use util::config::UserConfig;
use util::rng;
-use bitcoin::util::hash::{BitcoinHash, Sha256dHash};
+use bitcoin::util::hash::BitcoinHash;
+use bitcoin_hashes::sha256d::Hash as Sha256dHash;
use bitcoin::util::bip143;
use bitcoin::util::address::Address;
use bitcoin::util::bip32::{ChildNumber, ExtendedPubKey, ExtendedPrivKey};
use std::default::Default;
use std::sync::Arc;
use std::sync::atomic::Ordering;
-use std::time::Instant;
use std::mem;
use ln::functional_test_utils::*;
close_channel(&nodes[1], &nodes[3], &chan_5.2, chan_5.3, false);
}
+#[test]
+fn holding_cell_htlc_counting() {
+ // Tests that HTLCs in the holding cell count towards the pending HTLC limits on outbound HTLCs
+ // to ensure we don't end up with HTLCs sitting around in our holding cell for several
+ // commitment dance rounds.
+ let mut nodes = create_network(3);
+ create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
+ let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
+
+ let mut payments = Vec::new();
+ for _ in 0..::ln::channel::OUR_MAX_HTLCS {
+ let route = nodes[1].router.get_route(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), None, &Vec::new(), 100000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV).unwrap();
+ let (payment_preimage, payment_hash) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(nodes[0]);
+ nodes[1].node.send_payment(route, payment_hash).unwrap();
+ payments.push((payment_preimage, payment_hash));
+ }
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+
+ let mut events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ let initial_payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.pop().unwrap());
+ assert_eq!(initial_payment_event.node_id, nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
+
+ // There is now one HTLC in an outbound commitment transaction and (OUR_MAX_HTLCS - 1) HTLCs in
+ // the holding cell waiting on B's RAA to send. At this point we should not be able to add
+ // another HTLC.
+ let route = nodes[1].router.get_route(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), None, &Vec::new(), 100000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV).unwrap();
+ let (_, payment_hash_1) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(nodes[0]);
+ if let APIError::ChannelUnavailable { err } = nodes[1].node.send_payment(route, payment_hash_1).unwrap_err() {
+ assert_eq!(err, "Cannot push more than their max accepted HTLCs");
+ } else { panic!("Unexpected event"); }
+
+ // This should also be true if we try to forward a payment.
+ let route = nodes[0].router.get_route(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), None, &Vec::new(), 100000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV).unwrap();
+ let (_, payment_hash_2) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(nodes[0]);
+ nodes[0].node.send_payment(route, payment_hash_2).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+
+ let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ let payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.pop().unwrap());
+ assert_eq!(payment_event.node_id, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+
+ nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]).unwrap();
+ commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
+ // We have to forward pending HTLCs twice - once tries to forward the payment forward (and
+ // fails), the second will process the resulting failure and fail the HTLC backward.
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+
+ let bs_fail_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+ nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_fail_updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]).unwrap();
+ commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], bs_fail_updates.commitment_signed, false, true);
+
+ let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ match events[0] {
+ MessageSendEvent::PaymentFailureNetworkUpdate { update: msgs::HTLCFailChannelUpdate::ChannelUpdateMessage { ref msg }} => {
+ assert_eq!(msg.contents.short_channel_id, chan_2.0.contents.short_channel_id);
+ },
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ }
+
+ let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ match events[0] {
+ Event::PaymentFailed { payment_hash, rejected_by_dest, .. } => {
+ assert_eq!(payment_hash, payment_hash_2);
+ assert!(!rejected_by_dest);
+ },
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ }
+
+ // Now forward all the pending HTLCs and claim them back
+ nodes[2].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &initial_payment_event.msgs[0]).unwrap();
+ nodes[2].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &initial_payment_event.commitment_msg).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
+
+ let (bs_revoke_and_ack, bs_commitment_signed) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+ nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_revoke_and_ack).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+ let as_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
+
+ nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_commitment_signed).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+ let as_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
+
+ for ref update in as_updates.update_add_htlcs.iter() {
+ nodes[2].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), update).unwrap();
+ }
+ nodes[2].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_updates.commitment_signed).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
+ nodes[2].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_raa).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
+ let (bs_revoke_and_ack, bs_commitment_signed) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+
+ nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_revoke_and_ack).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+ nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_commitment_signed).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+ let as_final_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
