}
enum OnionPayload {
- /// Contains a total_msat (which may differ from value if this is a Multi-Path Payment) and a
- /// payment_secret which prevents path-probing attacks and can associate different HTLCs which
- /// are part of the same payment.
- Invoice(msgs::FinalOnionHopData),
+ /// Indicates this incoming onion payload is for the purpose of paying an invoice.
+ Invoice {
+ /// This is only here for backwards-compatibility in serialization, in the future it can be
+ /// removed, breaking clients running 0.0.106 and earlier.
+ _legacy_hop_data: msgs::FinalOnionHopData,
+ },
/// Contains the payer-provided preimage.
Spontaneous(PaymentPreimage),
}
+/// HTLCs that are to us and can be failed/claimed by the user
struct ClaimableHTLC {
prev_hop: HTLCPreviousHopData,
cltv_expiry: u32,
+ /// The amount (in msats) of this MPP part
value: u64,
onion_payload: OnionPayload,
timer_ticks: u8,
+ /// The sum total of all MPP parts
+ total_msat: u64,
}
/// A payment identifier used to uniquely identify a payment to LDK.
HTLCForwardInfo::AddHTLC { prev_short_channel_id, prev_htlc_id, forward_info: PendingHTLCInfo {
routing, incoming_shared_secret, payment_hash, amt_to_forward, .. },
prev_funding_outpoint } => {
- let (cltv_expiry, onion_payload, phantom_shared_secret) = match routing {
- PendingHTLCRouting::Receive { payment_data, incoming_cltv_expiry, phantom_shared_secret } =>
- (incoming_cltv_expiry, OnionPayload::Invoice(payment_data), phantom_shared_secret),
+ let (cltv_expiry, onion_payload, payment_data, phantom_shared_secret) = match routing {
+ PendingHTLCRouting::Receive { payment_data, incoming_cltv_expiry, phantom_shared_secret } => {
+ let _legacy_hop_data = payment_data.clone();
+ (incoming_cltv_expiry, OnionPayload::Invoice { _legacy_hop_data }, Some(payment_data), phantom_shared_secret)
+ },
PendingHTLCRouting::ReceiveKeysend { payment_preimage, incoming_cltv_expiry } =>
- (incoming_cltv_expiry, OnionPayload::Spontaneous(payment_preimage), None),
+ (incoming_cltv_expiry, OnionPayload::Spontaneous(payment_preimage), None, None),
_ => {
panic!("short_channel_id == 0 should imply any pending_forward entries are of type Receive");
}
},
value: amt_to_forward,
timer_ticks: 0,
+ total_msat: if let Some(data) = &payment_data { data.total_msat } else { amt_to_forward },
cltv_expiry,
onion_payload,
};
}
macro_rules! check_total_value {
- ($payment_data_total_msat: expr, $payment_secret: expr, $payment_preimage: expr) => {{
+ ($payment_data: expr, $payment_preimage: expr) => {{
let mut payment_received_generated = false;
let htlcs = channel_state.claimable_htlcs.entry(payment_hash)
.or_insert(Vec::new());
for htlc in htlcs.iter() {
total_value += htlc.value;
match &htlc.onion_payload {
- OnionPayload::Invoice(htlc_payment_data) => {
- if htlc_payment_data.total_msat != $payment_data_total_msat {
+ OnionPayload::Invoice { .. } => {
+ if htlc.total_msat != $payment_data.total_msat {
log_trace!(self.logger, "Failing HTLCs with payment_hash {} as the HTLCs had inconsistent total values (eg {} and {})",
- log_bytes!(payment_hash.0), $payment_data_total_msat, htlc_payment_data.total_msat);
+ log_bytes!(payment_hash.0), $payment_data.total_msat, htlc.total_msat);
total_value = msgs::MAX_VALUE_MSAT;
}
if total_value >= msgs::MAX_VALUE_MSAT { break; }
_ => unreachable!(),
}
}
- if total_value >= msgs::MAX_VALUE_MSAT || total_value > $payment_data_total_msat {
+ if total_value >= msgs::MAX_VALUE_MSAT || total_value > $payment_data.total_msat {
