}
}
- let session_priv = SecretKey::from_slice(&self.secp_ctx, &{
- let mut session_key = [0; 32];
- rng::fill_bytes(&mut session_key);
- session_key
- }).expect("RNG is bad!");
+ let session_priv = self.keys_manager.get_session_key();
let cur_height = self.latest_block_height.load(Ordering::Acquire) as u32 + 1;
// but if we've sent a shutdown and they haven't acknowledged it yet, we just
// want to reject the new HTLC and fail it backwards instead of forwarding.
if let PendingHTLCStatus::Forward(PendingForwardHTLCInfo { incoming_shared_secret, .. }) = pending_forward_info {
+ let chan_update = self.get_channel_update(chan);
pending_forward_info = PendingHTLCStatus::Fail(HTLCFailureMsg::Relay(msgs::UpdateFailHTLC {
channel_id: msg.channel_id,
htlc_id: msg.htlc_id,
- reason: ChannelManager::build_first_hop_failure_packet(&incoming_shared_secret, 0x1000|20, &self.get_channel_update(chan).unwrap().encode_with_len()[..]),
+ reason: if let Ok(update) = chan_update {
+ ChannelManager::build_first_hop_failure_packet(&incoming_shared_secret, 0x1000|20, &update.encode_with_len()[..])
+ } else {
+ // This can only happen if the channel isn't in the fully-funded
+ // state yet, implying our counterparty is trying to route payments
+ // over the channel back to themselves (cause no one else should
+ // know the short_id is a lightning channel yet). We should have no
+ // problem just calling this unknown_next_peer
+ ChannelManager::build_first_hop_failure_packet(&incoming_shared_secret, 0x4000|10, &[])
+ },
}));
}
}
check_spends!(spend_txn[0], node_txn[0].clone());
}
+ #[test]
+ fn test_claim_on_remote_revoked_sizeable_push_msat() {
+ // Same test as previous, just test on remote revoked commitment tx, as per_commitment_point registration changes following you're funder/fundee and
+ // to_remote output is encumbered by a P2WPKH
+
+ let nodes = create_network(2);
+
+ let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 59000000);
+ let payment_preimage = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 3000000).0;
+ let revoked_local_txn = nodes[0].node.channel_state.lock().unwrap().by_id.get(&chan.2).unwrap().last_local_commitment_txn.clone();
+ assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
+ assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan.3.txid());
+
+ claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage);
+ let header = BlockHeader { version: 0x20000000, prev_blockhash: Default::default(), merkle_root: Default::default(), time: 42, bits: 42, nonce: 42 };
+ nodes[1].chain_monitor.block_connected_with_filtering(&Block { header, txdata: vec![revoked_local_txn[0].clone()] }, 1);
+ let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ match events[0] {
+ MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { .. } => {},
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ }
+ let node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
+ let spend_txn = check_spendable_outputs!(nodes[1], 1);
+ assert_eq!(spend_txn.len(), 4);
+ assert_eq!(spend_txn[0], spend_txn[2]); // to_remote output on revoked remote commitment_tx
+ check_spends!(spend_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0].clone());
+ assert_eq!(spend_txn[1], spend_txn[3]); // to_local output on local commitment tx
+ check_spends!(spend_txn[1], node_txn[0].clone());
+ }
+
#[test]
fn test_static_spendable_outputs_preimage_tx() {
let nodes = create_network(2);