payment_data: msgs::FinalOnionHopData,
incoming_cltv_expiry: u32, // Used to track when we should expire pending HTLCs that go unclaimed
},
+ ReceiveKeysend {
+ payment_preimage: PaymentPreimage,
+ incoming_cltv_expiry: u32, // Used to track when we should expire pending HTLCs that go unclaimed
+ },
}
#[derive(Clone)] // See Channel::revoke_and_ack for why, tl;dr: Rust bug
outpoint: OutPoint,
}
-struct ClaimableHTLC {
- prev_hop: HTLCPreviousHopData,
- value: u64,
+enum OnionPayload {
/// Contains a total_msat (which may differ from value if this is a Multi-Path Payment) and a
/// payment_secret which prevents path-probing attacks and can associate different HTLCs which
/// are part of the same payment.
- payment_data: msgs::FinalOnionHopData,
+ Invoice(msgs::FinalOnionHopData),
+ /// Contains the payer-provided preimage.
+ Spontaneous(PaymentPreimage),
+}
+
+struct ClaimableHTLC {
+ prev_hop: HTLCPreviousHopData,
cltv_expiry: u32,
+ value: u64,
+ onion_payload: OnionPayload,
}
/// Tracks the inbound corresponding to an outbound HTLC
};
let pending_forward_info = if next_hop_hmac == [0; 32] {
- #[cfg(test)]
- {
- // In tests, make sure that the initial onion pcket data is, at least, non-0.
- // We could do some fancy randomness test here, but, ehh, whatever.
- // This checks for the issue where you can calculate the path length given the
- // onion data as all the path entries that the originator sent will be here
- // as-is (and were originally 0s).
- // Of course reverse path calculation is still pretty easy given naive routing
- // algorithms, but this fixes the most-obvious case.
- let mut next_bytes = [0; 32];
- chacha_stream.read_exact(&mut next_bytes).unwrap();
- assert_ne!(next_bytes[..], [0; 32][..]);
- chacha_stream.read_exact(&mut next_bytes).unwrap();
- assert_ne!(next_bytes[..], [0; 32][..]);
- }
-
- // OUR PAYMENT!
- // final_expiry_too_soon
- // We have to have some headroom to broadcast on chain if we have the preimage, so make sure we have at least
- // HTLC_FAIL_BACK_BUFFER blocks to go.
- // Also, ensure that, in the case of an unknown payment hash, our payment logic has enough time to fail the HTLC backward
- // before our onchain logic triggers a channel closure (see HTLC_FAIL_BACK_BUFFER rational).
- if (msg.cltv_expiry as u64) <= self.best_block.read().unwrap().height() as u64 + HTLC_FAIL_BACK_BUFFER as u64 + 1 {
- return_err!("The final CLTV expiry is too soon to handle", 17, &[0;0]);
- }
- // final_incorrect_htlc_amount
- if next_hop_data.amt_to_forward > msg.amount_msat {
- return_err!("Upstream node sent less than we were supposed to receive in payment", 19, &byte_utils::be64_to_array(msg.amount_msat));
- }
- // final_incorrect_cltv_expiry
- if next_hop_data.outgoing_cltv_value != msg.cltv_expiry {
- return_err!("Upstream node set CLTV to the wrong value", 18, &byte_utils::be32_to_array(msg.cltv_expiry));
- }
-
- let payment_data = match next_hop_data.format {
- msgs::OnionHopDataFormat::Legacy { .. } => None,
- msgs::OnionHopDataFormat::NonFinalNode { .. } => return_err!("Got non final data with an HMAC of 0", 0x4000 | 22, &[0;0]),
- msgs::OnionHopDataFormat::FinalNode { payment_data } => payment_data,
- };
+ #[cfg(test)]
+ {
+ // In tests, make sure that the initial onion pcket data is, at least, non-0.
+ // We could do some fancy randomness test here, but, ehh, whatever.
+ // This checks for the issue where you can calculate the path length given the
+ // onion data as all the path entries that the originator sent will be here
+ // as-is (and were originally 0s).
+ // Of course reverse path calculation is still pretty easy given naive routing
+ // algorithms, but this fixes the most-obvious case.
