Don't apply PathFailure::ChannelUpdateMessage
authorElias Rohrer <dev@tnull.de>
Thu, 19 Oct 2023 15:00:50 +0000 (17:00 +0200)
committerElias Rohrer <dev@tnull.de>
Thu, 19 Oct 2023 15:03:15 +0000 (17:03 +0200)
If we receive a channel update from an intermediary via a failure onion
we shouldn't apply them in a persisted and network-observable way to our
network graph, as this might introduce a privacy leak. Here, we
therefore avoid applying such updates to our network graph.

lightning/src/routing/gossip.rs

index d13fe9a2b76e8230c279880698539387ca23c45e..c51180fee731c60197d31e4cf8ad022bf3d1f4b5 100644 (file)
@@ -341,6 +341,9 @@ where U::Target: UtxoLookup, L::Target: Logger
 
 impl<L: Deref> NetworkGraph<L> where L::Target: Logger {
        /// Handles any network updates originating from [`Event`]s.
+       //
+       /// Note that this will skip applying any [`NetworkUpdate::ChannelUpdateMessage`] to avoid
+       /// leaking possibly identifying information of the sender to the public network.
        ///
        /// [`Event`]: crate::events::Event
        pub fn handle_network_update(&self, network_update: &NetworkUpdate) {
@@ -349,8 +352,7 @@ impl<L: Deref> NetworkGraph<L> where L::Target: Logger {
                                let short_channel_id = msg.contents.short_channel_id;
                                let is_enabled = msg.contents.flags & (1 << 1) != (1 << 1);
                                let status = if is_enabled { "enabled" } else { "disabled" };
-                               log_debug!(self.logger, "Updating channel with channel_update from a payment failure. Channel {} is {}.", short_channel_id, status);
-                               let _ = self.update_channel(msg);
+                               log_debug!(self.logger, "Skipping application of a channel update from a payment failure. Channel {} is {}.", short_channel_id, status);
                        },
                        NetworkUpdate::ChannelFailure { short_channel_id, is_permanent } => {
                                if is_permanent {
@@ -2531,7 +2533,8 @@ pub(crate) mod tests {
 
                let short_channel_id;
                {
-                       // Announce a channel we will update
+                       // Check we won't apply an update via `handle_network_update` for privacy reasons, but
+                       // can continue fine if we manually apply it.
                        let valid_channel_announcement = get_signed_channel_announcement(|_| {}, node_1_privkey, node_2_privkey, &secp_ctx);
                        short_channel_id = valid_channel_announcement.contents.short_channel_id;
                        let chain_source: Option<&test_utils::TestChainSource> = None;
@@ -2542,10 +2545,11 @@ pub(crate) mod tests {
                        assert!(network_graph.read_only().channels().get(&short_channel_id).unwrap().one_to_two.is_none());
 
                        network_graph.handle_network_update(&NetworkUpdate::ChannelUpdateMessage {
-                               msg: valid_channel_update,
+                               msg: valid_channel_update.clone(),
                        });
 
-                       assert!(network_graph.read_only().channels().get(&short_channel_id).unwrap().one_to_two.is_some());
+                       assert!(network_graph.read_only().channels().get(&short_channel_id).unwrap().one_to_two.is_none());
+                       network_graph.update_channel(&valid_channel_update).unwrap();
                }
 
                // Non-permanent failure doesn't touch the channel at all