short_to_id: HashMap<u64, [u8; 32]>,
next_forward: Instant,
/// short channel id -> forward infos. Key of 0 means payments received
+ /// Note that while this is held in the same mutex as the channels themselves, no consistency
+ /// guarantees are made about there existing a channel with the short id here, nor the short
+ /// ids in the PendingForwardHTLCInfo!
forward_htlcs: HashMap<u64, Vec<PendingForwardHTLCInfo>>,
+ /// Note that while this is held in the same mutex as the channels themselves, no consistency
+ /// guarantees are made about the channels given here actually existing anymore by the time you
+ /// go to read them!
claimable_htlcs: HashMap<[u8; 32], PendingOutboundHTLC>,
}
struct MutChannelHolder<'a> {
by_id: &'a mut HashMap<[u8; 32], Channel>,
short_to_id: &'a mut HashMap<u64, [u8; 32]>,
next_forward: &'a mut Instant,
- /// short channel id -> forward infos. Key of 0 means payments received
forward_htlcs: &'a mut HashMap<u64, Vec<PendingForwardHTLCInfo>>,
claimable_htlcs: &'a mut HashMap<[u8; 32], PendingOutboundHTLC>,
}
self.fail_htlc_backwards_internal(self.channel_state.lock().unwrap(), payment_hash, HTLCFailReason::Reason { failure_code: 0x4000 | 15, data: Vec::new() })
}
+ /// Fails an HTLC backwards to the sender of it to us.
+ /// Note that while we take a channel_state lock as input, we do *not* assume consistency here.
+ /// There are several callsites that do stupid things like loop over a list of payment_hashes
+ /// to fail and take the channel_state lock for each iteration (as we take ownership and may
+ /// drop it). In other words, no assumptions are made that entries in claimable_htlcs point to
+ /// still-available channels.
fn fail_htlc_backwards_internal(&self, mut channel_state: MutexGuard<ChannelHolder>, payment_hash: &[u8; 32], onion_error: HTLCFailReason) -> bool {
let mut pending_htlc = {
match channel_state.claimable_htlcs.remove(payment_hash) {
}
match pending_htlc {
- PendingOutboundHTLC::CycledRoute { .. } => { panic!("WAT"); },
+ PendingOutboundHTLC::CycledRoute { .. } => unreachable!(),
PendingOutboundHTLC::OutboundRoute { .. } => {
mem::drop(channel_state);
}
match pending_htlc {
- PendingOutboundHTLC::CycledRoute { .. } => { panic!("WAT"); },
+ PendingOutboundHTLC::CycledRoute { .. } => unreachable!(),
PendingOutboundHTLC::OutboundRoute { .. } => {
if from_user {
panic!("Called claim_funds with a preimage for an outgoing payment. There is nothing we can do with this, and something is seriously wrong if you knew this...");
let (node_id, fulfill_msgs) = {
let chan_id = match channel_state.short_to_id.get(&source_short_channel_id) {
Some(chan_id) => chan_id.clone(),
- None => return false
+ None => {
+ // TODO: There is probably a channel manager somewhere that needs to
+ // learn the preimage as the channel already hit the chain and that's
+ // why its missing.
+ return false
+ }
};
let chan = channel_state.by_id.get_mut(&chan_id).unwrap();
match chan.get_update_fulfill_htlc_and_commit(payment_preimage) {
Ok(msg) => (chan.get_their_node_id(), msg),
Err(_e) => {
+ // TODO: There is probably a channel manager somewhere that needs to
+ // learn the preimage as the channel may be about to hit the chain.
//TODO: Do something with e?
return false;
},
pending_forward_info.prev_short_channel_id = short_channel_id;
(short_channel_id, chan.update_add_htlc(&msg, pending_forward_info)?)
},
- None => return Err(HandleError{err: "Failed to find corresponding channel", action: None}), //TODO: panic?
+ None => return Err(HandleError{err: "Failed to find corresponding channel", action: None}),
};
match claimable_htlcs_entry {
&mut PendingOutboundHTLC::OutboundRoute { ref route, ref session_priv } => {
(route.clone(), session_priv.clone())
},
- _ => { panic!("WAT") },
+ _ => unreachable!(),
};
*outbound_route = PendingOutboundHTLC::CycledRoute {
source_short_channel_id,