{
self.payment_preimages.insert(payment_hash.clone(), payment_preimage.clone());
+ let confirmed_spend_txid = self.funding_spend_confirmed.or_else(|| {
+ self.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf.iter().find_map(|event| match event.event {
+ OnchainEvent::FundingSpendConfirmation { .. } => Some(event.txid),
+ _ => None,
+ })
+ });
+ let confirmed_spend_txid = if let Some(txid) = confirmed_spend_txid {
+ txid
+ } else {
+ return;
+ };
+
// If the channel is force closed, try to claim the output from this preimage.
// First check if a counterparty commitment transaction has been broadcasted:
macro_rules! claim_htlcs {
}
}
if let Some(txid) = self.current_counterparty_commitment_txid {
- if let Some(commitment_number) = self.counterparty_commitment_txn_on_chain.get(&txid) {
- claim_htlcs!(*commitment_number, txid);
+ if txid == confirmed_spend_txid {
+ if let Some(commitment_number) = self.counterparty_commitment_txn_on_chain.get(&txid) {
+ claim_htlcs!(*commitment_number, txid);
+ } else {
+ debug_assert!(false);
+ log_error!(logger, "Detected counterparty commitment tx on-chain without tracking commitment number");
+ }
return;
}
}
if let Some(txid) = self.prev_counterparty_commitment_txid {
- if let Some(commitment_number) = self.counterparty_commitment_txn_on_chain.get(&txid) {
- claim_htlcs!(*commitment_number, txid);
+ if txid == confirmed_spend_txid {
+ if let Some(commitment_number) = self.counterparty_commitment_txn_on_chain.get(&txid) {
+ claim_htlcs!(*commitment_number, txid);
+ } else {
+ debug_assert!(false);
+ log_error!(logger, "Detected counterparty commitment tx on-chain without tracking commitment number");
+ }
return;
}
}
// *we* sign a holder commitment transaction, not when e.g. a watchtower broadcasts one of our
// holder commitment transactions.
if self.broadcasted_holder_revokable_script.is_some() {
- // Assume that the broadcasted commitment transaction confirmed in the current best
- // block. Even if not, its a reasonable metric for the bump criteria on the HTLC
- // transactions.
- let (claim_reqs, _) = self.get_broadcasted_holder_claims(&self.current_holder_commitment_tx, self.best_block.height());
- self.onchain_tx_handler.update_claims_view_from_requests(claim_reqs, self.best_block.height(), self.best_block.height(), broadcaster, fee_estimator, logger);
- if let Some(ref tx) = self.prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx {
- let (claim_reqs, _) = self.get_broadcasted_holder_claims(&tx, self.best_block.height());
+ let holder_commitment_tx = if self.current_holder_commitment_tx.txid == confirmed_spend_txid {
+ Some(&self.current_holder_commitment_tx)
+ } else if let Some(prev_holder_commitment_tx) = &self.prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx {
+ if prev_holder_commitment_tx.txid == confirmed_spend_txid {
+ Some(prev_holder_commitment_tx)
+ } else {
+ None
+ }
+ } else {
+ None
+ };
+ if let Some(holder_commitment_tx) = holder_commitment_tx {
+ // Assume that the broadcasted commitment transaction confirmed in the current best
+ // block. Even if not, its a reasonable metric for the bump criteria on the HTLC
+ // transactions.
+ let (claim_reqs, _) = self.get_broadcasted_holder_claims(&holder_commitment_tx, self.best_block.height());
self.onchain_tx_handler.update_claims_view_from_requests(claim_reqs, self.best_block.height(), self.best_block.height(), broadcaster, fee_estimator, logger);
}
}
//! Further functional tests which test blockchain reorganizations.
+use crate::chain::chaininterface::LowerBoundedFeeEstimator;
use crate::chain::channelmonitor::{ANTI_REORG_DELAY, LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS};
use crate::chain::transaction::OutPoint;
use crate::chain::Confirm;
-use crate::events::{Event, MessageSendEventsProvider, ClosureReason, HTLCDestination};
+use crate::events::{Event, MessageSendEventsProvider, ClosureReason, HTLCDestination, MessageSendEvent};
use crate::ln::msgs::{ChannelMessageHandler, Init};
use crate::util::test_utils;
use crate::util::ser::Writeable;
do_test_to_remote_after_local_detection(ConnectStyle::TransactionsFirstReorgsOnlyTip);
do_test_to_remote_after_local_detection(ConnectStyle::FullBlockViaListen);
}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_htlc_preimage_claim_holder_commitment_after_counterparty_commitment_reorg() {
+ // We detect a counterparty commitment confirm onchain, followed by a reorg and a confirmation
+ // of a holder commitment. Then, if we learn of the preimage for an HTLC in both commitments,
+ // test that we only claim the currently confirmed commitment.
+ let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
+ let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
+ let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
+ let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+
+ let (_, _, chan_id, funding_tx) = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
+
+ // Route an HTLC which we will claim onchain with the preimage.
+ let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 1_000_000);
+
+ // Force close with the latest counterparty commitment, confirm it, and reorg it with the latest
+ // holder commitment.
