use util::enforcing_trait_impls::EnforcingSigner;
use util::test_utils;
use util::test_utils::TestChainMonitor;
-use util::events::{Event, MessageSendEvent, MessageSendEventsProvider};
+use util::events::{Event, MessageSendEvent, MessageSendEventsProvider, PaymentPurpose};
use util::errors::APIError;
use util::config::UserConfig;
use util::ser::{ReadableArgs, Writeable, Readable};
let events = $node.node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
match events[0] {
- Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, ref payment_preimage, ref payment_secret, amt, user_payment_id: _ } => {
+ Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, ref purpose, amt } => {
assert_eq!($expected_payment_hash, *payment_hash);
- assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
- assert_eq!($expected_payment_secret, *payment_secret);
assert_eq!($expected_recv_value, amt);
+ match purpose {
+ PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, payment_secret, .. } => {
+ assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
+ assert_eq!($expected_payment_secret, *payment_secret);
+ },
+ _ => {},
+ }
},
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
}
}
}
+macro_rules! expect_payment_forwarded {
+ ($node: expr, $expected_fee: expr, $upstream_force_closed: expr) => {
+ let events = $node.node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ match events[0] {
+ Event::PaymentForwarded { fee_earned_msat, claim_from_onchain_tx } => {
+ assert_eq!(fee_earned_msat, $expected_fee);
+ assert_eq!(claim_from_onchain_tx, $upstream_force_closed);
+ },
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ }
+ }
+}
+
#[cfg(test)]
macro_rules! expect_payment_failure_chan_update {
($node: expr, $scid: expr, $chan_closed: expr) => {
pass_along_route(origin_node, expected_paths, recv_value, our_payment_hash, our_payment_secret);
}
-pub fn pass_along_path<'a, 'b, 'c>(origin_node: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, expected_path: &[&Node<'a, 'b, 'c>], recv_value: u64, our_payment_hash: PaymentHash, our_payment_secret: PaymentSecret, ev: MessageSendEvent, payment_received_expected: bool) {
+pub fn pass_along_path<'a, 'b, 'c>(origin_node: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, expected_path: &[&Node<'a, 'b, 'c>], recv_value: u64, our_payment_hash: PaymentHash, our_payment_secret: Option<PaymentSecret>, ev: MessageSendEvent, payment_received_expected: bool, expected_preimage: Option<PaymentPreimage>) {
let mut payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(ev);
let mut prev_node = origin_node;
if payment_received_expected {
assert_eq!(events_2.len(), 1);
match events_2[0] {
- Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, ref payment_preimage, ref payment_secret, amt, user_payment_id: _ } => {
+ Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, ref purpose, amt} => {
assert_eq!(our_payment_hash, *payment_hash);
- assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
- assert_eq!(our_payment_secret, *payment_secret);
+ match &purpose {
+ PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, payment_secret, .. } => {
+ assert_eq!(expected_preimage, *payment_preimage);
+ assert_eq!(our_payment_secret.unwrap(), *payment_secret);
+ },
+ PaymentPurpose::SpontaneousPayment(payment_preimage) => {
+ assert_eq!(expected_preimage.unwrap(), *payment_preimage);
+ assert!(our_payment_secret.is_none());
+ },
+ }
assert_eq!(amt, recv_value);
},
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
// Once we've gotten through all the HTLCs, the last one should result in a
// PaymentReceived (but each previous one should not!), .
let expect_payment = path_idx == expected_route.len() - 1;
- pass_along_path(origin_node, expected_path, recv_value, our_payment_hash.clone(), our_payment_secret, ev, expect_payment);
+ pass_along_path(origin_node, expected_path, recv_value, our_payment_hash.clone(), Some(our_payment_secret), ev, expect_payment, None);
}
}
($node: expr, $prev_node: expr, $new_msgs: expr) => {
{
$node.node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&$prev_node.node.get_our_node_id(), &next_msgs.as_ref().unwrap().0);
+ let fee = $node.node.channel_state.lock().unwrap().by_id.get(&next_msgs.as_ref().unwrap().0.channel_id).unwrap().config.forwarding_fee_base_msat;
+ expect_payment_forwarded!($node, Some(fee as u64), false);
check_added_monitors!($node, 1);
let new_next_msgs = if $new_msgs {
let events = $node.node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
/// pending_htlc_adds includes both the holding cell and in-flight update_add_htlcs, whereas
/// for claims/fails they are separated out.
