if: "matrix.build-no-std && !matrix.coverage"
run: |
cd lightning
- cargo test --verbose --color always --features hashbrown
+ cargo test --verbose --color always --no-default-features --features no_std
+ # check if there is a conflict between no_std and the default std feature
+ cargo test --verbose --color always --features no_std
cd ..
- name: Test on no_std bullds Rust ${{ matrix.toolchain }} and full code-linking for coverage generation
if: "matrix.build-no-std && matrix.coverage"
run: |
cd lightning
- RUSTFLAGS="-C link-dead-code" cargo test --verbose --color always --features hashbrown
+ RUSTFLAGS="-C link-dead-code" cargo test --verbose --color always --no-default-features --features no_std
cd ..
- name: Test on Rust ${{ matrix.toolchain }}
if: "! matrix.build-net-tokio"
_ if err.starts_with("Cannot push more than their max accepted HTLCs ") => {},
_ if err.starts_with("Cannot send value that would put us over the max HTLC value in flight our peer will accept ") => {},
_ if err.starts_with("Cannot send value that would put our balance under counterparty-announced channel reserve value") => {},
+ _ if err.starts_with("Cannot send value that would put counterparty balance under holder-announced channel reserve value") => {},
_ if err.starts_with("Cannot send value that would overdraw remaining funds.") => {},
_ if err.starts_with("Cannot send value that would not leave enough to pay for fees.") => {},
_ => panic!("{}", err),
# This is unsafe to use in production because it may result in the counterparty publishing taking our funds.
unsafe_revoked_tx_signing = []
unstable = []
+
no_std = ["hashbrown"]
+std = []
+
+default = ["std"]
[dependencies]
bitcoin = "0.26"
use util::events::EventHandler;
use prelude::*;
-use std::sync::RwLock;
+use sync::RwLock;
use core::ops::Deref;
/// An implementation of [`chain::Watch`] for monitoring channels.
use core::{cmp, mem};
use std::io::Error;
use core::ops::Deref;
-use std::sync::Mutex;
+use sync::Mutex;
/// An update generated by the underlying Channel itself which contains some new information the
/// ChannelMonitor should be made aware of.
}
/// An error enum representing a failure to persist a channel monitor update.
-#[derive(Clone, Debug)]
+#[derive(Clone, Copy, Debug, PartialEq)]
pub enum ChannelMonitorUpdateErr {
/// Used to indicate a temporary failure (eg connection to a watchtower or remote backup of
/// our state failed, but is expected to succeed at some point in the future).
use util::test_utils::{TestLogger, TestBroadcaster, TestFeeEstimator};
use bitcoin::secp256k1::key::{SecretKey,PublicKey};
use bitcoin::secp256k1::Secp256k1;
- use std::sync::{Arc, Mutex};
+ use sync::{Arc, Mutex};
use chain::keysinterface::InMemorySigner;
use prelude::*;
#[cfg(feature = "hashbrown")]
pub use self::hashbrown::{HashMap, HashSet, hash_map};
}
+
+#[cfg(feature = "std")]
+mod sync {
+ pub use ::std::sync::{Arc, Mutex, Condvar, MutexGuard, RwLock, RwLockReadGuard};
+}
+
+#[cfg(not(feature = "std"))]
+mod sync;
use routing::router::get_route;
use util::config::UserConfig;
use util::enforcing_trait_impls::EnforcingSigner;
-use util::events::{Event, MessageSendEvent, MessageSendEventsProvider};
+use util::events::{Event, MessageSendEvent, MessageSendEventsProvider, PaymentPurpose};
use util::errors::APIError;
use util::ser::{ReadableArgs, Writeable};
use util::test_utils::TestBroadcaster;
use util::test_utils;
use prelude::*;
-use std::sync::{Arc, Mutex};
+use sync::{Arc, Mutex};
// If persister_fail is true, we have the persister return a PermanentFailure
// instead of the higher-level ChainMonitor.
if disconnect {
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (true, true), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (true, true), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
}
match persister_fail {
let events_3 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(events_3.len(), 1);
match events_3[0] {
- Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, ref payment_preimage, ref payment_secret, amt, user_payment_id: _ } => {
+ Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, ref purpose, amt } => {
assert_eq!(payment_hash_1, *payment_hash);
- assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
- assert_eq!(payment_secret_1, *payment_secret);
assert_eq!(amt, 1000000);
+ match &purpose {
+ PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, payment_secret, .. } => {
+ assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
+ assert_eq!(payment_secret_1, *payment_secret);
+ },
+ _ => panic!("expected PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment")
+ }
},
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
}
if disconnect {
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
}
// ...and make sure we can force-close a frozen channel
let events_5 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(events_5.len(), 1);
match events_5[0] {
- Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, ref payment_preimage, ref payment_secret, amt, user_payment_id: _ } => {
+ Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, ref purpose, amt } => {
assert_eq!(payment_hash_2, *payment_hash);
- assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
- assert_eq!(payment_secret_2, *payment_secret);
assert_eq!(amt, 1000000);
+ match &purpose {
+ PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, payment_secret, .. } => {
+ assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
+ assert_eq!(payment_secret_2, *payment_secret);
+ },
+ _ => panic!("expected PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment")
+ }
},
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
}
let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
match events[0] {
- Event::PaymentReceived { payment_hash, payment_preimage, payment_secret, amt, user_payment_id: _ } => {
+ Event::PaymentReceived { payment_hash, ref purpose, amt } => {
assert_eq!(payment_hash, our_payment_hash);
- assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
- assert_eq!(our_payment_secret, payment_secret);
assert_eq!(amt, 1000000);
+ match &purpose {
+ PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, payment_secret, .. } => {
+ assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
+ assert_eq!(our_payment_secret, *payment_secret);
+ },
+ _ => panic!("expected PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment")
+ }
},
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
};
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
match events[0] {
- Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, ref payment_preimage, ref payment_secret, amt, user_payment_id: _ } => {
+ Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, ref purpose, amt } => {
assert_eq!(payment_hash_2, *payment_hash);
- assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
- assert_eq!(payment_secret_2, *payment_secret);
assert_eq!(1_000_000, amt);
+ match &purpose {
+ PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, payment_secret, .. } => {
+ assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
+ assert_eq!(payment_secret_2, *payment_secret);
+ },
+ _ => panic!("expected PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment")
+ }
},
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
}
match events[1] {
- Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, ref payment_preimage, ref payment_secret, amt, user_payment_id: _ } => {
+ Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, ref purpose, amt } => {
assert_eq!(payment_hash_3, *payment_hash);
- assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
- assert_eq!(payment_secret_3, *payment_secret);
assert_eq!(1_000_000, amt);
+ match &purpose {
+ PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, payment_secret, .. } => {
+ assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
+ assert_eq!(payment_secret_3, *payment_secret);
+ },
+ _ => panic!("expected PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment")
+ }
},
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
}
// Make sure nodes[1] isn't stupid enough to re-send the FundingLocked on reconnect
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, confirm_a_first), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, confirm_a_first), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
// Pass the first HTLC of the payment along to nodes[3].
let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
- pass_along_path(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[3]], 0, payment_hash.clone(), payment_secret, events.pop().unwrap(), false);
+ pass_along_path(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[3]], 0, payment_hash.clone(), Some(payment_secret), events.pop().unwrap(), false, None);
// And check that, after we successfully update the monitor for chan_2 we can pass the second
// HTLC along to nodes[3] and claim the whole payment back to nodes[0].
nodes[0].node.channel_monitor_updated(&outpoint, latest_update);
let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
- pass_along_path(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3]], 200_000, payment_hash.clone(), payment_secret, events.pop().unwrap(), true);
+ pass_along_path(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3]], 200_000, payment_hash.clone(), Some(payment_secret), events.pop().unwrap(), true, None);
claim_payment_along_route(&nodes[0], &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[3]], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3]]], false, payment_preimage);
}
do_channel_holding_cell_serialize(true, false);
do_channel_holding_cell_serialize(false, true); // last arg doesn't matter
}
+
+#[derive(PartialEq)]
+enum HTLCStatusAtDupClaim {
+ Received,
+ HoldingCell,
+ Cleared,
+}
+fn do_test_reconnect_dup_htlc_claims(htlc_status: HTLCStatusAtDupClaim, second_fails: bool) {
+ // When receiving an update_fulfill_htlc message, we immediately forward the claim backwards
+ // along the payment path before waiting for a full commitment_signed dance. This is great, but
+ // can cause duplicative claims if a node sends an update_fulfill_htlc message, disconnects,
+ // reconnects, and then has to re-send its update_fulfill_htlc message again.
+ // In previous code, we didn't handle the double-claim correctly, spuriously closing the
+ // channel on which the inbound HTLC was received.
+ let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
+ let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
+ let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
+ let mut nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+
+ create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+ let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()).2;
+
+ let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], 100_000);
+
+ let mut as_raa = None;
+ if htlc_status == HTLCStatusAtDupClaim::HoldingCell {
+ // In order to get the HTLC claim into the holding cell at nodes[1], we need nodes[1] to be
+ // awaiting a remote revoke_and_ack from nodes[0].