+ nodes[0].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&chan_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
+ check_closed_broadcast(&nodes[0], 1, true);
+ check_added_monitors(&nodes[0], 1);
+ check_closed_event(&nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, false, &[nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
+
+ nodes[1].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&chan_id, &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
+ check_closed_broadcast(&nodes[1], 1, true);
+ check_added_monitors(&nodes[1], 1);
+ check_closed_event(&nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, false, &[nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
+
+ let mut txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcast();
+ assert_eq!(txn.len(), 1);
+ let commitment_tx_a = txn.pop().unwrap();
+ check_spends!(commitment_tx_a, funding_tx);
+
+ let mut txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcast();
+ assert_eq!(txn.len(), 1);
+ let commitment_tx_b = txn.pop().unwrap();
+ check_spends!(commitment_tx_b, funding_tx);
+
+ mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &commitment_tx_a);
+ mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &commitment_tx_a);
+
+ disconnect_blocks(&nodes[0], 1);
+ disconnect_blocks(&nodes[1], 1);
+
+ mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &commitment_tx_b);
+ mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &commitment_tx_b);
+
+ // Provide the preimage now, such that we only claim from the holder commitment (since it's
+ // currently confirmed) and not the counterparty's.
+ get_monitor!(nodes[1], chan_id).provide_payment_preimage(
+ &payment_hash, &payment_preimage, &nodes[1].tx_broadcaster,
+ &LowerBoundedFeeEstimator(nodes[1].fee_estimator), &nodes[1].logger
+ );
+
+ let mut txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcast();
+ assert_eq!(txn.len(), 1);
+ let htlc_success_tx = txn.pop().unwrap();
+ check_spends!(htlc_success_tx, commitment_tx_b);
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_htlc_preimage_claim_prev_counterparty_commitment_after_current_counterparty_commitment_reorg() {
+ // We detect a counterparty commitment confirm onchain, followed by a reorg and a
+ // confirmation of the previous (still unrevoked) counterparty commitment. Then, if we learn
+ // of the preimage for an HTLC in both commitments, test that we only claim the currently
+ // confirmed commitment.
+ let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
+ let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
+ let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
+ let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+
+ let (_, _, chan_id, funding_tx) = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
+
+ // Route an HTLC which we will claim onchain with the preimage.
+ let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 1_000_000);
+
+ // Obtain the current commitment, which will become the previous after a fee update.
+ let prev_commitment_a = &get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_id)[0];
+
+ *nodes[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap() *= 4;
+ nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
+ check_added_monitors(&nodes[0], 1);
+ let mut msg_events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(msg_events.len(), 1);
+ let (update_fee, commit_sig) = if let MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { node_id, mut updates } = msg_events.pop().unwrap() {
+ assert_eq!(node_id, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+ (updates.update_fee.take().unwrap(), updates.commitment_signed)
+ } else {
+ panic!("Unexpected message send event");
+ };
+
+ // Handle the fee update on the other side, but don't send the last RAA such that the previous
+ // commitment is still valid (unrevoked).
+ nodes[1].node().handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_fee);
+ let _last_revoke_and_ack = commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], commit_sig, false, true, false, true);
+
+ // Force close with the latest commitment, confirm it, and reorg it with the previous commitment.
+ nodes[0].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&chan_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
+ check_closed_broadcast(&nodes[0], 1, true);
+ check_added_monitors(&nodes[0], 1);
+ check_closed_event(&nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, false, &[nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
+
+ let mut txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcast();
+ assert_eq!(txn.len(), 1);
+ let current_commitment_a = txn.pop().unwrap();
+ assert_ne!(current_commitment_a.txid(), prev_commitment_a.txid());
+ check_spends!(current_commitment_a, funding_tx);
+
+ mine_transaction(&nodes[0], ¤t_commitment_a);
+ mine_transaction(&nodes[1], ¤t_commitment_a);
+
+ check_closed_broadcast(&nodes[1], 1, true);
+ check_added_monitors(&nodes[1], 1);
+ check_closed_event(&nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, false, &[nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
+
+ disconnect_blocks(&nodes[0], 1);
+ disconnect_blocks(&nodes[1], 1);
+
+ mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &prev_commitment_a);
+ mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &prev_commitment_a);
+
+ // Provide the preimage now, such that we only claim from the previous commitment (since it's
+ // currently confirmed) and not the latest.
+ get_monitor!(nodes[1], chan_id).provide_payment_preimage(
+ &payment_hash, &payment_preimage, &nodes[1].tx_broadcaster,
+ &LowerBoundedFeeEstimator(nodes[1].fee_estimator), &nodes[1].logger
+ );
+
+ let mut txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcast();
+ assert_eq!(txn.len(), 1);
+ let htlc_preimage_tx = txn.pop().unwrap();
+ check_spends!(htlc_preimage_tx, prev_commitment_a);
+ // Make sure it was indeed a preimage claim and not a revocation claim since the previous
+ // commitment (still unrevoked) is the currently confirmed closing transaction.
+ assert_eq!(htlc_preimage_tx.input[0].witness.second_to_last().unwrap(), &payment_preimage.0[..]);
+}
projects / rust-lightning / commitdiff