(2, SpontaneousPayment)
);
+ /// Information about an HTLC that is part of a payment that can be claimed.
+ #[derive(Clone, Debug, PartialEq, Eq)]
+ pub struct ClaimedHTLC {
+ /// The `channel_id` of the channel over which the HTLC was received.
+ pub channel_id: [u8; 32],
+ /// The `user_channel_id` of the channel over which the HTLC was received. This is the value
+ /// passed in to [`ChannelManager::create_channel`] for outbound channels, or to
+ /// [`ChannelManager::accept_inbound_channel`] for inbound channels if
+ /// [`UserConfig::manually_accept_inbound_channels`] config flag is set to true. Otherwise
+ /// `user_channel_id` will be randomized for an inbound channel.
+ ///
+ /// This field will be zero for a payment that was serialized prior to LDK version 0.0.117. (This
+ /// should only happen in the case that a payment was claimable prior to LDK version 0.0.117, but
+ /// was not actually claimed until after upgrading.)
+ ///
+ /// [`ChannelManager::create_channel`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::create_channel
+ /// [`ChannelManager::accept_inbound_channel`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::accept_inbound_channel
+ /// [`UserConfig::manually_accept_inbound_channels`]: crate::util::config::UserConfig::manually_accept_inbound_channels
+ pub user_channel_id: u128,
+ /// The block height at which this HTLC expires.
+ pub cltv_expiry: u32,
+ /// The amount (in msats) of this part of an MPP.
+ pub value_msat: u64,
+ }
+ impl_writeable_tlv_based!(ClaimedHTLC, {
+ (0, channel_id, required),
+ (2, user_channel_id, required),
+ (4, cltv_expiry, required),
+ (6, value_msat, required),
+ });
+
/// When the payment path failure took place and extra details about it. [`PathFailure::OnPath`] may
/// contain a [`NetworkUpdate`] that needs to be applied to the [`NetworkGraph`].
///
/// The purpose of the claimed payment, i.e. whether the payment was for an invoice or a
/// spontaneous payment.
purpose: PaymentPurpose,
+ /// The HTLCs that comprise the claimed payment. This will be empty for events serialized prior
+ /// to LDK version 0.0.117.
+ htlcs: Vec<ClaimedHTLC>,
+ /// The sender-intended sum total of all the MPP parts. This will be `None` for events
+ /// serialized prior to LDK version 0.0.117.
+ sender_intended_total_msat: Option<u64>,
},
/// Indicates an outbound payment we made succeeded (i.e. it made it all the way to its target
/// and we got back the payment preimage for it).
/// payment is no longer retryable, due either to the [`Retry`] provided or
/// [`ChannelManager::abandon_payment`] having been called for the corresponding payment.
///
+ /// In exceedingly rare cases, it is possible that an [`Event::PaymentFailed`] is generated for
+ /// a payment after an [`Event::PaymentSent`] event for this same payment has already been
+ /// received and processed. In this case, the [`Event::PaymentFailed`] event MUST be ignored,
+ /// and the payment MUST be treated as having succeeded.
+ ///
/// [`Retry`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::Retry
/// [`ChannelManager::abandon_payment`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::abandon_payment
PaymentFailed {
// We never write the OpenChannelRequest events as, upon disconnection, peers
// drop any channels which have not yet exchanged funding_signed.
