ClaimableOnChannelClose {
/// The amount available to claim, in satoshis, excluding the on-chain fees which will be
/// required to do so.
- claimable_amount_satoshis: u64,
+ amount_satoshis: u64,
},
/// The channel has been closed, and the given balance is ours but awaiting confirmations until
/// we consider it spendable.
ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
/// The amount available to claim, in satoshis, possibly excluding the on-chain fees which
/// were spent in broadcasting the transaction.
- claimable_amount_satoshis: u64,
+ amount_satoshis: u64,
/// The height at which an [`Event::SpendableOutputs`] event will be generated for this
/// amount.
confirmation_height: u32,
ContentiousClaimable {
/// The amount available to claim, in satoshis, excluding the on-chain fees which will be
/// required to do so.
- claimable_amount_satoshis: u64,
+ amount_satoshis: u64,
/// The height at which the counterparty may be able to claim the balance if we have not
/// done so.
timeout_height: u32,
MaybeTimeoutClaimableHTLC {
/// The amount potentially available to claim, in satoshis, excluding the on-chain fees
/// which will be required to do so.
- claimable_amount_satoshis: u64,
+ amount_satoshis: u64,
/// The height at which we will be able to claim the balance if our counterparty has not
/// done so.
claimable_height: u32,
MaybePreimageClaimableHTLC {
/// The amount potentially available to claim, in satoshis, excluding the on-chain fees
/// which will be required to do so.
- claimable_amount_satoshis: u64,
+ amount_satoshis: u64,
/// The height at which our counterparty will be able to claim the balance if we have not
/// yet received the preimage and claimed it ourselves.
expiry_height: u32,
///
/// Note that for outputs from HTLC balances this may be excluding some on-chain fees that
/// were already spent.
- claimable_amount_satoshis: u64,
+ amount_satoshis: u64,
},
}
/// On-chain fees required to claim the balance are not included in this amount.
pub fn claimable_amount_satoshis(&self) -> u64 {
match self {
- Balance::ClaimableOnChannelClose {
- claimable_amount_satoshis,
- } => *claimable_amount_satoshis,
- Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis,
- ..
- } => *claimable_amount_satoshis,
- Balance::ContentiousClaimable {
- claimable_amount_satoshis,
- ..
- } => *claimable_amount_satoshis,
- Balance::MaybeTimeoutClaimableHTLC {
- ..
- } => 0,
- Balance::MaybePreimageClaimableHTLC {
- ..
- } => 0,
- Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable {
- claimable_amount_satoshis,
- ..
- } => *claimable_amount_satoshis,
+ Balance::ClaimableOnChannelClose { amount_satoshis, .. }|
+ Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations { amount_satoshis, .. }|
+ Balance::ContentiousClaimable { amount_satoshis, .. }|
+ Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable { amount_satoshis, .. }
+ => *amount_satoshis,
+ Balance::MaybeTimeoutClaimableHTLC { .. }|
+ Balance::MaybePreimageClaimableHTLC { .. }
+ => 0,
}
}
}
if let Some(conf_thresh) = holder_delayed_output_pending {
debug_assert!(holder_commitment);
return Some(Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: htlc.amount_msat / 1000,
+ amount_satoshis: htlc.amount_msat / 1000,
confirmation_height: conf_thresh,
});
} else if htlc_resolved.is_some() && !htlc_output_spend_pending {
debug_assert!(!htlc.offered || htlc_spend_pending.is_none() || !htlc_spend_pending.unwrap().1,
"We don't (currently) generate preimage claims against revoked outputs, where did you get one?!");
return Some(Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: htlc.amount_msat / 1000,
+ amount_satoshis: htlc.amount_msat / 1000,
});
}
} else if htlc.offered == holder_commitment {
// and awaiting confirmations on it.
if let Some(conf_thresh) = holder_timeout_spend_pending {
return Some(Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: htlc.amount_msat / 1000,
+ amount_satoshis: htlc.amount_msat / 1000,
confirmation_height: conf_thresh,
});
} else {
return Some(Balance::MaybeTimeoutClaimableHTLC {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: htlc.amount_msat / 1000,
+ amount_satoshis: htlc.amount_msat / 1000,
claimable_height: htlc.cltv_expiry,
payment_hash: htlc.payment_hash,
});
debug_assert!(holder_timeout_spend_pending.is_none());
if let Some((conf_thresh, true)) = htlc_spend_pending {
return Some(Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: htlc.amount_msat / 1000,
+ amount_satoshis: htlc.amount_msat / 1000,
confirmation_height: conf_thresh,
});
} else {
return Some(Balance::ContentiousClaimable {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: htlc.amount_msat / 1000,
+ amount_satoshis: htlc.amount_msat / 1000,
timeout_height: htlc.cltv_expiry,
payment_hash: htlc.payment_hash,
payment_preimage: *payment_preimage,
}
} else if htlc_resolved.is_none() {
return Some(Balance::MaybePreimageClaimableHTLC {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: htlc.amount_msat / 1000,
+ amount_satoshis: htlc.amount_msat / 1000,
expiry_height: htlc.cltv_expiry,
payment_hash: htlc.payment_hash,
});
} else { None }
}) {
res.push(Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: value,
+ amount_satoshis: value,
confirmation_height: conf_thresh,
});
} else {
descriptor: SpendableOutputDescriptor::StaticOutput { output, .. }
} = &event.event {
res.push(Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: output.value,
+ amount_satoshis: output.value,
confirmation_height: event.confirmation_threshold(),
});
if let Some(confirmed_to_self_idx) = confirmed_counterparty_output.map(|(idx, _)| idx) {
.is_output_spend_pending(&BitcoinOutPoint::new(txid, confirmed_to_self_idx));
if output_spendable {
res.push(Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: amt,
+ amount_satoshis: amt,
});
}
} else {
walk_htlcs!(true, false, us.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|(a, _, _)| a));
if let Some(conf_thresh) = pending_commitment_tx_conf_thresh {
res.push(Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: us.current_holder_commitment_tx.to_self_value_sat,
+ amount_satoshis: us.current_holder_commitment_tx.to_self_value_sat,
confirmation_height: conf_thresh,
});
}
walk_htlcs!(true, false, prev_commitment.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|(a, _, _)| a));
if let Some(conf_thresh) = pending_commitment_tx_conf_thresh {
res.push(Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: prev_commitment.to_self_value_sat,
+ amount_satoshis: prev_commitment.to_self_value_sat,
confirmation_height: conf_thresh,
});
}
// neither us nor our counterparty misbehaved. At worst we've under-estimated
// the amount we can claim as we'll punish a misbehaving counterparty.
