/// so that we can choose cheaper paths (as per Dijkstra's algorithm).
/// Fee values should be updated only in the context of the whole path, see update_value_and_recompute_fees.
/// These fee values are useful to choose hops as we traverse the graph "payee-to-payer".
-#[derive(Clone)]
+#[derive(Clone, Debug)]
struct PathBuildingHop<'a> {
// The RouteHintHop fields which will eventually be used if this hop is used in a final Route.
// Note that node_features is calculated separately after our initial graph walk.
if let Some(hops) = first_hops {
for chan in hops {
let short_channel_id = chan.short_channel_id.expect("first_hops should be filled in with usable channels, not pending ones");
- if chan.remote_network_id == *our_node_id {
+ if chan.counterparty.node_id == *our_node_id {
return Err(LightningError{err: "First hop cannot have our_node_id as a destination.".to_owned(), action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError});
}
- first_hop_targets.insert(chan.remote_network_id, (short_channel_id, chan.counterparty_features.to_context(), chan.outbound_capacity_msat, chan.counterparty_features.to_context()));
+ first_hop_targets.insert(chan.counterparty.node_id, (short_channel_id, chan.counterparty.features.to_context(), chan.outbound_capacity_msat, chan.counterparty.features.to_context()));
}
if first_hop_targets.is_empty() {
return Err(LightningError{err: "Cannot route when there are no outbound routes away from us".to_owned(), action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError});
// - when we want to stop looking for new paths.
let mut already_collected_value_msat = 0;
+ log_trace!(logger, "Building path from {} (payee) to {} (us/payer) for value {} msat.", payee, our_node_id, final_value_msat);
+
macro_rules! add_entry {
// Adds entry which goes from $src_node_id to $dest_node_id
// over the channel with id $chan_id with fees described in
// $directional_info.
// $next_hops_fee_msat represents the fees paid for using all the channel *after* this one,
// since that value has to be transferred over this channel.
+ // Returns whether this channel caused an update to `targets`.
( $chan_id: expr, $src_node_id: expr, $dest_node_id: expr, $directional_info: expr, $capacity_sats: expr, $chan_features: expr, $next_hops_fee_msat: expr,
- $next_hops_value_contribution: expr, $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat: expr ) => {
+ $next_hops_value_contribution: expr, $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat: expr ) => { {
+ // We "return" whether we updated the path at the end, via this:
+ let mut did_add_update_path_to_src_node = false;
// Channels to self should not be used. This is more of belt-and-suspenders, because in
// practice these cases should be caught earlier:
// - for regular channels at channel announcement (TODO)
{
old_entry.value_contribution_msat = value_contribution_msat;
}
+ did_add_update_path_to_src_node = true;
} else if old_entry.was_processed && new_cost < old_cost {
#[cfg(any(test, feature = "fuzztarget"))]
{
}
}
}
- };
+ did_add_update_path_to_src_node
+ } }
}
let empty_node_features = NodeFeatures::empty();
// it matters only if the fees are exactly the same.
for hop in last_hops.iter() {
let have_hop_src_in_graph =
- if let Some(&(ref first_hop, ref features, ref outbound_capacity_msat, _)) = first_hop_targets.get(&hop.src_node_id) {
- // If this hop connects to a node with which we have a direct channel, ignore
- // the network graph and add both the hop and our direct channel to
- // the candidate set.
- //
- // Currently there are no channel-context features defined, so we are a
- // bit lazy here. In the future, we should pull them out via our
- // ChannelManager, but there's no reason to waste the space until we
- // need them.
- add_entry!(first_hop, *our_node_id , hop.src_node_id, dummy_directional_info, Some(outbound_capacity_msat / 1000), features, 0, path_value_msat, 0);
- true
- } else {
- // In any other case, only add the hop if the source is in the regular network
- // graph:
- network.get_nodes().get(&hop.src_node_id).is_some()
- };
+ // Only add the last hop to our candidate set if either we have a direct channel or
+ // they are in the regular network graph.
