}
}
+/// The recipient of a payment.
+pub struct Payee {
+ /// The node id of the payee.
+ pubkey: PublicKey,
+
+ /// Features supported by the payee.
+ ///
+ /// May be set from the payee's invoice or via [`for_keysend`]. May be `None` if the invoice
+ /// does not contain any features.
+ ///
+ /// [`for_keysend`]: Self::for_keysend
+ pub features: Option<InvoiceFeatures>,
+
+ /// Hints for routing to the payee, containing channels connecting the payee to public nodes.
+ pub route_hints: Vec<RouteHint>,
+}
+
+impl Payee {
+ /// Creates a payee with the node id of the given `pubkey`.
+ pub fn new(pubkey: PublicKey) -> Self {
+ Self {
+ pubkey,
+ features: None,
+ route_hints: vec![],
+ }
+ }
+
+ /// Creates a payee with the node id of the given `pubkey` to use for keysend payments.
+ pub fn for_keysend(pubkey: PublicKey) -> Self {
+ Self::new(pubkey).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::for_keysend())
+ }
+
+ /// Includes the payee's features.
+ ///
+ /// (C-not exported) since bindings don't support move semantics
+ pub fn with_features(self, features: InvoiceFeatures) -> Self {
+ Self { features: Some(features), ..self }
+ }
+
+ /// Includes hints for routing to the payee.
+ ///
+ /// (C-not exported) since bindings don't support move semantics
+ pub fn with_route_hints(self, route_hints: Vec<RouteHint>) -> Self {
+ Self { route_hints, ..self }
+ }
+}
+
/// A list of hops along a payment path terminating with a channel to the recipient.
#[derive(Clone, Debug, Hash, Eq, PartialEq)]
pub struct RouteHint(pub Vec<RouteHintHop>);
/// Gets a keysend route from us (payer) to the given target node (payee). This is needed because
/// keysend payments do not have an invoice from which to pull the payee's supported features, which
-/// makes it tricky to otherwise supply the `payee_features` parameter of `get_route`.
+/// makes it tricky to otherwise supply the `payee` parameter of `get_route`.
pub fn get_keysend_route<L: Deref, S: routing::Score>(
our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, network: &NetworkGraph, payee: &PublicKey,
first_hops: Option<&[&ChannelDetails]>, last_hops: &[&RouteHint], final_value_msat: u64,
final_cltv: u32, logger: L, scorer: &S
) -> Result<Route, LightningError>
where L::Target: Logger {
- let invoice_features = InvoiceFeatures::for_keysend();
+ let route_hints = last_hops.iter().map(|hint| (*hint).clone()).collect();
+ let payee = Payee::for_keysend(*payee).with_route_hints(route_hints);
get_route(
- our_node_pubkey, network, payee, Some(invoice_features), first_hops, last_hops,
- final_value_msat, final_cltv, logger, scorer
+ our_node_pubkey, &payee, network, first_hops, final_value_msat, final_cltv, logger, scorer
)
}
/// Gets a route from us (payer) to the given target node (payee).
///
-/// If the payee provided features in their invoice, they should be provided via payee_features.
-/// Without this, MPP will only be used if the payee's features are available in the network graph.
+/// If the payee provided features in their invoice, they should be provided via `payee`. Without
+/// this, MPP will only be used if the payee's features are available in the network graph.
///
-/// Private routing paths between a public node and the target may be included in `last_hops`.
+/// Private routing paths between a public node and the target may be included in `payee`.
/// Currently, only the last hop in each path is considered.