+
+ nodes[2].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_final_raa).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
+
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[2]);
+
+ let events = nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), payments.len());
+ for (event, &(_, ref hash)) in events.iter().zip(payments.iter()) {
+ match event {
+ &Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, .. } => {
+ assert_eq!(*payment_hash, *hash);
+ },
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ };
+ }
+
+ for (preimage, _) in payments.drain(..) {
+ claim_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[2]], preimage);
+ }
+
+ send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], 1000000);
+}
+
#[test]
fn duplicate_htlc_test() {
// Test that we accept duplicate payment_hash HTLCs across the network and that
assert!(route.hops.iter().rev().skip(1).all(|h| h.fee_msat == feemsat));
let err = nodes[0].node.send_payment(route, our_payment_hash).err().unwrap();
match err {
- APIError::ChannelUnavailable{err} => assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send value that would put us over our max HTLC value in flight"),
+ APIError::ChannelUnavailable{err} => assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send value that would put us over the max HTLC value in flight"),
_ => panic!("Unknown error variants"),
}
}
let (route, our_payment_hash, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(recv_value + 1);
let err = nodes[0].node.send_payment(route.clone(), our_payment_hash).err().unwrap();
match err {
- APIError::ChannelUnavailable{err} => assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send value that would put us over our reserve value"),
+ APIError::ChannelUnavailable{err} => assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send value that would put us over the reserve value"),
_ => panic!("Unknown error variants"),
}
}
{
let (route, our_payment_hash, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(recv_value_2 + 1);
match nodes[0].node.send_payment(route, our_payment_hash).err().unwrap() {
- APIError::ChannelUnavailable{err} => assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send value that would put us over our reserve value"),
+ APIError::ChannelUnavailable{err} => assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send value that would put us over the reserve value"),
_ => panic!("Unknown error variants"),
}
}
{
let (route, our_payment_hash, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(recv_value_22+1);
match nodes[0].node.send_payment(route, our_payment_hash).err().unwrap() {
- APIError::ChannelUnavailable{err} => assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send value that would put us over our reserve value"),
+ APIError::ChannelUnavailable{err} => assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send value that would put us over the reserve value"),
_ => panic!("Unknown error variants"),
}
}
do_channel_reserve_test(true);
}
+#[test]
+fn channel_reserve_in_flight_removes() {
+ // In cases where one side claims an HTLC, it thinks it has additional available funds that it
+ // can send to its counterparty, but due to update ordering, the other side may not yet have
+ // considered those HTLCs fully removed.
+ // This tests that we don't count HTLCs which will not be included in the next remote
+ // commitment transaction towards the reserve value (as it implies no commitment transaction
+ // will be generated which violates the remote reserve value).
+ // This was broken previously, and discovered by the chanmon_fail_consistency fuzz test.
+ // To test this we:
+ // * route two HTLCs from A to B (note that, at a high level, this test is checking that, when
+ // you consider the values of both of these HTLCs, B may not send an HTLC back to A, but if
+ // you only consider the value of the first HTLC, it may not),
+ // * start routing a third HTLC from A to B,
+ // * claim the first two HTLCs (though B will generate an update_fulfill for one, and put
+ // the other claim in its holding cell, as it immediately goes into AwaitingRAA),
+ // * deliver the first fulfill from B
+ // * deliver the update_add and an RAA from A, resulting in B freeing the second holding cell
+ // claim,
+ // * deliver A's response CS and RAA.
+ // This results in A having the second HTLC in AwaitingRemovedRemoteRevoke, but B having
+ // removed it fully. B now has the push_msat plus the first two HTLCs in value.
+ // * Now B happily sends another HTLC, potentially violating its reserve value from A's point
+ // of view (if A counts the AwaitingRemovedRemoteRevoke HTLC).
+ let mut nodes = create_network(2);
+ let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
+
+ let b_chan_values = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[1], chan_1.2);
+ // Route the first two HTLCs.
+ let (payment_preimage_1, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], b_chan_values.channel_reserve_msat - b_chan_values.value_to_self_msat - 10000);
+ let (payment_preimage_2, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 20000);
+
+ // Start routing the third HTLC (this is just used to get everyone in the right state).
+ let (payment_preimage_3, payment_hash_3) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(nodes[0]);
+ let send_1 = {
+ let route = nodes[0].router.get_route(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), None, &[], 100000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV).unwrap();
+ nodes[0].node.send_payment(route, payment_hash_3).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+ let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ SendEvent::from_event(events.remove(0))
+ };
+
+ // Now claim both of the first two HTLCs on B's end, putting B in AwaitingRAA and generating an
+ // initial fulfill/CS.
