Use ClosingTransaction in BaseSign

[rust-lightning] / lightning / src / util / enforcing_trait_impls.rs

// This file is Copyright its original authors, visible in version control
// history.
//
// This file is licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 <LICENSE-APACHE
// or http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0> or the MIT license
// <LICENSE-MIT or http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT>, at your option.
// You may not use this file except in accordance with one or both of these
// licenses.

use ln::chan_utils::{HTLCOutputInCommitment, ChannelPublicKeys, HolderCommitmentTransaction, CommitmentTransaction, ChannelTransactionParameters, TrustedCommitmentTransaction, ClosingTransaction};
use ln::{chan_utils, msgs};
use chain::keysinterface::{Sign, InMemorySigner, BaseSign};

use prelude::*;
use core::cmp;
use sync::{Mutex, Arc};
#[cfg(test)] use sync::MutexGuard;

use bitcoin::blockdata::transaction::{Transaction, SigHashType};
use bitcoin::util::bip143;

use bitcoin::secp256k1;
use bitcoin::secp256k1::key::{SecretKey, PublicKey};
use bitcoin::secp256k1::{Secp256k1, Signature};
use util::ser::{Writeable, Writer};
use io::Error;

/// Initial value for revoked commitment downward counter
pub const INITIAL_REVOKED_COMMITMENT_NUMBER: u64 = 1 << 48;

/// An implementation of Sign that enforces some policy checks.  The current checks
/// are an incomplete set.  They include:
///
/// - When signing, the holder transaction has not been revoked
/// - When revoking, the holder transaction has not been signed
/// - The holder commitment number is monotonic and without gaps
/// - The revoked holder commitment number is monotonic and without gaps
/// - There is at least one unrevoked holder transaction at all times
/// - The counterparty commitment number is monotonic and without gaps
/// - The pre-derived keys and pre-built transaction in CommitmentTransaction were correctly built
///
/// Eventually we will probably want to expose a variant of this which would essentially
/// be what you'd want to run on a hardware wallet.
///
/// Note that counterparty signatures on the holder transaction are not checked, but it should
/// be in a complete implementation.
///
/// Note that before we do so we should ensure its serialization format has backwards- and
/// forwards-compatibility prefix/suffixes!
#[derive(Clone)]
pub struct EnforcingSigner {
        pub inner: InMemorySigner,
        /// Channel state used for policy enforcement
        pub state: Arc<Mutex<EnforcementState>>,
        pub disable_revocation_policy_check: bool,
}

impl EnforcingSigner {
        /// Construct an EnforcingSigner
        pub fn new(inner: InMemorySigner) -> Self {
                let state = Arc::new(Mutex::new(EnforcementState::new()));
                Self {
                        inner,
                        state,
                        disable_revocation_policy_check: false
                }
        }

        /// Construct an EnforcingSigner with externally managed storage
        ///
        /// Since there are multiple copies of this struct for each channel, some coordination is needed
        /// so that all copies are aware of enforcement state.  A pointer to this state is provided
        /// here, usually by an implementation of KeysInterface.
        pub fn new_with_revoked(inner: InMemorySigner, state: Arc<Mutex<EnforcementState>>, disable_revocation_policy_check: bool) -> Self {
                Self {
                        inner,
                        state,
                        disable_revocation_policy_check
                }
        }

        #[cfg(test)]
        pub fn get_enforcement_state(&self) -> MutexGuard<EnforcementState> {
                self.state.lock().unwrap()
        }
}

impl BaseSign for EnforcingSigner {
        fn get_per_commitment_point(&self, idx: u64, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<secp256k1::All>) -> PublicKey {
                self.inner.get_per_commitment_point(idx, secp_ctx)
        }

        fn release_commitment_secret(&self, idx: u64) -> [u8; 32] {
                {
                        let mut state = self.state.lock().unwrap();
                        assert!(idx == state.last_holder_revoked_commitment || idx == state.last_holder_revoked_commitment - 1, "can only revoke the current or next unrevoked commitment - trying {}, last revoked {}", idx, state.last_holder_revoked_commitment);
                        assert!(idx > state.last_holder_commitment, "cannot revoke the last holder commitment - attempted to revoke {} last commitment {}", idx, state.last_holder_commitment);
                        state.last_holder_revoked_commitment = idx;
                }
                self.inner.release_commitment_secret(idx)
        }

        fn validate_holder_commitment(&self, holder_tx: &HolderCommitmentTransaction) -> Result<(), ()> {
                let mut state = self.state.lock().unwrap();
                let idx = holder_tx.commitment_number();
                assert!(idx == state.last_holder_commitment || idx == state.last_holder_commitment - 1, "expecting to validate the current or next holder commitment - trying {}, current {}", idx, state.last_holder_commitment);
                state.last_holder_commitment = idx;
                Ok(())
        }

        fn pubkeys(&self) -> &ChannelPublicKeys { self.inner.pubkeys() }
        fn channel_keys_id(&self) -> [u8; 32] { self.inner.channel_keys_id() }

        fn sign_counterparty_commitment(&self, commitment_tx: &CommitmentTransaction, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<secp256k1::All>) -> Result<(Signature, Vec<Signature>), ()> {
                self.verify_counterparty_commitment_tx(commitment_tx, secp_ctx);