log_trace!(self.logger, "Failing HTLCs with payment_hash {} as the total value {} ran over expected value {} (or HTLCs were inconsistent)",
- log_bytes!(payment_hash.0), total_value, $payment_data_total_msat);
+ log_bytes!(payment_hash.0), total_value, $payment_data.total_msat);
fail_htlc!(claimable_htlc);
- } else if total_value == $payment_data_total_msat {
+ } else if total_value == $payment_data.total_msat {
htlcs.push(claimable_htlc);
new_events.push(events::Event::PaymentReceived {
payment_hash,
purpose: events::PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment {
payment_preimage: $payment_preimage,
- payment_secret: $payment_secret,
+ payment_secret: $payment_data.payment_secret,
},
amt: total_value,
});
match payment_secrets.entry(payment_hash) {
hash_map::Entry::Vacant(_) => {
match claimable_htlc.onion_payload {
- OnionPayload::Invoice(ref payment_data) => {
- let payment_preimage = match inbound_payment::verify(payment_hash, payment_data.clone(), self.highest_seen_timestamp.load(Ordering::Acquire) as u64, &self.inbound_payment_key, &self.logger) {
+ OnionPayload::Invoice { .. } => {
+ let payment_data = payment_data.unwrap();
+ let payment_preimage = match inbound_payment::verify(payment_hash, &payment_data, self.highest_seen_timestamp.load(Ordering::Acquire) as u64, &self.inbound_payment_key, &self.logger) {
Ok(payment_preimage) => payment_preimage,
Err(()) => {
fail_htlc!(claimable_htlc);
continue
}
};
- let payment_data_total_msat = payment_data.total_msat;
- let payment_secret = payment_data.payment_secret.clone();
- check_total_value!(payment_data_total_msat, payment_secret, payment_preimage);
+ check_total_value!(payment_data, payment_preimage);
},
OnionPayload::Spontaneous(preimage) => {
match channel_state.claimable_htlcs.entry(payment_hash) {
}
},
hash_map::Entry::Occupied(inbound_payment) => {
- let payment_data =
- if let OnionPayload::Invoice(ref data) = claimable_htlc.onion_payload {
- data.clone()
- } else {
- log_trace!(self.logger, "Failing new keysend HTLC with payment_hash {} because we already have an inbound payment with the same payment hash", log_bytes!(payment_hash.0));
- fail_htlc!(claimable_htlc);
- continue
- };
+ if payment_data.is_none() {
+ log_trace!(self.logger, "Failing new keysend HTLC with payment_hash {} because we already have an inbound payment with the same payment hash", log_bytes!(payment_hash.0));
+ fail_htlc!(claimable_htlc);
+ continue
+ };
+ let payment_data = payment_data.unwrap();
if inbound_payment.get().payment_secret != payment_data.payment_secret {
log_trace!(self.logger, "Failing new HTLC with payment_hash {} as it didn't match our expected payment secret.", log_bytes!(payment_hash.0));
fail_htlc!(claimable_htlc);
log_bytes!(payment_hash.0), payment_data.total_msat, inbound_payment.get().min_value_msat.unwrap());
fail_htlc!(claimable_htlc);
} else {
- let payment_received_generated = check_total_value!(payment_data.total_msat, payment_data.payment_secret, inbound_payment.get().payment_preimage);
+ let payment_received_generated = check_total_value!(payment_data, inbound_payment.get().payment_preimage);
if payment_received_generated {
inbound_payment.remove_entry();
}
debug_assert!(false);
return false;
}
- if let OnionPayload::Invoice(ref final_hop_data) = htlcs[0].onion_payload {
+ if let OnionPayload::Invoice { .. } = htlcs[0].onion_payload {
// Check if we've received all the parts we need for an MPP (the value of the parts adds to total_msat).
// In this case we're not going to handle any timeouts of the parts here.