+ first_hop_targets.get(&hop.src_node_id).is_some() ||
+ network.get_nodes().get(&hop.src_node_id).is_some();
if have_hop_src_in_graph {
// BOLT 11 doesn't allow inclusion of features for the last hop hints, which
// really sucks, cause we're gonna need that eventually.
htlc_maximum_msat: hop.htlc_maximum_msat,
fees: hop.fees,
};
- add_entry!(hop.short_channel_id, hop.src_node_id, payee, directional_info, None::<u64>, &empty_channel_features, 0, path_value_msat, 0);
+ if add_entry!(hop.short_channel_id, hop.src_node_id, payee, directional_info, None::<u64>, &empty_channel_features, 0, path_value_msat, 0) {
+ // If this hop connects to a node with which we have a direct channel,
+ // ignore the network graph and, if the last hop was added, add our
+ // direct channel to the candidate set.
+ //
+ // Note that we *must* check if the last hop was added as `add_entry`
+ // always assumes that the third argument is a node to which we have a
+ // path.
+ if let Some(&(ref first_hop, ref features, ref outbound_capacity_msat, _)) = first_hop_targets.get(&hop.src_node_id) {
+ add_entry!(first_hop, *our_node_id , hop.src_node_id, dummy_directional_info, Some(outbound_capacity_msat / 1000), features, 0, path_value_msat, 0);
+ }
+ }
}
}
+ log_trace!(logger, "Starting main path collection loop with {} nodes pre-filled from first/last hops.", targets.len());
+
// At this point, targets are filled with the data from first and
// last hops communicated by the caller, and the payment receiver.
let mut found_new_path = false;
ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().0.hop_use_fee_msat = 0;
ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().0.cltv_expiry_delta = final_cltv;
+ log_trace!(logger, "Found a path back to us from the target with {} hops contributing up to {} msat: {:?}",
+ ordered_hops.len(), value_contribution_msat, ordered_hops);
+
let mut payment_path = PaymentPath {hops: ordered_hops};
// We could have possibly constructed a slightly inconsistent path: since we reduce
// If we weren't capped by hitting a liquidity limit on a channel in the path,
// we'll probably end up picking the same path again on the next iteration.
// Decrease the available liquidity of a hop in the middle of the path.
- let victim_liquidity = bookkeeped_channels_liquidity_available_msat.get_mut(
- &payment_path.hops[(payment_path.hops.len() - 1) / 2].0.short_channel_id).unwrap();
+ let victim_scid = payment_path.hops[(payment_path.hops.len() - 1) / 2].0.short_channel_id;
+ log_trace!(logger, "Disabling channel {} for future path building iterations to avoid duplicates.", victim_scid);
+ let victim_liquidity = bookkeeped_channels_liquidity_available_msat.get_mut(&victim_scid).unwrap();
*victim_liquidity = 0;
}
// In the latter case, making another path finding attempt won't help,
// because we deterministically terminated the search due to low liquidity.
if already_collected_value_msat >= recommended_value_msat || !found_new_path {
+ log_trace!(logger, "Have now collected {} msat (seeking {} msat) in paths. Last path loop {} a new path.",
+ already_collected_value_msat, recommended_value_msat, if found_new_path { "found" } else { "did not find" });
break 'paths_collection;
} else if found_new_path && already_collected_value_msat == final_value_msat && payment_paths.len() == 1 {
// Further, if this was our first walk of the graph, and we weren't limited by an
// potentially allowing us to pay fees to meet the htlc_minimum on the new path while
// still keeping a lower total fee than this path.