                {
                        let mut state = self.state.lock().unwrap();
                        let actual_commitment_number = commitment_tx.commitment_number();
                        let last_commitment_number = state.last_counterparty_commitment;
                        // These commitment numbers are backwards counting.  We expect either the same as the previously encountered,
                        // or the next one.
                        assert!(last_commitment_number == actual_commitment_number || last_commitment_number - 1 == actual_commitment_number, "{} doesn't come after {}", actual_commitment_number, last_commitment_number);
                        // Ensure that the counterparty doesn't get more than two broadcastable commitments -
                        // the last and the one we are trying to sign
                        assert!(actual_commitment_number >= state.last_counterparty_revoked_commitment - 2, "cannot sign a commitment if second to last wasn't revoked - signing {} revoked {}", actual_commitment_number, state.last_counterparty_revoked_commitment);
                        state.last_counterparty_commitment = cmp::min(last_commitment_number, actual_commitment_number)
                }

                Ok(self.inner.sign_counterparty_commitment(commitment_tx, secp_ctx).unwrap())
        }

        fn validate_counterparty_revocation(&self, idx: u64, _secret: &SecretKey) -> Result<(), ()> {
                let mut state = self.state.lock().unwrap();
                assert!(idx == state.last_counterparty_revoked_commitment || idx == state.last_counterparty_revoked_commitment - 1, "expecting to validate the current or next counterparty revocation - trying {}, current {}", idx, state.last_counterparty_revoked_commitment);
                state.last_counterparty_revoked_commitment = idx;
                Ok(())
        }

        fn sign_holder_commitment_and_htlcs(&self, commitment_tx: &HolderCommitmentTransaction, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<secp256k1::All>) -> Result<(Signature, Vec<Signature>), ()> {
                let trusted_tx = self.verify_holder_commitment_tx(commitment_tx, secp_ctx);
                let commitment_txid = trusted_tx.txid();
                let holder_csv = self.inner.counterparty_selected_contest_delay();

                let state = self.state.lock().unwrap();
                let commitment_number = trusted_tx.commitment_number();
                if state.last_holder_revoked_commitment - 1 != commitment_number && state.last_holder_revoked_commitment - 2 != commitment_number {
                        if !self.disable_revocation_policy_check {
                                panic!("can only sign the next two unrevoked commitment numbers, revoked={} vs requested={} for {}",
                                       state.last_holder_revoked_commitment, commitment_number, self.inner.commitment_seed[0])
                        }
                }

                for (this_htlc, sig) in trusted_tx.htlcs().iter().zip(&commitment_tx.counterparty_htlc_sigs) {
                        assert!(this_htlc.transaction_output_index.is_some());
                        let keys = trusted_tx.keys();
                        let htlc_tx = chan_utils::build_htlc_transaction(&commitment_txid, trusted_tx.feerate_per_kw(), holder_csv, &this_htlc, &keys.broadcaster_delayed_payment_key, &keys.revocation_key);

                        let htlc_redeemscript = chan_utils::get_htlc_redeemscript(&this_htlc, &keys);

                        let sighash = hash_to_message!(&bip143::SigHashCache::new(&htlc_tx).signature_hash(0, &htlc_redeemscript, this_htlc.amount_msat / 1000, SigHashType::All)[..]);
                        secp_ctx.verify(&sighash, sig, &keys.countersignatory_htlc_key).unwrap();
                }

                Ok(self.inner.sign_holder_commitment_and_htlcs(commitment_tx, secp_ctx).unwrap())
        }