- if final_hop_data.total_msat == htlcs.iter().fold(0, |total, htlc| total + htlc.value) {
+ if htlcs[0].total_msat == htlcs.iter().fold(0, |total, htlc| total + htlc.value) {
return true;
} else if htlcs.into_iter().any(|htlc| {
htlc.timer_ticks += 1;
impl Writeable for ClaimableHTLC {
fn write<W: Writer>(&self, writer: &mut W) -> Result<(), io::Error> {
let payment_data = match &self.onion_payload {
- OnionPayload::Invoice(data) => Some(data.clone()),
+ OnionPayload::Invoice { _legacy_hop_data } => Some(_legacy_hop_data),
_ => None,
};
let keysend_preimage = match self.onion_payload {
- OnionPayload::Invoice(_) => None,
+ OnionPayload::Invoice { .. } => None,
OnionPayload::Spontaneous(preimage) => Some(preimage.clone()),
};
- write_tlv_fields!
- (writer,
- {
- (0, self.prev_hop, required), (2, self.value, required),
- (4, payment_data, option), (6, self.cltv_expiry, required),
- (8, keysend_preimage, option),
- });
+ write_tlv_fields!(writer, {
+ (0, self.prev_hop, required),
+ (1, self.total_msat, required),
+ (2, self.value, required),
+ (4, payment_data, option),
+ (6, self.cltv_expiry, required),
+ (8, keysend_preimage, option),
+ });
Ok(())
}
}
let mut value = 0;
let mut payment_data: Option<msgs::FinalOnionHopData> = None;
let mut cltv_expiry = 0;
+ let mut total_msat = None;
let mut keysend_preimage: Option<PaymentPreimage> = None;
- read_tlv_fields!
- (reader,
- {
- (0, prev_hop, required), (2, value, required),
- (4, payment_data, option), (6, cltv_expiry, required),
- (8, keysend_preimage, option)
- });
+ read_tlv_fields!(reader, {
+ (0, prev_hop, required),
+ (1, total_msat, option),
+ (2, value, required),
+ (4, payment_data, option),
+ (6, cltv_expiry, required),
+ (8, keysend_preimage, option)
+ });
let onion_payload = match keysend_preimage {
Some(p) => {
if payment_data.is_some() {
return Err(DecodeError::InvalidValue)
}
+ if total_msat.is_none() {
+ total_msat = Some(value);
+ }
OnionPayload::Spontaneous(p)
},
None => {
if payment_data.is_none() {
return Err(DecodeError::InvalidValue)
}
- OnionPayload::Invoice(payment_data.unwrap())
+ if total_msat.is_none() {
+ total_msat = Some(payment_data.as_ref().unwrap().total_msat);
+ }
+ OnionPayload::Invoice { _legacy_hop_data: payment_data.unwrap() }
},
};
Ok(Self {
prev_hop: prev_hop.0.unwrap(),
timer_ticks: 0,
value,
+ total_msat: total_msat.unwrap(),
onion_payload,
cltv_expiry,
})
// payment verification fails as expected.
let mut bad_payment_hash = payment_hash.clone();
bad_payment_hash.0[0] += 1;
- match inbound_payment::verify(bad_payment_hash, payment_data.clone(), nodes[0].node.highest_seen_timestamp.load(Ordering::Acquire) as u64, &nodes[0].node.inbound_payment_key, &nodes[0].logger) {
+ match inbound_payment::verify(bad_payment_hash, &payment_data, nodes[0].node.highest_seen_timestamp.load(Ordering::Acquire) as u64, &nodes[0].node.inbound_payment_key, &nodes[0].logger) {
Ok(_) => panic!("Unexpected ok"),
Err(()) => {
nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::inbound_payment".to_string(), "Failing HTLC with user-generated payment_hash".to_string(), 1);
}
// Check that using the original payment hash succeeds.