res.push(Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: us.current_holder_commitment_tx.to_self_value_sat,
+ amount_satoshis: us.current_holder_commitment_tx.to_self_value_sat,
confirmation_height: conf_thresh,
});
}
if htlc.transaction_output_index.is_none() { continue; }
if htlc.offered {
res.push(Balance::MaybeTimeoutClaimableHTLC {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: htlc.amount_msat / 1000,
+ amount_satoshis: htlc.amount_msat / 1000,
claimable_height: htlc.cltv_expiry,
payment_hash: htlc.payment_hash,
});
// As long as the HTLC is still in our latest commitment state, treat
// it as potentially claimable, even if it has long-since expired.
res.push(Balance::MaybePreimageClaimableHTLC {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: htlc.amount_msat / 1000,
+ amount_satoshis: htlc.amount_msat / 1000,
expiry_height: htlc.cltv_expiry,
payment_hash: htlc.payment_hash,
});
}
}
res.push(Balance::ClaimableOnChannelClose {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: us.current_holder_commitment_tx.to_self_value_sat + claimable_inbound_htlc_value_sat,
+ amount_satoshis: us.current_holder_commitment_tx.to_self_value_sat + claimable_inbound_htlc_value_sat,
});
}
use crate::ln::features::ChannelTypeFeatures;
use crate::ln::PaymentPreimage;
use crate::prelude::*;
-use crate::sign::{ChannelSigner, EcdsaChannelSigner, SignerProvider, WriteableEcdsaChannelSigner};
+use crate::sign::{EcdsaChannelSigner, SignerProvider, WriteableEcdsaChannelSigner};
use crate::sync::Mutex;
use crate::util::logger::Logger;
if disconnect {
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (true, true), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
+ reconnect_args.send_channel_ready = (true, true);
+ reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
}
chanmon_cfgs[0].persister.set_update_ret(ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::Completed);
if disconnect {
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ reconnect_nodes(ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]));
}
// ...and make sure we can force-close a frozen channel
// Make sure nodes[1] isn't stupid enough to re-send the ChannelReady on reconnect
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, confirm_a_first), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
+ reconnect_args.send_channel_ready.1 = confirm_a_first;
+ reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
// But we want to re-emit ChannelPending
expect_channel_pending_event(&nodes[1], &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
nodes[2].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
if second_fails {
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (1, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[1], &nodes[2]);
+ reconnect_args.pending_htlc_fails.0 = 1;
+ reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_id_2 }]);
} else {
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], (false, false), (0, 0), (1, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[1], &nodes[2]);
+ reconnect_args.pending_htlc_claims.0 = 1;
+ reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
}
if htlc_status == HTLCStatusAtDupClaim::HoldingCell {
}
/// There are a few "states" and then a number of flags which can be applied:
-/// We first move through init with OurInitSent -> TheirInitSent -> FundingCreated -> FundingSent.
-/// TheirChannelReady and OurChannelReady then get set on FundingSent, and when both are set we
-/// move on to ChannelReady.
-/// Note that PeerDisconnected can be set on both ChannelReady and FundingSent.
-/// ChannelReady can then get all remaining flags set on it, until we finish shutdown, then we
-/// move on to ShutdownComplete, at which point most calls into this channel are disallowed.
+/// We first move through init with `OurInitSent` -> `TheirInitSent` -> `FundingCreated` -> `FundingSent`.
+/// `TheirChannelReady` and `OurChannelReady` then get set on `FundingSent`, and when both are set we
+/// move on to `ChannelReady`.
+/// Note that `PeerDisconnected` can be set on both `ChannelReady` and `FundingSent`.
+/// `ChannelReady` can then get all remaining flags set on it, until we finish shutdown, then we
+/// move on to `ShutdownComplete`, at which point most calls into this channel are disallowed.
enum ChannelState {
/// Implies we have (or are prepared to) send our open_channel/accept_channel message
OurInitSent = 1 << 0,
- /// Implies we have received their open_channel/accept_channel message
+ /// Implies we have received their `open_channel`/`accept_channel` message
TheirInitSent = 1 << 1,
- /// We have sent funding_created and are awaiting a funding_signed to advance to FundingSent.
- /// Note that this is nonsense for an inbound channel as we immediately generate funding_signed
- /// upon receipt of funding_created, so simply skip this state.
+ /// We have sent `funding_created` and are awaiting a `funding_signed` to advance to `FundingSent`.
+ /// Note that this is nonsense for an inbound channel as we immediately generate `funding_signed`
+ /// upon receipt of `funding_created`, so simply skip this state.
FundingCreated = 4,
- /// Set when we have received/sent funding_created and funding_signed and are thus now waiting
- /// on the funding transaction to confirm. The ChannelReady flags are set to indicate when we
+ /// Set when we have received/sent `funding_created` and `funding_signed` and are thus now waiting
+ /// on the funding transaction to confirm. The `ChannelReady` flags are set to indicate when we
/// and our counterparty consider the funding transaction confirmed.
FundingSent = 8,
- /// Flag which can be set on FundingSent to indicate they sent us a channel_ready message.
