(self.pending_inbound_htlcs.len() as u32, htlc_inbound_value_msat)
}
- /// Returns (outbound_htlc_count, htlc_outbound_value_msat)
+ /// Returns (outbound_htlc_count, htlc_outbound_value_msat) *including* pending adds in our
+ /// holding cell.
fn get_outbound_pending_htlc_stats(&self) -> (u32, u64) {
let mut htlc_outbound_value_msat = 0;
for ref htlc in self.pending_outbound_htlcs.iter() {
htlc_outbound_value_msat += htlc.amount_msat;
}
- (self.pending_outbound_htlcs.len() as u32, htlc_outbound_value_msat)
+ let mut htlc_outbound_count = self.pending_outbound_htlcs.len();
+ for update in self.holding_cell_htlc_updates.iter() {
+ if let &HTLCUpdateAwaitingACK::AddHTLC { ref amount_msat, .. } = update {
+ htlc_outbound_count += 1;
+ htlc_outbound_value_msat += amount_msat;
+ }
+ }
+
+ (htlc_outbound_count as u32, htlc_outbound_value_msat)
}
pub fn update_add_htlc(&mut self, msg: &msgs::UpdateAddHTLC, pending_forward_state: PendingHTLCStatus) -> Result<(), ChannelError> {
match self.send_htlc(amount_msat, *payment_hash, cltv_expiry, source.clone(), onion_routing_packet.clone()) {
Ok(update_add_msg_option) => update_add_htlcs.push(update_add_msg_option.unwrap()),
Err(e) => {
+ match e {
+ ChannelError::Ignore(ref msg) => {
+ log_info!(self, "Failed to send HTLC with payment_hash {} due to {}", log_bytes!(payment_hash.0), msg);
+ },
+ _ => {
+ log_info!(self, "Failed to send HTLC with payment_hash {} resulting in a channel closure during holding_cell freeing", log_bytes!(payment_hash.0));
+ },
+ }
err = Some(e);
}
}
}
if err.is_some() {
self.holding_cell_htlc_updates.push(htlc_update);
+ if let Some(ChannelError::Ignore(_)) = err {
+ // If we failed to add the HTLC, but got an Ignore error, we should
+ // still send the new commitment_signed, so reset the err to None.
+ err = None;
+ }
}
}
}
//TODO: Spec is unclear if this is per-direction or in total (I assume per direction):
// Check their_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat
if htlc_outbound_value_msat + amount_msat > self.their_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat {
- return Err(ChannelError::Ignore("Cannot send value that would put us over our max HTLC value in flight"));
- }
-
- let mut holding_cell_outbound_amount_msat = 0;
- for holding_htlc in self.holding_cell_htlc_updates.iter() {
- match holding_htlc {
- &HTLCUpdateAwaitingACK::AddHTLC { ref amount_msat, .. } => {
- holding_cell_outbound_amount_msat += *amount_msat;
- }
- _ => {}
- }
+ return Err(ChannelError::Ignore("Cannot send value that would put us over the max HTLC value in flight"));
}
// Check self.their_channel_reserve_satoshis (the amount we must keep as
// reserve for them to have something to claim if we misbehave)
- if self.value_to_self_msat < self.their_channel_reserve_satoshis * 1000 + amount_msat + holding_cell_outbound_amount_msat + htlc_outbound_value_msat {
- return Err(ChannelError::Ignore("Cannot send value that would put us over our reserve value"));
+ if self.value_to_self_msat < self.their_channel_reserve_satoshis * 1000 + amount_msat + htlc_outbound_value_msat {
+ return Err(ChannelError::Ignore("Cannot send value that would put us over the reserve value"));
}
//TODO: Check cltv_expiry? Do this in channel manager?
// Now update local state:
if (self.channel_state & (ChannelState::AwaitingRemoteRevoke as u32)) == (ChannelState::AwaitingRemoteRevoke as u32) {
- //TODO: Check the limits *including* other pending holding cell HTLCs!
self.holding_cell_htlc_updates.push(HTLCUpdateAwaitingACK::AddHTLC {
amount_msat: amount_msat,
payment_hash: payment_hash,
close_channel(&nodes[1], &nodes[3], &chan_5.2, chan_5.3, false);
}
+#[test]
+fn holding_cell_htlc_counting() {
+ // Tests that HTLCs in the holding cell count towards the pending HTLC limits on outbound HTLCs
+ // to ensure we don't end up with HTLCs sitting around in our holding cell for several
+ // commitment dance rounds.
+ let mut nodes = create_network(3);
+ create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
+ let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
+
+ let mut payments = Vec::new();
+ for _ in 0..::ln::channel::OUR_MAX_HTLCS {
+ let route = nodes[1].router.get_route(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), None, &Vec::new(), 100000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV).unwrap();
+ let (payment_preimage, payment_hash) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(nodes[0]);
+ nodes[1].node.send_payment(route, payment_hash).unwrap();
+ payments.push((payment_preimage, payment_hash));
+ }
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+
+ let mut events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ let initial_payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.pop().unwrap());
+ assert_eq!(initial_payment_event.node_id, nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
+
+ // There is now one HTLC in an outbound commitment transaction and (OUR_MAX_HTLCS - 1) HTLCs in
+ // the holding cell waiting on B's RAA to send. At this point we should not be able to add
+ // another HTLC.