},
- &Event::PaymentClaimed { ref payment_hash, ref amount_msat, ref purpose, ref receiver_node_id } => {
+ &Event::PaymentClaimed { ref payment_hash, ref amount_msat, ref purpose, ref receiver_node_id, ref htlcs, ref sender_intended_total_msat } => {
19u8.write(writer)?;
write_tlv_fields!(writer, {
(0, payment_hash, required),
(1, receiver_node_id, option),
(2, purpose, required),
(4, amount_msat, required),
+ (5, *htlcs, optional_vec),
+ (7, sender_intended_total_msat, option),
});
},
&Event::ProbeSuccessful { ref payment_id, ref payment_hash, ref path } => {
let mut purpose = UpgradableRequired(None);
let mut amount_msat = 0;
let mut receiver_node_id = None;
+ let mut htlcs: Option<Vec<ClaimedHTLC>> = Some(vec![]);
+ let mut sender_intended_total_msat: Option<u64> = None;
read_tlv_fields!(reader, {
(0, payment_hash, required),
(1, receiver_node_id, option),
(2, purpose, upgradable_required),
(4, amount_msat, required),
+ (5, htlcs, optional_vec),
+ (7, sender_intended_total_msat, option),
});
Ok(Some(Event::PaymentClaimed {
receiver_node_id,
payment_hash,
purpose: _init_tlv_based_struct_field!(purpose, upgradable_required),
amount_msat,
+ htlcs: htlcs.unwrap_or(vec![]),
+ sender_intended_total_msat,
}))
};
f()
pub(crate) struct HTLCPreviousHopData {
// Note that this may be an outbound SCID alias for the associated channel.
short_channel_id: u64,
+ user_channel_id: Option<u128>,
htlc_id: u64,
incoming_packet_shared_secret: [u8; 32],
phantom_shared_secret: Option<[u8; 32]>,
counterparty_skimmed_fee_msat: Option<u64>,
}
+ impl From<&ClaimableHTLC> for events::ClaimedHTLC {
+ fn from(val: &ClaimableHTLC) -> Self {
+ events::ClaimedHTLC {
+ channel_id: val.prev_hop.outpoint.to_channel_id(),
+ user_channel_id: val.prev_hop.user_channel_id.unwrap_or(0),
+ cltv_expiry: val.cltv_expiry,
+ value_msat: val.value,
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
/// A payment identifier used to uniquely identify a payment to LDK.
///
/// This is not exported to bindings users as we just use [u8; 32] directly
amount_msat: u64,
payment_purpose: events::PaymentPurpose,
receiver_node_id: PublicKey,
+ htlcs: Vec<events::ClaimedHTLC>,
+ sender_intended_value: Option<u64>,
}
impl_writeable_tlv_based!(ClaimingPayment, {
(0, amount_msat, required),
(2, payment_purpose, required),
(4, receiver_node_id, required),
+ (5, htlcs, optional_vec),
+ (7, sender_intended_value, option),
});
struct ClaimablePayment {
/// could be in the middle of being processed without the direct mutex held.
///
/// See `ChannelManager` struct-level documentation for lock order requirements.
+ #[cfg(not(any(test, feature = "_test_utils")))]
pending_events: Mutex<VecDeque<(events::Event, Option<EventCompletionAction>)>>,
+ #[cfg(any(test, feature = "_test_utils"))]
+ pub(crate) pending_events: Mutex<VecDeque<(events::Event, Option<EventCompletionAction>)>>,
+
/// A simple atomic flag to ensure only one task at a time can be processing events asynchronously.
pending_events_processor: AtomicBool,
if let PendingHTLCRouting::Forward { short_channel_id, .. } = payment.forward_info.routing {
let htlc_source = HTLCSource::PreviousHopData(HTLCPreviousHopData {
short_channel_id: payment.prev_short_channel_id,
+ user_channel_id: Some(payment.prev_user_channel_id),
outpoint: payment.prev_funding_outpoint,
htlc_id: payment.prev_htlc_id,
incoming_packet_shared_secret: payment.forward_info.incoming_shared_secret,
let htlc_source = HTLCSource::PreviousHopData(HTLCPreviousHopData {
short_channel_id: prev_short_channel_id,
+ user_channel_id: Some(prev_user_channel_id),
outpoint: prev_funding_outpoint,
htlc_id: prev_htlc_id,
incoming_packet_shared_secret: incoming_shared_secret,
for forward_info in pending_forwards.drain(..) {
match forward_info {
HTLCForwardInfo::AddHTLC(PendingAddHTLCInfo {
- prev_short_channel_id, prev_htlc_id, prev_funding_outpoint, prev_user_channel_id: _,
+ prev_short_channel_id, prev_htlc_id, prev_funding_outpoint, prev_user_channel_id,
forward_info: PendingHTLCInfo {
incoming_shared_secret, payment_hash, outgoing_amt_msat, outgoing_cltv_value,
routing: PendingHTLCRouting::Forward { onion_packet, .. }, skimmed_fee_msat, ..