+ assert!(nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage_1));
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+ let bs_removes = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+
+ // This claim goes in B's holding cell, allowing us to have a pending B->A RAA which does not
+ // remove the second HTLC when we send the HTLC back from B to A.
+ assert!(nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage_2));
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+ assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
+
+ nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_removes.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]).unwrap();
+ nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_removes.commitment_signed).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+ let as_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+ expect_payment_sent!(nodes[0], payment_preimage_1);
+
+ nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &send_1.msgs[0]).unwrap();
+ nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &send_1.commitment_msg).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+ // B is already AwaitingRAA, so cant generate a CS here
+ let bs_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+
+ nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_raa).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+ let bs_cs = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+
+ nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_raa).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+ let as_cs = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+
+ nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_cs.commitment_signed).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+ let bs_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+
+ // The second HTLCis removed, but as A is in AwaitingRAA it can't generate a CS here, so the
+ // RAA that B generated above doesn't fully resolve the second HTLC from A's point of view.
+ // However, the RAA A generates here *does* fully resolve the HTLC from B's point of view (as A
+ // can no longer broadcast a commitment transaction with it and B has the preimage so can go
+ // on-chain as necessary).
+ nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_cs.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]).unwrap();
+ nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_cs.commitment_signed).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+ let as_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+ expect_payment_sent!(nodes[0], payment_preimage_2);
+
+ nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_raa).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+ assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
+
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
+ expect_payment_received!(nodes[1], payment_hash_3, 100000);
+
+ // Note that as this RAA was generated before the delivery of the update_fulfill it shouldn't
+ // resolve the second HTLC from A's point of view.
+ nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_raa).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+ let as_cs = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+
+ // Now that B doesn't have the second RAA anymore, but A still does, send a payment from B back
+ // to A to ensure that A doesn't count the almost-removed HTLC in update_add processing.
+ let (payment_preimage_4, payment_hash_4) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(nodes[1]);
+ let send_2 = {
+ let route = nodes[1].router.get_route(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), None, &[], 10000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV).unwrap();
+ nodes[1].node.send_payment(route, payment_hash_4).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+ let mut events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ SendEvent::from_event(events.remove(0))
+ };
+
+ nodes[0].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &send_2.msgs[0]).unwrap();
+ nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &send_2.commitment_msg).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+ let as_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+
+ // Now just resolve all the outstanding messages/HTLCs for completeness...
+
+ nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_cs.commitment_signed).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+ let bs_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+
+ nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_raa).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+
+ nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_raa).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+ let as_cs = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+
+ nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_cs.commitment_signed).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+ let bs_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+
+ nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_raa).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[0]);
+ expect_payment_received!(nodes[0], payment_hash_4, 10000);
+
+ claim_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], payment_preimage_4);
+ claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage_3);
+}
+
#[test]
fn channel_monitor_network_test() {
// Simple test which builds a network of ChannelManagers, connects them to each other, and
// Broadcast legit commitment tx from C on B's chain
let commitment_tx = nodes[2].node.channel_state.lock().unwrap().by_id.get(&chan_2.2).unwrap().last_local_commitment_txn.clone();
check_spends!(commitment_tx[0], chan_2.3.clone());
- nodes[2].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash, 0);
+ nodes[2].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 0);
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[2]);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
let (_, second_payment_hash) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], value);
let (_, third_payment_hash) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], value);
- assert!(nodes[2].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&first_payment_hash, 0));
+ assert!(nodes[2].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&first_payment_hash));
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[2]);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
let bs_raa = commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[2], updates.commitment_signed, false, true, false, true);
// Drop the last RAA from 3 -> 2
- assert!(nodes[2].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&second_payment_hash, 0));
+ assert!(nodes[2].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&second_payment_hash));
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[2]);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
nodes[2].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_raa).unwrap();
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
- assert!(nodes[2].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&third_payment_hash, 0));
+ assert!(nodes[2].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&third_payment_hash));
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[2]);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
};
}
- nodes[1].node.channel_state.lock().unwrap().next_forward = Instant::now();
nodes[1].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
// Now check that if we add the preimage to ChannelMonitor it broadcasts our HTLC-Success..