- assert!(inbound_payment::verify(payment_hash, payment_data, nodes[0].node.highest_seen_timestamp.load(Ordering::Acquire) as u64, &nodes[0].node.inbound_payment_key, &nodes[0].logger).is_ok());
+ assert!(inbound_payment::verify(payment_hash, &payment_data, nodes[0].node.highest_seen_timestamp.load(Ordering::Acquire) as u64, &nodes[0].node.inbound_payment_key, &nodes[0].logger).is_ok());
}
}
}
}
+#[macro_export]
+macro_rules! get_route {
+ ($send_node: expr, $payment_params: expr, $recv_value: expr, $cltv: expr) => {{
+ use $crate::chain::keysinterface::KeysInterface;
+ let scorer = $crate::util::test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
+ let keys_manager = $crate::util::test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], bitcoin::network::constants::Network::Testnet);
+ let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
+ $crate::routing::router::get_route(
+ &$send_node.node.get_our_node_id(), &$payment_params, &$send_node.network_graph.read_only(),
+ Some(&$send_node.node.list_usable_channels().iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()),
+ $recv_value, $cltv, $send_node.logger, &scorer, &random_seed_bytes
+ )
+ }}
+}
+
#[cfg(test)]
#[macro_export]
macro_rules! get_route_and_payment_hash {
$crate::get_route_and_payment_hash!($send_node, $recv_node, payment_params, $recv_value, TEST_FINAL_CLTV)
}};
($send_node: expr, $recv_node: expr, $payment_params: expr, $recv_value: expr, $cltv: expr) => {{
- use $crate::chain::keysinterface::KeysInterface;
let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, payment_secret) = $crate::get_payment_preimage_hash!($recv_node, Some($recv_value));
- let scorer = $crate::util::test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
- let keys_manager = $crate::util::test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], bitcoin::network::constants::Network::Testnet);
- let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
- let route = $crate::routing::router::get_route(
- &$send_node.node.get_our_node_id(), &$payment_params, &$send_node.network_graph.read_only(),
- Some(&$send_node.node.list_usable_channels().iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()),
- $recv_value, $cltv, $send_node.logger, &scorer, &random_seed_bytes
- ).unwrap();
- (route, payment_hash, payment_preimage, payment_secret)
+ let route = $crate::get_route!($send_node, $payment_params, $recv_value, $cltv);
+ (route.unwrap(), payment_hash, payment_preimage, payment_secret)
}}
}
pub fn route_payment<'a, 'b, 'c>(origin_node: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, expected_route: &[&Node<'a, 'b, 'c>], recv_value: u64) -> (PaymentPreimage, PaymentHash, PaymentSecret) {
let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(expected_route.last().unwrap().node.get_our_node_id())
.with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
- let network_graph = origin_node.network_graph.read_only();
- let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
- let seed = [0u8; 32];
- let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&seed, Network::Testnet);
- let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
- let route = get_route(
- &origin_node.node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_params, &network_graph,
- Some(&origin_node.node.list_usable_channels().iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()),
- recv_value, TEST_FINAL_CLTV, origin_node.logger, &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route!(origin_node, payment_params, recv_value, TEST_FINAL_CLTV).unwrap();
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1);
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), expected_route.len());
for (node, hop) in expected_route.iter().zip(route.paths[0].iter()) {
claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], payment_preimage_2);
}
-#[test]
-fn test_dup_htlc_second_fail_panic() {
- // Previously, if we received two HTLCs back-to-back, where the second overran the expected
- // value for the payment, we'd fail back both HTLCs after generating a `PaymentReceived` event.
- // Then, if the user failed the second payment, they'd hit a "tried to fail an already failed
- // HTLC" debug panic. This tests for this behavior, checking that only one HTLC is auto-failed.
+fn do_test_dup_htlc_second_rejected(test_for_second_fail_panic: bool) {
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id())
.with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
- let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0);
- let random_seed_bytes = chanmon_cfgs[1].keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
- let route = get_route(
- &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_params, &nodes[0].network_graph.read_only(),
- Some(&nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels().iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()),
- 10_000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV, nodes[0].logger, &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
+ let route = get_route!(nodes[0], payment_params, 10_000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV).unwrap();
- let (_, our_payment_hash, our_payment_secret) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(&nodes[1]);
+ let (our_payment_preimage, our_payment_hash, our_payment_secret) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(&nodes[1]);
{
nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &Some(our_payment_secret)).unwrap();
// the first HTLC delivered above.
}
- // Now we go fail back the first HTLC from the user end.
