use bitcoin::network::constants::Network;
use bitcoin::util::hash::BitcoinHash;
-use bitcoin_hashes::{Hash, HashEngine};
-use bitcoin_hashes::hmac::{Hmac, HmacEngine};
-use bitcoin_hashes::sha256::Hash as Sha256;
-use bitcoin_hashes::sha256d::Hash as Sha256dHash;
-use bitcoin_hashes::cmp::fixed_time_eq;
+use bitcoin::hashes::{Hash, HashEngine};
+use bitcoin::hashes::hmac::{Hmac, HmacEngine};
+use bitcoin::hashes::sha256::Hash as Sha256;
+use bitcoin::hashes::sha256d::Hash as Sha256dHash;
+use bitcoin::hashes::cmp::fixed_time_eq;
-use secp256k1::key::{SecretKey,PublicKey};
-use secp256k1::Secp256k1;
-use secp256k1::ecdh::SharedSecret;
-use secp256k1;
+use bitcoin::secp256k1::key::{SecretKey,PublicKey};
+use bitcoin::secp256k1::Secp256k1;
+use bitcoin::secp256k1::ecdh::SharedSecret;
+use bitcoin::secp256k1;
use chain::chaininterface::{BroadcasterInterface,ChainListener,FeeEstimator};
use chain::transaction::OutPoint;
if msg.cltv_expiry > cur_height + CLTV_FAR_FAR_AWAY as u32 { // expiry_too_far
break Some(("CLTV expiry is too far in the future", 21, None));
}
+ // In theory, we would be safe against unitentional channel-closure, if we only required a margin of LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS.
+ // But, to be safe against policy reception, we use a longuer delay.
+ if (*outgoing_cltv_value) as u64 <= (cur_height + HTLC_FAIL_BACK_BUFFER) as u64 {
+ break Some(("Outgoing CLTV value is too soon", 0x1000 | 14, Some(self.get_channel_update(chan).unwrap())));
+ }
+
break None;
}
{