+ let mut next_bytes = [0; 32];
+ chacha_stream.read_exact(&mut next_bytes).unwrap();
+ assert_ne!(next_bytes[..], [0; 32][..]);
+ chacha_stream.read_exact(&mut next_bytes).unwrap();
+ assert_ne!(next_bytes[..], [0; 32][..]);
+ }
- if payment_data.is_none() {
- return_err!("We require payment_secrets", 0x4000|0x2000|3, &[0;0]);
- }
+ // OUR PAYMENT!
+ // final_expiry_too_soon
+ // We have to have some headroom to broadcast on chain if we have the preimage, so make sure we have at least
+ // HTLC_FAIL_BACK_BUFFER blocks to go.
+ // Also, ensure that, in the case of an unknown payment hash, our payment logic has enough time to fail the HTLC backward
+ // before our onchain logic triggers a channel closure (see HTLC_FAIL_BACK_BUFFER rational).
+ if (msg.cltv_expiry as u64) <= self.best_block.read().unwrap().height() as u64 + HTLC_FAIL_BACK_BUFFER as u64 + 1 {
+ return_err!("The final CLTV expiry is too soon to handle", 17, &[0;0]);
+ }
+ // final_incorrect_htlc_amount
+ if next_hop_data.amt_to_forward > msg.amount_msat {
+ return_err!("Upstream node sent less than we were supposed to receive in payment", 19, &byte_utils::be64_to_array(msg.amount_msat));
+ }
+ // final_incorrect_cltv_expiry
+ if next_hop_data.outgoing_cltv_value != msg.cltv_expiry {
+ return_err!("Upstream node set CLTV to the wrong value", 18, &byte_utils::be32_to_array(msg.cltv_expiry));
+ }
- // Note that we could obviously respond immediately with an update_fulfill_htlc
- // message, however that would leak that we are the recipient of this payment, so
- // instead we stay symmetric with the forwarding case, only responding (after a
- // delay) once they've send us a commitment_signed!
+ let routing = match next_hop_data.format {
+ msgs::OnionHopDataFormat::Legacy { .. } => return_err!("We require payment_secrets", 0x4000|0x2000|3, &[0;0]),
+ msgs::OnionHopDataFormat::NonFinalNode { .. } => return_err!("Got non final data with an HMAC of 0", 0x4000 | 22, &[0;0]),
+ msgs::OnionHopDataFormat::FinalNode { payment_data, keysend_preimage } => {
+ if payment_data.is_some() && keysend_preimage.is_some() {
+ return_err!("We don't support MPP keysend payments", 0x4000|22, &[0;0]);
+ } else if let Some(data) = payment_data {
+ PendingHTLCRouting::Receive {
+ payment_data: data,
+ incoming_cltv_expiry: msg.cltv_expiry,
+ }
+ } else if let Some(payment_preimage) = keysend_preimage {
+ // We need to check that the sender knows the keysend preimage before processing this
+ // payment further. Otherwise, an intermediary routing hop forwarding non-keysend-HTLC X
+ // could discover the final destination of X, by probing the adjacent nodes on the route
+ // with a keysend payment of identical payment hash to X and observing the processing
+ // time discrepancies due to a hash collision with X.
+ let hashed_preimage = PaymentHash(Sha256::hash(&payment_preimage.0).into_inner());
+ if hashed_preimage != msg.payment_hash {
+ return_err!("Payment preimage didn't match payment hash", 0x4000|22, &[0;0]);
+ }
- PendingHTLCStatus::Forward(PendingHTLCInfo {
- routing: PendingHTLCRouting::Receive {
- payment_data: payment_data.unwrap(),
- incoming_cltv_expiry: msg.cltv_expiry,
- },
- payment_hash: msg.payment_hash.clone(),
- incoming_shared_secret: shared_secret,
- amt_to_forward: next_hop_data.amt_to_forward,
- outgoing_cltv_value: next_hop_data.outgoing_cltv_value,
- })
- } else {
- let mut new_packet_data = [0; 20*65];
- let read_pos = chacha_stream.read(&mut new_packet_data).unwrap();
- #[cfg(debug_assertions)]
- {
- // Check two things:
- // a) that the behavior of our stream here will return Ok(0) even if the TLV
- // read above emptied out our buffer and the unwrap() wont needlessly panic
- // b) that we didn't somehow magically end up with extra data.