- /// Once both TheirChannelReady and OurChannelReady are set, state moves on to ChannelReady.
+ /// Flag which can be set on `FundingSent` to indicate they sent us a `channel_ready` message.
+ /// Once both `TheirChannelReady` and `OurChannelReady` are set, state moves on to `ChannelReady`.
TheirChannelReady = 1 << 4,
- /// Flag which can be set on FundingSent to indicate we sent them a channel_ready message.
- /// Once both TheirChannelReady and OurChannelReady are set, state moves on to ChannelReady.
+ /// Flag which can be set on `FundingSent` to indicate we sent them a `channel_ready` message.
+ /// Once both `TheirChannelReady` and `OurChannelReady` are set, state moves on to `ChannelReady`.
OurChannelReady = 1 << 5,
ChannelReady = 64,
- /// Flag which is set on ChannelReady and FundingSent indicating remote side is considered
- /// "disconnected" and no updates are allowed until after we've done a channel_reestablish
+ /// Flag which is set on `ChannelReady` and `FundingSent` indicating remote side is considered
+ /// "disconnected" and no updates are allowed until after we've done a `channel_reestablish`
/// dance.
PeerDisconnected = 1 << 7,
- /// Flag which is set on ChannelReady, FundingCreated, and FundingSent indicating the user has
- /// told us a ChannelMonitor update is pending async persistence somewhere and we should pause
+ /// Flag which is set on `ChannelReady`, FundingCreated, and `FundingSent` indicating the user has
+ /// told us a `ChannelMonitor` update is pending async persistence somewhere and we should pause
/// sending any outbound messages until they've managed to finish.
MonitorUpdateInProgress = 1 << 8,
/// Flag which implies that we have sent a commitment_signed but are awaiting the responding
/// messages as then we will be unable to determine which HTLCs they included in their
/// revoke_and_ack implicit ACK, so instead we have to hold them away temporarily to be sent
/// later.
- /// Flag is set on ChannelReady.
+ /// Flag is set on `ChannelReady`.
AwaitingRemoteRevoke = 1 << 9,
- /// Flag which is set on ChannelReady or FundingSent after receiving a shutdown message from
+ /// Flag which is set on `ChannelReady` or `FundingSent` after receiving a shutdown message from
/// the remote end. If set, they may not add any new HTLCs to the channel, and we are expected
/// to respond with our own shutdown message when possible.
RemoteShutdownSent = 1 << 10,
- /// Flag which is set on ChannelReady or FundingSent after sending a shutdown message. At this
+ /// Flag which is set on `ChannelReady` or `FundingSent` after sending a shutdown message. At this
/// point, we may not add any new HTLCs to the channel.
LocalShutdownSent = 1 << 11,
/// We've successfully negotiated a closing_signed dance. At this point ChannelManager is about
// something in the handler for the message that prompted this message):
/// Gets an UnsignedChannelAnnouncement for this channel. The channel must be publicly
- /// announceable and available for use (have exchanged ChannelReady messages in both
+ /// announceable and available for use (have exchanged [`ChannelReady`] messages in both
/// directions). Should be used for both broadcasted announcements and in response to an
/// AnnouncementSignatures message from the remote peer.
///
/// closing).
///
/// This will only return ChannelError::Ignore upon failure.
+ ///
+ /// [`ChannelReady`]: crate::ln::msgs::ChannelReady
fn get_channel_announcement<NS: Deref>(
&self, node_signer: &NS, chain_hash: BlockHash, user_config: &UserConfig,
) -> Result<msgs::UnsignedChannelAnnouncement, ChannelError> where NS::Target: NodeSigner {
/// Fetches the set of [`NodeFeatures`] flags which are provided by or required by
/// [`ChannelManager`].
pub(crate) fn provided_node_features(config: &UserConfig) -> NodeFeatures {
- provided_init_features(config).to_context()
+ let mut node_features = provided_init_features(config).to_context();
+ node_features.set_keysend_optional();
+ node_features
}
/// Fetches the set of [`Bolt11InvoiceFeatures`] flags which are provided by or required by
}
}
+pub struct ReconnectArgs<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd> {
+ pub node_a: &'a Node<'b, 'c, 'd>,
+ pub node_b: &'a Node<'b, 'c, 'd>,
+ pub send_channel_ready: (bool, bool),
+ pub pending_htlc_adds: (i64, i64),
+ pub pending_htlc_claims: (usize, usize),
+ pub pending_htlc_fails: (usize, usize),
+ pub pending_cell_htlc_claims: (usize, usize),
+ pub pending_cell_htlc_fails: (usize, usize),
+ pub pending_raa: (bool, bool),
+}
+
+impl<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd> ReconnectArgs<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd> {
+ pub fn new(node_a: &'a Node<'b, 'c, 'd>, node_b: &'a Node<'b, 'c, 'd>) -> Self {
+ Self {
+ node_a,
+ node_b,
+ send_channel_ready: (false, false),
+ pending_htlc_adds: (0, 0),
+ pending_htlc_claims: (0, 0),
+ pending_htlc_fails: (0, 0),
+ pending_cell_htlc_claims: (0, 0),
+ pending_cell_htlc_fails: (0, 0),
+ pending_raa: (false, false),
+ }
+ }
+}
+
/// pending_htlc_adds includes both the holding cell and in-flight update_add_htlcs, whereas
/// for claims/fails they are separated out.