if !hit_minimum_limit {
+ log_trace!(logger, "Collected exactly our payment amount on the first pass, without hitting an htlc_minimum_msat limit, exiting.");
break 'paths_collection;
}
+ log_trace!(logger, "Collected our payment amount on the first pass, but running again to collect extra paths with a potentially higher limit.");
path_value_msat = recommended_value_msat;
}
}
}
let route = Route { paths: selected_paths };
- log_trace!(logger, "Got route: {}", log_route!(route));
+ log_info!(logger, "Got route to {}: {}", payee, log_route!(route));
Ok(route)
}
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
- use routing::router::{get_route, RouteHint, RouteHintHop, RoutingFees};
+ use routing::router::{get_route, Route, RouteHint, RouteHintHop, RoutingFees};
use routing::network_graph::{NetworkGraph, NetGraphMsgHandler};
use chain::transaction::OutPoint;
use ln::features::{ChannelFeatures, InitFeatures, InvoiceFeatures, NodeFeatures};
use bitcoin::secp256k1::{Secp256k1, All};
use prelude::*;
- use std::sync::Arc;
+ use sync::{self, Arc};
+
+ fn get_channel_details(short_channel_id: Option<u64>, node_id: PublicKey,
+ features: InitFeatures, outbound_capacity_msat: u64) -> channelmanager::ChannelDetails {
+ channelmanager::ChannelDetails {
+ channel_id: [0; 32],
+ counterparty: channelmanager::ChannelCounterparty {
+ features,
+ node_id,
+ unspendable_punishment_reserve: 0,
+ forwarding_info: None,
+ },
+ funding_txo: Some(OutPoint { txid: bitcoin::Txid::from_slice(&[0; 32]).unwrap(), index: 0 }),
+ short_channel_id,
+ channel_value_satoshis: 0,
+ user_id: 0,
+ outbound_capacity_msat,
+ inbound_capacity_msat: 42,
+ unspendable_punishment_reserve: None,
+ confirmations_required: None,
+ force_close_spend_delay: None,
+ is_outbound: true, is_funding_locked: true,
+ is_usable: true, is_public: true,
+ }
+ }
// Using the same keys for LN and BTC ids
fn add_channel(net_graph_msg_handler: &NetGraphMsgHandler<Arc<test_utils::TestChainSource>, Arc<test_utils::TestLogger>>, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<All>, node_1_privkey: &SecretKey,
}
}
- fn build_graph() -> (Secp256k1<All>, NetGraphMsgHandler<std::sync::Arc<test_utils::TestChainSource>, std::sync::Arc<crate::util::test_utils::TestLogger>>, std::sync::Arc<test_utils::TestChainSource>, std::sync::Arc<test_utils::TestLogger>) {
+ fn build_graph() -> (Secp256k1<All>, NetGraphMsgHandler<sync::Arc<test_utils::TestChainSource>, sync::Arc<crate::util::test_utils::TestLogger>>, sync::Arc<test_utils::TestChainSource>, sync::Arc<test_utils::TestLogger>) {
let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
let logger = Arc::new(test_utils::TestLogger::new());
let chain_monitor = Arc::new(test_utils::TestChainSource::new(Network::Testnet));
// Simple route to 2 via 1
- let our_chans = vec![channelmanager::ChannelDetails {
- channel_id: [0; 32],
- funding_txo: Some(OutPoint { txid: bitcoin::Txid::from_slice(&[0; 32]).unwrap(), index: 0 }),
- short_channel_id: Some(2),
- remote_network_id: our_id,
- counterparty_features: InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]),
- channel_value_satoshis: 100000,
- user_id: 0,
- outbound_capacity_msat: 100000,
- inbound_capacity_msat: 100000,
- is_outbound: true, is_funding_locked: true,
- is_usable: true, is_public: true,
- counterparty_forwarding_info: None,
- }];
+ let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(2), our_id, InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), 100000)];
if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) {
assert_eq!(err, "First hop cannot have our_node_id as a destination.");
} else { panic!(); }
// If we specify a channel to node7, that overrides our local channel view and that gets used
- let our_chans = vec![channelmanager::ChannelDetails {
- channel_id: [0; 32],
- funding_txo: Some(OutPoint { txid: bitcoin::Txid::from_slice(&[0; 32]).unwrap(), index: 0 }),
- short_channel_id: Some(42),
- remote_network_id: nodes[7].clone(),
- counterparty_features: InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]),
- channel_value_satoshis: 0,
- user_id: 0,
- outbound_capacity_msat: 250_000_000,
- inbound_capacity_msat: 0,
- is_outbound: true, is_funding_locked: true,
- is_usable: true, is_public: true,
- counterparty_forwarding_info: None,
- }];
+ let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(42), nodes[7].clone(), InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), 250_000_000)];
let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
let (_, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
// Disable nodes 1, 2, and 8 by requiring unknown feature bits
- let mut unknown_features = NodeFeatures::known();
- unknown_features.set_required_unknown_bits();
+ let unknown_features = NodeFeatures::known().set_unknown_feature_required();
add_or_update_node(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &privkeys[0], unknown_features.clone(), 1);
add_or_update_node(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &privkeys[1], unknown_features.clone(), 1);
add_or_update_node(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &privkeys[7], unknown_features.clone(), 1);
} else { panic!(); }
// If we specify a channel to node7, that overrides our local channel view and that gets used
- let our_chans = vec![channelmanager::ChannelDetails {
- channel_id: [0; 32],
