/// (CSV or CLTV following cases). In case of high-fee spikes, claim tx may stuck in the mempool, so you need to bump its feerate quickly using Replace-By-Fee or Child-Pay-For-Parent.
/// Panics if there are signing errors, because signing operations in reaction to on-chain events
/// are not expected to fail, and if they do, we may lose funds.
- fn generate_claim_tx<F: Deref, L: Deref>(&mut self, height: u32, cached_request: &PackageTemplate, fee_estimator: &F, logger: &L) -> Option<(Option<u32>, u64, Transaction)>
+ fn generate_claim_tx<F: Deref, L: Deref>(&mut self, cur_height: u32, cached_request: &PackageTemplate, fee_estimator: &F, logger: &L) -> Option<(Option<u32>, u64, Transaction)>
where F::Target: FeeEstimator,
L::Target: Logger,
{
// Compute new height timer to decide when we need to regenerate a new bumped version of the claim tx (if we
// didn't receive confirmation of it before, or not enough reorg-safe depth on top of it).
- let new_timer = Some(cached_request.get_height_timer(height));
+ let new_timer = Some(cached_request.get_height_timer(cur_height));
if cached_request.is_malleable() {
let predicted_weight = cached_request.package_weight(&self.destination_script);
if let Some((output_value, new_feerate)) = cached_request.compute_package_output(predicted_weight, fee_estimator, logger) {
/// for this channel, provide new relevant on-chain transactions and/or new claim requests.
/// Formerly this was named `block_connected`, but it is now also used for claiming an HTLC output
/// if we receive a preimage after force-close.
- pub(crate) fn update_claims_view<B: Deref, F: Deref, L: Deref>(&mut self, txn_matched: &[&Transaction], requests: Vec<PackageTemplate>, height: u32, broadcaster: &B, fee_estimator: &F, logger: &L)
+ /// `conf_height` represents the height at which the transactions in `txn_matched` were
+ /// confirmed. This does not need to equal the current blockchain tip height, which should be
+ /// provided via `cur_height`, however it must never be higher than `cur_height`.
+ pub(crate) fn update_claims_view<B: Deref, F: Deref, L: Deref>(&mut self, txn_matched: &[&Transaction], requests: Vec<PackageTemplate>, conf_height: u32, cur_height: u32, broadcaster: &B, fee_estimator: &F, logger: &L)
where B::Target: BroadcasterInterface,
F::Target: FeeEstimator,
L::Target: Logger,
{
- log_trace!(logger, "Updating claims view at height {} with {} matched transactions and {} claim requests", height, txn_matched.len(), requests.len());
+ log_debug!(logger, "Updating claims view at height {} with {} matched transactions in block {} and {} claim requests", cur_height, txn_matched.len(), conf_height, requests.len());
let mut preprocessed_requests = Vec::with_capacity(requests.len());
let mut aggregated_request = None;
for req in requests {
// Don't claim a outpoint twice that would be bad for privacy and may uselessly lock a CPFP input for a while
if let Some(_) = self.claimable_outpoints.get(req.outpoints()[0]) {
- log_trace!(logger, "Ignoring second claim for outpoint {}:{}, already registered its claiming request", req.outpoints()[0].txid, req.outpoints()[0].vout);
+ log_info!(logger, "Ignoring second claim for outpoint {}:{}, already registered its claiming request", req.outpoints()[0].txid, req.outpoints()[0].vout);
} else {
let timelocked_equivalent_package = self.locktimed_packages.iter().map(|v| v.1.iter()).flatten()
.find(|locked_package| locked_package.outpoints() == req.outpoints());
if let Some(package) = timelocked_equivalent_package {
- log_trace!(logger, "Ignoring second claim for outpoint {}:{}, we already have one which we're waiting on a timelock at {} for.",
+ log_info!(logger, "Ignoring second claim for outpoint {}:{}, we already have one which we're waiting on a timelock at {} for.",
req.outpoints()[0].txid, req.outpoints()[0].vout, package.package_timelock());
continue;
}
- if req.package_timelock() > height + 1 {
- log_debug!(logger, "Delaying claim of package until its timelock at {} (current height {}), the following outpoints are spent:", req.package_timelock(), height);
+ if req.package_timelock() > cur_height + 1 {
+ log_info!(logger, "Delaying claim of package until its timelock at {} (current height {}), the following outpoints are spent:", req.package_timelock(), cur_height);
for outpoint in req.outpoints() {
- log_debug!(logger, " Outpoint {}", outpoint);
+ log_info!(logger, " Outpoint {}", outpoint);
}
self.locktimed_packages.entry(req.package_timelock()).or_insert(Vec::new()).push(req);
continue;
}
- log_trace!(logger, "Test if outpoint can be aggregated with expiration {} against {}", req.timelock(), height + CLTV_SHARED_CLAIM_BUFFER);
- if req.timelock() <= height + CLTV_SHARED_CLAIM_BUFFER || !req.aggregable() {
+ log_trace!(logger, "Test if outpoint can be aggregated with expiration {} against {}", req.timelock(), cur_height + CLTV_SHARED_CLAIM_BUFFER);
+ if req.timelock() <= cur_height + CLTV_SHARED_CLAIM_BUFFER || !req.aggregable() {
// Don't aggregate if outpoint package timelock is soon or marked as non-aggregable
preprocessed_requests.push(req);
} else if aggregated_request.is_none() {
preprocessed_requests.push(req);
}
- // Claim everything up to and including height + 1
- let remaining_locked_packages = self.locktimed_packages.split_off(&(height + 2));
+ // Claim everything up to and including cur_height + 1
+ let remaining_locked_packages = self.locktimed_packages.split_off(&(cur_height + 2));
for (pop_height, mut entry) in self.locktimed_packages.iter_mut() {
log_trace!(logger, "Restoring delayed claim of package(s) at their timelock at {}.", pop_height);
preprocessed_requests.append(&mut entry);
// Generate claim transactions and track them to bump if necessary at
// height timer expiration (i.e in how many blocks we're going to take action).