{
let mut monitors = nodes[2].chan_monitor.simple_monitor.monitors.lock().unwrap();
- monitors.get_mut(&OutPoint::new(Sha256dHash::from(&payment_event.commitment_msg.channel_id[..]), 0)).unwrap()
+ monitors.get_mut(&OutPoint::new(Sha256dHash::from_slice(&payment_event.commitment_msg.channel_id[..]).unwrap(), 0)).unwrap()
.provide_payment_preimage(&our_payment_hash, &our_payment_preimage);
}
nodes[2].chain_monitor.block_connected_checked(&header, 1, &[&tx], &[1]);
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
- nodes[1].node.channel_state.lock().unwrap().next_forward = Instant::now();
nodes[1].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
let events_2 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
macro_rules! sign_msg {
($unsigned_msg: expr) => {
- let msghash = Message::from_slice(&Sha256dHash::from_data(&$unsigned_msg.encode()[..])[..]).unwrap();
+ let msghash = Message::from_slice(&Sha256dHash::hash(&$unsigned_msg.encode()[..])[..]).unwrap();
let as_bitcoin_sig = secp_ctx.sign(&msghash, &as_chan.get_local_keys().funding_key);
let bs_bitcoin_sig = secp_ctx.sign(&msghash, &bs_chan.get_local_keys().funding_key);
let as_node_sig = secp_ctx.sign(&msghash, &nodes[0].keys_manager.get_node_secret());
assert!(nodes[0].router.handle_channel_announcement(&chan_announcement).is_err());
let mut unsigned_msg = dummy_unsigned_msg!();
- unsigned_msg.chain_hash = Sha256dHash::from_data(&[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]);
+ unsigned_msg.chain_hash = Sha256dHash::hash(&[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]);
sign_msg!(unsigned_msg);
assert!(nodes[0].router.handle_channel_announcement(&chan_announcement).is_err());
}
let mut chan_0_monitor_serialized = test_utils::TestVecWriter(Vec::new());
nodes[0].chan_monitor.simple_monitor.monitors.lock().unwrap().iter().next().unwrap().1.write_for_disk(&mut chan_0_monitor_serialized).unwrap();
- nodes[0].chan_monitor = Arc::new(test_utils::TestChannelMonitor::new(nodes[0].chain_monitor.clone(), nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.clone(), Arc::new(test_utils::TestLogger::new())));
+ nodes[0].chan_monitor = Arc::new(test_utils::TestChannelMonitor::new(nodes[0].chain_monitor.clone(), nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.clone(), Arc::new(test_utils::TestLogger::new()), Arc::new(test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: 253 })));
let mut chan_0_monitor_read = &chan_0_monitor_serialized.0[..];
let (_, chan_0_monitor) = <(Sha256dHash, ChannelMonitor)>::read(&mut chan_0_monitor_read, Arc::new(test_utils::TestLogger::new())).unwrap();
assert!(chan_0_monitor_read.is_empty());
let mut chan_0_monitor_serialized = test_utils::TestVecWriter(Vec::new());
nodes[0].chan_monitor.simple_monitor.monitors.lock().unwrap().iter().next().unwrap().1.write_for_disk(&mut chan_0_monitor_serialized).unwrap();
- nodes[0].chan_monitor = Arc::new(test_utils::TestChannelMonitor::new(nodes[0].chain_monitor.clone(), nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.clone(), Arc::new(test_utils::TestLogger::new())));
+ nodes[0].chan_monitor = Arc::new(test_utils::TestChannelMonitor::new(nodes[0].chain_monitor.clone(), nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.clone(), Arc::new(test_utils::TestLogger::new()), Arc::new(test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: 253 })));
let mut chan_0_monitor_read = &chan_0_monitor_serialized.0[..];
let (_, chan_0_monitor) = <(Sha256dHash, ChannelMonitor)>::read(&mut chan_0_monitor_read, Arc::new(test_utils::TestLogger::new())).unwrap();
assert!(chan_0_monitor_read.is_empty());
node_0_monitors_serialized.push(writer.0);
}
- nodes[0].chan_monitor = Arc::new(test_utils::TestChannelMonitor::new(nodes[0].chain_monitor.clone(), nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.clone(), Arc::new(test_utils::TestLogger::new())));
+ nodes[0].chan_monitor = Arc::new(test_utils::TestChannelMonitor::new(nodes[0].chain_monitor.clone(), nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.clone(), Arc::new(test_utils::TestLogger::new()), Arc::new(test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: 253 })));
let mut node_0_monitors = Vec::new();
for serialized in node_0_monitors_serialized.iter() {
let mut read = &serialized[..];
};
let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
let remotepubkey = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, &key);
- let witness_script = Address::p2pkh(&remotepubkey, Network::Testnet).script_pubkey();
+ let witness_script = Address::p2pkh(&::bitcoin::PublicKey{compressed: true, key: remotepubkey}, Network::Testnet).script_pubkey();