///
/// If some channels aren't announced, it may be useful to fill in a first_hops with the
/// equal), however the enabled/disabled bit on such channels as well as the
/// htlc_minimum_msat/htlc_maximum_msat *are* checked as they may change based on the receiving node.
pub fn get_route<L: Deref, S: routing::Score>(
- our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, network: &NetworkGraph, payee: &PublicKey,
- payee_features: Option<InvoiceFeatures>, first_hops: Option<&[&ChannelDetails]>,
- last_hops: &[&RouteHint], final_value_msat: u64, final_cltv: u32, logger: L, scorer: &S
+ our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, payee: &Payee, network: &NetworkGraph,
+ first_hops: Option<&[&ChannelDetails]>, final_value_msat: u64, final_cltv: u32, logger: L,
+ scorer: &S
) -> Result<Route, LightningError>
where L::Target: Logger {
- let payee_node_id = NodeId::from_pubkey(&payee);
+ let payee_node_id = NodeId::from_pubkey(&payee.pubkey);
let our_node_id = NodeId::from_pubkey(&our_node_pubkey);
if payee_node_id == our_node_id {
return Err(LightningError{err: "Cannot send a payment of 0 msat".to_owned(), action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError});
}
- for route in last_hops.iter() {
+ for route in payee.route_hints.iter() {
for hop in &route.0 {
- if hop.src_node_id == *payee {
- return Err(LightningError{err: "Last hop cannot have a payee as a source.".to_owned(), action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError});
+ if hop.src_node_id == payee.pubkey {
+ return Err(LightningError{err: "Route hint cannot have the payee as the source.".to_owned(), action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError});
}
}
}
// Allow MPP only if we have a features set from somewhere that indicates the payee supports
// it. If the payee supports it they're supposed to include it in the invoice, so that should
// work reliably.
- let allow_mpp = if let Some(features) = &payee_features {
+ let allow_mpp = if let Some(features) = &payee.features {
features.supports_basic_mpp()
} else if let Some(node) = network_nodes.get(&payee_node_id) {
if let Some(node_info) = node.announcement_info.as_ref() {
node_info.features.supports_basic_mpp()
} else { false }
} else { false };
- log_trace!(logger, "Searching for a route from payer {} to payee {} {} MPP", our_node_pubkey, payee,
- if allow_mpp { "with" } else { "without" });
+ log_trace!(logger, "Searching for a route from payer {} to payee {} {} MPP", our_node_pubkey,
+ payee.pubkey, if allow_mpp { "with" } else { "without" });
// Step (1).
// Prepare the data we'll use for payee-to-payer search by
// - when we want to stop looking for new paths.
let mut already_collected_value_msat = 0;
- log_trace!(logger, "Building path from {} (payee) to {} (us/payer) for value {} msat.", payee, our_node_pubkey, final_value_msat);
+ log_trace!(logger, "Building path from {} (payee) to {} (us/payer) for value {} msat.", payee.pubkey, our_node_pubkey, final_value_msat);
macro_rules! add_entry {
// Adds entry which goes from $src_node_id to $dest_node_id
// If a caller provided us with last hops, add them to routing targets. Since this happens
// earlier than general path finding, they will be somewhat prioritized, although currently
// it matters only if the fees are exactly the same.
- for route in last_hops.iter().filter(|route| !route.0.is_empty()) {
+ for route in payee.route_hints.iter().filter(|route| !route.0.is_empty()) {
let first_hop_in_route = &(route.0)[0];
let have_hop_src_in_graph =
// Only add the hops in this route to our candidate set if either
// We start building the path from reverse, i.e., from payee
// to the first RouteHintHop in the path.