-pub fn reconnect_nodes<'a, 'b, 'c>(node_a: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, node_b: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, send_channel_ready: (bool, bool), pending_htlc_adds: (i64, i64), pending_htlc_claims: (usize, usize), pending_htlc_fails: (usize, usize), pending_cell_htlc_claims: (usize, usize), pending_cell_htlc_fails: (usize, usize), pending_raa: (bool, bool)) {
+pub fn reconnect_nodes<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd>(args: ReconnectArgs<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd>) {
+ let ReconnectArgs {
+ node_a, node_b, send_channel_ready, pending_htlc_adds, pending_htlc_claims, pending_htlc_fails,
+ pending_cell_htlc_claims, pending_cell_htlc_fails, pending_raa
+ } = args;
node_a.node.peer_connected(&node_b.node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init {
features: node_b.node.init_features(), networks: None, remote_network_address: None
}, true).unwrap();
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (1, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
+ reconnect_args.pending_htlc_claims.0 = 1;
+ reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
expect_payment_path_successful!(nodes[0]);
}
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (true, true), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
+ reconnect_args.send_channel_ready = (true, true);
+ reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
let payment_preimage_1 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 1000000).0;
let payment_hash_2 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 1000000).1;
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ reconnect_nodes(ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]));
let (payment_preimage_3, payment_hash_3, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 1000000);
let payment_preimage_4 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 1000000).0;
claim_payment_along_route(&nodes[0], &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]]], true, payment_preimage_3);
fail_payment_along_route(&nodes[0], &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]]], true, payment_hash_5);
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (1, 0), (1, 0), (false, false));
+ let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
+ reconnect_args.pending_cell_htlc_fails.0 = 1;
+ reconnect_args.pending_cell_htlc_claims.0 = 1;
+ reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
{
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(events.len(), 4);
}
// Even if the channel_ready messages get exchanged, as long as nothing further was
// received on either side, both sides will need to resend them.
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (true, true), (0, 1), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
+ reconnect_args.send_channel_ready = (true, true);
+ reconnect_args.pending_htlc_adds.1 = 1;
+ reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
} else if messages_delivered == 3 {
// nodes[0] still wants its RAA + commitment_signed
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (-1, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (true, false));
+ let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
+ reconnect_args.pending_htlc_adds.0 = -1;
+ reconnect_args.pending_raa.0 = true;
+ reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
} else if messages_delivered == 4 {
// nodes[0] still wants its commitment_signed
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (-1, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
+ reconnect_args.pending_htlc_adds.0 = -1;
+ reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
} else if messages_delivered == 5 {
// nodes[1] still wants its final RAA
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, true));
+ let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
+ reconnect_args.pending_raa.1 = true;
+ reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
} else if messages_delivered == 6 {
// Everything was delivered...
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ reconnect_nodes(ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]));
}
let events_1 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ reconnect_nodes(ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]));
nodes[1].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
if messages_delivered < 2 {
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (1, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
+ reconnect_args.pending_htlc_claims.0 = 1;
+ reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
if messages_delivered < 1 {
expect_payment_sent!(nodes[0], payment_preimage_1);
} else {
}
} else if messages_delivered == 2 {
// nodes[0] still wants its RAA + commitment_signed
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, -1), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, true));
+ let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
+ reconnect_args.pending_htlc_adds.1 = -1;
+ reconnect_args.pending_raa.1 = true;
+ reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
} else if messages_delivered == 3 {
// nodes[0] still wants its commitment_signed
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, -1), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
+ reconnect_args.pending_htlc_adds.1 = -1;
+ reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
} else if messages_delivered == 4 {
// nodes[1] still wants its final RAA
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (true, false));
+ let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
+ reconnect_args.pending_raa.0 = true;
+ reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
} else if messages_delivered == 5 {
// Everything was delivered...
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ reconnect_nodes(ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]));
}
if messages_delivered == 1 || messages_delivered == 2 {
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
}
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ reconnect_nodes(ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]));
if messages_delivered > 2 {
expect_payment_path_successful!(nodes[0]);
let channel_type_features = get_channel_type_features!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_id);
assert_eq!(vec![Balance::ClaimableOnChannelClose {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 1_000 - chan_feerate * channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(&channel_type_features) / 1000
+ amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 1_000 - chan_feerate * channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(&channel_type_features) / 1000
}],
nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances());
- assert_eq!(vec![Balance::ClaimableOnChannelClose { claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000, }],
+ assert_eq!(vec![Balance::ClaimableOnChannelClose { amount_satoshis: 1_000, }],
nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances());
nodes[0].node.close_channel(&chan_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
assert!(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
assert_eq!(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 1_000 - chan_feerate * channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(&channel_type_features) / 1000,
+ amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 1_000 - chan_feerate * channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(&channel_type_features) / 1000,
confirmation_height: nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1,
}],
nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances());
assert_eq!(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 1000,
+ amount_satoshis: 1000,
confirmation_height: nodes[1].best_block_info().1 + ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1,
}],
nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances());
let remote_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan_id);
let sent_htlc_balance = Balance::MaybeTimeoutClaimableHTLC {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 3_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 3_000,
claimable_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
payment_hash,
};
let sent_htlc_timeout_balance = Balance::MaybeTimeoutClaimableHTLC {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 4_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 4_000,
claimable_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
payment_hash: timeout_payment_hash,
};
let received_htlc_balance = Balance::MaybePreimageClaimableHTLC {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 3_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 3_000,
expiry_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
payment_hash,
};
let received_htlc_timeout_balance = Balance::MaybePreimageClaimableHTLC {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 4_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 4_000,
expiry_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
payment_hash: timeout_payment_hash,
};
let received_htlc_claiming_balance = Balance::ContentiousClaimable {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 3_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 3_000,
timeout_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
payment_hash,
payment_preimage,
};
let received_htlc_timeout_claiming_balance = Balance::ContentiousClaimable {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 4_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 4_000,
timeout_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
payment_hash: timeout_payment_hash,
payment_preimage: timeout_payment_preimage,
// Before B receives the payment preimage, it only suggests the push_msat value of 1_000 sats
// as claimable. A lists both its to-self balance and the (possibly-claimable) HTLCs.