+ let (_, second_payment_hash, second_payment_secret) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(nodes[1]);
+ let route = get_route(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &nodes[0].net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(),
+ &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 100_000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV, nodes[1].logger).unwrap();
+ nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, second_payment_hash, &Some(second_payment_secret)).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+
+ let send_event = SendEvent::from_event(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().remove(0));
+ nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &send_event.msgs[0]);
+ nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &send_event.commitment_msg);
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+
+ let (bs_raa, bs_cs) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+ nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_raa);
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+ nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_cs);
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+
+ as_raa = Some(get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()));
+ }
+
+ let fulfill_msg = msgs::UpdateFulfillHTLC {
+ channel_id: chan_2,
+ htlc_id: 0,
+ payment_preimage,
+ };
+ if second_fails {
+ assert!(nodes[2].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash));
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[2]);
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
+ get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+ } else {
+ assert!(nodes[2].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage));
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
+ let cs_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+ assert_eq!(cs_updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 1);
+ // Check that the message we're about to deliver matches the one generated:
+ assert_eq!(fulfill_msg, cs_updates.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
+ }
+ nodes[1].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &fulfill_msg);
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+
+ let mut bs_updates = None;
+ if htlc_status != HTLCStatusAtDupClaim::HoldingCell {
+ bs_updates = Some(get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()));
+ assert_eq!(bs_updates.as_ref().unwrap().update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 1);
+ nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_updates.as_ref().unwrap().update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
+ expect_payment_sent!(nodes[0], payment_preimage);
+ if htlc_status == HTLCStatusAtDupClaim::Cleared {
+ commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], &bs_updates.as_ref().unwrap().commitment_signed, false);
+ }
+ } else {
+ assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
+ }
+
+ nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
+ nodes[2].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
+
+ if second_fails {
+ reconnect_nodes(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (1, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
+ } else {
+ reconnect_nodes(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], (false, false), (0, 0), (1, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ }
+
+ if htlc_status == HTLCStatusAtDupClaim::HoldingCell {
+ nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_raa.unwrap());
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_ignore!(nodes[1]); // We finally receive the second payment, but don't claim it
+
+ bs_updates = Some(get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()));
+ assert_eq!(bs_updates.as_ref().unwrap().update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 1);
+ nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_updates.as_ref().unwrap().update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
+ expect_payment_sent!(nodes[0], payment_preimage);
+ }
+ if htlc_status != HTLCStatusAtDupClaim::Cleared {
+ commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], &bs_updates.as_ref().unwrap().commitment_signed, false);
+ }
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_reconnect_dup_htlc_claims() {
+ do_test_reconnect_dup_htlc_claims(HTLCStatusAtDupClaim::Received, false);
+ do_test_reconnect_dup_htlc_claims(HTLCStatusAtDupClaim::HoldingCell, false);
+ do_test_reconnect_dup_htlc_claims(HTLCStatusAtDupClaim::Cleared, false);
+ do_test_reconnect_dup_htlc_claims(HTLCStatusAtDupClaim::Received, true);
+ do_test_reconnect_dup_htlc_claims(HTLCStatusAtDupClaim::HoldingCell, true);
+ do_test_reconnect_dup_htlc_claims(HTLCStatusAtDupClaim::Cleared, true);
+}
use prelude::*;
use core::{cmp,mem,fmt};
use core::ops::Deref;
-#[cfg(any(test, feature = "fuzztarget"))]
-use std::sync::Mutex;
+#[cfg(any(test, feature = "fuzztarget", debug_assertions))]
+use sync::Mutex;
use bitcoin::hashes::hex::ToHex;
use bitcoin::blockdata::opcodes::all::OP_PUSHBYTES_0;
pub cltv_expiry_delta: u16,
}
+/// A return value enum for get_update_fulfill_htlc. See UpdateFulfillCommitFetch variants for
+/// description
+enum UpdateFulfillFetch {
+ NewClaim {
+ monitor_update: ChannelMonitorUpdate,
+ msg: Option<msgs::UpdateFulfillHTLC>,
+ },
+ DuplicateClaim {},
+}
+
+/// The return type of get_update_fulfill_htlc_and_commit.
+pub enum UpdateFulfillCommitFetch {
+ /// Indicates the HTLC fulfill is new, and either generated an update_fulfill message, placed
+ /// it in the holding cell, or re-generated the update_fulfill message after the same claim was
+ /// previously placed in the holding cell (and has since been removed).
+ NewClaim {
+ /// The ChannelMonitorUpdate which places the new payment preimage in the channel monitor
+ monitor_update: ChannelMonitorUpdate,
+ /// The update_fulfill message and commitment_signed message (if the claim was not placed
+ /// in the holding cell).
+ msgs: Option<(msgs::UpdateFulfillHTLC, msgs::CommitmentSigned)>,
+ },
+ /// Indicates the HTLC fulfill is duplicative and already existed either in the holding cell
+ /// or has been forgotten (presumably previously claimed).
+ DuplicateClaim {},
+}
+
// TODO: We should refactor this to be an Inbound/OutboundChannel until initial setup handshaking
// has been completed, and then turn into a Channel to get compiler-time enforcement of things like
// calling channel_id() before we're set up or things like get_outbound_funding_signed on an
#[cfg(debug_assertions)]
/// Max to_local and to_remote outputs in a locally-generated commitment transaction
- holder_max_commitment_tx_output: ::std::sync::Mutex<(u64, u64)>,
+ holder_max_commitment_tx_output: Mutex<(u64, u64)>,
#[cfg(debug_assertions)]
/// Max to_local and to_remote outputs in a remote-generated commitment transaction
- counterparty_max_commitment_tx_output: ::std::sync::Mutex<(u64, u64)>,
+ counterparty_max_commitment_tx_output: Mutex<(u64, u64)>,
last_sent_closing_fee: Option<(u32, u64, Signature)>, // (feerate, fee, holder_sig)
///
/// See-also <https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/issues/4006>
pub workaround_lnd_bug_4006: Option<msgs::FundingLocked>,
+
+ #[cfg(any(test, feature = "fuzztarget"))]
+ // When we receive an HTLC fulfill on an outbound path, we may immediately fulfill the
+ // corresponding HTLC on the inbound path. If, then, the outbound path channel is
+ // disconnected and reconnected (before we've exchange commitment_signed and revoke_and_ack
+ // messages), they may re-broadcast their update_fulfill_htlc, causing a duplicate claim. This
+ // is fine, but as a sanity check in our failure to generate the second claim, we check here
+ // that the original was a claim, and that we aren't now trying to fulfill a failed HTLC.
+ historical_inbound_htlc_fulfills: HashSet<u64>,
}
#[cfg(any(test, feature = "fuzztarget"))]
monitor_pending_failures: Vec::new(),
#[cfg(debug_assertions)]
- holder_max_commitment_tx_output: ::std::sync::Mutex::new((channel_value_satoshis * 1000 - push_msat, push_msat)),
+ holder_max_commitment_tx_output: Mutex::new((channel_value_satoshis * 1000 - push_msat, push_msat)),
#[cfg(debug_assertions)]
- counterparty_max_commitment_tx_output: ::std::sync::Mutex::new((channel_value_satoshis * 1000 - push_msat, push_msat)),
+ counterparty_max_commitment_tx_output: Mutex::new((channel_value_satoshis * 1000 - push_msat, push_msat)),
last_sent_closing_fee: None,
next_remote_commitment_tx_fee_info_cached: Mutex::new(None),
workaround_lnd_bug_4006: None,
+
+ #[cfg(any(test, feature = "fuzztarget"))]
+ historical_inbound_htlc_fulfills: HashSet::new(),
})
}
monitor_pending_failures: Vec::new(),
#[cfg(debug_assertions)]
- holder_max_commitment_tx_output: ::std::sync::Mutex::new((msg.push_msat, msg.funding_satoshis * 1000 - msg.push_msat)),
+ holder_max_commitment_tx_output: Mutex::new((msg.push_msat, msg.funding_satoshis * 1000 - msg.push_msat)),
#[cfg(debug_assertions)]
- counterparty_max_commitment_tx_output: ::std::sync::Mutex::new((msg.push_msat, msg.funding_satoshis * 1000 - msg.push_msat)),
+ counterparty_max_commitment_tx_output: Mutex::new((msg.push_msat, msg.funding_satoshis * 1000 - msg.push_msat)),
last_sent_closing_fee: None,
next_remote_commitment_tx_fee_info_cached: Mutex::new(None),
workaround_lnd_bug_4006: None,
+
+ #[cfg(any(test, feature = "fuzztarget"))]
+ historical_inbound_htlc_fulfills: HashSet::new(),
};
Ok(chan)
make_funding_redeemscript(&self.get_holder_pubkeys().funding_pubkey, self.counterparty_funding_pubkey())
}
- /// Per HTLC, only one get_update_fail_htlc or get_update_fulfill_htlc call may be made.
- /// In such cases we debug_assert!(false) and return a ChannelError::Ignore. Thus, will always
- /// return Ok(_) if debug assertions are turned on or preconditions are met.
- ///
- /// Note that it is still possible to hit these assertions in case we find a preimage on-chain
- /// but then have a reorg which settles on an HTLC-failure on chain.
- fn get_update_fulfill_htlc<L: Deref>(&mut self, htlc_id_arg: u64, payment_preimage_arg: PaymentPreimage, logger: &L) -> Result<(Option<msgs::UpdateFulfillHTLC>, Option<ChannelMonitorUpdate>), ChannelError> where L::Target: Logger {
+ fn get_update_fulfill_htlc<L: Deref>(&mut self, htlc_id_arg: u64, payment_preimage_arg: PaymentPreimage, logger: &L) -> UpdateFulfillFetch where L::Target: Logger {
// Either ChannelFunded got set (which means it won't be unset) or there is no way any
// caller thought we could have something claimed (cause we wouldn't have accepted in an
// incoming HTLC anyway). If we got to ShutdownComplete, callers aren't allowed to call us,
if let &InboundHTLCRemovalReason::Fulfill(_) = reason {
} else {
log_warn!(logger, "Have preimage and want to fulfill HTLC with payment hash {} we already failed against channel {}", log_bytes!(htlc.payment_hash.0), log_bytes!(self.channel_id()));
+ debug_assert!(false, "Tried to fulfill an HTLC that was already failed");
}
- debug_assert!(false, "Tried to fulfill an HTLC that was already fail/fulfilled");
- return Ok((None, None));
+ return UpdateFulfillFetch::DuplicateClaim {};
},
_ => {
debug_assert!(false, "Have an inbound HTLC we tried to claim before it was fully committed to");
}
}
if pending_idx == core::usize::MAX {
- return Err(ChannelError::Ignore("Unable to find a pending HTLC which matched the given HTLC ID".to_owned()));
+ #[cfg(any(test, feature = "fuzztarget"))]
+ // If we failed to find an HTLC to fulfill, make sure it was previously fulfilled and
+ // this is simply a duplicate claim, not previously failed and we lost funds.
+ debug_assert!(self.historical_inbound_htlc_fulfills.contains(&htlc_id_arg));
+ return UpdateFulfillFetch::DuplicateClaim {};
}
// Now update local state:
if htlc_id_arg == htlc_id {
// Make sure we don't leave latest_monitor_update_id incremented here:
self.latest_monitor_update_id -= 1;
- debug_assert!(false, "Tried to fulfill an HTLC that was already fulfilled");
- return Ok((None, None));
+ #[cfg(any(test, feature = "fuzztarget"))]
+ debug_assert!(self.historical_inbound_htlc_fulfills.contains(&htlc_id_arg));
+ return UpdateFulfillFetch::DuplicateClaim {};
}
},
&HTLCUpdateAwaitingACK::FailHTLC { htlc_id, .. } => {
// TODO: We may actually be able to switch to a fulfill here, though its
// rare enough it may not be worth the complexity burden.
