}
},
events::Event::PaymentSent { .. } => {},
- events::Event::PaymentFailed { .. } => {},
+ events::Event::PaymentPathFailed { .. } => {},
events::Event::PaymentForwarded { .. } if $node == 1 => {},
events::Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable { .. } => {
nodes[$node].process_pending_htlc_forwards();
};
// TODO: Once we hit the chain with the failure transaction we should check that we get a
- // PaymentFailed event
+ // PaymentPathFailed event
assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: "ChannelMonitor storage failure".to_string() });
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
// TODO: Once we hit the chain with the failure transaction we should check that we get a
- // PaymentFailed event
+ // PaymentPathFailed event
assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed);
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
- if let Event::PaymentFailed { payment_hash, rejected_by_dest, .. } = events[0] {
+ if let Event::PaymentPathFailed { payment_hash, rejected_by_dest, .. } = events[0] {
assert_eq!(payment_hash, payment_hash_1);
assert!(rejected_by_dest);
} else { panic!("Unexpected event!"); }
/// The session_priv bytes of outbound payments which are pending resolution.
/// The authoritative state of these HTLCs resides either within Channels or ChannelMonitors
/// (if the channel has been force-closed), however we track them here to prevent duplicative
- /// PaymentSent/PaymentFailed events. Specifically, in the case of a duplicative
+ /// PaymentSent/PaymentPathFailed events. Specifically, in the case of a duplicative
/// update_fulfill_htlc message after a reconnect, we may "claim" a payment twice.
/// Additionally, because ChannelMonitors are often not re-serialized after connecting block(s)
/// which may generate a claim event, we may receive similar duplicate claim/fail MonitorEvents
if let hash_map::Entry::Occupied(mut sessions) = outbounds.entry(mpp_id) {
if sessions.get_mut().remove(&session_priv_bytes) {
self.pending_events.lock().unwrap().push(
- events::Event::PaymentFailed {
+ events::Event::PaymentPathFailed {
payment_hash,
rejected_by_dest: false,
network_update: None,
// process_onion_failure we should close that channel as it implies our
// next-hop is needlessly blaming us!
self.pending_events.lock().unwrap().push(
- events::Event::PaymentFailed {
+ events::Event::PaymentPathFailed {
payment_hash: payment_hash.clone(),
rejected_by_dest: !payment_retryable,
network_update,
// TODO: For non-temporary failures, we really should be closing the
// channel here as we apparently can't relay through them anyway.
self.pending_events.lock().unwrap().push(
- events::Event::PaymentFailed {
+ events::Event::PaymentPathFailed {
payment_hash: payment_hash.clone(),
rejected_by_dest: path.len() == 1,
network_update: None,
let events = $node.node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
match events[0] {
- Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, ref error_code, ref error_data, .. } => {
+ Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, ref error_code, ref error_data, .. } => {
assert_eq!(*payment_hash, $expected_payment_hash, "unexpected payment_hash");
assert_eq!(rejected_by_dest, $rejected_by_dest, "unexpected rejected_by_dest value");
assert!(error_code.is_some(), "expected error_code.is_some() = true");
let events = $node.node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
match events[0] {
- Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, rejected_by_dest, network_update: _, ref error_code, ref error_data, .. } => {
+ Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, rejected_by_dest, network_update: _, ref error_code, ref error_data, .. } => {
assert_eq!(*payment_hash, $expected_payment_hash, "unexpected payment_hash");
assert_eq!(rejected_by_dest, $rejected_by_dest, "unexpected rejected_by_dest value");
assert!(error_code.is_some(), "expected error_code.is_some() = true");
let events = origin_node.node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
match events[0] {
- Event::PaymentFailed { payment_hash, rejected_by_dest, all_paths_failed, .. } => {
+ Event::PaymentPathFailed { payment_hash, rejected_by_dest, all_paths_failed, .. } => {
assert_eq!(payment_hash, our_payment_hash);
assert!(rejected_by_dest);
assert_eq!(all_paths_failed, i == expected_paths.len() - 1);
_ => panic!("Unexepected event"),
}
match events[1] {
- Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, .. } => {
+ Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, .. } => {
assert_eq!(*payment_hash, fourth_payment_hash);
},
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(events.len(), 3);
match events[0] {
- Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, rejected_by_dest: _, ref network_update, .. } => {
+ Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, rejected_by_dest: _, ref network_update, .. } => {
assert!(failed_htlcs.insert(payment_hash.0));
// If we delivered B's RAA we got an unknown preimage error, not something
// that we should update our routing table for.