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableOnChannelClose {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 3_000 - 4_000 - 1_000 - 3 - chan_feerate *
+ amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 3_000 - 4_000 - 1_000 - 3 - chan_feerate *
(channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(&channel_type_features) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
}, sent_htlc_balance.clone(), sent_htlc_timeout_balance.clone()]),
sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableOnChannelClose {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 1_000,
}, received_htlc_balance.clone(), received_htlc_timeout_balance.clone()]),
sorted_vec(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
// Once B has received the payment preimage, it includes the value of the HTLC in its
// "claimable if you were to close the channel" balance.
let mut a_expected_balances = vec![Balance::ClaimableOnChannelClose {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - // Channel funding value in satoshis
+ amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - // Channel funding value in satoshis
4_000 - // The to-be-failed HTLC value in satoshis
3_000 - // The claimed HTLC value in satoshis
1_000 - // The push_msat value in satoshis
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(a_expected_balances),
sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
assert_eq!(vec![Balance::ClaimableOnChannelClose {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000 + 3_000 + 4_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 1_000 + 3_000 + 4_000,
}],
nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances());
assert!(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 3_000 - 4_000 - 1_000 - 3 - chan_feerate *
+ amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 3_000 - 4_000 - 1_000 - 3 - chan_feerate *
(channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(&channel_type_features) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
confirmation_height: nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1,
}, sent_htlc_balance.clone(), sent_htlc_timeout_balance.clone()]),
// The main non-HTLC balance is just awaiting confirmations, but the claimable height is the
// CSV delay, not ANTI_REORG_DELAY.
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 1_000,
confirmation_height: node_b_commitment_claimable,
},
// Both HTLC balances are "contentious" as our counterparty could claim them if we wait too
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![sent_htlc_balance.clone(), sent_htlc_timeout_balance.clone()]),
sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 1_000,
confirmation_height: node_b_commitment_claimable,
}, received_htlc_claiming_balance.clone(), received_htlc_timeout_claiming_balance.clone()]),
sorted_vec(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &a_broadcast_txn[1]);
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
assert_eq!(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 4_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 4_000,
confirmation_height: nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1,
}],
nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances());
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &b_broadcast_txn[0]);
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 1_000,
confirmation_height: node_b_commitment_claimable,
}, Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 3_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 3_000,
confirmation_height: node_b_htlc_claimable,
}, received_htlc_timeout_claiming_balance.clone()]),
sorted_vec(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &remote_txn[0]);
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 3_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 3_000,
confirmation_height: node_b_htlc_claimable,
}, received_htlc_timeout_claiming_balance.clone()]),
sorted_vec(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
let htlc_balance_known_preimage = Balance::MaybeTimeoutClaimableHTLC {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 10_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 10_000,
claimable_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
payment_hash,
};
let htlc_balance_unknown_preimage = Balance::MaybeTimeoutClaimableHTLC {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 20_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 20_000,
claimable_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
payment_hash: payment_hash_2,
};
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 10_000 - 20_000 - chan_feerate *
+ amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 10_000 - 20_000 - chan_feerate *
(channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(&channel_type_features) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
confirmation_height: node_a_commitment_claimable,
}, htlc_balance_known_preimage.clone(), htlc_balance_unknown_preimage.clone()]),
// transaction.
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV - 1);
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 10_000 - 20_000 - chan_feerate *
+ amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 10_000 - 20_000 - chan_feerate *
(channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(&channel_type_features) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
confirmation_height: node_a_commitment_claimable,
}, htlc_balance_known_preimage.clone(), htlc_balance_unknown_preimage.clone()]),
// balance) check failed. With this check removed, the code panicked in the `connect_blocks`
// call, as described, two hunks down.
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 10_000 - 20_000 - chan_feerate *
+ amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 10_000 - 20_000 - chan_feerate *
(channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(&channel_type_features) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
confirmation_height: node_a_commitment_claimable,
}, Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 10_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 10_000,
confirmation_height: node_a_htlc_claimable,
}, htlc_balance_unknown_preimage.clone()]),
sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &bs_htlc_claim_txn[0]);
expect_payment_sent!(nodes[0], payment_preimage_2);
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 10_000 - 20_000 - chan_feerate *
+ amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 10_000 - 20_000 - chan_feerate *
(channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(&channel_type_features) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
confirmation_height: node_a_commitment_claimable,
}, Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 10_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 10_000,
confirmation_height: node_a_htlc_claimable,
}, htlc_balance_unknown_preimage.clone()]),
sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], payment_hash, false);
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 10_000 - 20_000 - chan_feerate *
+ amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 10_000 - 20_000 - chan_feerate *
(channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(&channel_type_features) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
confirmation_height: node_a_commitment_claimable,
}, Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 10_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 10_000,
confirmation_height: node_a_htlc_claimable,
}]),
sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
// `SpendableOutputs` event and removing the claimable balance entry.
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], node_a_commitment_claimable - nodes[0].best_block_info().1);
assert_eq!(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 10_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 10_000,
confirmation_height: node_a_htlc_claimable,
}],
nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances());
let channel_type_features = get_channel_type_features!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_id);
let a_sent_htlc_balance = Balance::MaybeTimeoutClaimableHTLC {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 10_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 10_000,
claimable_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
payment_hash: to_b_failed_payment_hash,
};
let a_received_htlc_balance = Balance::MaybePreimageClaimableHTLC {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 20_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 20_000,
expiry_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
payment_hash: to_a_failed_payment_hash,
};
let b_received_htlc_balance = Balance::MaybePreimageClaimableHTLC {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 10_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 10_000,
expiry_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
payment_hash: to_b_failed_payment_hash,
};
let b_sent_htlc_balance = Balance::MaybeTimeoutClaimableHTLC {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 20_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 20_000,
claimable_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
payment_hash: to_a_failed_payment_hash,
};
// HTLC output is spent.