debug_assert!(false, "Tried to fulfill an HTLC that was already failed");
- return Ok((None, Some(monitor_update)));
+ return UpdateFulfillFetch::NewClaim { monitor_update, msg: None };
}
},
_ => {}
self.holding_cell_htlc_updates.push(HTLCUpdateAwaitingACK::ClaimHTLC {
payment_preimage: payment_preimage_arg, htlc_id: htlc_id_arg,
});
- return Ok((None, Some(monitor_update)));
+ #[cfg(any(test, feature = "fuzztarget"))]
+ self.historical_inbound_htlc_fulfills.insert(htlc_id_arg);
+ return UpdateFulfillFetch::NewClaim { monitor_update, msg: None };
}
+ #[cfg(any(test, feature = "fuzztarget"))]
+ self.historical_inbound_htlc_fulfills.insert(htlc_id_arg);
{
let htlc = &mut self.pending_inbound_htlcs[pending_idx];
if let InboundHTLCState::Committed = htlc.state {
} else {
debug_assert!(false, "Have an inbound HTLC we tried to claim before it was fully committed to");
- return Ok((None, Some(monitor_update)));
+ return UpdateFulfillFetch::NewClaim { monitor_update, msg: None };
}
log_trace!(logger, "Upgrading HTLC {} to LocalRemoved with a Fulfill in channel {}!", log_bytes!(htlc.payment_hash.0), log_bytes!(self.channel_id));
htlc.state = InboundHTLCState::LocalRemoved(InboundHTLCRemovalReason::Fulfill(payment_preimage_arg.clone()));
}
- Ok((Some(msgs::UpdateFulfillHTLC {
- channel_id: self.channel_id(),
- htlc_id: htlc_id_arg,
- payment_preimage: payment_preimage_arg,
- }), Some(monitor_update)))
+ UpdateFulfillFetch::NewClaim {
+ monitor_update,
+ msg: Some(msgs::UpdateFulfillHTLC {
+ channel_id: self.channel_id(),
+ htlc_id: htlc_id_arg,
+ payment_preimage: payment_preimage_arg,
+ }),
+ }
}
- pub fn get_update_fulfill_htlc_and_commit<L: Deref>(&mut self, htlc_id: u64, payment_preimage: PaymentPreimage, logger: &L) -> Result<(Option<(msgs::UpdateFulfillHTLC, msgs::CommitmentSigned)>, Option<ChannelMonitorUpdate>), ChannelError> where L::Target: Logger {
- match self.get_update_fulfill_htlc(htlc_id, payment_preimage, logger)? {
- (Some(update_fulfill_htlc), Some(mut monitor_update)) => {
- let (commitment, mut additional_update) = self.send_commitment_no_status_check(logger)?;
+ pub fn get_update_fulfill_htlc_and_commit<L: Deref>(&mut self, htlc_id: u64, payment_preimage: PaymentPreimage, logger: &L) -> Result<UpdateFulfillCommitFetch, (ChannelError, ChannelMonitorUpdate)> where L::Target: Logger {
+ match self.get_update_fulfill_htlc(htlc_id, payment_preimage, logger) {
+ UpdateFulfillFetch::NewClaim { mut monitor_update, msg: Some(update_fulfill_htlc) } => {
+ let (commitment, mut additional_update) = match self.send_commitment_no_status_check(logger) {
+ Err(e) => return Err((e, monitor_update)),
+ Ok(res) => res
+ };
// send_commitment_no_status_check may bump latest_monitor_id but we want them to be
// strictly increasing by one, so decrement it here.
self.latest_monitor_update_id = monitor_update.update_id;
monitor_update.updates.append(&mut additional_update.updates);
- Ok((Some((update_fulfill_htlc, commitment)), Some(monitor_update)))
+ Ok(UpdateFulfillCommitFetch::NewClaim { monitor_update, msgs: Some((update_fulfill_htlc, commitment)) })
},
- (Some(update_fulfill_htlc), None) => {
- let (commitment, monitor_update) = self.send_commitment_no_status_check(logger)?;
- Ok((Some((update_fulfill_htlc, commitment)), Some(monitor_update)))
- },
- (None, Some(monitor_update)) => Ok((None, Some(monitor_update))),
- (None, None) => Ok((None, None))
+ UpdateFulfillFetch::NewClaim { monitor_update, msg: None } => Ok(UpdateFulfillCommitFetch::NewClaim { monitor_update, msgs: None }),
+ UpdateFulfillFetch::DuplicateClaim {} => Ok(UpdateFulfillCommitFetch::DuplicateClaim {}),
}
}
- /// Per HTLC, only one get_update_fail_htlc or get_update_fulfill_htlc call may be made.
- /// In such cases we debug_assert!(false) and return a ChannelError::Ignore. Thus, will always
- /// return Ok(_) if debug assertions are turned on or preconditions are met.
- ///
- /// Note that it is still possible to hit these assertions in case we find a preimage on-chain
- /// but then have a reorg which settles on an HTLC-failure on chain.
+ /// We can only have one resolution per HTLC. In some cases around reconnect, we may fulfill
+ /// an HTLC more than once or fulfill once and then attempt to fail after reconnect. We cannot,
+ /// however, fail more than once as we wait for an upstream failure to be irrevocably committed
+ /// before we fail backwards.
+ /// If we do fail twice, we debug_assert!(false) and return Ok(None). Thus, will always return
+ /// Ok(_) if debug assertions are turned on or preconditions are met.
pub fn get_update_fail_htlc<L: Deref>(&mut self, htlc_id_arg: u64, err_packet: msgs::OnionErrorPacket, logger: &L) -> Result<Option<msgs::UpdateFailHTLC>, ChannelError> where L::Target: Logger {
if (self.channel_state & (ChannelState::ChannelFunded as u32)) != (ChannelState::ChannelFunded as u32) {
panic!("Was asked to fail an HTLC when channel was not in an operational state");
if htlc.htlc_id == htlc_id_arg {
match htlc.state {
InboundHTLCState::Committed => {},
- InboundHTLCState::LocalRemoved(_) => {
- debug_assert!(false, "Tried to fail an HTLC that was already fail/fulfilled");
+ InboundHTLCState::LocalRemoved(ref reason) => {
+ if let &InboundHTLCRemovalReason::Fulfill(_) = reason {
+ } else {
+ debug_assert!(false, "Tried to fail an HTLC that was already failed");
+ }
return Ok(None);
},
_ => {
}
}
if pending_idx == core::usize::MAX {
- return Err(ChannelError::Ignore("Unable to find a pending HTLC which matched the given HTLC ID".to_owned()));
+ #[cfg(any(test, feature = "fuzztarget"))]
+ // If we failed to find an HTLC to fail, make sure it was previously fulfilled and this
+ // is simply a duplicate fail, not previously failed and we failed-back too early.
+ debug_assert!(self.historical_inbound_htlc_fulfills.contains(&htlc_id_arg));
+ return Ok(None);
}
// Now update local state:
match pending_update {
&HTLCUpdateAwaitingACK::ClaimHTLC { htlc_id, .. } => {
if htlc_id_arg == htlc_id {
- debug_assert!(false, "Tried to fail an HTLC that was already fulfilled");
- return Err(ChannelError::Ignore("Unable to find a pending HTLC which matched the given HTLC ID".to_owned()));
+ #[cfg(any(test, feature = "fuzztarget"))]
+ debug_assert!(self.historical_inbound_htlc_fulfills.contains(&htlc_id_arg));
+ return Ok(None);
}
},
&HTLCUpdateAwaitingACK::FailHTLC { htlc_id, .. } => {
}
},
&HTLCUpdateAwaitingACK::ClaimHTLC { ref payment_preimage, htlc_id, .. } => {
- match self.get_update_fulfill_htlc(htlc_id, *payment_preimage, logger) {
- Ok((update_fulfill_msg_option, additional_monitor_update_opt)) => {
- update_fulfill_htlcs.push(update_fulfill_msg_option.unwrap());
- if let Some(mut additional_monitor_update) = additional_monitor_update_opt {
- monitor_update.updates.append(&mut additional_monitor_update.updates);
- }
- },
- Err(e) => {
- if let ChannelError::Ignore(_) = e {}
- else {
- panic!("Got a non-IgnoreError action trying to fulfill holding cell HTLC");
- }
- }
- }
+ // If an HTLC claim was previously added to the holding cell (via
+ // `get_update_fulfill_htlc`, then generating the claim message itself must
+ // not fail - any in between attempts to claim the HTLC will have resulted
+ // in it hitting the holding cell again and we cannot change the state of a
+ // holding cell HTLC from fulfill to anything else.
+ let (update_fulfill_msg_option, mut additional_monitor_update) =
+ if let UpdateFulfillFetch::NewClaim { msg, monitor_update } = self.get_update_fulfill_htlc(htlc_id, *payment_preimage, logger) {
+ (msg, monitor_update)
+ } else { unreachable!() };
+ update_fulfill_htlcs.push(update_fulfill_msg_option.unwrap());
+ monitor_update.updates.append(&mut additional_monitor_update.updates);
},
&HTLCUpdateAwaitingACK::FailHTLC { htlc_id, ref err_packet } => {
match self.get_update_fail_htlc(htlc_id, err_packet.clone(), logger) {
- Ok(update_fail_msg_option) => update_fail_htlcs.push(update_fail_msg_option.unwrap()),
+ Ok(update_fail_msg_option) => {
+ // If an HTLC failure was previously added to the holding cell (via
+ // `get_update_fail_htlc`) then generating the fail message itself
+ // must not fail - we should never end up in a state where we
+ // double-fail an HTLC or fail-then-claim an HTLC as it indicates
+ // we didn't wait for a full revocation before failing.
+ update_fail_htlcs.push(update_fail_msg_option.unwrap())
+ },
Err(e) => {
if let ChannelError::Ignore(_) = e {}
else {
if !self.is_outbound() {
// Check that we won't violate the remote channel reserve by adding this HTLC.
let counterparty_balance_msat = self.channel_value_satoshis * 1000 - self.value_to_self_msat;
- let holder_selected_chan_reserve_msat = Channel::<Signer>::get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(self.channel_value_satoshis);
+ let holder_selected_chan_reserve_msat = Channel::<Signer>::get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(self.channel_value_satoshis) * 1000;
let htlc_candidate = HTLCCandidate::new(amount_msat, HTLCInitiator::LocalOffered);
let counterparty_commit_tx_fee_msat = self.next_remote_commit_tx_fee_msat(htlc_candidate, None);
if counterparty_balance_msat < holder_selected_chan_reserve_msat + counterparty_commit_tx_fee_msat {
self.channel_update_status.write(writer)?;
+ #[cfg(any(test, feature = "fuzztarget"))]
+ (self.historical_inbound_htlc_fulfills.len() as u64).write(writer)?;
+ #[cfg(any(test, feature = "fuzztarget"))]
+ for htlc in self.historical_inbound_htlc_fulfills.iter() {
+ htlc.write(writer)?;
+ }
+
write_tlv_fields!(writer, {
(0, self.announcement_sigs, option),
// minimum_depth and counterparty_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis used to have a
let channel_update_status = Readable::read(reader)?;
+ #[cfg(any(test, feature = "fuzztarget"))]
+ let mut historical_inbound_htlc_fulfills = HashSet::new();
+ #[cfg(any(test, feature = "fuzztarget"))]
+ {
+ let htlc_fulfills_len: u64 = Readable::read(reader)?;
+ for _ in 0..htlc_fulfills_len {
+ assert!(historical_inbound_htlc_fulfills.insert(Readable::read(reader)?));
+ }
+ }
+
let mut announcement_sigs = None;
read_tlv_fields!(reader, {
(0, announcement_sigs, option),
feerate_per_kw,
#[cfg(debug_assertions)]
- holder_max_commitment_tx_output: ::std::sync::Mutex::new((0, 0)),
+ holder_max_commitment_tx_output: Mutex::new((0, 0)),
#[cfg(debug_assertions)]
- counterparty_max_commitment_tx_output: ::std::sync::Mutex::new((0, 0)),
+ counterparty_max_commitment_tx_output: Mutex::new((0, 0)),
last_sent_closing_fee,
next_remote_commitment_tx_fee_info_cached: Mutex::new(None),
workaround_lnd_bug_4006: None,
+
+ #[cfg(any(test, feature = "fuzztarget"))]
+ historical_inbound_htlc_fulfills,
})
}
}
use bitcoin::hashes::sha256::Hash as Sha256;
use bitcoin::hashes::Hash;
use bitcoin::hash_types::{Txid, WPubkeyHash};
- use std::sync::Arc;
+ use sync::Arc;
use prelude::*;
struct TestFeeEstimator {
// construct one themselves.