let hop_iter = route.0.iter().rev();
- let prev_hop_iter = core::iter::once(payee).chain(
+ let prev_hop_iter = core::iter::once(&payee.pubkey).chain(
route.0.iter().skip(1).rev().map(|hop| &hop.src_node_id));
let mut hop_used = true;
let mut aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat: u64 = 0;
}).collect());
}
- if let Some(features) = &payee_features {
+ if let Some(features) = &payee.features {
for path in selected_paths.iter_mut() {
if let Ok(route_hop) = path.last_mut().unwrap() {
route_hop.node_features = features.to_context();
}
let route = Route { paths: selected_paths.into_iter().map(|path| path.into_iter().collect()).collect::<Result<Vec<_>, _>>()? };
- log_info!(logger, "Got route to {}: {}", payee, log_route!(route));
+ log_info!(logger, "Got route to {}: {}", payee.pubkey, log_route!(route));
Ok(route)
}
mod tests {
use routing;
use routing::network_graph::{NetworkGraph, NetGraphMsgHandler, NodeId};
- use routing::router::{get_route, Route, RouteHint, RouteHintHop, RouteHop, RoutingFees};
+ use routing::router::{get_route, Payee, Route, RouteHint, RouteHintHop, RouteHop, RoutingFees};
use routing::scorer::Scorer;
use chain::transaction::OutPoint;
use ln::features::{ChannelFeatures, InitFeatures, InvoiceFeatures, NodeFeatures};
fn simple_route_test() {
let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let payee = Payee::new(nodes[2]);
let scorer = Scorer::new(0);
// Simple route to 2 via 1
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2], None, None, &Vec::new(), 0, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 0, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send a payment of 0 msat");
} else { panic!(); }
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2], None, None, &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]);
fn invalid_first_hop_test() {
let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let payee = Payee::new(nodes[2]);
let scorer = Scorer::new(0);
// Simple route to 2 via 1
let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(2), our_id, InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), 100000)];
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2], None, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "First hop cannot have our_node_pubkey as a destination.");
} else { panic!(); }
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2], None, None, &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
}
fn htlc_minimum_test() {
let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let payee = Payee::new(nodes[2]);
let scorer = Scorer::new(0);
// Simple route to 2 via 1
});
// Not possible to send 199_999_999, because the minimum on channel=2 is 200_000_000.
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2], None, None, &Vec::new(), 199_999_999, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 199_999_999, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a path to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
});
// A payment above the minimum should pass
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2], None, None, &Vec::new(), 199_999_999, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 199_999_999, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
}
fn htlc_minimum_overpay_test() {
let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let payee = Payee::new(nodes[2]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
let scorer = Scorer::new(0);
// A route to node#2 via two paths.
excess_data: Vec::new()
});
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
// Overpay fees to hit htlc_minimum_msat.
let overpaid_fees = route.paths[0][0].fee_msat + route.paths[1][0].fee_msat;
// TODO: this could be better balanced to overpay 10k and not 15k.
excess_data: Vec::new()
});
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
// Fine to overpay for htlc_minimum_msat if it allows us to save fee.
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].short_channel_id, 12);
let fees = route.paths[0][0].fee_msat;
assert_eq!(fees, 5_000);
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
// Not fine to overpay for htlc_minimum_msat if it requires paying more than fee on
// the other channel.
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
fn disable_channels_test() {
let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let payee = Payee::new(nodes[2]);
let scorer = Scorer::new(0);
// // Disable channels 4 and 12 by flags=2
});
// If all the channels require some features we don't understand, route should fail
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2], None, None, &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a path to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
// If we specify a channel to node7, that overrides our local channel view and that gets used
let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(42), nodes[7].clone(), InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), 250_000_000)];
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2], None, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[7]);
fn disable_node_test() {
let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (_, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let payee = Payee::new(nodes[2]);
let scorer = Scorer::new(0);
// Disable nodes 1, 2, and 8 by requiring unknown feature bits
add_or_update_node(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &privkeys[7], unknown_features.clone(), 1);
// If all nodes require some features we don't understand, route should fail
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2], None, None, &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a path to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
// If we specify a channel to node7, that overrides our local channel view and that gets used
let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(42), nodes[7].clone(), InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), 250_000_000)];
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2], None, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[7]);
let scorer = Scorer::new(0);
// Route to 1 via 2 and 3 because our channel to 1 is disabled
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[0], None, None, &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let payee = Payee::new(nodes[0]);
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 3);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].channel_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(3));
// If we specify a channel to node7, that overrides our local channel view and that gets used
+ let payee = Payee::new(nodes[2]);
let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(42), nodes[7].clone(), InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), 250_000_000)];
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2], None, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[7]);
let mut invalid_last_hops = last_hops_multi_private_channels(&nodes);
invalid_last_hops.push(invalid_last_hop);
{
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[6], None, None, &invalid_last_hops.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
- assert_eq!(err, "Last hop cannot have a payee as a source.");
+ let payee = Payee::new(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(invalid_last_hops);
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ assert_eq!(err, "Route hint cannot have the payee as the source.");
} else { panic!(); }
}
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[6], None, None, &last_hops_multi_private_channels(&nodes).iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let payee = Payee::new(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops_multi_private_channels(&nodes));
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 5);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]);
fn ignores_empty_last_hops_test() {
let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let payee = Payee::new(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(empty_last_hop(&nodes));
let scorer = Scorer::new(0);
// Test handling of an empty RouteHint passed in Invoice.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[6], None, None, &empty_last_hop(&nodes).iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 5);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]);
fn multi_hint_last_hops_test() {
let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (_, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let payee = Payee::new(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(multi_hint_last_hops(&nodes));
let scorer = Scorer::new(0);
// Test through channels 2, 3, 5, 8.