- let mut t = [0; 1];
- debug_assert!(chacha_stream.read(&mut t).unwrap() == 0);
- }
- // Once we've emptied the set of bytes our peer gave us, encrypt 0 bytes until we
- // fill the onion hop data we'll forward to our next-hop peer.
- chacha_stream.chacha.process_in_place(&mut new_packet_data[read_pos..]);
+ PendingHTLCRouting::ReceiveKeysend {
+ payment_preimage,
+ incoming_cltv_expiry: msg.cltv_expiry,
+ }
+ } else {
+ return_err!("We require payment_secrets", 0x4000|0x2000|3, &[0;0]);
+ }
+ },
+ };
- let mut new_pubkey = msg.onion_routing_packet.public_key.unwrap();
+ // Note that we could obviously respond immediately with an update_fulfill_htlc
+ // message, however that would leak that we are the recipient of this payment, so
+ // instead we stay symmetric with the forwarding case, only responding (after a
+ // delay) once they've send us a commitment_signed!
+
+ PendingHTLCStatus::Forward(PendingHTLCInfo {
+ routing,
+ payment_hash: msg.payment_hash.clone(),
+ incoming_shared_secret: shared_secret,
+ amt_to_forward: next_hop_data.amt_to_forward,
+ outgoing_cltv_value: next_hop_data.outgoing_cltv_value,
+ })
+ } else {
+ let mut new_packet_data = [0; 20*65];
+ let read_pos = chacha_stream.read(&mut new_packet_data).unwrap();
+ #[cfg(debug_assertions)]
+ {
+ // Check two things:
+ // a) that the behavior of our stream here will return Ok(0) even if the TLV
+ // read above emptied out our buffer and the unwrap() wont needlessly panic
+ // b) that we didn't somehow magically end up with extra data.
+ let mut t = [0; 1];
+ debug_assert!(chacha_stream.read(&mut t).unwrap() == 0);
+ }
+ // Once we've emptied the set of bytes our peer gave us, encrypt 0 bytes until we
+ // fill the onion hop data we'll forward to our next-hop peer.
+ chacha_stream.chacha.process_in_place(&mut new_packet_data[read_pos..]);
- let blinding_factor = {
- let mut sha = Sha256::engine();
- sha.input(&new_pubkey.serialize()[..]);
- sha.input(&shared_secret);
- Sha256::from_engine(sha).into_inner()
- };
+ let mut new_pubkey = msg.onion_routing_packet.public_key.unwrap();
- let public_key = if let Err(e) = new_pubkey.mul_assign(&self.secp_ctx, &blinding_factor[..]) {
- Err(e)
- } else { Ok(new_pubkey) };
+ let blinding_factor = {
+ let mut sha = Sha256::engine();
+ sha.input(&new_pubkey.serialize()[..]);
+ sha.input(&shared_secret);
+ Sha256::from_engine(sha).into_inner()
+ };
- let outgoing_packet = msgs::OnionPacket {
- version: 0,
- public_key,
- hop_data: new_packet_data,
- hmac: next_hop_hmac.clone(),
- };
+ let public_key = if let Err(e) = new_pubkey.mul_assign(&self.secp_ctx, &blinding_factor[..]) {
+ Err(e)
+ } else { Ok(new_pubkey) };
- let short_channel_id = match next_hop_data.format {
- msgs::OnionHopDataFormat::Legacy { short_channel_id } => short_channel_id,
- msgs::OnionHopDataFormat::NonFinalNode { short_channel_id } => short_channel_id,
- msgs::OnionHopDataFormat::FinalNode { .. } => {
- return_err!("Final Node OnionHopData provided for us as an intermediary node", 0x4000 | 22, &[0;0]);
- },
- };
+ let outgoing_packet = msgs::OnionPacket {
+ version: 0,
+ public_key,
+ hop_data: new_packet_data,
+ hmac: next_hop_hmac.clone(),
+ };
- PendingHTLCStatus::Forward(PendingHTLCInfo {
- routing: PendingHTLCRouting::Forward {
- onion_packet: outgoing_packet,
- short_channel_id,
- },
- payment_hash: msg.payment_hash.clone(),
- incoming_shared_secret: shared_secret,
- amt_to_forward: next_hop_data.amt_to_forward,
- outgoing_cltv_value: next_hop_data.outgoing_cltv_value,