use ln::{PaymentHash, PaymentPreimage, PaymentSecret};
pub use ln::channel::CounterpartyForwardingInfo;
-use ln::channel::{Channel, ChannelError, ChannelUpdateStatus};
+use ln::channel::{Channel, ChannelError, ChannelUpdateStatus, UpdateFulfillCommitFetch};
use ln::features::{InitFeatures, NodeFeatures};
use routing::router::{Route, RouteHop};
use ln::msgs;
use util::{byte_utils, events};
use util::ser::{Readable, ReadableArgs, MaybeReadable, Writeable, Writer};
use util::chacha20::{ChaCha20, ChaChaReader};
-use util::logger::Logger;
+use util::logger::{Logger, Level};
use util::errors::APIError;
use prelude::*;
use core::{cmp, mem};
use core::cell::RefCell;
use std::io::{Cursor, Read};
-use std::sync::{Arc, Condvar, Mutex, MutexGuard, RwLock, RwLockReadGuard};
+use sync::{Arc, Condvar, Mutex, MutexGuard, RwLock, RwLockReadGuard};
use core::sync::atomic::{AtomicUsize, Ordering};
use core::time::Duration;
#[cfg(any(test, feature = "allow_wallclock_use"))]
payment_data: msgs::FinalOnionHopData,
incoming_cltv_expiry: u32, // Used to track when we should expire pending HTLCs that go unclaimed
},
+ ReceiveKeysend {
+ payment_preimage: PaymentPreimage,
+ incoming_cltv_expiry: u32, // Used to track when we should expire pending HTLCs that go unclaimed
+ },
}
#[derive(Clone)] // See Channel::revoke_and_ack for why, tl;dr: Rust bug
outpoint: OutPoint,
}
-struct ClaimableHTLC {
- prev_hop: HTLCPreviousHopData,
- value: u64,
+enum OnionPayload {
/// Contains a total_msat (which may differ from value if this is a Multi-Path Payment) and a
/// payment_secret which prevents path-probing attacks and can associate different HTLCs which
/// are part of the same payment.
- payment_data: msgs::FinalOnionHopData,
+ Invoice(msgs::FinalOnionHopData),
+ /// Contains the payer-provided preimage.
+ Spontaneous(PaymentPreimage),
+}
+
+struct ClaimableHTLC {
+ prev_hop: HTLCPreviousHopData,
cltv_expiry: u32,
+ value: u64,
+ onion_payload: OnionPayload,
}
/// Tracks the inbound corresponding to an outbound HTLC
};
let pending_forward_info = if next_hop_hmac == [0; 32] {
- #[cfg(test)]
- {
- // In tests, make sure that the initial onion pcket data is, at least, non-0.
- // We could do some fancy randomness test here, but, ehh, whatever.
- // This checks for the issue where you can calculate the path length given the
- // onion data as all the path entries that the originator sent will be here
- // as-is (and were originally 0s).
- // Of course reverse path calculation is still pretty easy given naive routing
- // algorithms, but this fixes the most-obvious case.
- let mut next_bytes = [0; 32];
- chacha_stream.read_exact(&mut next_bytes).unwrap();
- assert_ne!(next_bytes[..], [0; 32][..]);
- chacha_stream.read_exact(&mut next_bytes).unwrap();
- assert_ne!(next_bytes[..], [0; 32][..]);
- }
-
- // OUR PAYMENT!
- // final_expiry_too_soon
- // We have to have some headroom to broadcast on chain if we have the preimage, so make sure we have at least
- // HTLC_FAIL_BACK_BUFFER blocks to go.
- // Also, ensure that, in the case of an unknown payment hash, our payment logic has enough time to fail the HTLC backward
- // before our onchain logic triggers a channel closure (see HTLC_FAIL_BACK_BUFFER rational).
- if (msg.cltv_expiry as u64) <= self.best_block.read().unwrap().height() as u64 + HTLC_FAIL_BACK_BUFFER as u64 + 1 {
- return_err!("The final CLTV expiry is too soon to handle", 17, &[0;0]);
- }
- // final_incorrect_htlc_amount
- if next_hop_data.amt_to_forward > msg.amount_msat {
- return_err!("Upstream node sent less than we were supposed to receive in payment", 19, &byte_utils::be64_to_array(msg.amount_msat));
- }
- // final_incorrect_cltv_expiry
- if next_hop_data.outgoing_cltv_value != msg.cltv_expiry {
- return_err!("Upstream node set CLTV to the wrong value", 18, &byte_utils::be32_to_array(msg.cltv_expiry));
- }
-
- let payment_data = match next_hop_data.format {
- msgs::OnionHopDataFormat::Legacy { .. } => None,
- msgs::OnionHopDataFormat::NonFinalNode { .. } => return_err!("Got non final data with an HMAC of 0", 0x4000 | 22, &[0;0]),
- msgs::OnionHopDataFormat::FinalNode { payment_data } => payment_data,
- };
+ #[cfg(test)]
+ {
+ // In tests, make sure that the initial onion pcket data is, at least, non-0.
+ // We could do some fancy randomness test here, but, ehh, whatever.
+ // This checks for the issue where you can calculate the path length given the
+ // onion data as all the path entries that the originator sent will be here
+ // as-is (and were originally 0s).
+ // Of course reverse path calculation is still pretty easy given naive routing
+ // algorithms, but this fixes the most-obvious case.
+ let mut next_bytes = [0; 32];
+ chacha_stream.read_exact(&mut next_bytes).unwrap();
+ assert_ne!(next_bytes[..], [0; 32][..]);
+ chacha_stream.read_exact(&mut next_bytes).unwrap();
+ assert_ne!(next_bytes[..], [0; 32][..]);
+ }
- if payment_data.is_none() {
- return_err!("We require payment_secrets", 0x4000|0x2000|3, &[0;0]);
- }
+ // OUR PAYMENT!
+ // final_expiry_too_soon
+ // We have to have some headroom to broadcast on chain if we have the preimage, so make sure
+ // we have at least HTLC_FAIL_BACK_BUFFER blocks to go.
+ // Also, ensure that, in the case of an unknown preimage for the received payment hash, our
+ // payment logic has enough time to fail the HTLC backward before our onchain logic triggers a
+ // channel closure (see HTLC_FAIL_BACK_BUFFER rationale).
+ if (msg.cltv_expiry as u64) <= self.best_block.read().unwrap().height() as u64 + HTLC_FAIL_BACK_BUFFER as u64 + 1 {
+ return_err!("The final CLTV expiry is too soon to handle", 17, &[0;0]);
+ }
+ // final_incorrect_htlc_amount
+ if next_hop_data.amt_to_forward > msg.amount_msat {
+ return_err!("Upstream node sent less than we were supposed to receive in payment", 19, &byte_utils::be64_to_array(msg.amount_msat));
+ }
+ // final_incorrect_cltv_expiry
+ if next_hop_data.outgoing_cltv_value != msg.cltv_expiry {
+ return_err!("Upstream node set CLTV to the wrong value", 18, &byte_utils::be32_to_array(msg.cltv_expiry));
+ }
- // Note that we could obviously respond immediately with an update_fulfill_htlc
- // message, however that would leak that we are the recipient of this payment, so
- // instead we stay symmetric with the forwarding case, only responding (after a
- // delay) once they've send us a commitment_signed!
+ let routing = match next_hop_data.format {
+ msgs::OnionHopDataFormat::Legacy { .. } => return_err!("We require payment_secrets", 0x4000|0x2000|3, &[0;0]),
+ msgs::OnionHopDataFormat::NonFinalNode { .. } => return_err!("Got non final data with an HMAC of 0", 0x4000 | 22, &[0;0]),
+ msgs::OnionHopDataFormat::FinalNode { payment_data, keysend_preimage } => {
+ if payment_data.is_some() && keysend_preimage.is_some() {
+ return_err!("We don't support MPP keysend payments", 0x4000|22, &[0;0]);
+ } else if let Some(data) = payment_data {
+ PendingHTLCRouting::Receive {
+ payment_data: data,
+ incoming_cltv_expiry: msg.cltv_expiry,
+ }
+ } else if let Some(payment_preimage) = keysend_preimage {
+ // We need to check that the sender knows the keysend preimage before processing this
+ // payment further. Otherwise, an intermediary routing hop forwarding non-keysend-HTLC X
+ // could discover the final destination of X, by probing the adjacent nodes on the route
+ // with a keysend payment of identical payment hash to X and observing the processing
+ // time discrepancies due to a hash collision with X.
+ let hashed_preimage = PaymentHash(Sha256::hash(&payment_preimage.0).into_inner());
+ if hashed_preimage != msg.payment_hash {
+ return_err!("Payment preimage didn't match payment hash", 0x4000|22, &[0;0]);
+ }
- PendingHTLCStatus::Forward(PendingHTLCInfo {
- routing: PendingHTLCRouting::Receive {
- payment_data: payment_data.unwrap(),
- incoming_cltv_expiry: msg.cltv_expiry,
- },
- payment_hash: msg.payment_hash.clone(),
- incoming_shared_secret: shared_secret,
- amt_to_forward: next_hop_data.amt_to_forward,
- outgoing_cltv_value: next_hop_data.outgoing_cltv_value,
- })
- } else {
- let mut new_packet_data = [0; 20*65];
- let read_pos = chacha_stream.read(&mut new_packet_data).unwrap();
- #[cfg(debug_assertions)]
- {
- // Check two things:
- // a) that the behavior of our stream here will return Ok(0) even if the TLV
- // read above emptied out our buffer and the unwrap() wont needlessly panic
- // b) that we didn't somehow magically end up with extra data.
- let mut t = [0; 1];
- debug_assert!(chacha_stream.read(&mut t).unwrap() == 0);
- }
- // Once we've emptied the set of bytes our peer gave us, encrypt 0 bytes until we
- // fill the onion hop data we'll forward to our next-hop peer.