log_trace!(self.logger, "Adding HTLC from short id {} with payment_hash {} to channel with short id {} after delay", prev_short_channel_id, log_bytes!(payment_hash.0), short_chan_id);
let htlc_source = HTLCSource::PreviousHopData(HTLCPreviousHopData {
short_channel_id: prev_short_channel_id,
+ user_channel_id: Some(prev_user_channel_id),
outpoint: prev_funding_outpoint,
htlc_id: prev_htlc_id,
incoming_packet_shared_secret: incoming_shared_secret,
let claimable_htlc = ClaimableHTLC {
prev_hop: HTLCPreviousHopData {
short_channel_id: prev_short_channel_id,
+ user_channel_id: Some(prev_user_channel_id),
outpoint: prev_funding_outpoint,
htlc_id: prev_htlc_id,
incoming_packet_shared_secret: incoming_shared_secret,
);
failed_forwards.push((HTLCSource::PreviousHopData(HTLCPreviousHopData {
short_channel_id: $htlc.prev_hop.short_channel_id,
+ user_channel_id: $htlc.prev_hop.user_channel_id,
outpoint: prev_funding_outpoint,
htlc_id: $htlc.prev_hop.htlc_id,
incoming_packet_shared_secret: $htlc.prev_hop.incoming_packet_shared_secret,
&self.pending_events, &self.logger)
{ self.push_pending_forwards_ev(); }
},
- HTLCSource::PreviousHopData(HTLCPreviousHopData { ref short_channel_id, ref htlc_id, ref incoming_packet_shared_secret, ref phantom_shared_secret, ref outpoint }) => {
+ HTLCSource::PreviousHopData(HTLCPreviousHopData { ref short_channel_id, ref htlc_id, ref incoming_packet_shared_secret, ref phantom_shared_secret, ref outpoint, .. }) => {
log_trace!(self.logger, "Failing HTLC with payment_hash {} backwards from us with {:?}", log_bytes!(payment_hash.0), onion_error);
let err_packet = onion_error.get_encrypted_failure_packet(incoming_packet_shared_secret, phantom_shared_secret);
}
}
+ let htlcs = payment.htlcs.iter().map(events::ClaimedHTLC::from).collect();
+ let sender_intended_value = payment.htlcs.first().map(|htlc| htlc.total_msat);
let dup_purpose = claimable_payments.pending_claiming_payments.insert(payment_hash,
ClaimingPayment { amount_msat: payment.htlcs.iter().map(|source| source.value).sum(),
- payment_purpose: payment.purpose, receiver_node_id,
+ payment_purpose: payment.purpose, receiver_node_id, htlcs, sender_intended_value
});
if dup_purpose.is_some() {
debug_assert!(false, "Shouldn't get a duplicate pending claim event ever");
self.pending_outbound_payments.finalize_claims(sources, &self.pending_events);
}
- fn claim_funds_internal(&self, source: HTLCSource, payment_preimage: PaymentPreimage, forwarded_htlc_value_msat: Option<u64>, from_onchain: bool, next_channel_id: [u8; 32]) {
+ fn claim_funds_internal(&self, source: HTLCSource, payment_preimage: PaymentPreimage, forwarded_htlc_value_msat: Option<u64>, from_onchain: bool, next_channel_outpoint: OutPoint) {
match source {
HTLCSource::OutboundRoute { session_priv, payment_id, path, .. } => {
debug_assert!(self.background_events_processed_since_startup.load(Ordering::Acquire),
"We don't support claim_htlc claims during startup - monitors may not be available yet");
- self.pending_outbound_payments.claim_htlc(payment_id, payment_preimage, session_priv, path, from_onchain, &self.pending_events, &self.logger);
+ let ev_completion_action = EventCompletionAction::ReleaseRAAChannelMonitorUpdate {
+ channel_funding_outpoint: next_channel_outpoint,
+ counterparty_node_id: path.hops[0].pubkey,
+ };
+ self.pending_outbound_payments.claim_htlc(payment_id, payment_preimage,
+ session_priv, path, from_onchain, ev_completion_action, &self.pending_events,
+ &self.logger);
},
HTLCSource::PreviousHopData(hop_data) => {
let prev_outpoint = hop_data.outpoint;
fee_earned_msat,
claim_from_onchain_tx: from_onchain,