for mut req in preprocessed_requests {
- if let Some((new_timer, new_feerate, tx)) = self.generate_claim_tx(height, &req, &*fee_estimator, &*logger) {
+ if let Some((new_timer, new_feerate, tx)) = self.generate_claim_tx(cur_height, &req, &*fee_estimator, &*logger) {
req.set_timer(new_timer);
req.set_feerate(new_feerate);
let txid = tx.txid();
for k in req.outpoints() {
- log_trace!(logger, "Registering claiming request for {}:{}", k.txid, k.vout);
- self.claimable_outpoints.insert(k.clone(), (txid, height));
+ log_info!(logger, "Registering claiming request for {}:{}", k.txid, k.vout);
+ self.claimable_outpoints.insert(k.clone(), (txid, conf_height));
}
self.pending_claim_requests.insert(txid, req);
- log_trace!(logger, "Broadcasting onchain {}", log_tx!(tx));
+ log_info!(logger, "Broadcasting onchain {}", log_tx!(tx));
broadcaster.broadcast_transaction(&tx);
}
}
() => {
let entry = OnchainEventEntry {
txid: tx.txid(),
- height,
+ height: conf_height,
event: OnchainEvent::Claim { claim_request: first_claim_txid_height.0.clone() }
};
if !self.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf.contains(&entry) {
for package in claimed_outputs_material.drain(..) {
let entry = OnchainEventEntry {
txid: tx.txid(),
- height,
+ height: conf_height,
event: OnchainEvent::ContentiousOutpoint { package },
};
if !self.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf.contains(&entry) {
let onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf =
self.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf.drain(..).collect::<Vec<_>>();
for entry in onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf {
- if entry.has_reached_confirmation_threshold(height) {
+ if entry.has_reached_confirmation_threshold(cur_height) {
match entry.event {
OnchainEvent::Claim { claim_request } => {
// We may remove a whole set of claim outpoints here, as these one may have
// been aggregated in a single tx and claimed so atomically
if let Some(request) = self.pending_claim_requests.remove(&claim_request) {
for outpoint in request.outpoints() {
+ log_debug!(logger, "Removing claim tracking for {} due to maturation of claim tx {}.", outpoint, claim_request);
self.claimable_outpoints.remove(&outpoint);
}
}
},
OnchainEvent::ContentiousOutpoint { package } => {
+ log_debug!(logger, "Removing claim tracking due to maturation of claim tx for outpoints:");
+ log_debug!(logger, " {:?}", package.outpoints());
self.claimable_outpoints.remove(&package.outpoints()[0]);
}
}
// Check if any pending claim request must be rescheduled
for (first_claim_txid, ref request) in self.pending_claim_requests.iter() {
if let Some(h) = request.timer() {
- if height >= h {
+ if cur_height >= h {
bump_candidates.insert(*first_claim_txid, (*request).clone());
}
}
// Build, bump and rebroadcast tx accordingly
log_trace!(logger, "Bumping {} candidates", bump_candidates.len());
for (first_claim_txid, request) in bump_candidates.iter() {
- if let Some((new_timer, new_feerate, bump_tx)) = self.generate_claim_tx(height, &request, &*fee_estimator, &*logger) {
- log_trace!(logger, "Broadcasting onchain {}", log_tx!(bump_tx));
+ if let Some((new_timer, new_feerate, bump_tx)) = self.generate_claim_tx(cur_height, &request, &*fee_estimator, &*logger) {
+ log_info!(logger, "Broadcasting RBF-bumped onchain {}", log_tx!(bump_tx));
broadcaster.broadcast_transaction(&bump_tx);
if let Some(request) = self.pending_claim_requests.get_mut(first_claim_txid) {
request.set_timer(new_timer);
projects / rust-lightning / blobdiff