- chacha_stream.chacha.process_in_place(&mut new_packet_data[read_pos..]);
+ PendingHTLCRouting::ReceiveKeysend {
+ payment_preimage,
+ incoming_cltv_expiry: msg.cltv_expiry,
+ }
+ } else {
+ return_err!("We require payment_secrets", 0x4000|0x2000|3, &[0;0]);
+ }
+ },
+ };
- let mut new_pubkey = msg.onion_routing_packet.public_key.unwrap();
+ // Note that we could obviously respond immediately with an update_fulfill_htlc
+ // message, however that would leak that we are the recipient of this payment, so
+ // instead we stay symmetric with the forwarding case, only responding (after a
+ // delay) once they've send us a commitment_signed!
+
+ PendingHTLCStatus::Forward(PendingHTLCInfo {
+ routing,
+ payment_hash: msg.payment_hash.clone(),
+ incoming_shared_secret: shared_secret,
+ amt_to_forward: next_hop_data.amt_to_forward,
+ outgoing_cltv_value: next_hop_data.outgoing_cltv_value,
+ })
+ } else {
+ let mut new_packet_data = [0; 20*65];
+ let read_pos = chacha_stream.read(&mut new_packet_data).unwrap();
+ #[cfg(debug_assertions)]
+ {
+ // Check two things:
+ // a) that the behavior of our stream here will return Ok(0) even if the TLV
+ // read above emptied out our buffer and the unwrap() wont needlessly panic
+ // b) that we didn't somehow magically end up with extra data.
+ let mut t = [0; 1];
+ debug_assert!(chacha_stream.read(&mut t).unwrap() == 0);
+ }
+ // Once we've emptied the set of bytes our peer gave us, encrypt 0 bytes until we
+ // fill the onion hop data we'll forward to our next-hop peer.
+ chacha_stream.chacha.process_in_place(&mut new_packet_data[read_pos..]);
- let blinding_factor = {
- let mut sha = Sha256::engine();
- sha.input(&new_pubkey.serialize()[..]);
- sha.input(&shared_secret);
- Sha256::from_engine(sha).into_inner()
- };
+ let mut new_pubkey = msg.onion_routing_packet.public_key.unwrap();
- let public_key = if let Err(e) = new_pubkey.mul_assign(&self.secp_ctx, &blinding_factor[..]) {
- Err(e)
- } else { Ok(new_pubkey) };
+ let blinding_factor = {
+ let mut sha = Sha256::engine();
+ sha.input(&new_pubkey.serialize()[..]);
+ sha.input(&shared_secret);
+ Sha256::from_engine(sha).into_inner()
+ };
- let outgoing_packet = msgs::OnionPacket {
- version: 0,
- public_key,
- hop_data: new_packet_data,
- hmac: next_hop_hmac.clone(),
- };
+ let public_key = if let Err(e) = new_pubkey.mul_assign(&self.secp_ctx, &blinding_factor[..]) {
+ Err(e)
+ } else { Ok(new_pubkey) };
- let short_channel_id = match next_hop_data.format {
- msgs::OnionHopDataFormat::Legacy { short_channel_id } => short_channel_id,
- msgs::OnionHopDataFormat::NonFinalNode { short_channel_id } => short_channel_id,
- msgs::OnionHopDataFormat::FinalNode { .. } => {
- return_err!("Final Node OnionHopData provided for us as an intermediary node", 0x4000 | 22, &[0;0]);
- },
- };
+ let outgoing_packet = msgs::OnionPacket {
+ version: 0,
+ public_key,
+ hop_data: new_packet_data,
+ hmac: next_hop_hmac.clone(),
+ };
- PendingHTLCStatus::Forward(PendingHTLCInfo {
- routing: PendingHTLCRouting::Forward {
- onion_packet: outgoing_packet,
- short_channel_id,
- },
- payment_hash: msg.payment_hash.clone(),
- incoming_shared_secret: shared_secret,
- amt_to_forward: next_hop_data.amt_to_forward,
- outgoing_cltv_value: next_hop_data.outgoing_cltv_value,
- })
+ let short_channel_id = match next_hop_data.format {
+ msgs::OnionHopDataFormat::Legacy { short_channel_id } => short_channel_id,
+ msgs::OnionHopDataFormat::NonFinalNode { short_channel_id } => short_channel_id,
+ msgs::OnionHopDataFormat::FinalNode { .. } => {
+ return_err!("Final Node OnionHopData provided for us as an intermediary node", 0x4000 | 22, &[0;0]);
+ },
};
+ PendingHTLCStatus::Forward(PendingHTLCInfo {
+ routing: PendingHTLCRouting::Forward {
+ onion_packet: outgoing_packet,
+ short_channel_id,
+ },
+ payment_hash: msg.payment_hash.clone(),
+ incoming_shared_secret: shared_secret,
+ amt_to_forward: next_hop_data.amt_to_forward,
+ outgoing_cltv_value: next_hop_data.outgoing_cltv_value,
+ })
+ };
+
channel_state = Some(self.channel_state.lock().unwrap());
if let &PendingHTLCStatus::Forward(PendingHTLCInfo { ref routing, ref amt_to_forward, ref outgoing_cltv_value, .. }) = &pending_forward_info {
// If short_channel_id is 0 here, we'll reject the HTLC as there cannot be a channel
}
// Only public for testing, this should otherwise never be called direcly
- pub(crate) fn send_payment_along_path(&self, path: &Vec<RouteHop>, payment_hash: &PaymentHash, payment_secret: &Option<PaymentSecret>, total_value: u64, cur_height: u32) -> Result<(), APIError> {
+ pub(crate) fn send_payment_along_path(&self, path: &Vec<RouteHop>, payment_hash: &PaymentHash, payment_secret: &Option<PaymentSecret>, total_value: u64, cur_height: u32, keysend_preimage: &Option<PaymentPreimage>) -> Result<(), APIError> {
log_trace!(self.logger, "Attempting to send payment for path with next hop {}", path.first().unwrap().short_channel_id);
let prng_seed = self.keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
let session_priv_bytes = self.keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
let onion_keys = onion_utils::construct_onion_keys(&self.secp_ctx, &path, &session_priv)
.map_err(|_| APIError::RouteError{err: "Pubkey along hop was maliciously selected"})?;
- let (onion_payloads, htlc_msat, htlc_cltv) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(path, total_value, payment_secret, cur_height)?;
+ let (onion_payloads, htlc_msat, htlc_cltv) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(path, total_value, payment_secret, cur_height, keysend_preimage)?;
if onion_utils::route_size_insane(&onion_payloads) {
return Err(APIError::RouteError{err: "Route size too large considering onion data"});
}
/// bit set (either as required or as available). If multiple paths are present in the Route,
/// we assume the invoice had the basic_mpp feature set.
pub fn send_payment(&self, route: &Route, payment_hash: PaymentHash, payment_secret: &Option<PaymentSecret>) -> Result<(), PaymentSendFailure> {
+ self.send_payment_internal(route, payment_hash, payment_secret, None)
+ }
+
+ fn send_payment_internal(&self, route: &Route, payment_hash: PaymentHash, payment_secret: &Option<PaymentSecret>, keysend_preimage: Option<PaymentPreimage>) -> Result<(), PaymentSendFailure> {
if route.paths.len() < 1 {
return Err(PaymentSendFailure::ParameterError(APIError::RouteError{err: "There must be at least one path to send over"}));
}
let cur_height = self.best_block.read().unwrap().height() + 1;
let mut results = Vec::new();
for path in route.paths.iter() {
- results.push(self.send_payment_along_path(&path, &payment_hash, payment_secret, total_value, cur_height));
+ results.push(self.send_payment_along_path(&path, &payment_hash, payment_secret, total_value, cur_height, &keysend_preimage));
}
let mut has_ok = false;
let mut has_err = false;
}
}
+ /// Send a spontaneous payment, which is a payment that does not require the recipient to have
+ /// generated an invoice. Optionally, you may specify the preimage. If you do choose to specify
+ /// the preimage, it must be a cryptographically secure random value that no intermediate node
+ /// would be able to guess -- otherwise, an intermediate node may claim the payment and it will
+ /// never reach the recipient.
+ ///
+ /// Similar to regular payments, you MUST NOT reuse a `payment_preimage` value. See
+ /// [`send_payment`] for more information about the risks of duplicate preimage usage.
+ ///
+ /// [`send_payment`]: Self::send_payment
+ pub fn send_spontaneous_payment(&self, route: &Route, payment_preimage: Option<PaymentPreimage>) -> Result<PaymentHash, PaymentSendFailure> {
+ let preimage = match payment_preimage {
+ Some(p) => p,
+ None => PaymentPreimage(self.keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes()),
+ };
+ let payment_hash = PaymentHash(Sha256::hash(&preimage.0).into_inner());
+ match self.send_payment_internal(route, payment_hash, &None, Some(preimage)) {
+ Ok(()) => Ok(payment_hash),
+ Err(e) => Err(e)
+ }
+ }
+
/// Handles the generation of a funding transaction, optionally (for tests) with a function
/// which checks the correctness of the funding transaction given the associated channel.