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_ignore!(nodes[1]);
nodes[1].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
- nodes[1].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&our_payment_hash);
- expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_ignore!(nodes[1]);
- nodes[1].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
+ if test_for_second_fail_panic {
+ // Now we go fail back the first HTLC from the user end.
+ nodes[1].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&our_payment_hash);
- check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
- let fail_updates_1 = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
- assert_eq!(fail_updates_1.update_fail_htlcs.len(), 2);
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_ignore!(nodes[1]);
+ nodes[1].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
+
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+ let fail_updates_1 = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+ assert_eq!(fail_updates_1.update_fail_htlcs.len(), 2);
+
+ nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &fail_updates_1.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
+ nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &fail_updates_1.update_fail_htlcs[1]);
+ commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], fail_updates_1.commitment_signed, false);
+
+ let failure_events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
+ assert_eq!(failure_events.len(), 2);
+ if let Event::PaymentPathFailed { .. } = failure_events[0] {} else { panic!(); }
+ if let Event::PaymentPathFailed { .. } = failure_events[1] {} else { panic!(); }
+ } else {
+ // Let the second HTLC fail and claim the first
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_ignore!(nodes[1]);
+ nodes[1].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
+
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+ let fail_updates_1 = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+ nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &fail_updates_1.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
+ commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], fail_updates_1.commitment_signed, false);
+
+ expect_payment_failed_conditions!(nodes[0], our_payment_hash, true, PaymentFailedConditions::new().mpp_parts_remain());
+
+ claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], our_payment_preimage);
+ }
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_dup_htlc_second_fail_panic() {
+ // Previously, if we received two HTLCs back-to-back, where the second overran the expected
+ // value for the payment, we'd fail back both HTLCs after generating a `PaymentReceived` event.
+ // Then, if the user failed the second payment, they'd hit a "tried to fail an already failed
+ // HTLC" debug panic. This tests for this behavior, checking that only one HTLC is auto-failed.
+ do_test_dup_htlc_second_rejected(true);
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_dup_htlc_second_rejected() {
+ // Test that if we receive a second HTLC for an MPP payment that overruns the payment amount we
+ // simply reject the second HTLC but are still able to claim the first HTLC.
+ do_test_dup_htlc_second_rejected(false);
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_inconsistent_mpp_params() {
+ // Test that if we recieve two HTLCs with different payment parameters we fail back the first
+ // such HTLC and allow the second to stay.
+ let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(4);
+ let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(4, &chanmon_cfgs);
+ let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(4, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None, None]);
+ let nodes = create_network(4, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+
+ create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100_000, 0, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+ create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 2, 100_000, 0, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+ create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 1, 3, 100_000, 0, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+ create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 2, 3, 100_000, 0, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+
+ let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id())
+ .with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known());
+ let mut route = get_route!(nodes[0], payment_params, 15_000_000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV).unwrap();
+ assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 2);
+ route.paths.sort_by(|path_a, _| {
+ // Sort the path so that the path through nodes[1] comes first
+ if path_a[0].pubkey == nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id() {
+ core::cmp::Ordering::Less } else { core::cmp::Ordering::Greater }
+ });
+ let payment_params_opt = Some(payment_params);
+
+ let (our_payment_preimage, our_payment_hash, our_payment_secret) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(&nodes[3]);
+
+ let cur_height = nodes[0].best_block_info().1;
+ let payment_id = PaymentId([42; 32]);
+ {
+ nodes[0].node.send_payment_along_path(&route.paths[0], &payment_params_opt, &our_payment_hash, &Some(our_payment_secret), 15_000_000, cur_height, payment_id, &None).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+
+ let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ pass_along_path(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[3]], 15_000_000, our_payment_hash, Some(our_payment_secret), events.pop().unwrap(), false, None);
+ }
+ assert!(nodes[3].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
+
+ {
+ nodes[0].node.send_payment_along_path(&route.paths[1], &payment_params_opt, &our_payment_hash, &Some(our_payment_secret), 14_000_000, cur_height, payment_id, &None).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+
+ let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ let payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.pop().unwrap());
+
+ nodes[2].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
+ commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[2], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
- nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &fail_updates_1.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
- nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &fail_updates_1.update_fail_htlcs[1]);
- commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], fail_updates_1.commitment_signed, false);
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[2]);
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
+
+ let mut events = nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ let payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.pop().unwrap());
+
+ nodes[3].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[3], 0);
+ commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[3], nodes[2], payment_event.commitment_msg, true, true);
+
+ // At this point, nodes[3] should notice the two HTLCs don't contain the same total payment
+ // amount. It will assume the second is a privacy attack (no longer particularly relevant
+ // post-payment_secrets) and fail back the new HTLC.