- })
+ let short_channel_id = match next_hop_data.format {
+ msgs::OnionHopDataFormat::Legacy { short_channel_id } => short_channel_id,
+ msgs::OnionHopDataFormat::NonFinalNode { short_channel_id } => short_channel_id,
+ msgs::OnionHopDataFormat::FinalNode { .. } => {
+ return_err!("Final Node OnionHopData provided for us as an intermediary node", 0x4000 | 22, &[0;0]);
+ },
};
+ PendingHTLCStatus::Forward(PendingHTLCInfo {
+ routing: PendingHTLCRouting::Forward {
+ onion_packet: outgoing_packet,
+ short_channel_id,
+ },
+ payment_hash: msg.payment_hash.clone(),
+ incoming_shared_secret: shared_secret,
+ amt_to_forward: next_hop_data.amt_to_forward,
+ outgoing_cltv_value: next_hop_data.outgoing_cltv_value,
+ })
+ };
+
channel_state = Some(self.channel_state.lock().unwrap());
if let &PendingHTLCStatus::Forward(PendingHTLCInfo { ref routing, ref amt_to_forward, ref outgoing_cltv_value, .. }) = &pending_forward_info {
// If short_channel_id is 0 here, we'll reject the HTLC as there cannot be a channel
for forward_info in pending_forwards.drain(..) {
match forward_info {
HTLCForwardInfo::AddHTLC { prev_short_channel_id, prev_htlc_id, forward_info: PendingHTLCInfo {
- routing: PendingHTLCRouting::Receive { payment_data, incoming_cltv_expiry },
- incoming_shared_secret, payment_hash, amt_to_forward, .. },
+ routing, incoming_shared_secret, payment_hash, amt_to_forward, .. },
prev_funding_outpoint } => {
+ let (cltv_expiry, onion_payload) = match routing {
+ PendingHTLCRouting::Receive { payment_data, incoming_cltv_expiry } =>
+ (incoming_cltv_expiry, OnionPayload::Invoice(payment_data)),
+ PendingHTLCRouting::ReceiveKeysend { payment_preimage, incoming_cltv_expiry } =>
+ (incoming_cltv_expiry, OnionPayload::Spontaneous(payment_preimage)),
+ _ => {
+ panic!("short_channel_id == 0 should imply any pending_forward entries are of type Receive");
+ }
+ };
let claimable_htlc = ClaimableHTLC {
prev_hop: HTLCPreviousHopData {
short_channel_id: prev_short_channel_id,
incoming_packet_shared_secret: incoming_shared_secret,
},
value: amt_to_forward,
- payment_data: payment_data.clone(),
- cltv_expiry: incoming_cltv_expiry,
+ cltv_expiry,
+ onion_payload,
};
macro_rules! fail_htlc {
let mut payment_secrets = self.pending_inbound_payments.lock().unwrap();
match payment_secrets.entry(payment_hash) {
hash_map::Entry::Vacant(_) => {
- log_trace!(self.logger, "Failing new HTLC with payment_hash {} as we didn't have a corresponding inbound payment.", log_bytes!(payment_hash.0));
- fail_htlc!(claimable_htlc);
+ match claimable_htlc.onion_payload {
+ OnionPayload::Invoice(_) => {
+ log_trace!(self.logger, "Failing new HTLC with payment_hash {} as we didn't have a corresponding inbound payment.", log_bytes!(payment_hash.0));
+ fail_htlc!(claimable_htlc);
+ },
+ OnionPayload::Spontaneous(preimage) => {
+ match channel_state.claimable_htlcs.entry(payment_hash) {
+ hash_map::Entry::Vacant(e) => {
+ e.insert(vec![claimable_htlc]);
+ new_events.push(events::Event::PaymentReceived {
+ payment_hash,
+ amt: amt_to_forward,
+ purpose: events::PaymentPurpose::SpontaneousPayment(preimage),
+ });
+ },
+ hash_map::Entry::Occupied(_) => {
+ log_trace!(self.logger, "Failing new keysend HTLC with payment_hash {} for a duplicative payment hash", log_bytes!(payment_hash.0));
+ fail_htlc!(claimable_htlc);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
},
hash_map::Entry::Occupied(inbound_payment) => {
+ let payment_data =
+ if let OnionPayload::Invoice(ref data) = claimable_htlc.onion_payload {