prev_channel_id: Some(prev_outpoint.to_channel_id()),
- next_channel_id: Some(next_channel_id),
+ next_channel_id: Some(next_channel_outpoint.to_channel_id()),
outbound_amount_forwarded_msat: forwarded_htlc_value_msat,
},
downstream_counterparty_and_funding_outpoint: None,
match action {
MonitorUpdateCompletionAction::PaymentClaimed { payment_hash } => {
let payment = self.claimable_payments.lock().unwrap().pending_claiming_payments.remove(&payment_hash);
- if let Some(ClaimingPayment { amount_msat, payment_purpose: purpose, receiver_node_id }) = payment {
+ if let Some(ClaimingPayment {
+ amount_msat,
+ payment_purpose: purpose,
+ receiver_node_id,
+ htlcs,
+ sender_intended_value: sender_intended_total_msat,
+ }) = payment {
self.pending_events.lock().unwrap().push_back((events::Event::PaymentClaimed {
- payment_hash, purpose, amount_msat, receiver_node_id: Some(receiver_node_id),
+ payment_hash,
+ purpose,
+ amount_msat,
+ receiver_node_id: Some(receiver_node_id),
+ htlcs,
+ sender_intended_total_msat,
}, None));
}
},
}
fn internal_update_fulfill_htlc(&self, counterparty_node_id: &PublicKey, msg: &msgs::UpdateFulfillHTLC) -> Result<(), MsgHandleErrInternal> {
+ let funding_txo;
let (htlc_source, forwarded_htlc_value) = {
let per_peer_state = self.per_peer_state.read().unwrap();
let peer_state_mutex = per_peer_state.get(counterparty_node_id)
let peer_state = &mut *peer_state_lock;
match peer_state.channel_by_id.entry(msg.channel_id) {
hash_map::Entry::Occupied(mut chan) => {
- try_chan_entry!(self, chan.get_mut().update_fulfill_htlc(&msg), chan)
+ let res = try_chan_entry!(self, chan.get_mut().update_fulfill_htlc(&msg), chan);
+ funding_txo = chan.get().context.get_funding_txo().expect("We won't accept a fulfill until funded");
+ res
},
hash_map::Entry::Vacant(_) => return Err(MsgHandleErrInternal::send_err_msg_no_close(format!("Got a message for a channel from the wrong node! No such channel for the passed counterparty_node_id {}", counterparty_node_id), msg.channel_id))
}
};
- self.claim_funds_internal(htlc_source, msg.payment_preimage.clone(), Some(forwarded_htlc_value), false, msg.channel_id);
+ self.claim_funds_internal(htlc_source, msg.payment_preimage.clone(), Some(forwarded_htlc_value), false, funding_txo);
Ok(())
}
log_info!(self.logger, "Failed to forward incoming HTLC: detected duplicate intercepted payment over short channel id {}", scid);
let htlc_source = HTLCSource::PreviousHopData(HTLCPreviousHopData {
short_channel_id: prev_short_channel_id,
+ user_channel_id: Some(prev_user_channel_id),
outpoint: prev_funding_outpoint,
htlc_id: prev_htlc_id,
incoming_packet_shared_secret: forward_info.incoming_shared_secret,
let peer_state = &mut *peer_state_lock;
match peer_state.channel_by_id.entry(msg.channel_id) {
hash_map::Entry::Occupied(mut chan) => {
- let funding_txo = chan.get().context.get_funding_txo();
- let (htlcs_to_fail, monitor_update_opt) = try_chan_entry!(self, chan.get_mut().revoke_and_ack(&msg, &self.fee_estimator, &self.logger), chan);
+ let funding_txo_opt = chan.get().context.get_funding_txo();
+ let mon_update_blocked = if let Some(funding_txo) = funding_txo_opt {
+ self.raa_monitor_updates_held(
+ &peer_state.actions_blocking_raa_monitor_updates, funding_txo,
+ *counterparty_node_id)
+ } else { false };
+ let (htlcs_to_fail, monitor_update_opt) = try_chan_entry!(self,
+ chan.get_mut().revoke_and_ack(&msg, &self.fee_estimator, &self.logger, mon_update_blocked), chan);
let res = if let Some(monitor_update) = monitor_update_opt {
- handle_new_monitor_update!(self, funding_txo.unwrap(), monitor_update,
+ let funding_txo = funding_txo_opt