fn funding_transaction_generated_intern<FundingOutput: Fn(&Channel<Signer>, &Transaction) -> Result<OutPoint, APIError>>
for forward_info in pending_forwards.drain(..) {
match forward_info {
HTLCForwardInfo::AddHTLC { prev_short_channel_id, prev_htlc_id, forward_info: PendingHTLCInfo {
- routing: PendingHTLCRouting::Receive { payment_data, incoming_cltv_expiry },
- incoming_shared_secret, payment_hash, amt_to_forward, .. },
+ routing, incoming_shared_secret, payment_hash, amt_to_forward, .. },
prev_funding_outpoint } => {
+ let (cltv_expiry, onion_payload) = match routing {
+ PendingHTLCRouting::Receive { payment_data, incoming_cltv_expiry } =>
+ (incoming_cltv_expiry, OnionPayload::Invoice(payment_data)),
+ PendingHTLCRouting::ReceiveKeysend { payment_preimage, incoming_cltv_expiry } =>
+ (incoming_cltv_expiry, OnionPayload::Spontaneous(payment_preimage)),
+ _ => {
+ panic!("short_channel_id == 0 should imply any pending_forward entries are of type Receive");
+ }
+ };
let claimable_htlc = ClaimableHTLC {
prev_hop: HTLCPreviousHopData {
short_channel_id: prev_short_channel_id,
incoming_packet_shared_secret: incoming_shared_secret,
},
value: amt_to_forward,
- payment_data: payment_data.clone(),
- cltv_expiry: incoming_cltv_expiry,
+ cltv_expiry,
+ onion_payload,
};
macro_rules! fail_htlc {
let mut payment_secrets = self.pending_inbound_payments.lock().unwrap();
match payment_secrets.entry(payment_hash) {
hash_map::Entry::Vacant(_) => {
- log_trace!(self.logger, "Failing new HTLC with payment_hash {} as we didn't have a corresponding inbound payment.", log_bytes!(payment_hash.0));
- fail_htlc!(claimable_htlc);
+ match claimable_htlc.onion_payload {
+ OnionPayload::Invoice(_) => {
+ log_trace!(self.logger, "Failing new HTLC with payment_hash {} as we didn't have a corresponding inbound payment.", log_bytes!(payment_hash.0));
+ fail_htlc!(claimable_htlc);
+ },
+ OnionPayload::Spontaneous(preimage) => {
+ match channel_state.claimable_htlcs.entry(payment_hash) {
+ hash_map::Entry::Vacant(e) => {
+ e.insert(vec![claimable_htlc]);
+ new_events.push(events::Event::PaymentReceived {
+ payment_hash,
+ amt: amt_to_forward,
+ purpose: events::PaymentPurpose::SpontaneousPayment(preimage),
+ });
+ },
+ hash_map::Entry::Occupied(_) => {
+ log_trace!(self.logger, "Failing new keysend HTLC with payment_hash {} for a duplicative payment hash", log_bytes!(payment_hash.0));
+ fail_htlc!(claimable_htlc);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
},
hash_map::Entry::Occupied(inbound_payment) => {
+ let payment_data =
+ if let OnionPayload::Invoice(ref data) = claimable_htlc.onion_payload {
+ data.clone()
+ } else {
+ log_trace!(self.logger, "Failing new keysend HTLC with payment_hash {} because we already have an inbound payment with the same payment hash", log_bytes!(payment_hash.0));
+ fail_htlc!(claimable_htlc);
+ continue
+ };
if inbound_payment.get().payment_secret != payment_data.payment_secret {
log_trace!(self.logger, "Failing new HTLC with payment_hash {} as it didn't match our expected payment secret.", log_bytes!(payment_hash.0));
fail_htlc!(claimable_htlc);
let mut total_value = 0;
let htlcs = channel_state.claimable_htlcs.entry(payment_hash)
.or_insert(Vec::new());
+ if htlcs.len() == 1 {
+ if let OnionPayload::Spontaneous(_) = htlcs[0].onion_payload {
+ log_trace!(self.logger, "Failing new HTLC with payment_hash {} as we already had an existing keysend HTLC with the same payment hash", log_bytes!(payment_hash.0));
+ fail_htlc!(claimable_htlc);
+ continue
+ }
+ }
htlcs.push(claimable_htlc);
for htlc in htlcs.iter() {
total_value += htlc.value;
- if htlc.payment_data.total_msat != payment_data.total_msat {
- log_trace!(self.logger, "Failing HTLCs with payment_hash {} as the HTLCs had inconsistent total values (eg {} and {})",
- log_bytes!(payment_hash.0), payment_data.total_msat, htlc.payment_data.total_msat);
- total_value = msgs::MAX_VALUE_MSAT;
+ match &htlc.onion_payload {
+ OnionPayload::Invoice(htlc_payment_data) => {
+ if htlc_payment_data.total_msat != payment_data.total_msat {
+ log_trace!(self.logger, "Failing HTLCs with payment_hash {} as the HTLCs had inconsistent total values (eg {} and {})",
+ log_bytes!(payment_hash.0), payment_data.total_msat, htlc_payment_data.total_msat);
+ total_value = msgs::MAX_VALUE_MSAT;
+ }
+ if total_value >= msgs::MAX_VALUE_MSAT { break; }
+ },
+ _ => unreachable!(),
}
- if total_value >= msgs::MAX_VALUE_MSAT { break; }
}
if total_value >= msgs::MAX_VALUE_MSAT || total_value > payment_data.total_msat {
log_trace!(self.logger, "Failing HTLCs with payment_hash {} as the total value {} ran over expected value {} (or HTLCs were inconsistent)",
} else if total_value == payment_data.total_msat {
new_events.push(events::Event::PaymentReceived {
payment_hash,
- payment_preimage: inbound_payment.get().payment_preimage,
- payment_secret: payment_data.payment_secret,
+ purpose: events::PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment {
+ payment_preimage: inbound_payment.get().payment_preimage,
+ payment_secret: payment_data.payment_secret,
+ user_payment_id: inbound_payment.get().user_payment_id,
+ },
amt: total_value,
- user_payment_id: inbound_payment.get().user_payment_id,
});
// Only ever generate at most one PaymentReceived
// per registered payment_hash, even if it isn't
},
};
},
- HTLCForwardInfo::AddHTLC { .. } => {
- panic!("short_channel_id == 0 should imply any pending_forward entries are of type Receive");
- },
HTLCForwardInfo::FailHTLC { .. } => {
panic!("Got pending fail of our own HTLC");
}
};
if let hash_map::Entry::Occupied(mut chan) = channel_state.by_id.entry(chan_id) {
- let was_frozen_for_monitor = chan.get().is_awaiting_monitor_update();
match chan.get_mut().get_update_fulfill_htlc_and_commit(prev_hop.htlc_id, payment_preimage, &self.logger) {
- Ok((msgs, monitor_option)) => {
- if let Some(monitor_update) = monitor_option {
+ Ok(msgs_monitor_option) => {
+ if let UpdateFulfillCommitFetch::NewClaim { msgs, monitor_update } = msgs_monitor_option {
if let Err(e) = self.chain_monitor.update_channel(chan.get().get_funding_txo().unwrap(), monitor_update) {
- if was_frozen_for_monitor {
- assert!(msgs.is_none());
- } else {
- return Err(Some((chan.get().get_counterparty_node_id(), handle_monitor_err!(self, e, channel_state, chan, RAACommitmentOrder::CommitmentFirst, false, msgs.is_some()).unwrap_err())));
- }
+ log_given_level!(self.logger, if e == ChannelMonitorUpdateErr::PermanentFailure { Level::Error } else { Level::Debug },
+ "Failed to update channel monitor with preimage {:?}: {:?}",
+ payment_preimage, e);
+ return Err(Some((
+ chan.get().get_counterparty_node_id(),
+ handle_monitor_err!(self, e, channel_state, chan, RAACommitmentOrder::CommitmentFirst, false, msgs.is_some()).unwrap_err(),
+ )));
+ }
+ if let Some((msg, commitment_signed)) = msgs {
+ log_debug!(self.logger, "Claiming funds for HTLC with preimage {} resulted in a commitment_signed for channel {}",
+ log_bytes!(payment_preimage.0), log_bytes!(chan.get().channel_id()));
+ channel_state.pending_msg_events.push(events::MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs {
+ node_id: chan.get().get_counterparty_node_id(),
+ updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate {
+ update_add_htlcs: Vec::new(),
+ update_fulfill_htlcs: vec![msg],
+ update_fail_htlcs: Vec::new(),
+ update_fail_malformed_htlcs: Vec::new(),
+ update_fee: None,
+ commitment_signed,
+ }
+ });
}
- }
- if let Some((msg, commitment_signed)) = msgs {
- log_debug!(self.logger, "Claiming funds for HTLC with preimage {} resulted in a commitment_signed for channel {}",
- log_bytes!(payment_preimage.0), log_bytes!(chan.get().channel_id()));
- channel_state.pending_msg_events.push(events::MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs {
- node_id: chan.get().get_counterparty_node_id(),
- updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate {
- update_add_htlcs: Vec::new(),
- update_fulfill_htlcs: vec![msg],
- update_fail_htlcs: Vec::new(),
- update_fail_malformed_htlcs: Vec::new(),
- update_fee: None,
- commitment_signed,
- }
- });
}
return Ok(())
},
- Err(e) => {
- // TODO: Do something with e?
- // This should only occur if we are claiming an HTLC at the same time as the
- // HTLC is being failed (eg because a block is being connected and this caused
- // an HTLC to time out). This should, of course, only occur if the user is the
- // one doing the claiming (as it being a part of a peer claim would imply we're
- // about to lose funds) and only if the lock in claim_funds was dropped as a
- // previous HTLC was failed (thus not for an MPP payment).
- debug_assert!(false, "This shouldn't be reachable except in absurdly rare cases between monitor updates and HTLC timeouts: {:?}", e);
- return Err(None)
+ Err((e, monitor_update)) => {
+ if let Err(e) = self.chain_monitor.update_channel(chan.get().get_funding_txo().unwrap(), monitor_update) {
+ log_given_level!(self.logger, if e == ChannelMonitorUpdateErr::PermanentFailure { Level::Error } else { Level::Info },
+ "Failed to update channel monitor with preimage {:?} immediately prior to force-close: {:?}",
+ payment_preimage, e);
+ }
+ let counterparty_node_id = chan.get().get_counterparty_node_id();
+ let (drop, res) = convert_chan_err!(self, e, channel_state.short_to_id, chan.get_mut(), &chan_id);
+ if drop {
+ chan.remove_entry();
+ }
+ return Err(Some((counterparty_node_id, res)));
},
}
} else { unreachable!(); }
match channel_state.forward_htlcs.entry(match forward_info.routing {
PendingHTLCRouting::Forward { short_channel_id, .. } => short_channel_id,
PendingHTLCRouting::Receive { .. } => 0,
+ PendingHTLCRouting::ReceiveKeysend { .. } => 0,
}) {
hash_map::Entry::Occupied(mut entry) => {
entry.get_mut().push(HTLCForwardInfo::AddHTLC { prev_short_channel_id, prev_funding_outpoint,
/// The [`PaymentHash`] (and corresponding [`PaymentPreimage`]) must be globally unique. This
/// method may return an Err if another payment with the same payment_hash is still pending.
///
- /// `user_payment_id` will be provided back in [`PaymentReceived::user_payment_id`] events to
+ /// `user_payment_id` will be provided back in [`PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment::user_payment_id`] events to
/// allow tracking of which events correspond with which calls to this and
/// [`create_inbound_payment`]. `user_payment_id` has no meaning inside of LDK, it is simply
/// copied to events and otherwise ignored. It may be used to correlate PaymentReceived events
///
/// [`create_inbound_payment`]: Self::create_inbound_payment
/// [`PaymentReceived`]: events::Event::PaymentReceived
- /// [`PaymentReceived::user_payment_id`]: events::Event::PaymentReceived::user_payment_id
+ /// [`PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment::user_payment_id`]: events::PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment::user_payment_id
pub fn create_inbound_payment_for_hash(&self, payment_hash: PaymentHash, min_value_msat: Option<u64>, invoice_expiry_delta_secs: u32, user_payment_id: u64) -> Result<PaymentSecret, APIError> {
self.set_payment_hash_secret_map(payment_hash, None, min_value_msat, invoice_expiry_delta_secs, user_payment_id)
}
(1, Receive) => {
(0, payment_data, required),
(2, incoming_cltv_expiry, required),
- }
+ },
+ (2, ReceiveKeysend) => {
+ (0, payment_preimage, required),
+ (2, incoming_cltv_expiry, required),
+ },
;);
impl_writeable_tlv_based!(PendingHTLCInfo, {
(6, incoming_packet_shared_secret, required)
});
-impl_writeable_tlv_based!(ClaimableHTLC, {
- (0, prev_hop, required),
- (2, value, required),
- (4, payment_data, required),
- (6, cltv_expiry, required),
-});
+impl Writeable for ClaimableHTLC {
+ fn write<W: Writer>(&self, writer: &mut W) -> Result<(), ::std::io::Error> {
+ let payment_data = match &self.onion_payload {
+ OnionPayload::Invoice(data) => Some(data.clone()),
+ _ => None,
+ };
+ let keysend_preimage = match self.onion_payload {
+ OnionPayload::Invoice(_) => None,
+ OnionPayload::Spontaneous(preimage) => Some(preimage.clone()),
+ };
+ write_tlv_fields!