let sighash = Message::from_slice(&bip143::SighashComponents::new(&spend_tx).sighash_all(&spend_tx.input[0], &witness_script, output.value)[..]).unwrap();
let remotesig = secp_ctx.sign(&sighash, key);
spend_tx.input[0].witness.push(remotesig.serialize_der().to_vec());
let secret = {
match ExtendedPrivKey::new_master(Network::Testnet, &$node.node_seed) {
Ok(master_key) => {
- match master_key.ckd_priv(&secp_ctx, ChildNumber::from_hardened_idx($der_idx)) {
+ match master_key.ckd_priv(&secp_ctx, ChildNumber::from_hardened_idx($der_idx).expect("key space exhausted")) {
Ok(key) => key,
Err(_) => panic!("Your RNG is busted"),
}
let pubkey = ExtendedPubKey::from_private(&secp_ctx, &secret).public_key;
let witness_script = Address::p2pkh(&pubkey, Network::Testnet).script_pubkey();
let sighash = Message::from_slice(&bip143::SighashComponents::new(&spend_tx).sighash_all(&spend_tx.input[0], &witness_script, output.value)[..]).unwrap();
- let sig = secp_ctx.sign(&sighash, &secret.secret_key);
+ let sig = secp_ctx.sign(&sighash, &secret.private_key.key);
spend_tx.input[0].witness.push(sig.serialize_der().to_vec());
spend_tx.input[0].witness[0].push(SigHashType::All as u8);
- spend_tx.input[0].witness.push(pubkey.serialize().to_vec());
+ spend_tx.input[0].witness.push(pubkey.key.serialize().to_vec());
txn.push(spend_tx);
},
}
// Now fail back three of the over-dust-limit and three of the under-dust-limit payments in one go.
// Fail 0th below-dust, 4th above-dust, 8th above-dust, 10th below-dust HTLCs
- assert!(nodes[4].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_1, ds_dust_limit*1000));
- assert!(nodes[4].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_3, 1000000));
- assert!(nodes[4].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_5, 1000000));
- assert!(nodes[4].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_6, ds_dust_limit*1000));
+ assert!(nodes[4].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_1));
+ assert!(nodes[4].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_3));
+ assert!(nodes[4].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_5));
+ assert!(nodes[4].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_6));
check_added_monitors!(nodes[4], 0);
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[4]);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[4], 1);
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[3], nodes[4], four_removes.commitment_signed, false);
// Fail 3rd below-dust and 7th above-dust HTLCs
- assert!(nodes[5].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_2, ds_dust_limit*1000));
- assert!(nodes[5].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_4, 1000000));
+ assert!(nodes[5].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_2));
+ assert!(nodes[5].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_4));
check_added_monitors!(nodes[5], 0);
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[5]);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[5], 1);
// actually revoked.
let htlc_value = if use_dust { 50000 } else { 3000000 };
let (_, our_payment_hash) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], htlc_value);
- assert!(nodes[1].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&our_payment_hash, htlc_value));
+ assert!(nodes[1].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&our_payment_hash));
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
macro_rules! expect_htlc_forward {
($node: expr) => {{
expect_event!($node, Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable);
- $node.node.channel_state.lock().unwrap().next_forward = Instant::now();
$node.node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
}}
}
msgs::ChannelUpdate {
signature: Signature::from(FFISignature::new()),
contents: msgs::UnsignedChannelUpdate {
- chain_hash: Sha256dHash::from_data(&vec![0u8][..]),
+ chain_hash: Sha256dHash::hash(&vec![0u8][..]),
short_channel_id: 0,
timestamp: 0,
flags: 0,
let onion_keys = onion_utils::construct_onion_keys(&Secp256k1::new(), &route, &session_priv).unwrap();
msg.reason = onion_utils::build_first_hop_failure_packet(&onion_keys[1].shared_secret[..], NODE|2, &[0;0]);
}, ||{
- nodes[2].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash, 0);
+ nodes[2].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash);
}, true, Some(NODE|2), Some(msgs::HTLCFailChannelUpdate::NodeFailure{node_id: route.hops[1].pubkey, is_permanent: false}));
// intermediate node failure
let onion_keys = onion_utils::construct_onion_keys(&Secp256k1::new(), &route, &session_priv).unwrap();
msg.reason = onion_utils::build_first_hop_failure_packet(&onion_keys[1].shared_secret[..], PERM|NODE|2, &[0;0]);
}, ||{
- nodes[2].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash, 0);