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableOnChannelClose {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 500_000 - 10_000 - chan_feerate *
+ amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 500_000 - 10_000 - chan_feerate *
(channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(&channel_type_features) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
}, a_received_htlc_balance.clone(), a_sent_htlc_balance.clone()]),
sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableOnChannelClose {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 500_000 - 20_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 500_000 - 20_000,
}, b_received_htlc_balance.clone(), b_sent_htlc_balance.clone()]),
sorted_vec(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
// claimable balances remain the same except for the non-HTLC balance changing variant.
let node_a_commitment_claimable = nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT as u32;
let as_pre_spend_claims = sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 500_000 - 10_000 - chan_feerate *
+ amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 500_000 - 10_000 - chan_feerate *
(channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(&channel_type_features) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
confirmation_height: node_a_commitment_claimable,
}, a_received_htlc_balance.clone(), a_sent_htlc_balance.clone()]);
let node_b_commitment_claimable = nodes[1].best_block_info().1 + ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1;
let mut bs_pre_spend_claims = sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 500_000 - 20_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 500_000 - 20_000,
confirmation_height: node_b_commitment_claimable,
}, b_received_htlc_balance.clone(), b_sent_htlc_balance.clone()]);
assert_eq!(bs_pre_spend_claims,
mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &as_htlc_timeout_claim[0]);
let as_timeout_claimable_height = nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + (BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT as u32) - 1;
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 500_000 - 10_000 - chan_feerate *
+ amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 500_000 - 10_000 - chan_feerate *
(channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(&channel_type_features) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
confirmation_height: node_a_commitment_claimable,
}, a_received_htlc_balance.clone(), Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 10_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 10_000,
confirmation_height: as_timeout_claimable_height,
}]),
sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &bs_htlc_timeout_claim[0]);
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 500_000 - 10_000 - chan_feerate *
+ amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 500_000 - 10_000 - chan_feerate *
(channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(&channel_type_features) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
confirmation_height: node_a_commitment_claimable,
}, a_received_htlc_balance.clone(), Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 10_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 10_000,
confirmation_height: as_timeout_claimable_height,
}]),
sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], 1);
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 500_000 - 10_000 - chan_feerate *
+ amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 500_000 - 10_000 - chan_feerate *
(channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(&channel_type_features) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
confirmation_height: node_a_commitment_claimable,
}, Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 10_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 10_000,
confirmation_height: core::cmp::max(as_timeout_claimable_height, htlc_cltv_timeout),
}]),
sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], node_a_commitment_claimable - nodes[0].best_block_info().1);
assert_eq!(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 10_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 10_000,
confirmation_height: core::cmp::max(as_timeout_claimable_height, htlc_cltv_timeout),
}],
nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances());
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &bs_htlc_timeout_claim[0]);
let bs_timeout_claimable_height = nodes[1].best_block_info().1 + ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1;
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![b_received_htlc_balance.clone(), Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 20_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 20_000,
confirmation_height: bs_timeout_claimable_height,
}]),
sorted_vec(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &as_htlc_timeout_claim[0]);
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![b_received_htlc_balance.clone(), Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 20_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 20_000,
confirmation_height: bs_timeout_claimable_height,
}]),
sorted_vec(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
// Prior to channel closure, B considers the preimage HTLC as its own, and otherwise only
// lists the two on-chain timeout-able HTLCs as claimable balances.
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableOnChannelClose {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 100_000 - 5_000 - 4_000 - 3 - 2_000 + 3_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 100_000 - 5_000 - 4_000 - 3 - 2_000 + 3_000,
}, Balance::MaybeTimeoutClaimableHTLC {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 2_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 2_000,
claimable_height: missing_htlc_cltv_timeout,
payment_hash: missing_htlc_payment_hash,
}, Balance::MaybeTimeoutClaimableHTLC {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 4_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 4_000,
claimable_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
payment_hash: timeout_payment_hash,
}, Balance::MaybeTimeoutClaimableHTLC {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 5_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 5_000,
claimable_height: live_htlc_cltv_timeout,
payment_hash: live_payment_hash,
}]),
// claim balances separated out.
let expected_balance = vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
// to_remote output in A's revoked commitment
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 100_000 - 5_000 - 4_000 - 3,
+ amount_satoshis: 100_000 - 5_000 - 4_000 - 3,
confirmation_height: nodes[1].best_block_info().1 + 5,
}, Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 3_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 3_000,
}, Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 4_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 4_000,
}];
let to_self_unclaimed_balance = Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 100_000 - 3_000 - chan_feerate *
+ amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 100_000 - 3_000 - chan_feerate *
(channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(&channel_type_features) + 3 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
};
let to_self_claimed_avail_height;
let largest_htlc_unclaimed_balance = Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 5_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 5_000,
};
let largest_htlc_claimed_avail_height;
}
let largest_htlc_claimed_balance = Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 5_000 - chan_feerate * INBOUND_HTLC_CLAIM_EXP_WEIGHT as u64 / 1000,
+ amount_satoshis: 5_000 - chan_feerate * INBOUND_HTLC_CLAIM_EXP_WEIGHT as u64 / 1000,
confirmation_height: largest_htlc_claimed_avail_height,
};
let to_self_claimed_balance = Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 100_000 - 3_000 - chan_feerate *
+ amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 100_000 - 3_000 - chan_feerate *
(channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(&channel_type_features) + 3 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000
- chan_feerate * claim_txn[3].weight() as u64 / 1000,
confirmation_height: to_self_claimed_avail_height,
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
// to_remote output in A's revoked commitment
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 100_000 - 5_000 - 4_000 - 3,
+ amount_satoshis: 100_000 - 5_000 - 4_000 - 3,
confirmation_height: nodes[1].best_block_info().1 + 1,
}, Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 100_000 - 3_000 - chan_feerate *
+ amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 100_000 - 3_000 - chan_feerate *
(channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(&channel_type_features) + 3 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000
- chan_feerate * claim_txn[3].weight() as u64 / 1000,
confirmation_height: to_self_claimed_avail_height,
}, Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 3_000 - chan_feerate * OUTBOUND_HTLC_CLAIM_EXP_WEIGHT as u64 / 1000,
+ amount_satoshis: 3_000 - chan_feerate * OUTBOUND_HTLC_CLAIM_EXP_WEIGHT as u64 / 1000,
confirmation_height: nodes[1].best_block_info().1 + 4,
}, Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 4_000 - chan_feerate * INBOUND_HTLC_CLAIM_EXP_WEIGHT as u64 / 1000,
+ amount_satoshis: 4_000 - chan_feerate * INBOUND_HTLC_CLAIM_EXP_WEIGHT as u64 / 1000,
confirmation_height: nodes[1].best_block_info().1 + 5,
}, Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 5_000 - chan_feerate * INBOUND_HTLC_CLAIM_EXP_WEIGHT as u64 / 1000,
+ amount_satoshis: 5_000 - chan_feerate * INBOUND_HTLC_CLAIM_EXP_WEIGHT as u64 / 1000,
confirmation_height: largest_htlc_claimed_avail_height,
}]),
sorted_vec(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
// `CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable` entry doesn't change.