// Test shows that multiple hop hints are considered.
excess_data: Vec::new()
});
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[6], None, None, &multi_hint_last_hops(&nodes).iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 4);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]);
fn last_hops_with_public_channel_test() {
let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let payee = Payee::new(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops_with_public_channel(&nodes));
let scorer = Scorer::new(0);
// This test shows that public routes can be present in the invoice
// which would be handled in the same manner.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[6], None, None, &last_hops_with_public_channel(&nodes).iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 5);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]);
// Simple test with outbound channel to 4 to test that last_hops and first_hops connect
let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(42), nodes[3].clone(), InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), 250_000_000)];
let mut last_hops = last_hops(&nodes);
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[6], None, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), &last_hops.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let payee = Payee::new(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops.clone());
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[3]);
last_hops[0].0[0].fees.base_msat = 1000;
// Revert to via 6 as the fee on 8 goes up
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[6], None, None, &last_hops.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let payee = Payee::new(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops);
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 4);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly
// ...but still use 8 for larger payments as 6 has a variable feerate
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[6], None, None, &last_hops.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(), 2000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 2000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 5);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]);
htlc_minimum_msat: None,
htlc_maximum_msat: last_hop_htlc_max,
}]);
+ let payee = Payee::new(target_node_id).with_route_hints(vec![last_hops]);
let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(42), middle_node_id, InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), outbound_capacity_msat)];
let scorer = Scorer::new(0);
- get_route(&source_node_id, &NetworkGraph::new(genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash()), &target_node_id, None, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), &vec![&last_hops], route_val, 42, &test_utils::TestLogger::new(), &scorer)
+ get_route(&source_node_id, &payee, &NetworkGraph::new(genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash()), Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), route_val, 42, &test_utils::TestLogger::new(), &scorer)
}
#[test]
let (secp_ctx, mut net_graph_msg_handler, chain_monitor, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let scorer = Scorer::new(0);
+ let payee = Payee::new(nodes[2]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
// We will use a simple single-path route from
// our node to node2 via node0: channels {1, 3}.
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 250_000_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
+ &our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 250_000_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route an exact amount we have should be fine.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 250_000_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 250_000_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
let path = route.paths.last().unwrap();
assert_eq!(path.len(), 2);
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), &Vec::new(), 200_000_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
+ &our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 200_000_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route an exact amount we have should be fine.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), &Vec::new(), 200_000_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), 200_000_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
let path = route.paths.last().unwrap();
assert_eq!(path.len(), 2);
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 15_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
+ &our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 15_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route an exact amount we have should be fine.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 15_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 15_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
let path = route.paths.last().unwrap();
assert_eq!(path.len(), 2);
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 15_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
+ &our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 15_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route an exact amount we have should be fine.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 15_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 15_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
let path = route.paths.last().unwrap();
assert_eq!(path.len(), 2);
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 10_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
+ &our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 10_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route an exact amount we have should be fine.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 10_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 10_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
let path = route.paths.last().unwrap();
assert_eq!(path.len(), 2);
let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let scorer = Scorer::new(0);
+ let payee = Payee::new(nodes[3]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
// Path via {node7, node2, node4} is channels {12, 13, 6, 11}.