+ data.clone()
+ } else {
+ log_trace!(self.logger, "Failing new keysend HTLC with payment_hash {} because we already have an inbound payment with the same payment hash", log_bytes!(payment_hash.0));
+ fail_htlc!(claimable_htlc);
+ continue
+ };
if inbound_payment.get().payment_secret != payment_data.payment_secret {
log_trace!(self.logger, "Failing new HTLC with payment_hash {} as it didn't match our expected payment secret.", log_bytes!(payment_hash.0));
fail_htlc!(claimable_htlc);
let mut total_value = 0;
let htlcs = channel_state.claimable_htlcs.entry(payment_hash)
.or_insert(Vec::new());
+ if htlcs.len() == 1 {
+ if let OnionPayload::Spontaneous(_) = htlcs[0].onion_payload {
+ log_trace!(self.logger, "Failing new HTLC with payment_hash {} as we already had an existing keysend HTLC with the same payment hash", log_bytes!(payment_hash.0));
+ fail_htlc!(claimable_htlc);
+ continue
+ }
+ }
htlcs.push(claimable_htlc);
for htlc in htlcs.iter() {
total_value += htlc.value;
- if htlc.payment_data.total_msat != payment_data.total_msat {
- log_trace!(self.logger, "Failing HTLCs with payment_hash {} as the HTLCs had inconsistent total values (eg {} and {})",
- log_bytes!(payment_hash.0), payment_data.total_msat, htlc.payment_data.total_msat);
- total_value = msgs::MAX_VALUE_MSAT;
+ match &htlc.onion_payload {
+ OnionPayload::Invoice(htlc_payment_data) => {
+ if htlc_payment_data.total_msat != payment_data.total_msat {
+ log_trace!(self.logger, "Failing HTLCs with payment_hash {} as the HTLCs had inconsistent total values (eg {} and {})",
+ log_bytes!(payment_hash.0), payment_data.total_msat, htlc_payment_data.total_msat);
+ total_value = msgs::MAX_VALUE_MSAT;
+ }
+ if total_value >= msgs::MAX_VALUE_MSAT { break; }
+ },
+ _ => unreachable!(),
}
- if total_value >= msgs::MAX_VALUE_MSAT { break; }
}
if total_value >= msgs::MAX_VALUE_MSAT || total_value > payment_data.total_msat {
log_trace!(self.logger, "Failing HTLCs with payment_hash {} as the total value {} ran over expected value {} (or HTLCs were inconsistent)",
} else if total_value == payment_data.total_msat {
new_events.push(events::Event::PaymentReceived {
payment_hash,
- payment_preimage: inbound_payment.get().payment_preimage,
- payment_secret: payment_data.payment_secret,
+ purpose: events::PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment {
+ payment_preimage: inbound_payment.get().payment_preimage,
+ payment_secret: payment_data.payment_secret,
+ user_payment_id: inbound_payment.get().user_payment_id,
+ },
amt: total_value,
- user_payment_id: inbound_payment.get().user_payment_id,
});
// Only ever generate at most one PaymentReceived
// per registered payment_hash, even if it isn't
},
};
},
- HTLCForwardInfo::AddHTLC { .. } => {
- panic!("short_channel_id == 0 should imply any pending_forward entries are of type Receive");
- },
HTLCForwardInfo::FailHTLC { .. } => {
panic!("Got pending fail of our own HTLC");
}
match channel_state.forward_htlcs.entry(match forward_info.routing {
PendingHTLCRouting::Forward { short_channel_id, .. } => short_channel_id,
PendingHTLCRouting::Receive { .. } => 0,
+ PendingHTLCRouting::ReceiveKeysend { .. } => 0,
}) {
hash_map::Entry::Occupied(mut entry) => {
entry.get_mut().push(HTLCForwardInfo::AddHTLC { prev_short_channel_id, prev_funding_outpoint,
/// The [`PaymentHash`] (and corresponding [`PaymentPreimage`]) must be globally unique. This
/// method may return an Err if another payment with the same payment_hash is still pending.