-pub fn reconnect_nodes<'a, 'b, 'c>(node_a: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, node_b: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, send_funding_locked: (bool, bool), pending_htlc_adds: (i64, i64), pending_htlc_claims: (usize, usize), pending_cell_htlc_claims: (usize, usize), pending_cell_htlc_fails: (usize, usize), pending_raa: (bool, bool)) {
+pub fn reconnect_nodes<'a, 'b, 'c>(node_a: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, node_b: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, send_funding_locked: (bool, bool), pending_htlc_adds: (i64, i64), pending_htlc_claims: (usize, usize), pending_htlc_fails: (usize, usize), pending_cell_htlc_claims: (usize, usize), pending_cell_htlc_fails: (usize, usize), pending_raa: (bool, bool)) {
node_a.node.peer_connected(&node_b.node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init { features: InitFeatures::empty() });
let reestablish_1 = get_chan_reestablish_msgs!(node_a, node_b);
node_b.node.peer_connected(&node_a.node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init { features: InitFeatures::empty() });
}
// We don't yet support both needing updates, as that would require a different commitment dance:
- assert!((pending_htlc_adds.0 == 0 && pending_htlc_claims.0 == 0 && pending_cell_htlc_claims.0 == 0 && pending_cell_htlc_fails.0 == 0) ||
- (pending_htlc_adds.1 == 0 && pending_htlc_claims.1 == 0 && pending_cell_htlc_claims.1 == 0 && pending_cell_htlc_fails.1 == 0));
+ assert!((pending_htlc_adds.0 == 0 && pending_htlc_claims.0 == 0 && pending_htlc_fails.0 == 0 &&
+ pending_cell_htlc_claims.0 == 0 && pending_cell_htlc_fails.0 == 0) ||
+ (pending_htlc_adds.1 == 0 && pending_htlc_claims.1 == 0 && pending_htlc_fails.1 == 0 &&
+ pending_cell_htlc_claims.1 == 0 && pending_cell_htlc_fails.1 == 0));
for chan_msgs in resp_1.drain(..) {
if send_funding_locked.0 {
} else {
assert!(chan_msgs.1.is_none());
}
- if pending_htlc_adds.0 != 0 || pending_htlc_claims.0 != 0 || pending_cell_htlc_claims.0 != 0 || pending_cell_htlc_fails.0 != 0 {
+ if pending_htlc_adds.0 != 0 || pending_htlc_claims.0 != 0 || pending_htlc_fails.0 != 0 || pending_cell_htlc_claims.0 != 0 || pending_cell_htlc_fails.0 != 0 {
let commitment_update = chan_msgs.2.unwrap();
if pending_htlc_adds.0 != -1 { // We use -1 to denote a response commitment_signed
assert_eq!(commitment_update.update_add_htlcs.len(), pending_htlc_adds.0 as usize);
assert!(commitment_update.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
}
assert_eq!(commitment_update.update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), pending_htlc_claims.0 + pending_cell_htlc_claims.0);
- assert_eq!(commitment_update.update_fail_htlcs.len(), pending_cell_htlc_fails.0);
+ assert_eq!(commitment_update.update_fail_htlcs.len(), pending_htlc_fails.0 + pending_cell_htlc_fails.0);
assert!(commitment_update.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
for update_add in commitment_update.update_add_htlcs {
node_a.node.handle_update_add_htlc(&node_b.node.get_our_node_id(), &update_add);
} else {
assert!(chan_msgs.1.is_none());
}
- if pending_htlc_adds.1 != 0 || pending_htlc_claims.1 != 0 || pending_cell_htlc_claims.1 != 0 || pending_cell_htlc_fails.1 != 0 {
+ if pending_htlc_adds.1 != 0 || pending_htlc_claims.1 != 0 || pending_htlc_fails.1 != 0 || pending_cell_htlc_claims.1 != 0 || pending_cell_htlc_fails.1 != 0 {
let commitment_update = chan_msgs.2.unwrap();
if pending_htlc_adds.1 != -1 { // We use -1 to denote a response commitment_signed
assert_eq!(commitment_update.update_add_htlcs.len(), pending_htlc_adds.1 as usize);
}
- assert_eq!(commitment_update.update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), pending_htlc_claims.0 + pending_cell_htlc_claims.0);
- assert_eq!(commitment_update.update_fail_htlcs.len(), pending_cell_htlc_fails.0);
+ assert_eq!(commitment_update.update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), pending_htlc_claims.1 + pending_cell_htlc_claims.1);
+ assert_eq!(commitment_update.update_fail_htlcs.len(), pending_htlc_fails.1 + pending_cell_htlc_fails.1);
assert!(commitment_update.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
for update_add in commitment_update.update_add_htlcs {
node_b.node.handle_update_add_htlc(&node_a.node.get_our_node_id(), &update_add);
projects / rust-lightning / blobdiff