+ .expect("Funding outpoint must have been set for RAA handling to succeed");
+ handle_new_monitor_update!(self, funding_txo, monitor_update,
peer_state_lock, peer_state, per_peer_state, chan).map(|_| ())
} else { Ok(()) };
(htlcs_to_fail, res)
MonitorEvent::HTLCEvent(htlc_update) => {
if let Some(preimage) = htlc_update.payment_preimage {
log_trace!(self.logger, "Claiming HTLC with preimage {} from our monitor", log_bytes!(preimage.0));
- self.claim_funds_internal(htlc_update.source, preimage, htlc_update.htlc_value_satoshis.map(|v| v * 1000), true, funding_outpoint.to_channel_id());
+ self.claim_funds_internal(htlc_update.source, preimage, htlc_update.htlc_value_satoshis.map(|v| v * 1000), true, funding_outpoint);
} else {
log_trace!(self.logger, "Failing HTLC with hash {} from our monitor", log_bytes!(htlc_update.payment_hash.0));
let receiver = HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: counterparty_node_id, channel_id: funding_outpoint.to_channel_id() };
if height >= htlc.forward_info.outgoing_cltv_value - HTLC_FAIL_BACK_BUFFER {
let prev_hop_data = HTLCSource::PreviousHopData(HTLCPreviousHopData {
short_channel_id: htlc.prev_short_channel_id,
+ user_channel_id: Some(htlc.prev_user_channel_id),
htlc_id: htlc.prev_htlc_id,
incoming_packet_shared_secret: htlc.forward_info.incoming_shared_secret,
phantom_shared_secret: None,
(1, phantom_shared_secret, option),
(2, outpoint, required),
(4, htlc_id, required),
- (6, incoming_packet_shared_secret, required)
+ (6, incoming_packet_shared_secret, required),
+ (7, user_channel_id, option),
});
impl Writeable for ClaimableHTLC {
// generating a `PaymentPathSuccessful` event but regenerating
// it and the `PaymentSent` on every restart until the
// `ChannelMonitor` is removed.
- pending_outbounds.claim_htlc(payment_id, preimage, session_priv, path, false, &pending_events, &args.logger);
+ let compl_action =
+ EventCompletionAction::ReleaseRAAChannelMonitorUpdate {
+ channel_funding_outpoint: monitor.get_funding_txo().0,
+ counterparty_node_id: path.hops[0].pubkey,
+ };
+ pending_outbounds.claim_htlc(payment_id, preimage, session_priv,
+ path, false, compl_action, &pending_events, &args.logger);
pending_events_read = pending_events.into_inner().unwrap();
}
},
// downstream chan is closed (because we don't have a
// channel_id -> peer map entry).
counterparty_opt.is_none(),
- monitor.get_funding_txo().0.to_channel_id()))
+ monitor.get_funding_txo().0))
} else { None }
} else {
// If it was an outbound payment, we've handled it above - if a preimage
.expect("Failed to get node_id for phantom node recipient");
receiver_node_id = Some(phantom_pubkey)
}
- for claimable_htlc in payment.htlcs {
+ for claimable_htlc in &payment.htlcs {
claimable_amt_msat += claimable_htlc.value;
// Add a holding-cell claim of the payment to the Channel, which should be
payment_hash,
purpose: payment.purpose,
amount_msat: claimable_amt_msat,
+ htlcs: payment.htlcs.iter().map(events::ClaimedHTLC::from).collect(),
+ sender_intended_total_msat: payment.htlcs.first().map(|htlc| htlc.total_msat),
}, None));
}
}
channel_manager.fail_htlc_backwards_internal(&source, &payment_hash, &reason, receiver);
}
- for (source, preimage, downstream_value, downstream_closed, downstream_chan_id) in pending_claims_to_replay {
+ for (source, preimage, downstream_value, downstream_closed, downstream_funding) in pending_claims_to_replay {
// We use `downstream_closed` in place of `from_onchain` here just as a guess - we
// don't remember in the `ChannelMonitor` where we got a preimage from, but if the
// channel is closed we just assume that it probably came from an on-chain claim.