- funding_txo: Some(OutPoint { txid: bitcoin::Txid::from_slice(&[0; 32]).unwrap(), index: 0 }),
- short_channel_id: Some(42),
- remote_network_id: nodes[7].clone(),
- counterparty_features: InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]),
- channel_value_satoshis: 0,
- user_id: 0,
- outbound_capacity_msat: 250_000_000,
- inbound_capacity_msat: 0,
- is_outbound: true, is_funding_locked: true,
- is_usable: true, is_public: true,
- counterparty_forwarding_info: None,
- }];
+ let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(42), nodes[7].clone(), InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), 250_000_000)];
let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].channel_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(3));
// If we specify a channel to node7, that overrides our local channel view and that gets used
- let our_chans = vec![channelmanager::ChannelDetails {
- channel_id: [0; 32],
- funding_txo: Some(OutPoint { txid: bitcoin::Txid::from_slice(&[0; 32]).unwrap(), index: 0 }),
- short_channel_id: Some(42),
- remote_network_id: nodes[7].clone(),
- counterparty_features: InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]),
- channel_value_satoshis: 0,
- user_id: 0,
- outbound_capacity_msat: 250_000_000,
- inbound_capacity_msat: 0,
- is_outbound: true, is_funding_locked: true,
- is_usable: true, is_public: true,
- counterparty_forwarding_info: None,
- }];
+ let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(42), nodes[7].clone(), InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), 250_000_000)];
let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx);
// Simple test with outbound channel to 4 to test that last_hops and first_hops connect
- let our_chans = vec![channelmanager::ChannelDetails {
- channel_id: [0; 32],
- funding_txo: Some(OutPoint { txid: bitcoin::Txid::from_slice(&[0; 32]).unwrap(), index: 0 }),
- short_channel_id: Some(42),
- remote_network_id: nodes[3].clone(),
- counterparty_features: InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]),
- channel_value_satoshis: 0,
- user_id: 0,
- outbound_capacity_msat: 250_000_000,
- inbound_capacity_msat: 0,
- is_outbound: true, is_funding_locked: true,
- is_usable: true, is_public: true,
- counterparty_forwarding_info: None,
- }];
+ let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(42), nodes[3].clone(), InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), 250_000_000)];
let mut last_hops = last_hops(&nodes);
let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[6], None, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), &last_hops.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly
}
- #[test]
- fn unannounced_path_test() {
- // We should be able to send a payment to a destination without any help of a routing graph
- // if we have a channel with a common counterparty that appears in the first and last hop
- // hints.
+ fn do_unannounced_path_test(last_hop_htlc_max: Option<u64>, last_hop_fee_prop: u32, outbound_capacity_msat: u64, route_val: u64) -> Result<Route, LightningError> {
let source_node_id = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&Secp256k1::new(), &SecretKey::from_slice(&hex::decode(format!("{:02}", 41).repeat(32)).unwrap()[..]).unwrap());
let middle_node_id = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&Secp256k1::new(), &SecretKey::from_slice(&hex::decode(format!("{:02}", 42).repeat(32)).unwrap()[..]).unwrap());
let target_node_id = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&Secp256k1::new(), &SecretKey::from_slice(&hex::decode(format!("{:02}", 43).repeat(32)).unwrap()[..]).unwrap());
short_channel_id: 8,
fees: RoutingFees {
base_msat: 1000,
- proportional_millionths: 0,
+ proportional_millionths: last_hop_fee_prop,
},
cltv_expiry_delta: (8 << 8) | 1,
htlc_minimum_msat: None,
- htlc_maximum_msat: None,
+ htlc_maximum_msat: last_hop_htlc_max,
}]);
- let our_chans = vec![channelmanager::ChannelDetails {
- channel_id: [0; 32],
- funding_txo: Some(OutPoint { txid: bitcoin::Txid::from_slice(&[0; 32]).unwrap(), index: 0 }),
- short_channel_id: Some(42),
- remote_network_id: middle_node_id,
- counterparty_features: InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]),
- channel_value_satoshis: 100000,
- user_id: 0,
- outbound_capacity_msat: 100000,
- inbound_capacity_msat: 100000,
- is_outbound: true, is_funding_locked: true,
- is_usable: true, is_public: true,
- counterparty_forwarding_info: None,
- }];
- let route = get_route(&source_node_id, &NetworkGraph::new(genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash()), &target_node_id, None, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), &vec![&last_hops], 100, 42, Arc::new(test_utils::TestLogger::new())).unwrap();
+ let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(42), middle_node_id, InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), outbound_capacity_msat)];
+ get_route(&source_node_id, &NetworkGraph::new(genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash()), &target_node_id, None, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), &vec![&last_hops], route_val, 42, Arc::new(test_utils::TestLogger::new()))
+ }
+ #[test]
+ fn unannounced_path_test() {
+ // We should be able to send a payment to a destination without any help of a routing graph
+ // if we have a channel with a common counterparty that appears in the first and last hop
+ // hints.
