}
/// Tracks the inbound corresponding to an outbound HTLC
- #[derive(Clone)]
+ #[derive(Clone, PartialEq)]
pub struct HTLCPreviousHopData {
pub(super) short_channel_id: u64,
pub(super) htlc_id: u64,
}
/// Tracks the inbound corresponding to an outbound HTLC
- #[derive(Clone)]
+ #[derive(Clone, PartialEq)]
pub enum HTLCSource {
PreviousHopData(HTLCPreviousHopData),
OutboundRoute {
for tx in local_txn {
self.tx_broadcaster.broadcast_transaction(&tx);
}
- //TODO: We need to have a way where outbound HTLC claims can result in us claiming the
- //now-on-chain HTLC output for ourselves (and, thereafter, passing the HTLC backwards).
- //TODO: We need to handle monitoring of pending offered HTLCs which just hit the chain and
- //may be claimed, resulting in us claiming the inbound HTLCs (and back-failing after
- //timeouts are hit and our claims confirm).
- //TODO: In any case, we need to make sure we remove any pending htlc tracking (via
- //fail_backwards or claim_funds) eventually for all HTLCs that were in the channel
}
/// Force closes a channel, immediately broadcasting the latest local commitment transaction to
for failure in failed_channels.drain(..) {
self.finish_force_close_channel(failure);
}
+ {
+ for htlc_update in self.monitor.fetch_pending_htlc_updated() {
+ if let Some(preimage) = htlc_update.payment_preimage {
+ self.claim_funds_internal(self.channel_state.lock().unwrap(), htlc_update.source, preimage);
+ }
+ }
+ }
self.latest_block_height.store(height as usize, Ordering::Release);
*self.last_block_hash.try_lock().expect("block_(dis)connected must not be called in parallel") = header.bitcoin_hash();
}
assert!(nodes[2].node.list_channels().is_empty());
}
- #[test]
- fn update_fee_async_shutdown() {
- // Test update_fee works after shutdown start if messages are delivered out-of-order
- let nodes = create_network(2);
- let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
-
- let starting_feerate = nodes[0].node.channel_state.lock().unwrap().by_id.get(&chan_1.2).unwrap().get_feerate();
- nodes[0].node.update_fee(chan_1.2.clone(), starting_feerate + 20).unwrap();
- check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
- let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
- assert!(updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
- assert!(updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
- assert!(updates.update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
- assert!(updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
- assert!(updates.update_fee.is_some());
-
- nodes[1].node.close_channel(&chan_1.2).unwrap();
- let node_1_shutdown = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendShutdown, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
- nodes[0].node.handle_shutdown(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &node_1_shutdown).unwrap();
- // Note that we don't actually test normative behavior here. The spec indicates we could
- // actually send a closing_signed here, but is kinda unclear and could possibly be amended
- // to require waiting on the full commitment dance before doing so (see
- // https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lightning-rfc/issues/499). In any case, to avoid
- // ambiguity, we should wait until after the full commitment dance to send closing_signed.
- let node_0_shutdown = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendShutdown, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
-
- nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fee.unwrap()).unwrap();
- nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.commitment_signed).unwrap();
- check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
- nodes[1].node.handle_shutdown(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &node_0_shutdown).unwrap();
- let node_0_closing_signed = commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], (), false, true, true);
-
- assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
- nodes[1].node.handle_closing_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), match node_0_closing_signed.unwrap() {
- MessageSendEvent::SendClosingSigned { ref node_id, ref msg } => {
- assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
- msg
- },
- _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
- }).unwrap();
- let (_, node_1_closing_signed) = get_closing_signed_broadcast!(nodes[1].node, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
- nodes[0].node.handle_closing_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &node_1_closing_signed.unwrap()).unwrap();
- let (_, node_0_none) = get_closing_signed_broadcast!(nodes[0].node, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
- assert!(node_0_none.is_none());
- }
-
fn do_test_shutdown_rebroadcast(recv_count: u8) {
// Test that shutdown/closing_signed is re-sent on reconnect with a variable number of
// messages delivered prior to disconnect
false
} else { true }
});
- assert_eq!(res.len(), 2);
+ assert!(res.len() == 2 || res.len() == 3);
+ if res.len() == 3 {
+ assert_eq!(res[1], res[2]);
+ }
}
assert!(node_txn.is_empty());
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
}
let revoked_htlc_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
- assert_eq!(revoked_htlc_txn.len(), 2);
+ assert_eq!(revoked_htlc_txn.len(), 3);
+ assert_eq!(revoked_htlc_txn[0], revoked_htlc_txn[2]);
assert_eq!(revoked_htlc_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
assert_eq!(revoked_htlc_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), 133);
check_spends!(revoked_htlc_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0].clone());
+ check_spends!(revoked_htlc_txn[1], chan_1.3.clone());
// B will generate justice tx from A's revoked commitment/HTLC tx
nodes[1].chain_monitor.block_connected_with_filtering(&Block { header, txdata: vec![revoked_local_txn[0].clone(), revoked_htlc_txn[0].clone()] }, 1);
}
let revoked_htlc_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
- assert_eq!(revoked_htlc_txn.len(), 2);
+ assert_eq!(revoked_htlc_txn.len(), 3);
+ assert_eq!(revoked_htlc_txn[0], revoked_htlc_txn[2]);
assert_eq!(revoked_htlc_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
assert_eq!(revoked_htlc_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), 138);
check_spends!(revoked_htlc_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0].clone());
// Verify that B is able to spend its own HTLC-Success tx thanks to spendable output event given back by its ChannelMonitor
let spend_txn = check_spendable_outputs!(nodes[1], 1);
- assert_eq!(spend_txn.len(), 1);
+ assert_eq!(spend_txn.len(), 2);
check_spends!(spend_txn[0], node_txn[0].clone());
+ check_spends!(spend_txn[1], node_txn[2].clone());
}
#[test]
// Verify that A is able to spend its own HTLC-Timeout tx thanks to spendable output event given back by its ChannelMonitor
let spend_txn = check_spendable_outputs!(nodes[0], 1);
- assert_eq!(spend_txn.len(), 4);
+ assert_eq!(spend_txn.len(), 8);
assert_eq!(spend_txn[0], spend_txn[2]);
+ assert_eq!(spend_txn[0], spend_txn[4]);
+ assert_eq!(spend_txn[0], spend_txn[6]);
assert_eq!(spend_txn[1], spend_txn[3]);
+ assert_eq!(spend_txn[1], spend_txn[5]);
+ assert_eq!(spend_txn[1], spend_txn[7]);
check_spends!(spend_txn[0], local_txn[0].clone());
check_spends!(spend_txn[1], node_txn[0].clone());
}
projects / rust-lightning / blobdiff