+ }
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_ignore!(nodes[3]);
+ nodes[3].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_ignore!(nodes[3]);
+ nodes[3].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
+
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[3], 1);
+
+ let fail_updates_1 = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[3], nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
+ nodes[2].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id(), &fail_updates_1.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
+ commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[2], nodes[3], fail_updates_1.commitment_signed, false);
+
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[2]);
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
+
+ let fail_updates_2 = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+ nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &fail_updates_2.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
+ commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[2], fail_updates_2.commitment_signed, false);
+
+ expect_payment_failed_conditions!(nodes[0], our_payment_hash, true, PaymentFailedConditions::new().mpp_parts_remain());
+
+ nodes[0].node.send_payment_along_path(&route.paths[1], &payment_params_opt, &our_payment_hash, &Some(our_payment_secret), 15_000_000, cur_height, payment_id, &None).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+
+ let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ pass_along_path(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3]], 15_000_000, our_payment_hash, Some(our_payment_secret), events.pop().unwrap(), true, None);
- let failure_events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
- assert_eq!(failure_events.len(), 2);
- if let Event::PaymentPathFailed { .. } = failure_events[0] {} else { panic!(); }
- if let Event::PaymentPathFailed { .. } = failure_events[1] {} else { panic!(); }
+ claim_payment_along_route(&nodes[0], &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[3]], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3]]], false, our_payment_preimage);
}
#[test]
/// [`KeysInterface::get_inbound_payment_key_material`]: crate::chain::keysinterface::KeysInterface::get_inbound_payment_key_material
/// [`create_inbound_payment`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::create_inbound_payment
/// [`create_inbound_payment_for_hash`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::create_inbound_payment_for_hash
-pub(super) fn verify<L: Deref>(payment_hash: PaymentHash, payment_data: msgs::FinalOnionHopData, highest_seen_timestamp: u64, keys: &ExpandedKey, logger: &L) -> Result<Option<PaymentPreimage>, ()>
+pub(super) fn verify<L: Deref>(payment_hash: PaymentHash, payment_data:
&msgs::FinalOnionHopData, highest_seen_timestamp: u64, keys: &ExpandedKey, logger: &L) -> Result<Option<PaymentPreimage>, ()>
where L::Target: Logger
{
let (iv_bytes, metadata_bytes) = decrypt_metadata(payment_data.payment_secret, keys);
msgs_sent_since_pong: usize,
awaiting_pong_timer_tick_intervals: i8,
received_message_since_timer_tick: bool,
+ sent_gossip_timestamp_filter: bool,
}
impl Peer {
/// announcements/updates for the given channel_id then we will send it when we get to that
/// point and we shouldn't send it yet to avoid sending duplicate updates. If we've already
/// sent the old versions, we should send the update, and so return true here.
- fn should_forward_channel_announcement(&self, channel_id: u64)->bool{
+ fn should_forward_channel_announcement(&self, channel_id: u64) -> bool {
+ if self.their_features.as_ref().unwrap().supports_gossip_queries() &&
+ !self.sent_gossip_timestamp_filter {
+ return false;
+ }
match self.sync_status {
InitSyncTracker::NoSyncRequested => true,
InitSyncTracker::ChannelsSyncing(i) => i < channel_id,
/// Similar to the above, but for node announcements indexed by node_id.