+ let route = do_unannounced_path_test(None, 1, 2000000, 1000000).unwrap();
+
+ let middle_node_id = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&Secp256k1::new(), &SecretKey::from_slice(&hex::decode(format!("{:02}", 42).repeat(32)).unwrap()[..]).unwrap());
+ let target_node_id = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&Secp256k1::new(), &SecretKey::from_slice(&hex::decode(format!("{:02}", 43).repeat(32)).unwrap()[..]).unwrap());
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, middle_node_id);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].short_channel_id, 42);
- assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].fee_msat, 1000);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].fee_msat, 1001);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].cltv_expiry_delta, (8 << 8) | 1);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].node_features.le_flags(), &[0b11]);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].channel_features.le_flags(), &[0; 0]); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].pubkey, target_node_id);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].short_channel_id, 8);
- assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].fee_msat, 100);
+ assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].fee_msat, 1000000);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].cltv_expiry_delta, 42);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].node_features.le_flags(), &[0; 0]); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].channel_features.le_flags(), &[0; 0]); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly
}
+ #[test]
+ fn overflow_unannounced_path_test_liquidity_underflow() {
+ // Previously, when we had a last-hop hint connected directly to a first-hop channel, where
+ // the last-hop had a fee which overflowed a u64, we'd panic.
+ // This was due to us adding the first-hop from us unconditionally, causing us to think
+ // we'd built a path (as our node is in the "best candidate" set), when we had not.
+ // In this test, we previously hit a subtraction underflow due to having less available
+ // liquidity at the last hop than 0.
+ assert!(do_unannounced_path_test(Some(21_000_000_0000_0000_000), 0, 21_000_000_0000_0000_000, 21_000_000_0000_0000_000).is_err());
+ }
+
+ #[test]
+ fn overflow_unannounced_path_test_feerate_overflow() {
+ // This tests for the same case as above, except instead of hitting a subtraction
+ // underflow, we hit a case where the fee charged at a hop overflowed.
+ assert!(do_unannounced_path_test(Some(21_000_000_0000_0000_000), 50000, 21_000_000_0000_0000_000, 21_000_000_0000_0000_000).is_err());
+ }
+
#[test]
fn available_amount_while_routing_test() {
// Tests whether we choose the correct available channel amount while routing.
});
// Now, limit the first_hop by the outbound_capacity_msat of 200_000 sats.
- let our_chans = vec![channelmanager::ChannelDetails {
- channel_id: [0; 32],
- funding_txo: Some(OutPoint { txid: bitcoin::Txid::from_slice(&[0; 32]).unwrap(), index: 0 }),
- short_channel_id: Some(42),
- remote_network_id: nodes[0].clone(),
- counterparty_features: InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]),
- channel_value_satoshis: 0,
- user_id: 0,
- outbound_capacity_msat: 200_000_000,
- inbound_capacity_msat: 0,
- is_outbound: true, is_funding_locked: true,
- is_usable: true, is_public: true,
- counterparty_forwarding_info: None,
- }];
+ let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(42), nodes[0].clone(), InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), 200_000_000)];
{
// Attempt to route more than available results in a failure.
projects / rust-lightning / blobdiff