+ (writer,
+ {
+ (0, self.prev_hop, required), (2, self.value, required),
+ (4, payment_data, option), (6, self.cltv_expiry, required),
+ (8, keysend_preimage, option),
+ });
+ Ok(())
+ }
+}
+
+impl Readable for ClaimableHTLC {
+ fn read<R: Read>(reader: &mut R) -> Result<Self, DecodeError> {
+ let mut prev_hop = ::util::ser::OptionDeserWrapper(None);
+ let mut value = 0;
+ let mut payment_data: Option<msgs::FinalOnionHopData> = None;
+ let mut cltv_expiry = 0;
+ let mut keysend_preimage: Option<PaymentPreimage> = None;
+ read_tlv_fields!
+ (reader,
+ {
+ (0, prev_hop, required), (2, value, required),
+ (4, payment_data, option), (6, cltv_expiry, required),
+ (8, keysend_preimage, option)
+ });
+ let onion_payload = match keysend_preimage {
+ Some(p) => {
+ if payment_data.is_some() {
+ return Err(DecodeError::InvalidValue)
+ }
+ OnionPayload::Spontaneous(p)
+ },
+ None => {
+ if payment_data.is_none() {
+ return Err(DecodeError::InvalidValue)
+ }
+ OnionPayload::Invoice(payment_data.unwrap())
+ },
+ };
+ Ok(Self {
+ prev_hop: prev_hop.0.unwrap(),
+ value,
+ onion_payload,
+ cltv_expiry,
+ })
+ }
+}
impl_writeable_tlv_based_enum!(HTLCSource,
(0, OutboundRoute) => {
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
- use ln::channelmanager::PersistenceNotifier;
- use std::sync::Arc;
+ use bitcoin::hashes::Hash;
+ use bitcoin::hashes::sha256::Hash as Sha256;
use core::sync::atomic::{AtomicBool, Ordering};
- use std::thread;
use core::time::Duration;
+ use ln::{PaymentPreimage, PaymentHash, PaymentSecret};
+ use ln::channelmanager::PersistenceNotifier;
+ use ln::features::{InitFeatures, InvoiceFeatures};
use ln::functional_test_utils::*;
- use ln::features::InitFeatures;
+ use ln::msgs;
use ln::msgs::ChannelMessageHandler;
+ use routing::router::{get_keysend_route, get_route};
+ use util::events::{Event, MessageSendEvent, MessageSendEventsProvider};
+ use util::test_utils;
+ use std::sync::Arc;
+ use std::thread;
+ #[cfg(feature = "std")]
#[test]
fn test_wait_timeout() {
let persistence_notifier = Arc::new(PersistenceNotifier::new());
assert_ne!(nodes[0].node.list_channels()[0], node_a_chan_info);
assert_ne!(nodes[1].node.list_channels()[0], node_b_chan_info);
}
+
+ #[test]
+ fn test_keysend_dup_hash_partial_mpp() {
+ // Test that a keysend payment with a duplicate hash to an existing partial MPP payment fails as
+ // expected.
+ let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
+ let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
+ let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
+ let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+ create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+ let logger = test_utils::TestLogger::new();
+
+ // First, send a partial MPP payment.
+ let net_graph_msg_handler = &nodes[0].net_graph_msg_handler;
+ let route = get_route(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 100_000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV, &logger).unwrap();
+ let (payment_preimage, our_payment_hash, payment_secret) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(&nodes[1]);
+ // Use the utility function send_payment_along_path to send the payment with MPP data which
+ // indicates there are more HTLCs coming.
+ let cur_height = CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1; // route_payment calls send_payment, which adds 1 to the current height. So we do the same here to match.
+ nodes[0].node.send_payment_along_path(&route.paths[0], &our_payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret), 200_000, cur_height, &None).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+ let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ pass_along_path(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 200_000, our_payment_hash, Some(payment_secret), events.drain(..).next().unwrap(), false, None);
+
+ // Next, send a keysend payment with the same payment_hash and make sure it fails.
+ nodes[0].node.send_spontaneous_payment(&route, Some(payment_preimage)).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+ let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ let ev = events.drain(..).next().unwrap();
+ let payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(ev);
+ nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0);
+ commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+ let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+ assert!(updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
+ assert!(updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
+ assert_eq!(updates.update_fail_htlcs.len(), 1);
+ assert!(updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
+ assert!(updates.update_fee.is_none());
+ nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
+ commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], updates.commitment_signed, true, true);
+ expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], our_payment_hash, true);
+
+ // Send the second half of the original MPP payment.
+ nodes[0].node.send_payment_along_path(&route.paths[0], &our_payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret), 200_000, cur_height, &None).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+ let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ pass_along_path(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 200_000, our_payment_hash, Some(payment_secret), events.drain(..).next().unwrap(), true, None);
+
+ // Claim the full MPP payment. Note that we can't use a test utility like
+ // claim_funds_along_route because the ordering of the messages causes the second half of the
+ // payment to be put in the holding cell, which confuses the test utilities. So we exchange the
+ // lightning messages manually.
+ assert!(nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage));
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 2);
+ let bs_first_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+ nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_first_updates.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
+ nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_first_updates.commitment_signed);
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+ let (as_first_raa, as_first_cs) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+ nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_first_raa);
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+ let bs_second_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+ nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_first_cs);
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+ let bs_first_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+ nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_second_updates.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
+ nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_second_updates.commitment_signed);
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+ let as_second_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+ nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_first_raa);
+ let as_second_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+ nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_second_raa);
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+ nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_second_updates.commitment_signed);
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+ let bs_third_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+ nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_third_raa);
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+
+ // There's an existing bug that generates a PaymentSent event for each MPP path, so handle that here.
+ let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
+ match events[0] {
+ Event::PaymentSent { payment_preimage: ref preimage } => {
+ assert_eq!(payment_preimage, *preimage);
+ },
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ }
+ match events[1] {
+ Event::PaymentSent { payment_preimage: ref preimage } => {
+ assert_eq!(payment_preimage, *preimage);
+ },
+ _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+ }
+ }
+
+ #[test]
+ fn test_keysend_dup_payment_hash() {
+ // (1): Test that a keysend payment with a duplicate payment hash to an existing pending
+ // outbound regular payment fails as expected.
+ // (2): Test that a regular payment with a duplicate payment hash to an existing keysend payment
+ // fails as expected.
+ let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
+ let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
+ let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
+ let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+ create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+ let logger = test_utils::TestLogger::new();
+
+ // To start (1), send a regular payment but don't claim it.
+ let expected_route = [&nodes[1]];
+ let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &expected_route, 100_000);
+
+ // Next, attempt a keysend payment and make sure it fails.
+ let route = get_route(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &nodes[0].net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &expected_route.last().unwrap().node.get_our_node_id(), Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 100_000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV, &logger).unwrap();
+ nodes[0].node.send_spontaneous_payment(&route, Some(payment_preimage)).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+ let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ let ev = events.drain(..).next().unwrap();
+ let payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(ev);
+ nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0);
+ commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+ let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+ assert!(updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
+ assert!(updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
+ assert_eq!(updates.update_fail_htlcs.len(), 1);
+ assert!(updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
+ assert!(updates.update_fee.is_none());
+ nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
+ commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], updates.commitment_signed, true, true);
+ expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], payment_hash, true);
+
+ // Finally, claim the original payment.
+ claim_payment(&nodes[0], &expected_route, payment_preimage);
+
+ // To start (2), send a keysend payment but don't claim it.
+ let payment_preimage = PaymentPreimage([42; 32]);
+ let route = get_route(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &nodes[0].net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &expected_route.last().unwrap().node.get_our_node_id(), Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 100_000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV, &logger).unwrap();
+ let payment_hash = nodes[0].node.send_spontaneous_payment(&route, Some(payment_preimage)).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+ let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ let event = events.pop().unwrap();
+ let path = vec![&nodes[1]];
+ pass_along_path(&nodes[0], &path, 100_000, payment_hash, None, event, true, Some(payment_preimage));
+
+ // Next, attempt a regular payment and make sure it fails.
+ let payment_secret = PaymentSecret([43; 32]);
+ nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret)).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+ let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ let ev = events.drain(..).next().unwrap();
+ let payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(ev);
+ nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0);
+ commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+ let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+ assert!(updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
+ assert!(updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
+ assert_eq!(updates.update_fail_htlcs.len(), 1);
+ assert!(updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
+ assert!(updates.update_fee.is_none());
+ nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
+ commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], updates.commitment_signed, true, true);
+ expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], payment_hash, true);
+
+ // Finally, succeed the keysend payment.
+ claim_payment(&nodes[0], &expected_route, payment_preimage);
+ }
+
+ #[test]
+ fn test_keysend_hash_mismatch() {
+ // Test that if we receive a keysend `update_add_htlc` msg, we fail as expected if the keysend
+ // preimage doesn't match the msg's payment hash.
+ let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
+ let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
+ let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
+ let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+
+ let payer_pubkey = nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id();
+ let payee_pubkey = nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id();
+ nodes[0].node.peer_connected(&payee_pubkey, &msgs::Init { features: InitFeatures::known() });
+ nodes[1].node.peer_connected(&payer_pubkey, &msgs::Init { features: InitFeatures::known() });
+
+ let _chan = create_chan_between_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+ let network_graph = nodes[0].net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap();
+ let first_hops = nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels();
+ let route = get_keysend_route(&payer_pubkey, &network_graph, &payee_pubkey,
+ Some(&first_hops.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), &vec![], 10000, 40,
+ nodes[0].logger).unwrap();
+
+ let test_preimage = PaymentPreimage([42; 32]);
+ let mismatch_payment_hash = PaymentHash([43; 32]);
+ let _ = nodes[0].node.send_payment_internal(&route, mismatch_payment_hash, &None, Some(test_preimage)).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+
+ let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+ assert_eq!(updates.update_add_htlcs.len(), 1);
+ assert!(updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
+ assert!(updates.update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
+ assert!(updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
+ assert!(updates.update_fee.is_none());
+ nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
+
+ nodes[1].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Payment preimage didn't match payment hash".to_string(), 1);
+ }
+
+ #[test]
+ fn test_keysend_msg_with_secret_err() {
+ // Test that we error as expected if we receive a keysend payment that includes a payment secret.