        #[cfg(any(test,feature = "unsafe_revoked_tx_signing"))]
        fn unsafe_sign_holder_commitment_and_htlcs(&self, commitment_tx: &HolderCommitmentTransaction, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<secp256k1::All>) -> Result<(Signature, Vec<Signature>), ()> {
                Ok(self.inner.unsafe_sign_holder_commitment_and_htlcs(commitment_tx, secp_ctx).unwrap())
        }

        fn sign_justice_revoked_output(&self, justice_tx: &Transaction, input: usize, amount: u64, per_commitment_key: &SecretKey, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<secp256k1::All>) -> Result<Signature, ()> {
                Ok(self.inner.sign_justice_revoked_output(justice_tx, input, amount, per_commitment_key, secp_ctx).unwrap())
        }

        fn sign_justice_revoked_htlc(&self, justice_tx: &Transaction, input: usize, amount: u64, per_commitment_key: &SecretKey, htlc: &HTLCOutputInCommitment, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<secp256k1::All>) -> Result<Signature, ()> {
                Ok(self.inner.sign_justice_revoked_htlc(justice_tx, input, amount, per_commitment_key, htlc, secp_ctx).unwrap())
        }

        fn sign_counterparty_htlc_transaction(&self, htlc_tx: &Transaction, input: usize, amount: u64, per_commitment_point: &PublicKey, htlc: &HTLCOutputInCommitment, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<secp256k1::All>) -> Result<Signature, ()> {
                Ok(self.inner.sign_counterparty_htlc_transaction(htlc_tx, input, amount, per_commitment_point, htlc, secp_ctx).unwrap())
        }

        fn sign_closing_transaction(&self, closing_tx: &ClosingTransaction, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<secp256k1::All>) -> Result<Signature, ()> {
                closing_tx.verify(self.inner.funding_outpoint().into_bitcoin_outpoint())
                        .expect("derived different closing transaction");
                Ok(self.inner.sign_closing_transaction(closing_tx, secp_ctx).unwrap())
        }

        fn sign_channel_announcement(&self, msg: &msgs::UnsignedChannelAnnouncement, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<secp256k1::All>) -> Result<Signature, ()> {
                self.inner.sign_channel_announcement(msg, secp_ctx)
        }

        fn ready_channel(&mut self, channel_parameters: &ChannelTransactionParameters) {
                self.inner.ready_channel(channel_parameters)
        }
}

impl Sign for EnforcingSigner {}

impl Writeable for EnforcingSigner {
        fn write<W: Writer>(&self, writer: &mut W) -> Result<(), Error> {
                // EnforcingSigner has two fields - `inner` ([`InMemorySigner`]) and `state`
                // ([`EnforcementState`]). `inner` is serialized here and deserialized by
                // [`KeysInterface::read_chan_signer`]. `state` is managed by [`KeysInterface`]
                // and will be serialized as needed by the implementation of that trait.
                self.inner.write(writer)?;
                Ok(())
        }
}

impl EnforcingSigner {
        fn verify_counterparty_commitment_tx<'a, T: secp256k1::Signing + secp256k1::Verification>(&self, commitment_tx: &'a CommitmentTransaction, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<T>) -> TrustedCommitmentTransaction<'a> {
                commitment_tx.verify(&self.inner.get_channel_parameters().as_counterparty_broadcastable(),
                                     self.inner.counterparty_pubkeys(), self.inner.pubkeys(), secp_ctx)
                        .expect("derived different per-tx keys or built transaction")
        }

        fn verify_holder_commitment_tx<'a, T: secp256k1::Signing + secp256k1::Verification>(&self, commitment_tx: &'a CommitmentTransaction, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<T>) -> TrustedCommitmentTransaction<'a> {
                commitment_tx.verify(&self.inner.get_channel_parameters().as_holder_broadcastable(),
                                     self.inner.pubkeys(), self.inner.counterparty_pubkeys(), secp_ctx)
                        .expect("derived different per-tx keys or built transaction")
        }
}

/// The state used by [`EnforcingSigner`] in order to enforce policy checks
///
/// This structure is maintained by KeysInterface since we may have multiple copies of
/// the signer and they must coordinate their state.
#[derive(Clone)]
pub struct EnforcementState {
        /// The last counterparty commitment number we signed, backwards counting
        pub last_counterparty_commitment: u64,
        /// The last counterparty commitment they revoked, backwards counting
        pub last_counterparty_revoked_commitment: u64,
        /// The last holder commitment number we revoked, backwards counting
        pub last_holder_revoked_commitment: u64,
        /// The last validated holder commitment number, backwards counting
        pub last_holder_commitment: u64,
}

impl EnforcementState {
        /// Enforcement state for a new channel
        pub fn new() -> Self {
                EnforcementState {
                        last_counterparty_commitment: INITIAL_REVOKED_COMMITMENT_NUMBER,
                        last_counterparty_revoked_commitment: INITIAL_REVOKED_COMMITMENT_NUMBER,
                        last_holder_revoked_commitment: INITIAL_REVOKED_COMMITMENT_NUMBER,
                        last_holder_commitment: INITIAL_REVOKED_COMMITMENT_NUMBER,
                }
        }
}