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
}
match events[1] {
- Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, rejected_by_dest: _, ref network_update, .. } => {
+ Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, rejected_by_dest: _, ref network_update, .. } => {
assert!(failed_htlcs.insert(payment_hash.0));
assert!(network_update.is_some());
},
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
}
match events[2] {
- Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, rejected_by_dest: _, ref network_update, .. } => {
+ Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, rejected_by_dest: _, ref network_update, .. } => {
assert!(failed_htlcs.insert(payment_hash.0));
assert!(network_update.is_some());
},
assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
// Check that Alice fails backward the pending HTLC from the second payment.
match events[0] {
- Event::PaymentFailed { payment_hash, .. } => {
+ Event::PaymentPathFailed { payment_hash, .. } => {
assert_eq!(payment_hash, failed_payment_hash);
},
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
}
match events[1] {
- Event::PaymentFailed { payment_hash, rejected_by_dest, .. } => {
+ Event::PaymentPathFailed { payment_hash, rejected_by_dest, .. } => {
assert_eq!(payment_hash, payment_hash_5);
assert!(rejected_by_dest);
},
//
// If, due to an on-chain event, an HTLC is failed/claimed, and then we serialize the
// ChannelManager, we generally expect there not to be a duplicate HTLC fail/claim (eg via a
- // PaymentFailed event appearing). However, because we may not serialize the relevant
+ // PaymentPathFailed event appearing). However, because we may not serialize the relevant
// ChannelMonitor at the same time, this isn't strictly guaranteed. In order to provide this
// consistency, the ChannelManager explicitly tracks pending-onchain-resolution outbound HTLCs
// and de-duplicates ChannelMonitor events.
let mut as_failds = HashSet::new();
let mut as_updates = 0;
for event in as_events.iter() {
- if let &Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, .. } = event {
+ if let &Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, .. } = event {
assert!(as_failds.insert(*payment_hash));
if *payment_hash != payment_hash_2 {
assert_eq!(*rejected_by_dest, deliver_last_raa);
let mut bs_failds = HashSet::new();
let mut bs_updates = 0;
for event in bs_events.iter() {
- if let &Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, .. } = event {
+ if let &Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, .. } = event {
assert!(bs_failds.insert(*payment_hash));
if *payment_hash != payment_hash_1 && *payment_hash != payment_hash_5 {
assert_eq!(*rejected_by_dest, deliver_last_raa);
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
match &events[0] {
- &Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, ref error_code, ref error_data, ref all_paths_failed } => {
+ &Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, ref error_code, ref error_data, ref all_paths_failed } => {
assert_eq!(our_payment_hash.clone(), *payment_hash);
assert_eq!(*rejected_by_dest, false);
assert_eq!(*all_paths_failed, true);
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
match &events[0] {
- &Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, ref error_code, ref error_data, ref all_paths_failed } => {
+ &Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, ref error_code, ref error_data, ref all_paths_failed } => {
assert_eq!(payment_hash_2.clone(), *payment_hash);
assert_eq!(*rejected_by_dest, false);
assert_eq!(*all_paths_failed, true);
assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().len(), 0);
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
- // Only 2 PaymentFailed events should show up, over-dust HTLC has to be failed by timeout tx
+ // Only 2 PaymentPathFailed events should show up, over-dust HTLC has to be failed by timeout tx
assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
let mut first_failed = false;
for event in events {
match event {
- Event::PaymentFailed { payment_hash, .. } => {
+ Event::PaymentPathFailed { payment_hash, .. } => {
if payment_hash == payment_hash_1 {
assert!(!first_failed);
first_failed = true;
assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
let first;
match events[0] {
- Event::PaymentFailed { payment_hash, .. } => {
+ Event::PaymentPathFailed { payment_hash, .. } => {
if payment_hash == dust_hash { first = true; }
else { first = false; }
},
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
}
match events[1] {
- Event::PaymentFailed { payment_hash, .. } => {
+ Event::PaymentPathFailed { payment_hash, .. } => {
if first { assert_eq!(payment_hash, non_dust_hash); }
else { assert_eq!(payment_hash, dust_hash); }
},
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
- if let &Event::PaymentFailed { payment_hash:_, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, ref error_code, error_data: _, ref all_paths_failed } = &events[0] {
+ if let &Event::PaymentPathFailed { payment_hash:_, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, ref error_code, error_data: _, ref all_paths_failed } = &events[0] {
assert_eq!(*rejected_by_dest, !expected_retryable);
assert_eq!(*all_paths_failed, true);
assert_eq!(*error_code, expected_error_code);
impl<C: Deref, L: Deref> EventHandler for NetGraphMsgHandler<C, L>
where C::Target: chain::Access, L::Target: Logger {
fn handle_event(&self, event: &Event) {
- if let Event::PaymentFailed { payment_hash: _, rejected_by_dest: _, network_update, .. } = event {
+ if let Event::PaymentPathFailed { payment_hash: _, rejected_by_dest: _, network_update, .. } = event {
if let Some(network_update) = network_update {
self.handle_network_update(network_update);
}
/// Provides interface to help with initial routing sync by
/// serving historical announcements.
///
-/// Serves as an [`EventHandler`] for applying updates from [`Event::PaymentFailed`] to the
+/// Serves as an [`EventHandler`] for applying updates from [`Event::PaymentPathFailed`] to the
/// [`NetworkGraph`].
pub struct NetGraphMsgHandler<C: Deref, L: Deref>
where C::Target: chain::Access, L::Target: Logger
assert!(network_graph.read_only().channels().get(&short_channel_id).unwrap().one_to_two.is_none());
- net_graph_msg_handler.handle_event(&Event::PaymentFailed {
+ net_graph_msg_handler.handle_event(&Event::PaymentPathFailed {
payment_hash: PaymentHash([0; 32]),
rejected_by_dest: false,
all_paths_failed: true,
}
};
- net_graph_msg_handler.handle_event(&Event::PaymentFailed {
+ net_graph_msg_handler.handle_event(&Event::PaymentPathFailed {
payment_hash: PaymentHash([0; 32]),
rejected_by_dest: false,
all_paths_failed: true,
// Permanent closing deletes a channel
{
- net_graph_msg_handler.handle_event(&Event::PaymentFailed {
+ net_graph_msg_handler.handle_event(&Event::PaymentPathFailed {
payment_hash: PaymentHash([0; 32]),
rejected_by_dest: false,
all_paths_failed: true,
/// Indicates an outbound payment we made succeeded (i.e. it made it all the way to its target
/// and we got back the payment preimage for it).
///
- /// Note for MPP payments: in rare cases, this event may be preceded by a `PaymentFailed` event.
- /// In this situation, you SHOULD treat this payment as having succeeded.
+ /// Note for MPP payments: in rare cases, this event may be preceded by a `PaymentPathFailed`
+ /// event. In this situation, you SHOULD treat this payment as having succeeded.
PaymentSent {
/// The preimage to the hash given to ChannelManager::send_payment.
/// Note that this serves as a payment receipt, if you wish to have such a thing, you must
},
/// Indicates an outbound payment we made failed. Probably some intermediary node dropped
/// something. You may wish to retry with a different route.
- PaymentFailed {
+ PaymentPathFailed {
/// The hash which was given to ChannelManager::send_payment.
payment_hash: PaymentHash,
/// Indicates the payment was rejected for some reason by the recipient. This implies that
(0, payment_preimage, required),
});
},
- &Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, ref all_paths_failed,
+ &Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, ref all_paths_failed,
#[cfg(test)]
ref error_code,
#[cfg(test)]
(2, rejected_by_dest, required),
(3, all_paths_failed, option),
});
- Ok(Some(Event::PaymentFailed {
+ Ok(Some(Event::PaymentPathFailed {
payment_hash,
rejected_by_dest,
network_update,
projects / rust-lightning / commitdiff