// {12, 13, 11} have the capacities of 100, {6} has a capacity of 50.
});
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[3],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
+ &our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route 49 sats (just a bit below the capacity).
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[3],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 49_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 49_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
for path in &route.paths {
{
// Attempt to route an exact amount is also fine
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[3],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
for path in &route.paths {
let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let scorer = Scorer::new(0);
+ let payee = Payee::new(nodes[2]);
// Path via node0 is channels {1, 3}. Limit them to 100 and 50 sats (total limit 50).
update_channel(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &our_privkey, UnsignedChannelUpdate {
});
{
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2], None, None, &Vec::new(), 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
for path in &route.paths {
let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let scorer = Scorer::new(0);
+ let payee = Payee::new(nodes[2]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
// We need a route consisting of 3 paths:
// From our node to node2 via node0, node7, node1 (three paths one hop each).
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph,
- &nodes[2], Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 300_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
+ &our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 300_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route 250 sats (just a bit below the capacity).
// Our algorithm should provide us with these 3 paths.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 250_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 250_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 3);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
for path in &route.paths {
{
// Attempt to route an exact amount is also fine
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 290_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 290_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 3);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
for path in &route.paths {
let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let scorer = Scorer::new(0);
+ let payee = Payee::new(nodes[3]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
// We need a route consisting of 3 paths:
// From our node to node3 via {node0, node2}, {node7, node2, node4} and {node7, node2}.
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[3],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 350_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
+ &our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 350_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route 300 sats (exact amount we can route).
// Our algorithm should provide us with these 3 paths, 100 sats each.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[3],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 300_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 300_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 3);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let scorer = Scorer::new(0);
+ let payee = Payee::new(nodes[3]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
// This test checks that if we have two cheaper paths and one more expensive path,
// so that liquidity-wise any 2 of 3 combination is sufficient,
{
// Now, attempt to route 180 sats.
// Our algorithm should provide us with these 2 paths.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[3],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 180_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 180_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 2);
let mut total_value_transferred_msat = 0;
let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let scorer = Scorer::new(0);
+ let payee = Payee::new(nodes[3]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
// We need a route consisting of 2 paths:
// From our node to node3 via {node0, node2} and {node7, node2, node4}.
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[3],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 210_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
+ &our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 210_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route 200 sats (exact amount we can route).
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[3],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 200_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 200_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 2);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let scorer = Scorer::new(0);
+ let payee = Payee::new(nodes[2]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
// We need a route consisting of 3 paths:
// From our node to node2 via node0, node7, node1 (three paths one hop each).
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
- if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 150_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
+ if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(
+ &our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 150_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination");
} else { panic!(); }
}
{
// Now, attempt to route 125 sats (just a bit below the capacity of 3 channels).
// Our algorithm should provide us with these 3 paths.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 125_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 125_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 3);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
for path in &route.paths {
{
// Attempt to route without the last small cheap channel
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2],
- Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 90_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 90_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 2);
let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0;
for path in &route.paths {
let net_graph_msg_handler = NetGraphMsgHandler::new(network_graph, None, Arc::clone(&logger));
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let scorer = Scorer::new(0);
+ let payee = Payee::new(nodes[6]);
add_channel(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &our_privkey, &privkeys[1], ChannelFeatures::from_le_bytes(id_to_feature_flags(6)), 6);
update_channel(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &our_privkey, UnsignedChannelUpdate {
{
// Now ensure the route flows simply over nodes 1 and 4 to 6.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[6], None, None, &Vec::new(), 10_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 10_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 3);
let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let scorer = Scorer::new(0);
+ let payee = Payee::new(nodes[2]);
// We modify the graph to set the htlc_maximum of channel 2 to below the value we wish to
// send.
