Drop the stale `final_expiry_too_soon` error code
authorMatt Corallo <git@bluematt.me>
Thu, 1 Dec 2022 20:25:33 +0000 (20:25 +0000)
committerMatt Corallo <git@bluematt.me>
Tue, 6 Dec 2022 20:00:44 +0000 (20:00 +0000)
This replaces `final_expiry_too_soon` with
`incorrect_or_unknown_payment` as was done in
https://github.com/lightning/bolts/pull/608. Note that the
rationale for this (that it may expose whether you are the final
recipient for the payment or not) does not currently apply to us -
we don't apply different final CLTV values to different payments.
However, we might in the future, and this will make us slightly
more consistent with other nodes.

lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
lightning/src/ln/onion_route_tests.rs

index 7fed7b2f4277bd7479e7bfc5cf96abe27ebf9c59..36886645ab88c7e94924b59bf25137b2a6cb303c 100644 (file)
@@ -2042,10 +2042,13 @@ impl<M: Deref, T: Deref, K: Deref, F: Deref, L: Deref> ChannelManager<M, T, K, F
                // Also, ensure that, in the case of an unknown preimage for the received payment hash, our
                // payment logic has enough time to fail the HTLC backward before our onchain logic triggers a
                // channel closure (see HTLC_FAIL_BACK_BUFFER rationale).
-               if (hop_data.outgoing_cltv_value as u64) <= self.best_block.read().unwrap().height() as u64 + HTLC_FAIL_BACK_BUFFER as u64 + 1  {
+               let current_height: u32 = self.best_block.read().unwrap().height();
+               if (hop_data.outgoing_cltv_value as u64) <= current_height as u64 + HTLC_FAIL_BACK_BUFFER as u64 + 1 {
+                       let mut err_data = Vec::with_capacity(12);
+                       err_data.extend_from_slice(&amt_msat.to_be_bytes());
+                       err_data.extend_from_slice(&current_height.to_be_bytes());
                        return Err(ReceiveError {
-                               err_code: 17,
-                               err_data: Vec::new(),
+                               err_code: 0x4000 | 15, err_data,
                                msg: "The final CLTV expiry is too soon to handle",
                        });
                }
index 2bf36ffba8997fda27777e016d3bd643c9bc212e..28dc77689bb4e3067d95bc6ad371bbb668a4e76b 100644 (file)
@@ -548,7 +548,7 @@ fn test_onion_failure() {
                connect_blocks(&nodes[0], height - nodes[0].best_block_info().1);
                connect_blocks(&nodes[1], height - nodes[1].best_block_info().1);
                connect_blocks(&nodes[2], height - nodes[2].best_block_info().1);
-       }, || {}, true, Some(17), None, None);
+       }, || {}, false, Some(0x4000 | 15), None, None);
 
        run_onion_failure_test("final_incorrect_cltv_expiry", 1, &nodes, &route, &payment_hash, &payment_secret, |_| {}, || {
                for (_, pending_forwards) in nodes[1].node.forward_htlcs.lock().unwrap().iter_mut() {
@@ -1099,11 +1099,14 @@ fn test_phantom_failure_too_low_cltv() {
        commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], update_1.commitment_signed, false);
 
        // Ensure the payment fails with the expected error.
-       let error_data = Vec::new();
+       let mut error_data = recv_value_msat.to_be_bytes().to_vec();
+       error_data.extend_from_slice(
+               &nodes[0].node.best_block.read().unwrap().height().to_be_bytes(),
+       );
        let mut fail_conditions = PaymentFailedConditions::new()
                .blamed_scid(phantom_scid)
-               .expected_htlc_error_data(17, &error_data);
-       expect_payment_failed_conditions(&nodes[0], payment_hash, false, fail_conditions);
+               .expected_htlc_error_data(0x4000 | 15, &error_data);
+       expect_payment_failed_conditions(&nodes[0], payment_hash, true, fail_conditions);
 }
 
 #[test]