+ nodes[2].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash);
}, false, Some(PERM|NODE|2), Some(msgs::HTLCFailChannelUpdate::NodeFailure{node_id: route.hops[1].pubkey, is_permanent: true}));
// intermediate node failure
let onion_keys = onion_utils::construct_onion_keys(&Secp256k1::new(), &route, &session_priv).unwrap();
msg.reason = onion_utils::build_first_hop_failure_packet(&onion_keys[0].shared_secret[..], PERM|NODE|3, &[0;0]);
}, ||{
- nodes[2].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash, 0);
+ nodes[2].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash);
}, true, Some(PERM|NODE|3), Some(msgs::HTLCFailChannelUpdate::NodeFailure{node_id: route.hops[0].pubkey, is_permanent: true}));
// final node failure
let onion_keys = onion_utils::construct_onion_keys(&Secp256k1::new(), &route, &session_priv).unwrap();
msg.reason = onion_utils::build_first_hop_failure_packet(&onion_keys[1].shared_secret[..], PERM|NODE|3, &[0;0]);
}, ||{
- nodes[2].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash, 0);
+ nodes[2].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash);
}, false, Some(PERM|NODE|3), Some(msgs::HTLCFailChannelUpdate::NodeFailure{node_id: route.hops[1].pubkey, is_permanent: true}));
run_onion_failure_test("invalid_onion_version", 0, &nodes, &route, &payment_hash, |msg| { msg.onion_routing_packet.version = 1; }, ||{}, true,
}, ||{}, true, Some(UPDATE|14), Some(msgs::HTLCFailChannelUpdate::ChannelUpdateMessage{msg: ChannelUpdate::dummy()}));
run_onion_failure_test("unknown_payment_hash", 2, &nodes, &route, &payment_hash, |_| {}, || {
- nodes[2].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash, 0);
+ nodes[2].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash);
}, false, Some(PERM|15), None);
run_onion_failure_test("final_expiry_too_soon", 1, &nodes, &route, &payment_hash, |msg| {
for i in 0..max_accepted_htlcs {
let route = nodes[0].router.get_route(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), None, &[], 100000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV).unwrap();
let (_, our_payment_hash) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(nodes[0]);
- let mut payment_event = {
+ let payment_event = {
nodes[0].node.send_payment(route, our_payment_hash).unwrap();
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
let err = nodes[0].node.send_payment(route, our_payment_hash);
if let Err(APIError::ChannelUnavailable{err}) = err {
- assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send value that would put us over our max HTLC value in flight");
+ assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send value that would put us over the max HTLC value in flight");
} else {
assert!(false);
}
assert!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().is_empty());
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1]);
}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_update_fulfill_htlc_bolt2_update_fulfill_htlc_before_commitment() {
+ //BOLT 2 Requirement: until the corresponding HTLC is irrevocably committed in both sides' commitment transactions: MUST NOT send an update_fulfill_htlc, update_fail_htlc, or update_fail_malformed_htlc.
+
+ let mut nodes = create_network(2);
+ let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
+
+ let route = nodes[0].router.get_route(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), None, &[], 1000000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV).unwrap();
+ let (our_payment_preimage, our_payment_hash) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(nodes[0]);
+ nodes[0].node.send_payment(route, our_payment_hash).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+ let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+ nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]).unwrap();
+
+ let update_msg = msgs::UpdateFulfillHTLC{
+ channel_id: chan.2,
+ htlc_id: 0,
+ payment_preimage: our_payment_preimage,
+ };
+
+ let err = nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_msg);
+
+ if let Err(msgs::HandleError{err, action: Some(msgs::ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage {..})}) = err {
+ assert_eq!(err, "Remote tried to fulfill/fail HTLC before it had been committed");
+ } else {
+ assert!(false);
+ }
+
+ assert!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().is_empty());
+ check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0]);
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_update_fulfill_htlc_bolt2_update_fail_htlc_before_commitment() {
+ //BOLT 2 Requirement: until the corresponding HTLC is irrevocably committed in both sides' commitment transactions: MUST NOT send an update_fulfill_htlc, update_fail_htlc, or update_fail_malformed_htlc.
