Add a test of stale-feerate-force-closure behavior

diff --git a/lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs b/lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
index ef6089d3c5094173da88c7ec7c7b8600d253ff8a..80b98b2b6f5bacaafb31739744ea1357d5a0e1c1 100644 (file)
--- a/lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
+++ b/lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
@@ -965,7 +965,7 @@ const UNACCEPTED_INBOUND_CHANNEL_AGE_LIMIT_TICKS: i32 = 2;
 /// The number of blocks of historical feerate estimates we keep around and consider when deciding
 /// to force-close a channel for having too-low fees. Also the number of blocks we have to see
 /// after startup before we consider force-closing channels for having too-low fees.
-const FEERATE_TRACKING_BLOCKS: usize = 144;
+pub(super) const FEERATE_TRACKING_BLOCKS: usize = 144;
 
 /// Stores a PaymentSecret and any other data we may need to validate an inbound payment is
 /// actually ours and not some duplicate HTLC sent to us by a node along the route.

diff --git a/lightning/src/ln/shutdown_tests.rs b/lightning/src/ln/shutdown_tests.rs
index 0e03fd8db139353001f8fe1b0f12e717a213e49b..fe79da413c83eaadab6774a7637454dd59548f6d 100644 (file)
--- a/lightning/src/ln/shutdown_tests.rs
+++ b/lightning/src/ln/shutdown_tests.rs
@@ -1464,3 +1464,59 @@ fn batch_funding_failure() {
        check_closed_events(&nodes[0], &close);
        assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
 }
+
+#[test]
+fn test_force_closure_on_low_stale_fee() {
+       // Check that we force-close channels if they have a low fee and that has gotten stale (without
+       // update).
+       let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
+       let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
+       let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
+       let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+
+       let chan_id = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1).2;
+
+       // Start by connecting lots of blocks to give LDK some feerate history
+       for _ in 0..super::channelmanager::FEERATE_TRACKING_BLOCKS * 2 {
+               connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 1);
+       }
+
+       // Now connect a handful of blocks with a "high" feerate
+       {
+               let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[1].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
+               *feerate_lock *= 2;
+       }
+       for _ in 0..super::channelmanager::FEERATE_TRACKING_BLOCKS - 1 {
+               connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 1);
+       }
+       assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
+
+       // Now, note that one more block would cause us to force-close, it won't because we've dropped
+       // the feerate
+       {
+               let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[1].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
+               *feerate_lock /= 2;
+       }
+       connect_blocks(&nodes[1], super::channelmanager::FEERATE_TRACKING_BLOCKS as u32 * 2);
+       assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
+
+       // Now, connect another FEERATE_TRACKING_BLOCKS - 1 blocks at a high feerate, note that none of
+       // these will cause a force-closure because LDK only looks at the minimium feerate over the
+       // last FEERATE_TRACKING_BLOCKS blocks.
+       {
+               let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[1].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
+               *feerate_lock *= 2;
+       }
+
+       for _ in 0..super::channelmanager::FEERATE_TRACKING_BLOCKS - 1 {
+               connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 1);
+       }
+       assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
+
+       // Finally, connect one more block and check the force-close happened.
+       connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 1);
+       check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+       check_closed_broadcast(&nodes[1], 1, true);
+       let reason = ClosureReason::PeerFeerateTooLow { peer_feerate_sat_per_kw: 253, required_feerate_sat_per_kw: 253 * 2 };
+       check_closed_events(&nodes[1], &[ExpectedCloseEvent::from_id_reason(chan_id, false, reason)]);
+}