{
// Now, attempt to route 90 sats, which is exactly 90 sats at the last hop, plus the
// 200% fee charged channel 13 in the 1-to-2 direction.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2], None, None, &Vec::new(), 90_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 90_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
let scorer = Scorer::new(0);
+ let payee = Payee::new(nodes[2]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
// We modify the graph to set the htlc_minimum of channel 2 and 4 as needed - channel 2
// gets an htlc_maximum_msat of 80_000 and channel 4 an htlc_minimum_msat of 90_000. We
// Now, attempt to route 90 sats, hitting the htlc_minimum on channel 4, but
// overshooting the htlc_maximum on channel 2. Thus, we should pick the (absurdly
// expensive) channels 12-13 path.
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2], Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 90_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 90_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
let logger = Arc::new(test_utils::TestLogger::new());
let network_graph = NetworkGraph::new(genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash());
let scorer = Scorer::new(0);
+ let payee = Payee::new(nodes[0]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
{
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &network_graph, &nodes[0], Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), Some(&[
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, Some(&[
&get_channel_details(Some(3), nodes[0], InitFeatures::known(), 200_000),
&get_channel_details(Some(2), nodes[0], InitFeatures::known(), 10_000),
- ]), &[], 100_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ ]), 100_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 1);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].fee_msat, 100_000);
}
{
- let route = get_route(&our_id, &network_graph, &nodes[0], Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), Some(&[
+ let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, Some(&[
&get_channel_details(Some(3), nodes[0], InitFeatures::known(), 50_000),
&get_channel_details(Some(2), nodes[0], InitFeatures::known(), 50_000),
- ]), &[], 100_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
+ ]), 100_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 2);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 1);
assert_eq!(route.paths[1].len(), 1);
fn prefers_shorter_route_with_higher_fees() {
let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let payee = Payee::new(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops(&nodes));
// Without penalizing each hop 100 msats, a longer path with lower fees is chosen.
let scorer = Scorer::new(0);
let route = get_route(
- &our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[6], None, None,
- &last_hops(&nodes).iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer
+ &our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 100, 42,
+ Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer
).unwrap();
let path = route.paths[0].iter().map(|hop| hop.short_channel_id).collect::<Vec<_>>();
// from nodes[2] rather than channel 6, 11, and 8, even though the longer path is cheaper.
let scorer = Scorer::new(100);
let route = get_route(
- &our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[6], None, None,
- &last_hops(&nodes).iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer
+ &our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 100, 42,
+ Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer
).unwrap();
let path = route.paths[0].iter().map(|hop| hop.short_channel_id).collect::<Vec<_>>();
fn avoids_routing_through_bad_channels_and_nodes() {
let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph();
let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
+ let payee = Payee::new(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops(&nodes));
// A path to nodes[6] exists when no penalties are applied to any channel.
let scorer = Scorer::new(0);
let route = get_route(
- &our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[6], None, None,
- &last_hops(&nodes).iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer
+ &our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 100, 42,
+ Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer
).unwrap();
let path = route.paths[0].iter().map(|hop| hop.short_channel_id).collect::<Vec<_>>();
// A different path to nodes[6] exists if channel 6 cannot be routed over.
let scorer = BadChannelScorer { short_channel_id: 6 };
let route = get_route(
- &our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[6], None, None,
- &last_hops(&nodes).iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer
+ &our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 100, 42,
+ Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer
).unwrap();
let path = route.paths[0].iter().map(|hop| hop.short_channel_id).collect::<Vec<_>>();
// A path to nodes[6] does not exist if nodes[2] cannot be routed through.