+
+ let mut nodes = create_network(2);
+ let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
+
+ let route = nodes[0].router.get_route(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), None, &[], 1000000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV).unwrap();
+ let (_, our_payment_hash) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(nodes[0]);
+ nodes[0].node.send_payment(route, our_payment_hash).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+ let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+ nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]).unwrap();
+
+ let update_msg = msgs::UpdateFailHTLC{
+ channel_id: chan.2,
+ htlc_id: 0,
+ reason: msgs::OnionErrorPacket { data: Vec::new()},
+ };
+
+ let err = nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_msg);
+
+ if let Err(msgs::HandleError{err, action: Some(msgs::ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage {..})}) = err {
+ assert_eq!(err, "Remote tried to fulfill/fail HTLC before it had been committed");
+ } else {
+ assert!(false);
+ }
+
+ assert!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().is_empty());
+ check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0]);
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_update_fulfill_htlc_bolt2_update_fail_malformed_htlc_before_commitment() {
+ //BOLT 2 Requirement: until the corresponding HTLC is irrevocably committed in both sides' commitment transactions: MUST NOT send an update_fulfill_htlc, update_fail_htlc, or update_fail_malformed_htlc.
+
+ let mut nodes = create_network(2);
+ let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
+
+ let route = nodes[0].router.get_route(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), None, &[], 1000000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV).unwrap();
+ let (_, our_payment_hash) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(nodes[0]);
+ nodes[0].node.send_payment(route, our_payment_hash).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+ let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+ nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]).unwrap();
+
+ let update_msg = msgs::UpdateFailMalformedHTLC{
+ channel_id: chan.2,
+ htlc_id: 0,
+ sha256_of_onion: [1; 32],
+ failure_code: 0x8000,
+ };
+
+ let err = nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_malformed_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_msg);
+
+ if let Err(msgs::HandleError{err, action: Some(msgs::ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage {..})}) = err {
+ assert_eq!(err, "Remote tried to fulfill/fail HTLC before it had been committed");
+ } else {
+ assert!(false);
+ }
+
+ assert!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().is_empty());
+ check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0]);
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_update_fulfill_htlc_bolt2_incorrect_htlc_id() {
+ //BOLT 2 Requirement: A receiving node: if the id does not correspond to an HTLC in its current commitment transaction MUST fail the channel.
+
+ let nodes = create_network(2);
+ create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
+
+ let our_payment_preimage = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 100000).0;
+
+ nodes[1].node.claim_funds(our_payment_preimage);
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+
+ let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ let mut update_fulfill_msg: msgs::UpdateFulfillHTLC = {
+ match events[0] {
+ MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { node_id: _ , updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, ref update_fee, .. } } => {
+ assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
+ assert_eq!(update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 1);
+ assert!(update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
+ assert!(update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
+ assert!(update_fee.is_none());
+ update_fulfill_htlcs[0].clone()
+ },
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ }
+ };
+
+ update_fulfill_msg.htlc_id = 1;
+
+ let err = nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_fulfill_msg);
+ if let Err(msgs::HandleError{err, action: Some(msgs::ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage {..})}) = err {
+ assert_eq!(err, "Remote tried to fulfill/fail an HTLC we couldn't find");
+ } else {
+ assert!(false);
+ }
+
+ assert!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().is_empty());
+ check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0]);
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_update_fulfill_htlc_bolt2_wrong_preimage() {
+ //BOLT 2 Requirement: A receiving node: if the payment_preimage value in update_fulfill_htlc doesn't SHA256 hash to the corresponding HTLC payment_hash MUST fail the channel.
+
+ let nodes = create_network(2);
+ create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
+
+ let our_payment_preimage = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 100000).0;
+
+ nodes[1].node.claim_funds(our_payment_preimage);
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+
+ let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ let mut update_fulfill_msg: msgs::UpdateFulfillHTLC = {
+ match events[0] {
+ MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { node_id: _ , updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, ref update_fee, .. } } => {
+ assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
+ assert_eq!(update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 1);
+ assert!(update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
+ assert!(update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
+ assert!(update_fee.is_none());
+ update_fulfill_htlcs[0].clone()
+ },
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ }
+ };
+
+ update_fulfill_msg.payment_preimage = PaymentPreimage([1; 32]);
+
+ let err = nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_fulfill_msg);
+ if let Err(msgs::HandleError{err, action: Some(msgs::ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage {..})}) = err {
+ assert_eq!(err, "Remote tried to fulfill HTLC with an incorrect preimage");
+ } else {
+ assert!(false);
+ }
+
+ assert!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().is_empty());
+ check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0]);
+}
+
+
+#[test]
+fn test_update_fulfill_htlc_bolt2_missing_badonion_bit_for_malformed_htlc_message() {
+ //BOLT 2 Requirement: A receiving node: if the BADONION bit in failure_code is not set for update_fail_malformed_htlc MUST fail the channel.
