use util::enforcing_trait_impls::EnforcingSigner;
use util::test_utils;
use util::test_utils::TestChainMonitor;
-use util::events::{Event, MessageSendEvent, MessageSendEventsProvider};
+use util::events::{Event, MessageSendEvent, MessageSendEventsProvider, PaymentPurpose};
use util::errors::APIError;
use util::config::UserConfig;
use util::ser::{ReadableArgs, Writeable, Readable};
use prelude::*;
use core::cell::RefCell;
use std::rc::Rc;
-use std::sync::{Arc, Mutex};
+use sync::{Arc, Mutex};
use core::mem;
pub const CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH: u32 = 10;
let events = $node.node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
match events[0] {
- Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, ref payment_preimage, ref payment_secret, amt, user_payment_id: _ } => {
+ Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, ref purpose, amt } => {
assert_eq!($expected_payment_hash, *payment_hash);
- assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
- assert_eq!($expected_payment_secret, *payment_secret);
assert_eq!($expected_recv_value, amt);
+ match purpose {
+ PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, payment_secret, .. } => {
+ assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
+ assert_eq!($expected_payment_secret, *payment_secret);
+ },
+ _ => {},
+ }
},
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
}
pass_along_route(origin_node, expected_paths, recv_value, our_payment_hash, our_payment_secret);
}
-pub fn pass_along_path<'a, 'b, 'c>(origin_node: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, expected_path: &[&Node<'a, 'b, 'c>], recv_value: u64, our_payment_hash: PaymentHash, our_payment_secret: PaymentSecret, ev: MessageSendEvent, payment_received_expected: bool) {
+pub fn pass_along_path<'a, 'b, 'c>(origin_node: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, expected_path: &[&Node<'a, 'b, 'c>], recv_value: u64, our_payment_hash: PaymentHash, our_payment_secret: Option<PaymentSecret>, ev: MessageSendEvent, payment_received_expected: bool, expected_preimage: Option<PaymentPreimage>) {
let mut payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(ev);
let mut prev_node = origin_node;
if payment_received_expected {
assert_eq!(events_2.len(), 1);
match events_2[0] {
- Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, ref payment_preimage, ref payment_secret, amt, user_payment_id: _ } => {
+ Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, ref purpose, amt} => {
assert_eq!(our_payment_hash, *payment_hash);
- assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
- assert_eq!(our_payment_secret, *payment_secret);
+ match &purpose {
+ PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, payment_secret, .. } => {
+ assert_eq!(expected_preimage, *payment_preimage);
+ assert_eq!(our_payment_secret.unwrap(), *payment_secret);
+ },
+ PaymentPurpose::SpontaneousPayment(payment_preimage) => {
+ assert_eq!(expected_preimage.unwrap(), *payment_preimage);
+ assert!(our_payment_secret.is_none());
+ },
+ }
assert_eq!(amt, recv_value);
},
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
// Once we've gotten through all the HTLCs, the last one should result in a
// PaymentReceived (but each previous one should not!), .
let expect_payment = path_idx == expected_route.len() - 1;
- pass_along_path(origin_node, expected_path, recv_value, our_payment_hash.clone(), our_payment_secret, ev, expect_payment);
+ pass_along_path(origin_node, expected_path, recv_value, our_payment_hash.clone(), Some(our_payment_secret), ev, expect_payment, None);
}
}
pub fn route_payment<'a, 'b, 'c>(origin_node: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, expected_route: &[&Node<'a, 'b, 'c>], recv_value: u64) -> (PaymentPreimage, PaymentHash, PaymentSecret) {
let net_graph_msg_handler = &origin_node.net_graph_msg_handler;
let logger = test_utils::TestLogger::new();
- let route = get_route(&origin_node.node.get_our_node_id(), &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &expected_route.last().unwrap().node.get_our_node_id(), Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), recv_value, TEST_FINAL_CLTV, &logger).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route(&origin_node.node.get_our_node_id(), &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(),
+ &expected_route.last().unwrap().node.get_our_node_id(), Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()),
+ Some(&origin_node.node.list_usable_channels().iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), &[],
+ recv_value, TEST_FINAL_CLTV, &logger).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), expected_route.len());
for (node, hop) in expected_route.iter().zip(route.paths[0].iter()) {
})
}
+ for i in 0..node_count {
+ for j in (i+1)..node_count {
+ nodes[i].node.peer_connected(&nodes[j].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init { features: InitFeatures::known() });
+ nodes[j].node.peer_connected(&nodes[i].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init { features: InitFeatures::known() });
+ }
+ }
+
nodes
}
/// pending_htlc_adds includes both the holding cell and in-flight update_add_htlcs, whereas
/// for claims/fails they are separated out.
