assert!(actual_commitment_number >= state.last_counterparty_revoked_commitment - 2, "cannot sign a commitment if second to last wasn't revoked - signing {} revoked {}", actual_commitment_number, state.last_counterparty_revoked_commitment);
+                       state.last_counterparty_commitment = cmp::min(last_commitment_number, actual_commitment_number)
                }
 
                Ok(self.inner.sign_counterparty_commitment(commitment_tx, secp_ctx).unwrap())
        }
 
+       fn validate_counterparty_revocation(&self, idx: u64, _secret: &SecretKey) -> Result<(), ()> {
+               let mut state = self.state.lock().unwrap();
+               assert!(idx == state.last_counterparty_revoked_commitment || idx == state.last_counterparty_revoked_commitment - 1, "expecting to validate the current or next counterparty revocation - trying {}, current {}", idx, state.last_counterparty_revoked_commitment);
+               state.last_counterparty_revoked_commitment = idx;
+               Ok(())
+       }
+
        fn sign_holder_commitment_and_htlcs(&self, commitment_tx: &HolderCommitmentTransaction, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<secp256k1::All>) -> Result<(Signature, Vec<Signature>), ()> {
                let trusted_tx = self.verify_holder_commitment_tx(commitment_tx, secp_ctx);
                let commitment_txid = trusted_tx.txid();
                let holder_csv = self.inner.counterparty_selected_contest_delay();
 
-               let revoked = self.revoked_commitment.lock().unwrap();
+               let state = self.state.lock().unwrap();
                let commitment_number = trusted_tx.commitment_number();
-               if *revoked - 1 != commitment_number && *revoked - 2 != commitment_number {
+               if state.last_holder_revoked_commitment - 1 != commitment_number && state.last_holder_revoked_commitment - 2 != commitment_number {
                        if !self.disable_revocation_policy_check {
                                panic!("can only sign the next two unrevoked commitment numbers, revoked={} vs requested={} for {}",
-                                      *revoked, commitment_number, self.inner.commitment_seed[0])
+                                      state.last_holder_revoked_commitment, commitment_number, self.inner.commitment_seed[0])
                        }
                }
 
@@ -173,26 +199,15 @@ impl Sign for EnforcingSigner {}
 
 impl Writeable for EnforcingSigner {
        fn write<W: Writer>(&self, writer: &mut W) -> Result<(), Error> {
+               // EnforcingSigner has two fields - `inner` ([`InMemorySigner`]) and `state`
+               // ([`EnforcementState`]). `inner` is serialized here and deserialized by
+               // [`KeysInterface::read_chan_signer`]. `state` is managed by [`KeysInterface`]
+               // and will be serialized as needed by the implementation of that trait.
                self.inner.write(writer)?;
-               let last = *self.last_commitment_number.lock().unwrap();
-               last.write(writer)?;
                Ok(())
        }
 }
 
-impl Readable for EnforcingSigner {
-       fn read<R: ::std::io::Read>(reader: &mut R) -> Result<Self, DecodeError> {
-               let inner = Readable::read(reader)?;
-               let last_commitment_number = Readable::read(reader)?;
-               Ok(EnforcingSigner {
-                       inner,
-                       last_commitment_number: Arc::new(Mutex::new(last_commitment_number)),
-                       revoked_commitment: Arc::new(Mutex::new(INITIAL_REVOKED_COMMITMENT_NUMBER)),
-                       disable_revocation_policy_check: false,
-               })
-       }
-}
-
 impl EnforcingSigner {
        fn verify_counterparty_commitment_tx<'a, T: secp256k1::Signing + secp256k1::Verification>(&self, commitment_tx: &'a CommitmentTransaction, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<T>) -> TrustedCommitmentTransaction<'a> {
                commitment_tx.verify(&self.inner.get_channel_parameters().as_counterparty_broadcastable(),
@@ -206,3 +221,31 @@ impl EnforcingSigner {
                        .expect("derived different per-tx keys or built transaction")
        }
 }
+
+/// The state used by [`EnforcingSigner`] in order to enforce policy checks
+///
+/// This structure is maintained by KeysInterface since we may have multiple copies of
+/// the signer and they must coordinate their state.
+#[derive(Clone)]
+pub struct EnforcementState {
+       /// The last counterparty commitment number we signed, backwards counting
+       pub last_counterparty_commitment: u64,
+       /// The last counterparty commitment they revoked, backwards counting
+       pub last_counterparty_revoked_commitment: u64,
+       /// The last holder commitment number we revoked, backwards counting
+       pub last_holder_revoked_commitment: u64,
+       /// The last validated holder commitment number, backwards counting
+       pub last_holder_commitment: u64,
+}
+
+impl EnforcementState {
+       /// Enforcement state for a new channel
+       pub fn new() -> Self {
+               EnforcementState {
+                       last_counterparty_commitment: INITIAL_REVOKED_COMMITMENT_NUMBER,
+                       last_counterparty_revoked_commitment: INITIAL_REVOKED_COMMITMENT_NUMBER,
+                       last_holder_revoked_commitment: INITIAL_REVOKED_COMMITMENT_NUMBER,
+                       last_holder_commitment: INITIAL_REVOKED_COMMITMENT_NUMBER,
+               }
+       }
+}