let scorer = BadNodeScorer { node_id: NodeId::from_pubkey(&nodes[2]) };
match get_route(
- &our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[6], None, None,
- &last_hops(&nodes).iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer
+ &our_id, &payee, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 100, 42,
+ Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer
) {
Err(LightningError { err, .. } ) => {
assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a path to the given destination");
seed = seed.overflowing_mul(0xdeadbeef).0;
let src = &PublicKey::from_slice(nodes.keys().skip(seed % nodes.len()).next().unwrap().as_slice()).unwrap();
seed = seed.overflowing_mul(0xdeadbeef).0;
- let dst = &PublicKey::from_slice(nodes.keys().skip(seed % nodes.len()).next().unwrap().as_slice()).unwrap();
+ let dst = PublicKey::from_slice(nodes.keys().skip(seed % nodes.len()).next().unwrap().as_slice()).unwrap();
+ let payee = Payee::new(dst);
let amt = seed as u64 % 200_000_000;
- if get_route(src, &graph, dst, None, None, &[], amt, 42, &test_utils::TestLogger::new(), &scorer).is_ok() {
+ if get_route(src, &payee, &graph, None, amt, 42, &test_utils::TestLogger::new(), &scorer).is_ok() {
continue 'load_endpoints;
}
}
seed = seed.overflowing_mul(0xdeadbeef).0;
let src = &PublicKey::from_slice(nodes.keys().skip(seed % nodes.len()).next().unwrap().as_slice()).unwrap();
seed = seed.overflowing_mul(0xdeadbeef).0;
- let dst = &PublicKey::from_slice(nodes.keys().skip(seed % nodes.len()).next().unwrap().as_slice()).unwrap();
+ let dst = PublicKey::from_slice(nodes.keys().skip(seed % nodes.len()).next().unwrap().as_slice()).unwrap();
+ let payee = Payee::new(dst).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
let amt = seed as u64 % 200_000_000;
- if get_route(src, &graph, dst, Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &[], amt, 42, &test_utils::TestLogger::new(), &scorer).is_ok() {
+ if get_route(src, &payee, &graph, None, amt, 42, &test_utils::TestLogger::new(), &scorer).is_ok() {
continue 'load_endpoints;
}
}
let src = PublicKey::from_slice(nodes.keys().skip(seed % nodes.len()).next().unwrap().as_slice()).unwrap();
seed *= 0xdeadbeef;
let dst = PublicKey::from_slice(nodes.keys().skip(seed % nodes.len()).next().unwrap().as_slice()).unwrap();
+ let payee = Payee::new(dst);
let amt = seed as u64 % 1_000_000;
- if get_route(&src, &graph, &dst, None, None, &[], amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}, &scorer).is_ok() {
+ if get_route(&src, &payee, &graph, None, amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}, &scorer).is_ok() {
path_endpoints.push((src, dst, amt));
continue 'load_endpoints;
}
let mut idx = 0;
bench.iter(|| {
let (src, dst, amt) = path_endpoints[idx % path_endpoints.len()];
- assert!(get_route(&src, &graph, &dst, None, None, &[], amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}, &scorer).is_ok());
+ let payee = Payee::new(dst);
+ assert!(get_route(&src, &payee, &graph, None, amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}, &scorer).is_ok());
idx += 1;
});
}
let src = PublicKey::from_slice(nodes.keys().skip(seed % nodes.len()).next().unwrap().as_slice()).unwrap();
seed *= 0xdeadbeef;
let dst = PublicKey::from_slice(nodes.keys().skip(seed % nodes.len()).next().unwrap().as_slice()).unwrap();
+ let payee = Payee::new(dst).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
let amt = seed as u64 % 1_000_000;
- if get_route(&src, &graph, &dst, Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &[], amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}, &scorer).is_ok() {
+ if get_route(&src, &payee, &graph, None, amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}, &scorer).is_ok() {
path_endpoints.push((src, dst, amt));
continue 'load_endpoints;
}
let mut idx = 0;
bench.iter(|| {
let (src, dst, amt) = path_endpoints[idx % path_endpoints.len()];
- assert!(get_route(&src, &graph, &dst, Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &[], amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}, &scorer).is_ok());
+ let payee = Payee::new(dst).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
+ assert!(get_route(&src, &payee, &graph, None, amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}, &scorer).is_ok());
idx += 1;
});
}
projects / rust-lightning / commitdiff