+ let route = nodes[1].router.get_route(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), None, &Vec::new(), 100000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV).unwrap();
+ let (_, payment_hash_1) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(nodes[0]);
+ if let APIError::ChannelUnavailable { err } = nodes[1].node.send_payment(route, payment_hash_1).unwrap_err() {
+ assert_eq!(err, "Cannot push more than their max accepted HTLCs");
+ } else { panic!("Unexpected event"); }
+
+ // This should also be true if we try to forward a payment.
+ let route = nodes[0].router.get_route(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), None, &Vec::new(), 100000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV).unwrap();
+ let (_, payment_hash_2) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(nodes[0]);
+ nodes[0].node.send_payment(route, payment_hash_2).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+
+ let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ let payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.pop().unwrap());
+ assert_eq!(payment_event.node_id, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+
+ nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]).unwrap();
+ commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
+ // We have to forward pending HTLCs twice - once tries to forward the payment forward (and
+ // fails), the second will process the resulting failure and fail the HTLC backward.
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+
+ let bs_fail_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+ nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_fail_updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]).unwrap();
+ commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], bs_fail_updates.commitment_signed, false, true);
+
+ let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ match events[0] {
+ MessageSendEvent::PaymentFailureNetworkUpdate { update: msgs::HTLCFailChannelUpdate::ChannelUpdateMessage { ref msg }} => {
+ assert_eq!(msg.contents.short_channel_id, chan_2.0.contents.short_channel_id);
+ },
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ }
+
+ let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ match events[0] {
+ Event::PaymentFailed { payment_hash, rejected_by_dest, .. } => {
+ assert_eq!(payment_hash, payment_hash_2);
+ assert!(!rejected_by_dest);
+ },
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ }
+
+ // Now forward all the pending HTLCs and claim them back
+ nodes[2].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &initial_payment_event.msgs[0]).unwrap();
+ nodes[2].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &initial_payment_event.commitment_msg).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
+
+ let (bs_revoke_and_ack, bs_commitment_signed) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+ nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_revoke_and_ack).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+ let as_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
+
+ nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_commitment_signed).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+ let as_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
+
+ for ref update in as_updates.update_add_htlcs.iter() {
+ nodes[2].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), update).unwrap();
+ }
+ nodes[2].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_updates.commitment_signed).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
+ nodes[2].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_raa).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
+ let (bs_revoke_and_ack, bs_commitment_signed) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+
+ nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_revoke_and_ack).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+ nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_commitment_signed).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+ let as_final_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
+
+ nodes[2].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_final_raa).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
+
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[2]);
+
+ let events = nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), payments.len());
+ for (event, &(_, ref hash)) in events.iter().zip(payments.iter()) {
+ match event {
+ &Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, .. } => {
+ assert_eq!(*payment_hash, *hash);
+ },
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ };
+ }
+
+ for (preimage, _) in payments.drain(..) {
+ claim_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[2]], preimage);
+ }
+
+ send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], 1000000);
+}
+
#[test]
fn duplicate_htlc_test() {
// Test that we accept duplicate payment_hash HTLCs across the network and that
assert!(route.hops.iter().rev().skip(1).all(|h| h.fee_msat == feemsat));
let err = nodes[0].node.send_payment(route, our_payment_hash).err().unwrap();
match err {
- APIError::ChannelUnavailable{err} => assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send value that would put us over our max HTLC value in flight"),
+ APIError::ChannelUnavailable{err} => assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send value that would put us over the max HTLC value in flight"),
_ => panic!("Unknown error variants"),
}
}
let (route, our_payment_hash, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(recv_value + 1);
let err = nodes[0].node.send_payment(route.clone(), our_payment_hash).err().unwrap();
match err {
- APIError::ChannelUnavailable{err} => assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send value that would put us over our reserve value"),
+ APIError::ChannelUnavailable{err} => assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send value that would put us over the reserve value"),
_ => panic!("Unknown error variants"),
}
}
{
let (route, our_payment_hash, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(recv_value_2 + 1);
match nodes[0].node.send_payment(route, our_payment_hash).err().unwrap() {
- APIError::ChannelUnavailable{err} => assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send value that would put us over our reserve value"),
+ APIError::ChannelUnavailable{err} => assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send value that would put us over the reserve value"),
_ => panic!("Unknown error variants"),
}
}
{
let (route, our_payment_hash, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(recv_value_22+1);
match nodes[0].node.send_payment(route, our_payment_hash).err().unwrap() {
- APIError::ChannelUnavailable{err} => assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send value that would put us over our reserve value"),
+ APIError::ChannelUnavailable{err} => assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send value that would put us over the reserve value"),
_ => panic!("Unknown error variants"),
}
}
let err = nodes[0].node.send_payment(route, our_payment_hash);
if let Err(APIError::ChannelUnavailable{err}) = err {
- assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send value that would put us over our max HTLC value in flight");
+ assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send value that would put us over the max HTLC value in flight");
} else {
assert!(false);
}
projects / rust-lightning / commitdiff