let as_balances = sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
// to_remote output in B's revoked commitment
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 11_000 - 3_000 - chan_feerate *
+ amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 11_000 - 3_000 - chan_feerate *
(channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(&channel_type_features) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
confirmation_height: to_remote_conf_height,
}, Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable {
// to_self output in B's revoked commitment
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 10_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 10_000,
}, Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable { // HTLC 1
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 3_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 3_000,
}, Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable { // HTLC 2
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 1_000,
}]);
assert_eq!(as_balances,
sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &as_htlc_claim_tx[0]);
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
// to_remote output in B's revoked commitment
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 11_000 - 3_000 - chan_feerate *
+ amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 11_000 - 3_000 - chan_feerate *
(channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(&channel_type_features) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
confirmation_height: to_remote_conf_height,
}, Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable {
// to_self output in B's revoked commitment
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 10_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 10_000,
}, Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable { // HTLC 2
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 1_000,
}, Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: as_htlc_claim_tx[0].output[0].value,
+ amount_satoshis: as_htlc_claim_tx[0].output[0].value,
confirmation_height: nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1,
}]),
sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
test_spendable_output(&nodes[0], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable {
// to_self output to B
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 10_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 10_000,
}, Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable { // HTLC 2
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 1_000,
}, Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: as_htlc_claim_tx[0].output[0].value,
+ amount_satoshis: as_htlc_claim_tx[0].output[0].value,
confirmation_height: nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + 2,
}]),
sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
test_spendable_output(&nodes[0], &as_htlc_claim_tx[0]);
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable {
// to_self output in B's revoked commitment
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 10_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 10_000,
}, Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable { // HTLC 2
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 1_000,
}]),
sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable {
// to_self output in B's revoked commitment
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 10_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 10_000,
}, Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable { // HTLC 2
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 1_000,
}]),
sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &as_second_htlc_claim_tx[0]);
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable {
// to_self output in B's revoked commitment
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 10_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 10_000,
}, Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: as_second_htlc_claim_tx[0].output[0].value,
+ amount_satoshis: as_second_htlc_claim_tx[0].output[0].value,
confirmation_height: nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1,
}]),
sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &as_second_htlc_claim_tx[1]);
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
// to_self output in B's revoked commitment
- claimable_amount_satoshis: as_second_htlc_claim_tx[1].output[0].value,
+ amount_satoshis: as_second_htlc_claim_tx[1].output[0].value,
confirmation_height: nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1,
}, Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: as_second_htlc_claim_tx[0].output[0].value,
+ amount_satoshis: as_second_htlc_claim_tx[0].output[0].value,
confirmation_height: nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 2,
}]),
sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
let _a_htlc_msgs = get_htlc_update_msgs!(&nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableOnChannelClose {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 100_000 - 4_000 - 3_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 100_000 - 4_000 - 3_000,
}, Balance::MaybeTimeoutClaimableHTLC {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 4_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 4_000,
claimable_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
payment_hash: revoked_payment_hash,
}, Balance::MaybeTimeoutClaimableHTLC {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 3_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 3_000,
claimable_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
payment_hash: claimed_payment_hash,
}]),
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
// to_remote output in A's revoked commitment
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 100_000 - 4_000 - 3_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 100_000 - 4_000 - 3_000,
confirmation_height: to_remote_maturity,
}, Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable {
// to_self output in A's revoked commitment
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 100_000 - chan_feerate *
+ amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 100_000 - chan_feerate *
(channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(&channel_type_features) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
}, Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable { // HTLC 1
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 4_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 4_000,
}, Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable { // HTLC 2
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 3_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 3_000,
}]),
sorted_vec(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
// to_remote output in A's revoked commitment
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 100_000 - 4_000 - 3_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 100_000 - 4_000 - 3_000,
confirmation_height: to_remote_maturity,
}, Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable {
// to_self output in A's revoked commitment
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 100_000 - chan_feerate *
+ amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 100_000 - chan_feerate *
(channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(&channel_type_features) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
}, Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable { // HTLC 1
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 4_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 4_000,
}, Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable { // HTLC 2
// The amount here is a bit of a misnomer, really its been reduced by the HTLC
// transaction fee, but the claimable amount is always a bit of an overshoot for HTLCs
// anyway, so its not a big change.
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 3_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 3_000,
}]),
sorted_vec(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable {
// to_self output in A's revoked commitment
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 100_000 - chan_feerate *
+ amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 100_000 - chan_feerate *
(channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(&channel_type_features) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
}, Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable { // HTLC 1
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 4_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 4_000,
}, Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable { // HTLC 2
// The amount here is a bit of a misnomer, really its been reduced by the HTLC
// transaction fee, but the claimable amount is always a bit of an overshoot for HTLCs
// anyway, so its not a big change.