fn should_forward_node_announcement(&self, node_id: PublicKey) -> bool {
+ if self.their_features.as_ref().unwrap().supports_gossip_queries() &&
+ !self.sent_gossip_timestamp_filter {
+ return false;
+ }
match self.sync_status {
InitSyncTracker::NoSyncRequested => true,
InitSyncTracker::ChannelsSyncing(_) => false,
msgs_sent_since_pong: 0,
awaiting_pong_timer_tick_intervals: 0,
received_message_since_timer_tick: false,
+ sent_gossip_timestamp_filter: false,
}).is_some() {
panic!("PeerManager driver duplicated descriptors!");
};
msgs_sent_since_pong: 0,
awaiting_pong_timer_tick_intervals: 0,
received_message_since_timer_tick: false,
+ sent_gossip_timestamp_filter: false,
}).is_some() {
panic!("PeerManager driver duplicated descriptors!");
};
log_info!(self.logger, "Received peer Init message from {}: {}", log_pubkey!(peer.their_node_id.unwrap()), msg.features);
- if msg.features.initial_routing_sync() {
+ // For peers not supporting gossip queries start sync now, otherwise wait until we receive a filter.
+ if msg.features.initial_routing_sync() && !msg.features.supports_gossip_queries() {
peer.sync_status = InitSyncTracker::ChannelsSyncing(0);
}
if !msg.features.supports_static_remote_key() {
self.message_handler.route_handler.handle_reply_channel_range(&peer.their_node_id.unwrap(), msg)?;
},
wire::Message::GossipTimestampFilter(_msg) => {
- // TODO: handle message
+ // When supporting gossip messages, start inital gossip sync only after we receive
+ // a GossipTimestampFilter
+ if peer.their_features.as_ref().unwrap().supports_gossip_queries() &&
+ !peer.sent_gossip_timestamp_filter {
+ peer.sent_gossip_timestamp_filter = true;
+ peer.sync_status = InitSyncTracker::ChannelsSyncing(0);
+ }
},
// Unknown messages:
assert_eq!(peer_b.read_event(&mut fd_b, &fd_a.outbound_data.lock().unwrap().split_off(0)).unwrap(), false);
peer_b.process_events();
assert_eq!(peer_a.read_event(&mut fd_a, &fd_b.outbound_data.lock().unwrap().split_off(0)).unwrap(), false);
+ peer_a.process_events();
+ assert_eq!(peer_b.read_event(&mut fd_b, &fd_a.outbound_data.lock().unwrap().split_off(0)).unwrap(), false);
(fd_a.clone(), fd_b.clone())
}
let (mut fd_a, mut fd_b) = establish_connection(&peers[0], &peers[1]);
// Make each peer to read the messages that the other peer just wrote to them. Note that
- // due to the max-messagse-before-ping limits this may take a few iterations to complete.
+ // due to the max-message-before-ping limits this may take a few iterations to complete.
for _ in 0..150/super::BUFFER_DRAIN_MSGS_PER_TICK + 1 {
- peers[0].process_events();
- let b_read_data = fd_a.outbound_data.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
- assert!(!b_read_data.is_empty());
-
- peers[1].read_event(&mut fd_b, &b_read_data).unwrap();
peers[1].process_events();
-
let a_read_data = fd_b.outbound_data.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
assert!(!a_read_data.is_empty());
+
peers[0].read_event(&mut fd_a, &a_read_data).unwrap();
+ peers[0].process_events();
- peers[1].process_events();
- assert_eq!(fd_b.outbound_data.lock().unwrap().len(), 0, "Until B receives data, it shouldn't send more messages");
+ let b_read_data = fd_a.outbound_data.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
+ assert!(!b_read_data.is_empty());
+ peers[1].read_event(&mut fd_b, &b_read_data).unwrap();
+
+ peers[0].process_events();
+ assert_eq!(fd_a.outbound_data.lock().unwrap().len(), 0, "Until A receives data, it shouldn't send more messages");
}
// Check that each peer has received the expected number of channel updates and channel
assert!(self.channel_liquidities.insert(short_channel_id, liquidity).is_none());
self
}
+
+ /// Dump the contents of this scorer into the configured logger.
+ ///
+ /// Note that this writes roughly one line per channel for which we have a liquidity estimate,
+ /// which may be a substantial amount of log output.