///
- /// `user_payment_id` will be provided back in [`PaymentReceived::user_payment_id`] events to
+ /// `user_payment_id` will be provided back in [`PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment::user_payment_id`] events to
/// allow tracking of which events correspond with which calls to this and
/// [`create_inbound_payment`]. `user_payment_id` has no meaning inside of LDK, it is simply
/// copied to events and otherwise ignored. It may be used to correlate PaymentReceived events
///
/// [`create_inbound_payment`]: Self::create_inbound_payment
/// [`PaymentReceived`]: events::Event::PaymentReceived
- /// [`PaymentReceived::user_payment_id`]: events::Event::PaymentReceived::user_payment_id
+ /// [`PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment::user_payment_id`]: events::PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment::user_payment_id
pub fn create_inbound_payment_for_hash(&self, payment_hash: PaymentHash, min_value_msat: Option<u64>, invoice_expiry_delta_secs: u32, user_payment_id: u64) -> Result<PaymentSecret, APIError> {
self.set_payment_hash_secret_map(payment_hash, None, min_value_msat, invoice_expiry_delta_secs, user_payment_id)
}
(1, Receive) => {
(0, payment_data, required),
(2, incoming_cltv_expiry, required),
- }
+ },
+ (2, ReceiveKeysend) => {
+ (0, payment_preimage, required),
+ (2, incoming_cltv_expiry, required),
+ },
;);
impl_writeable_tlv_based!(PendingHTLCInfo, {
(6, incoming_packet_shared_secret, required)
});
-impl_writeable_tlv_based!(ClaimableHTLC, {
- (0, prev_hop, required),
- (2, value, required),
- (4, payment_data, required),
- (6, cltv_expiry, required),
-});
+impl Writeable for ClaimableHTLC {
+ fn write<W: Writer>(&self, writer: &mut W) -> Result<(), ::std::io::Error> {
+ let payment_data = match &self.onion_payload {
+ OnionPayload::Invoice(data) => Some(data.clone()),
+ _ => None,
+ };
+ let keysend_preimage = match self.onion_payload {
+ OnionPayload::Invoice(_) => None,
+ OnionPayload::Spontaneous(preimage) => Some(preimage.clone()),
+ };
+ write_tlv_fields!
+ (writer,
+ {
+ (0, self.prev_hop, required), (2, self.value, required),
+ (4, payment_data, option), (6, self.cltv_expiry, required),
+ (8, keysend_preimage, option),
+ });
+ Ok(())
+ }
+}
+
+impl Readable for ClaimableHTLC {
+ fn read<R: Read>(reader: &mut R) -> Result<Self, DecodeError> {
+ let mut prev_hop = ::util::ser::OptionDeserWrapper(None);
+ let mut value = 0;
+ let mut payment_data: Option<msgs::FinalOnionHopData> = None;
+ let mut cltv_expiry = 0;
+ let mut keysend_preimage: Option<PaymentPreimage> = None;
+ read_tlv_fields!
+ (reader,
+ {
+ (0, prev_hop, required), (2, value, required),
+ (4, payment_data, option), (6, cltv_expiry, required),
+ (8, keysend_preimage, option)
+ });
+ let onion_payload = match keysend_preimage {
+ Some(p) => {
+ if payment_data.is_some() {
+ return Err(DecodeError::InvalidValue)
+ }
+ OnionPayload::Spontaneous(p)
+ },
+ None => {
+ if payment_data.is_none() {
+ return Err(DecodeError::InvalidValue)
+ }
+ OnionPayload::Invoice(payment_data.unwrap())
+ },
+ };
+ Ok(Self {
+ prev_hop: prev_hop.0.unwrap(),
+ value,
+ onion_payload,
+ cltv_expiry,
+ })
+ }
+}
impl_writeable_tlv_based_enum!(HTLCSource,
(0, OutboundRoute) => {
use ln::features::InitFeatures;
use ln::msgs::ChannelMessageHandler;
+ #[cfg(feature = "std")]
#[test]
fn test_wait_timeout() {
let persistence_notifier = Arc::new(PersistenceNotifier::new());
use routing::router::get_route;
use util::test_utils;
use util::config::UserConfig;
- use util::events::{Event, MessageSendEvent, MessageSendEventsProvider};
+ use util::events::{Event, MessageSendEvent, MessageSendEventsProvider, PaymentPurpose};
use bitcoin::hashes::Hash;
use bitcoin::hashes::sha256::Hash as Sha256;
projects / rust-lightning / blobdiff