channel_manager.claim_funds_internal(source, preimage, Some(downstream_value),
- downstream_closed, downstream_chan_id);
+ downstream_closed, downstream_funding);
}
//TODO: Broadcast channel update for closed channels, but only after we've made a
let bs_first_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_first_updates.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
+ expect_payment_sent(&nodes[0], payment_preimage, None, false, false);
nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_first_updates.commitment_signed);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
let (as_first_raa, as_first_cs) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
// Note that successful MPP payments will generate a single PaymentSent event upon the first
// path's success and a PaymentPathSuccessful event for each path's success.
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
- assert_eq!(events.len(), 3);
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
match events[0] {
- Event::PaymentSent { payment_id: ref id, payment_preimage: ref preimage, payment_hash: ref hash, .. } => {
- assert_eq!(Some(payment_id), *id);
- assert_eq!(payment_preimage, *preimage);
- assert_eq!(our_payment_hash, *hash);
- },
- _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
- }
- match events[1] {
Event::PaymentPathSuccessful { payment_id: ref actual_payment_id, ref payment_hash, ref path } => {
assert_eq!(payment_id, *actual_payment_id);
assert_eq!(our_payment_hash, *payment_hash.as_ref().unwrap());
},
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
}
- match events[2] {
+ match events[1] {
Event::PaymentPathSuccessful { payment_id: ref actual_payment_id, ref payment_hash, ref path } => {
assert_eq!(payment_id, *actual_payment_id);
assert_eq!(our_payment_hash, *payment_hash.as_ref().unwrap());
use crate::sign::EntropySource;
use crate::chain::channelmonitor::ChannelMonitor;
use crate::chain::transaction::OutPoint;
- use crate::events::{ClosureReason, Event, HTLCDestination, MessageSendEvent, MessageSendEventsProvider, PathFailure, PaymentPurpose, PaymentFailureReason};
+ use crate::events::{ClaimedHTLC, ClosureReason, Event, HTLCDestination, MessageSendEvent, MessageSendEventsProvider, PathFailure, PaymentPurpose, PaymentFailureReason};
use crate::events::bump_transaction::{BumpTransactionEventHandler, Wallet, WalletSource};
use crate::ln::{PaymentPreimage, PaymentHash, PaymentSecret};
-use crate::ln::channelmanager::{AChannelManager, ChainParameters, ChannelManager, ChannelManagerReadArgs, RAACommitmentOrder, PaymentSendFailure, RecipientOnionFields, PaymentId, MIN_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA};
+use crate::ln::channelmanager::{self, AChannelManager, ChainParameters, ChannelManager, ChannelManagerReadArgs, RAACommitmentOrder, PaymentSendFailure, RecipientOnionFields, PaymentId, MIN_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA};
use crate::routing::gossip::{P2PGossipSync, NetworkGraph, NetworkUpdate};
use crate::routing::router::{self, PaymentParameters, Route};
use crate::ln::features::InitFeatures;
}
}
+ /// Checks whether the claimed HTLC for the specified path has the correct channel information.
+ ///
+ /// This will panic if the path is empty, if the HTLC's channel ID is not actually a channel that
+ /// connects the final two nodes in the path, or if the `user_channel_id` is incorrect.