-pub fn reconnect_nodes<'a, 'b, 'c>(node_a: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, node_b: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, send_funding_locked: (bool, bool), pending_htlc_adds: (i64, i64), pending_htlc_claims: (usize, usize), pending_cell_htlc_claims: (usize, usize), pending_cell_htlc_fails: (usize, usize), pending_raa: (bool, bool)) {
+pub fn reconnect_nodes<'a, 'b, 'c>(node_a: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, node_b: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, send_funding_locked: (bool, bool), pending_htlc_adds: (i64, i64), pending_htlc_claims: (usize, usize), pending_htlc_fails: (usize, usize), pending_cell_htlc_claims: (usize, usize), pending_cell_htlc_fails: (usize, usize), pending_raa: (bool, bool)) {
node_a.node.peer_connected(&node_b.node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init { features: InitFeatures::empty() });
let reestablish_1 = get_chan_reestablish_msgs!(node_a, node_b);
node_b.node.peer_connected(&node_a.node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init { features: InitFeatures::empty() });
}
// We don't yet support both needing updates, as that would require a different commitment dance:
- assert!((pending_htlc_adds.0 == 0 && pending_htlc_claims.0 == 0 && pending_cell_htlc_claims.0 == 0 && pending_cell_htlc_fails.0 == 0) ||
- (pending_htlc_adds.1 == 0 && pending_htlc_claims.1 == 0 && pending_cell_htlc_claims.1 == 0 && pending_cell_htlc_fails.1 == 0));
+ assert!((pending_htlc_adds.0 == 0 && pending_htlc_claims.0 == 0 && pending_htlc_fails.0 == 0 &&
+ pending_cell_htlc_claims.0 == 0 && pending_cell_htlc_fails.0 == 0) ||
+ (pending_htlc_adds.1 == 0 && pending_htlc_claims.1 == 0 && pending_htlc_fails.1 == 0 &&
+ pending_cell_htlc_claims.1 == 0 && pending_cell_htlc_fails.1 == 0));
for chan_msgs in resp_1.drain(..) {
if send_funding_locked.0 {
} else {
assert!(chan_msgs.1.is_none());
}
- if pending_htlc_adds.0 != 0 || pending_htlc_claims.0 != 0 || pending_cell_htlc_claims.0 != 0 || pending_cell_htlc_fails.0 != 0 {
+ if pending_htlc_adds.0 != 0 || pending_htlc_claims.0 != 0 || pending_htlc_fails.0 != 0 || pending_cell_htlc_claims.0 != 0 || pending_cell_htlc_fails.0 != 0 {
let commitment_update = chan_msgs.2.unwrap();
if pending_htlc_adds.0 != -1 { // We use -1 to denote a response commitment_signed
assert_eq!(commitment_update.update_add_htlcs.len(), pending_htlc_adds.0 as usize);
assert!(commitment_update.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
}
assert_eq!(commitment_update.update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), pending_htlc_claims.0 + pending_cell_htlc_claims.0);
- assert_eq!(commitment_update.update_fail_htlcs.len(), pending_cell_htlc_fails.0);
+ assert_eq!(commitment_update.update_fail_htlcs.len(), pending_htlc_fails.0 + pending_cell_htlc_fails.0);
assert!(commitment_update.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
for update_add in commitment_update.update_add_htlcs {
node_a.node.handle_update_add_htlc(&node_b.node.get_our_node_id(), &update_add);
} else {
assert!(chan_msgs.1.is_none());
}
- if pending_htlc_adds.1 != 0 || pending_htlc_claims.1 != 0 || pending_cell_htlc_claims.1 != 0 || pending_cell_htlc_fails.1 != 0 {
+ if pending_htlc_adds.1 != 0 || pending_htlc_claims.1 != 0 || pending_htlc_fails.1 != 0 || pending_cell_htlc_claims.1 != 0 || pending_cell_htlc_fails.1 != 0 {
let commitment_update = chan_msgs.2.unwrap();
if pending_htlc_adds.1 != -1 { // We use -1 to denote a response commitment_signed
assert_eq!(commitment_update.update_add_htlcs.len(), pending_htlc_adds.1 as usize);
}
- assert_eq!(commitment_update.update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), pending_htlc_claims.0 + pending_cell_htlc_claims.0);
- assert_eq!(commitment_update.update_fail_htlcs.len(), pending_cell_htlc_fails.0);
+ assert_eq!(commitment_update.update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), pending_htlc_claims.1 + pending_cell_htlc_claims.1);
+ assert_eq!(commitment_update.update_fail_htlcs.len(), pending_htlc_fails.1 + pending_cell_htlc_fails.1);
assert!(commitment_update.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
for update_add in commitment_update.update_add_htlcs {
node_b.node.handle_update_add_htlc(&node_a.node.get_our_node_id(), &update_add);
projects / rust-lightning / blobdiff