+
+ let mut nodes = create_network(2);
+ create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1000000, 1000000);
+ let route = nodes[0].router.get_route(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), None, &[], 1000000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV).unwrap();
+ let (_, our_payment_hash) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(nodes[0]);
+ nodes[0].node.send_payment(route, our_payment_hash).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+
+ let mut updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+ updates.update_add_htlcs[0].onion_routing_packet.version = 1; //Produce a malformed HTLC message
+
+ nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0);
+ commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], updates.commitment_signed, false, true);
+
+ let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+
+ let mut update_msg: msgs::UpdateFailMalformedHTLC = {
+ match events[0] {
+ MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { node_id: _ , updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, ref update_fee, .. } } => {
+ assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
+ assert!(update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
+ assert!(update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
+ assert_eq!(update_fail_malformed_htlcs.len(), 1);
+ assert!(update_fee.is_none());
+ update_fail_malformed_htlcs[0].clone()
+ },
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ }
+ };
+ update_msg.failure_code &= !0x8000;
+ let err = nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_malformed_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_msg);
+ if let Err(msgs::HandleError{err, action: Some(msgs::ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage {..})}) = err {
+ assert_eq!(err, "Got update_fail_malformed_htlc with BADONION not set");
+ } else {
+ assert!(false);
+ }
+
+ assert!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().is_empty());
+ check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0]);
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_update_fulfill_htlc_bolt2_after_malformed_htlc_message_must_forward_update_fail_htlc() {
+ //BOLT 2 Requirement: a receiving node which has an outgoing HTLC canceled by update_fail_malformed_htlc:
+ // * MUST return an error in the update_fail_htlc sent to the link which originally sent the HTLC, using the failure_code given and setting the data to sha256_of_onion.
+
+ let mut nodes = create_network(3);
+ create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1000000, 1000000);
+ create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 1, 2, 1000000, 1000000);
+
+ let route = nodes[0].router.get_route(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), None, &Vec::new(), 100000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV).unwrap();
+ let (_, our_payment_hash) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(nodes[0]);
+
+ //First hop
+ let mut payment_event = {
+ nodes[0].node.send_payment(route, our_payment_hash).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+ let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ SendEvent::from_event(events.remove(0))
+ };
+ nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0);
+ commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
+ let mut events_2 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events_2.len(), 1);
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+ payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events_2.remove(0));
+ assert_eq!(payment_event.msgs.len(), 1);
+
+ //Second Hop
+ payment_event.msgs[0].onion_routing_packet.version = 1; //Produce a malformed HTLC message
+ nodes[2].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 0);
+ commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[2], nodes[1], payment_event.commitment_msg, false, true);
+
+ let events_3 = nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events_3.len(), 1);
+ let update_msg : (msgs::UpdateFailMalformedHTLC, msgs::CommitmentSigned) = {
+ match events_3[0] {
+ MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { node_id: _ , updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, ref update_fee, ref commitment_signed } } => {
+ assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
+ assert!(update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
+ assert!(update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
+ assert_eq!(update_fail_malformed_htlcs.len(), 1);
+ assert!(update_fee.is_none());
+ (update_fail_malformed_htlcs[0].clone(), commitment_signed.clone())
+ },
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ }
+ };
+
+ nodes[1].node.handle_update_fail_malformed_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_msg.0).unwrap();
+
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0);
+ commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[2], update_msg.1, false, true);
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
+ let events_4 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events_4.len(), 1);
+
+ //Confirm that handlinge the update_malformed_htlc message produces an update_fail_htlc message to be forwarded back along the route
+ match events_4[0] {
+ MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { node_id: _ , updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, ref update_fee, .. } } => {
+ assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
+ assert!(update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
+ assert_eq!(update_fail_htlcs.len(), 1);
+ assert!(update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
+ assert!(update_fee.is_none());
+ },
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ };
+
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+}
projects / rust-lightning / blobdiff