+ pub fn check_claimed_htlc_channel<'a, 'b, 'c>(origin_node: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, path: &[&Node<'a, 'b, 'c>], htlc: &ClaimedHTLC) {
+ let mut nodes = path.iter().rev();
+ let dest = nodes.next().expect("path should have a destination").node;
+ let prev = nodes.next().unwrap_or(&origin_node).node;
+ let dest_channels = dest.list_channels();
+ let ch = dest_channels.iter().find(|ch| ch.channel_id == htlc.channel_id)
+ .expect("HTLC's channel should be one of destination node's channels");
+ assert_eq!(htlc.user_channel_id, ch.user_channel_id);
+ assert_eq!(ch.counterparty.node_id, prev.get_our_node_id());
+ }
+
pub fn _reload_node<'a, 'b, 'c>(node: &'a Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, default_config: UserConfig, chanman_encoded: &[u8], monitors_encoded: &[&[u8]]) -> TestChannelManager<'b, 'c> {
let mut monitors_read = Vec::with_capacity(monitors_encoded.len());
for encoded in monitors_encoded {
bs_revoke_and_ack
}
};
- ($node_a: expr, $node_b: expr, (), $fail_backwards: expr, true /* skip last step */, false /* no extra message */) => {
- assert!($crate::ln::functional_test_utils::commitment_signed_dance_through_cp_raa(&$node_a, &$node_b, $fail_backwards).is_none());
+ ($node_a: expr, $node_b: expr, (), $fail_backwards: expr, true /* skip last step */, false /* no extra message */, $incl_claim: expr) => {
+ assert!($crate::ln::functional_test_utils::commitment_signed_dance_through_cp_raa(&$node_a, &$node_b, $fail_backwards, $incl_claim).is_none());
};
($node_a: expr, $node_b: expr, $commitment_signed: expr, $fail_backwards: expr) => {
$crate::ln::functional_test_utils::do_commitment_signed_dance(&$node_a, &$node_b, &$commitment_signed, $fail_backwards, false);
/// the initiator's `revoke_and_ack` response. i.e. [`do_main_commitment_signed_dance`] plus the
/// `revoke_and_ack` response to it.
///
+/// An HTLC claim on one channel blocks the RAA channel monitor update for the outbound edge
+/// channel until the inbound edge channel preimage monitor update completes. Thus, when checking
+/// for channel monitor updates, we need to know if an `update_fulfill_htlc` was included in the
+/// the commitment we're exchanging. `includes_claim` provides that information.
+///
/// Returns any additional message `node_b` generated in addition to the `revoke_and_ack` response.
-pub fn commitment_signed_dance_through_cp_raa(node_a: &Node<'_, '_, '_>, node_b: &Node<'_, '_, '_>, fail_backwards: bool) -> Option<MessageSendEvent> {
+pub fn commitment_signed_dance_through_cp_raa(node_a: &Node<'_, '_, '_>, node_b: &Node<'_, '_, '_>, fail_backwards: bool, includes_claim: bool) -> Option<MessageSendEvent> {
let (extra_msg_option, bs_revoke_and_ack) = do_main_commitment_signed_dance(node_a, node_b, fail_backwards);
node_a.node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&node_b.node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_revoke_and_ack);
- check_added_monitors(node_a, 1);
+ check_added_monitors(node_a, if includes_claim { 0 } else { 1 });
extra_msg_option
}
node_a.node.handle_commitment_signed(&node_b.node.get_our_node_id(), commitment_signed);
check_added_monitors!(node_a, 1);
- commitment_signed_dance!(node_a, node_b, (), fail_backwards, true, false);
+ // If this commitment signed dance was due to a claim, don't check for an RAA monitor update.