+ pub fn debug_log_liquidity_stats(&self) {
+ let graph = self.network_graph.read_only();
+ for (scid, liq) in self.channel_liquidities.iter() {
+ if let Some(chan_debug) = graph.channels().get(scid) {
+ let log_direction = |source, target| {
+ if let Some((directed_info, _)) = chan_debug.as_directed_to(target) {
+ let amt = directed_info.effective_capacity().as_msat();
+ let dir_liq = liq.as_directed(source, target, amt, self.params.liquidity_offset_half_life);
+ log_debug!(self.logger, "Liquidity from {:?} to {:?} via {} is in the range ({}, {})",
+ source, target, scid, dir_liq.min_liquidity_msat(), dir_liq.max_liquidity_msat());
+ } else {
+ log_debug!(self.logger, "No amount known for SCID {} from {:?} to {:?}", scid, source, target);
+ }
+ };
+
+ log_direction(&chan_debug.node_one, &chan_debug.node_two);
+ log_direction(&chan_debug.node_two, &chan_debug.node_one);
+ } else {
+ log_debug!(self.logger, "No network graph entry for SCID {}", scid);
+ }
+ }
+ }
}
impl ProbabilisticScoringParameters {
use bitcoin::bech32::u5;
use chain::keysinterface::{InMemorySigner, Recipient, KeyMaterial};
+#[cfg(feature = "std")]
+use std::time::{SystemTime, UNIX_EPOCH};
+
pub struct TestVecWriter(pub Vec<u8>);
impl Writer for TestVecWriter {
fn write_all(&mut self, buf: &[u8]) -> Result<(), io::Error> {
pub struct TestRoutingMessageHandler {
pub chan_upds_recvd: AtomicUsize,
pub chan_anns_recvd: AtomicUsize,
+ pub pending_events: Mutex<Vec<events::MessageSendEvent>>,
pub request_full_sync: AtomicBool,
}
TestRoutingMessageHandler {
chan_upds_recvd: AtomicUsize::new(0),
chan_anns_recvd: AtomicUsize::new(0),
+ pending_events: Mutex::new(vec![]),
request_full_sync: AtomicBool::new(false),
}
}
Vec::new()
}
- fn peer_connected(&self, _their_node_id: &PublicKey, _init_msg: &msgs::Init) {}
+ fn peer_connected(&self, their_node_id: &PublicKey, init_msg: &msgs::Init) {
+ if !init_msg.features.supports_gossip_queries() {
+ return ();
+ }
+
+ let should_request_full_sync = self.request_full_sync.load(Ordering::Acquire);
+
+ #[allow(unused_mut, unused_assignments)]
+ let mut gossip_start_time = 0;
+ #[cfg(feature = "std")]
+ {
+ gossip_start_time = SystemTime::now().duration_since(UNIX_EPOCH).expect("Time must be > 1970").as_secs();
+ if should_request_full_sync {
+ gossip_start_time -= 60 * 60 * 24 * 7 * 2; // 2 weeks ago
+ } else {
+ gossip_start_time -= 60 * 60; // an hour ago
+ }
+ }
+
+ let mut pending_events = self.pending_events.lock().unwrap();
+ pending_events.push(events::MessageSendEvent::SendGossipTimestampFilter {
+ node_id: their_node_id.clone(),
+ msg: msgs::GossipTimestampFilter {
+ chain_hash: genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash(),
+ first_timestamp: gossip_start_time as u32,
+ timestamp_range: u32::max_value(),
+ },
+ });
+ }
fn handle_reply_channel_range(&self, _their_node_id: &PublicKey, _msg: msgs::ReplyChannelRange) -> Result<(), msgs::LightningError> {
Ok(())
impl events::MessageSendEventsProvider for TestRoutingMessageHandler {
fn get_and_clear_pending_msg_events(&self) -> Vec<events::MessageSendEvent> {
- vec![]
+ let mut ret = Vec::new();
+ let mut pending_events = self.pending_events.lock().unwrap();
+ core::mem::swap(&mut ret, &mut pending_events);
+ ret
}
}
projects / rust-lightning / commitdiff