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 3_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 3_000,
}]),
sorted_vec(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable {
// to_self output in A's revoked commitment
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 100_000 - chan_feerate *
+ amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 100_000 - chan_feerate *
(channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(&channel_type_features) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
}, Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable { // HTLC 1
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 4_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 4_000,
}, Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations { // HTLC 2
- claimable_amount_satoshis: claim_txn_2[1].output[0].value,
+ amount_satoshis: claim_txn_2[1].output[0].value,
confirmation_height: htlc_2_claim_maturity,
}]),
sorted_vec(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable {
// to_self output in A's revoked commitment
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 100_000 - chan_feerate *
+ amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 100_000 - chan_feerate *
(channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(&channel_type_features) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
}, Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable { // HTLC 1
- claimable_amount_satoshis: 4_000,
+ amount_satoshis: 4_000,
}]),
sorted_vec(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
let rest_claim_maturity = nodes[1].best_block_info().1 + ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1;
assert_eq!(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
- claimable_amount_satoshis: claim_txn_2[0].output[0].value,
+ amount_satoshis: claim_txn_2[0].output[0].value,
confirmation_height: rest_claim_maturity,
}],
nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances());
nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
}, true, Some(UPDATE|20), Some(NetworkUpdate::ChannelUpdateMessage{msg: ChannelUpdate::dummy(short_channel_id)}), Some(short_channel_id));
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ reconnect_nodes(ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[1], &nodes[2]));
run_onion_failure_test("expiry_too_far", 0, &nodes, &route, &payment_hash, &payment_secret, |msg| {
let session_priv = SecretKey::from_slice(&[3; 32]).unwrap();
// nodes[1] now immediately fails the HTLC as the next-hop channel is disconnected
let _ = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ reconnect_nodes(ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[1], &nodes[2]));
let as_commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_id)[0].clone();
if confirm_before_reload {
nodes[0].node.test_process_background_events();
check_added_monitors(&nodes[0], 1);
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (true, true), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
+ reconnect_args.send_channel_ready = (true, true);
+ reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
// Now resend the payment, delivering the HTLC and actually claiming it this time. This ensures
// the payment is not (spuriously) listed as still pending.
nodes[0].node.test_process_background_events();
check_added_monitors(&nodes[0], 1);
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ reconnect_nodes(ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]));
match nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&new_route, payment_hash, RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), payment_id) {
Err(PaymentSendFailure::DuplicatePayment) => {},
reload_node!(nodes[1], &chan_manager_serialized, &[&chan_0_monitor_serialized], persister, new_chain_monitor, nodes_1_deserialized);
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ reconnect_nodes(ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]));
nodes[1].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash);
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash }]);
reload_node!(nodes[3], config, &nodes[3].node.encode(), &[&mon_bd, &mon_cd],
persister, new_chain_monitor, nodes_0_deserialized);
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id());
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[1], &nodes[3], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ reconnect_nodes(ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[1], &nodes[3]));
}
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[2], &nodes[3], (true, true), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[2], &nodes[3]);
+ reconnect_args.send_channel_ready = (true, true);
+ reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
// Create a new channel between C and D as A will refuse to retry on the existing one because
// it just failed.
let events_1 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
assert!(events_1.is_empty());
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, true), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
+ reconnect_args.send_channel_ready.1 = true;
+ reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
reload_node!(nodes[0], &nodes[0].node.encode(), &[&chan_0_monitor_serialized], persister, new_chain_monitor, nodes_0_deserialized);
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ reconnect_nodes(ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]));
}
#[test]
let chan_0_monitor_serialized = get_monitor!(nodes[0], chan_id).encode();
reload_node!(nodes[0], nodes[0].node.encode(), &[&chan_0_monitor_serialized], persister, new_chain_monitor, nodes_0_deserialized);
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ reconnect_nodes(ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]));
fail_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], our_payment_hash);
claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], our_payment_preimage);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
// nodes[1] and nodes[2] have no lost state with nodes[0]...
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[2], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ reconnect_nodes(ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]));
+ reconnect_nodes(ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[2]));
//... and we can even still claim the payment!
claim_payment(&nodes[2], &[&nodes[0], &nodes[1]], our_payment_preimage);
let chan_1_monitor_serialized = get_monitor!(nodes[1], chan_id_2).encode();
reload_node!(nodes[1], nodes[1].node.encode(), &[&chan_0_monitor_serialized, &chan_1_monitor_serialized], persister, new_chain_monitor, nodes_1_deserialized);
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ reconnect_nodes(ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]));
// Note that nodes[1] and nodes[2] resend their channel_ready here since they haven't updated
// the commitment state.
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], (true, true), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[1], &nodes[2]);
+ reconnect_args.send_channel_ready = (true, true);
+ reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ reconnect_nodes(ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]));
if use_cs_commitment {
// If we confirm a commitment transaction that has the HTLC on-chain, nodes[1] should wait
// now forgotten everywhere. The ChannelManager should have, as a side-effect of reload,
// learned that the HTLC is gone from the ChannelMonitor and added it to the to-fail-back set.
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ reconnect_nodes(ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]));
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], [HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_id_2 }]);
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
pub manual_node_penalties: HashMap<NodeId, u64>,
/// This penalty is applied when `htlc_maximum_msat` is equal to or larger than half of the
- /// channel's capacity, (ie. htlc_maximum_msat ≥ 0.5 * channel_capacity) which makes us
+ /// channel's capacity, (ie. htlc_maximum_msat >= 0.5 * channel_capacity) which makes us
/// prefer nodes with a smaller `htlc_maximum_msat`. We treat such nodes preferentially
/// as this makes balance discovery attacks harder to execute, thereby creating an incentive
/// to restrict `htlc_maximum_msat` and improve privacy.
projects / rust-lightning / commitdiff