+ let got_claim = node_a.node.pending_events.lock().unwrap().iter().any(|(ev, action)| {
+ let matching_action = if let Some(channelmanager::EventCompletionAction::ReleaseRAAChannelMonitorUpdate
+ { channel_funding_outpoint, counterparty_node_id }) = action
+ {
+ if channel_funding_outpoint.to_channel_id() == commitment_signed.channel_id {
+ assert_eq!(*counterparty_node_id, node_b.node.get_our_node_id());
+ true
+ } else { false }
+ } else { false };
+ if matching_action {
+ if let Event::PaymentSent { .. } = ev {} else { panic!(); }
+ }
+ matching_action
+ });
+ if fail_backwards { assert!(!got_claim); }
+ commitment_signed_dance!(node_a, node_b, (), fail_backwards, true, false, got_claim);
if skip_last_step { return; }
pub fn expect_payment_sent<CM: AChannelManager, H: NodeHolder<CM=CM>>(node: &H,
expected_payment_preimage: PaymentPreimage, expected_fee_msat_opt: Option<Option<u64>>,
- expect_per_path_claims: bool,
+ expect_per_path_claims: bool, expect_post_ev_mon_update: bool,
) {
let events = node.node().get_and_clear_pending_events();
let expected_payment_hash = PaymentHash(
} else {
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
}
+ if expect_post_ev_mon_update {
+ check_added_monitors(node, 1);
+ }
let expected_payment_id = match events[0] {
Event::PaymentSent { ref payment_id, ref payment_preimage, ref payment_hash, ref fee_paid_msat } => {
assert_eq!(expected_payment_preimage, *payment_preimage);
}
}
-#[cfg(test)]
-#[macro_export]
-macro_rules! expect_payment_sent_without_paths {
- ($node: expr, $expected_payment_preimage: expr) => {
- expect_payment_sent!($node, $expected_payment_preimage, None::<u64>, false);
- };
- ($node: expr, $expected_payment_preimage: expr, $expected_fee_msat_opt: expr) => {
- expect_payment_sent!($node, $expected_payment_preimage, $expected_fee_msat_opt, false);
- }
-}
-
#[macro_export]
macro_rules! expect_payment_sent {
($node: expr, $expected_payment_preimage: expr) => {
};
($node: expr, $expected_payment_preimage: expr, $expected_fee_msat_opt: expr, $expect_paths: expr) => {
$crate::ln::functional_test_utils::expect_payment_sent(&$node, $expected_payment_preimage,
- $expected_fee_msat_opt.map(|o| Some(o)), $expect_paths);
+ $expected_fee_msat_opt.map(|o| Some(o)), $expect_paths, true);
}
}
let claim_event = expected_paths[0].last().unwrap().node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(claim_event.len(), 1);
match claim_event[0] {
- Event::PaymentClaimed { purpose: PaymentPurpose::SpontaneousPayment(preimage), .. }|
- Event::PaymentClaimed { purpose: PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage: Some(preimage), ..}, .. } =>
- assert_eq!(preimage, our_payment_preimage),
- Event::PaymentClaimed { purpose: PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { .. }, payment_hash, .. } =>
- assert_eq!(&payment_hash.0, &Sha256::hash(&our_payment_preimage.0)[..]),
+ Event::PaymentClaimed {
+ purpose: PaymentPurpose::SpontaneousPayment(preimage),
+ amount_msat,
+ ref htlcs,
+ .. }
+ | Event::PaymentClaimed {
+ purpose: PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage: Some(preimage), ..},
+ ref htlcs,
+ amount_msat,
+ ..
+ } => {
+ assert_eq!(preimage, our_payment_preimage);
+ assert_eq!(htlcs.len(), expected_paths.len()); // One per path.
+ assert_eq!(htlcs.iter().map(|h| h.value_msat).sum::<u64>(), amount_msat);
+ expected_paths.iter().zip(htlcs).for_each(|(path, htlc)| check_claimed_htlc_channel(origin_node, path, htlc));
+ },
+ Event::PaymentClaimed {
+ purpose: PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { .. },
+ payment_hash,
+ amount_msat,
+ ref htlcs,
+ ..
+ } => {
+ assert_eq!(&payment_hash.0, &Sha256::hash(&our_payment_preimage.0)[..]);
+ assert_eq!(htlcs.len(), expected_paths.len()); // One per path.
+ assert_eq!(htlcs.iter().map(|h| h.value_msat).sum::<u64>(), amount_msat);
+ expected_paths.iter().zip(htlcs).for_each(|(path, htlc)| check_claimed_htlc_channel(origin_node, path, htlc));
+ }
_ => panic!(),
}
projects / rust-lightning / commitdiff