+ let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
+ let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
+ let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
+ let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+
+ let payer_pubkey = nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id();
+ let payee_pubkey = nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id();
+ nodes[0].node.peer_connected(&payee_pubkey, &msgs::Init { features: InitFeatures::known() });
+ nodes[1].node.peer_connected(&payer_pubkey, &msgs::Init { features: InitFeatures::known() });
+
+ let _chan = create_chan_between_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+ let network_graph = nodes[0].net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap();
+ let first_hops = nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels();
+ let route = get_keysend_route(&payer_pubkey, &network_graph, &payee_pubkey,
+ Some(&first_hops.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), &vec![], 10000, 40,
+ nodes[0].logger).unwrap();
+
+ let test_preimage = PaymentPreimage([42; 32]);
+ let test_secret = PaymentSecret([43; 32]);
+ let payment_hash = PaymentHash(Sha256::hash(&test_preimage.0).into_inner());
+ let _ = nodes[0].node.send_payment_internal(&route, payment_hash, &Some(test_secret), Some(test_preimage)).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+
+ let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+ assert_eq!(updates.update_add_htlcs.len(), 1);
+ assert!(updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
+ assert!(updates.update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
+ assert!(updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
+ assert!(updates.update_fee.is_none());
+ nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
+
+ nodes[1].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "We don't support MPP keysend payments".to_string(), 1);
+ }
}
#[cfg(all(any(test, feature = "_test_utils"), feature = "unstable"))]
use routing::router::get_route;
use util::test_utils;
use util::config::UserConfig;
- use util::events::{Event, MessageSendEvent, MessageSendEventsProvider};
+ use util::events::{Event, MessageSendEvent, MessageSendEventsProvider, PaymentPurpose};
use bitcoin::hashes::Hash;
use bitcoin::hashes::sha256::Hash as Sha256;
use bitcoin::{Block, BlockHeader, Transaction, TxOut};
- use std::sync::{Arc, Mutex};
+ use sync::{Arc, Mutex};
use test::Bencher;
)*
];
}
+
+ impl alloc::fmt::Display for Features<$context> {
+ fn fmt(&self, fmt: &mut alloc::fmt::Formatter) -> Result<(), alloc::fmt::Error> {
+ $(
+ $(
+ fmt.write_fmt(format_args!("{}: {}, ", stringify!($required_feature),
+ if <$context as $required_feature>::requires_feature(&self.flags) { "required" }
+ else if <$context as $required_feature>::supports_feature(&self.flags) { "supported" }
+ else { "not supported" }))?;
+ )*
+ $(
+ fmt.write_fmt(format_args!("{}: {}, ", stringify!($optional_feature),
+ if <$context as $optional_feature>::requires_feature(&self.flags) { "required" }
+ else if <$context as $optional_feature>::supports_feature(&self.flags) { "supported" }
+ else { "not supported" }))?;
+ )*
+ )*
+ fmt.write_fmt(format_args!("unknown flags: {}",
+ if self.requires_unknown_bits() { "required" }
+ else if self.supports_unknown_bits() { "supported" } else { "none" }))
+ }
+ }
};
}
,
// Byte 3
,
+ // Byte 4
+ ,
+ // Byte 5
+ ,
+ // Byte 6
+ ,
],
optional_features: [
// Byte 0
BasicMPP,
// Byte 3
ShutdownAnySegwit,
+ // Byte 4
+ ,
+ // Byte 5
+ ,
+ // Byte 6
+ Keysend,
],
});
define_context!(ChannelContext {
define_feature!(27, ShutdownAnySegwit, [InitContext, NodeContext],
"Feature flags for `opt_shutdown_anysegwit`.", set_shutdown_any_segwit_optional,
set_shutdown_any_segwit_required);
+ define_feature!(55, Keysend, [NodeContext],
+ "Feature flags for keysend payments.", set_keysend_optional, set_keysend_required);
#[cfg(test)]
define_feature!(123456789, UnknownFeature, [NodeContext, ChannelContext, InvoiceContext],
pub(crate) fn to_context<C: sealed::Context>(&self) -> Features<C> {
self.to_context_internal()
}
+
+ /// Getting a route for a keysend payment to a private node requires providing the payee's
+ /// features (since they were not announced in a node announcement). However, keysend payments
+ /// don't have an invoice to pull the payee's features from, so this method is provided for use in
+ /// [`get_keysend_route`], thus omitting the need for payers to manually construct an
+ /// `InvoiceFeatures` for [`get_route`].
+ ///
+ /// [`get_keysend_route`]: crate::routing::router::get_keysend_route
+ /// [`get_route`]: crate::routing::router::get_route
+ pub(crate) fn for_keysend() -> InvoiceFeatures {
+ InvoiceFeatures::empty().set_variable_length_onion_optional()
+ }
}
impl ToBase32 for InvoiceFeatures {
pub(crate) fn requires_data_loss_protect(&self) -> bool {
<T as sealed::DataLossProtect>::requires_feature(&self.flags)
}
+ #[cfg(test)]
pub(crate) fn supports_data_loss_protect(&self) -> bool {
<T as sealed::DataLossProtect>::supports_feature(&self.flags)
}
use util::enforcing_trait_impls::EnforcingSigner;
use util::test_utils;
use util::test_utils::TestChainMonitor;
-use util::events::{Event, MessageSendEvent, MessageSendEventsProvider};
+use util::events::{Event, MessageSendEvent, MessageSendEventsProvider, PaymentPurpose};
use util::errors::APIError;
use util::config::UserConfig;
use util::ser::{ReadableArgs, Writeable, Readable};
use prelude::*;
use core::cell::RefCell;
use std::rc::Rc;
-use std::sync::{Arc, Mutex};
+use sync::{Arc, Mutex};
use core::mem;
pub const CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH: u32 = 10;
let events = $node.node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
match events[0] {
- Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, ref payment_preimage, ref payment_secret, amt, user_payment_id: _ } => {
+ Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, ref purpose, amt } => {
assert_eq!($expected_payment_hash, *payment_hash);
- assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
- assert_eq!($expected_payment_secret, *payment_secret);
assert_eq!($expected_recv_value, amt);
+ match purpose {
+ PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, payment_secret, .. } => {
+ assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
+ assert_eq!($expected_payment_secret, *payment_secret);
+ },
+ _ => {},
+ }
},
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
}
pass_along_route(origin_node, expected_paths, recv_value, our_payment_hash, our_payment_secret);
}
-pub fn pass_along_path<'a, 'b, 'c>(origin_node: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, expected_path: &[&Node<'a, 'b, 'c>], recv_value: u64, our_payment_hash: PaymentHash, our_payment_secret: PaymentSecret, ev: MessageSendEvent, payment_received_expected: bool) {
+pub fn pass_along_path<'a, 'b, 'c>(origin_node: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, expected_path: &[&Node<'a, 'b, 'c>], recv_value: u64, our_payment_hash: PaymentHash, our_payment_secret: Option<PaymentSecret>, ev: MessageSendEvent, payment_received_expected: bool, expected_preimage: Option<PaymentPreimage>) {
let mut payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(ev);
let mut prev_node = origin_node;
if payment_received_expected {
assert_eq!(events_2.len(), 1);
match events_2[0] {
- Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, ref payment_preimage, ref payment_secret, amt, user_payment_id: _ } => {
+ Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, ref purpose, amt} => {
assert_eq!(our_payment_hash, *payment_hash);
- assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
- assert_eq!(our_payment_secret, *payment_secret);
+ match &purpose {
+ PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, payment_secret, .. } => {
+ assert_eq!(expected_preimage, *payment_preimage);
+ assert_eq!(our_payment_secret.unwrap(), *payment_secret);
+ },
+ PaymentPurpose::SpontaneousPayment(payment_preimage) => {
+ assert_eq!(expected_preimage.unwrap(), *payment_preimage);
+ assert!(our_payment_secret.is_none());
+ },
+ }
assert_eq!(amt, recv_value);
},
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
// Once we've gotten through all the HTLCs, the last one should result in a
// PaymentReceived (but each previous one should not!), .
let expect_payment = path_idx == expected_route.len() - 1;
- pass_along_path(origin_node, expected_path, recv_value, our_payment_hash.clone(), our_payment_secret, ev, expect_payment);
+ pass_along_path(origin_node, expected_path, recv_value, our_payment_hash.clone(), Some(our_payment_secret), ev, expect_payment, None);
}
}
/// pending_htlc_adds includes both the holding cell and in-flight update_add_htlcs, whereas
/// for claims/fails they are separated out.
-pub fn reconnect_nodes<'a, 'b, 'c>(node_a: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, node_b: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, send_funding_locked: (bool, bool), pending_htlc_adds: (i64, i64), pending_htlc_claims: (usize, usize), pending_cell_htlc_claims: (usize, usize), pending_cell_htlc_fails: (usize, usize), pending_raa: (bool, bool)) {
+pub fn reconnect_nodes<'a, 'b, 'c>(node_a: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, node_b: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, send_funding_locked: (bool, bool), pending_htlc_adds: (i64, i64), pending_htlc_claims: (usize, usize), pending_htlc_fails: (usize, usize), pending_cell_htlc_claims: (usize, usize), pending_cell_htlc_fails: (usize, usize), pending_raa: (bool, bool)) {
node_a.node.peer_connected(&node_b.node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init { features: InitFeatures::empty() });
let reestablish_1 = get_chan_reestablish_msgs!(node_a, node_b);
node_b.node.peer_connected(&node_a.node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init { features: InitFeatures::empty() });
}
// We don't yet support both needing updates, as that would require a different commitment dance:
- assert!((pending_htlc_adds.0 == 0 && pending_htlc_claims.0 == 0 && pending_cell_htlc_claims.0 == 0 && pending_cell_htlc_fails.0 == 0) ||
- (pending_htlc_adds.1 == 0 && pending_htlc_claims.1 == 0 && pending_cell_htlc_claims.1 == 0 && pending_cell_htlc_fails.1 == 0));
+ assert!((pending_htlc_adds.0 == 0 && pending_htlc_claims.0 == 0 && pending_htlc_fails.0 == 0 &&
+ pending_cell_htlc_claims.0 == 0 && pending_cell_htlc_fails.0 == 0) ||
+ (pending_htlc_adds.1 == 0 && pending_htlc_claims.1 == 0 && pending_htlc_fails.1 == 0 &&
+ pending_cell_htlc_claims.1 == 0 && pending_cell_htlc_fails.1 == 0));
for chan_msgs in resp_1.drain(..) {
if send_funding_locked.0 {
} else {
assert!(chan_msgs.1.is_none());
}
- if pending_htlc_adds.0 != 0 || pending_htlc_claims.0 != 0 || pending_cell_htlc_claims.0 != 0 || pending_cell_htlc_fails.0 != 0 {
+ if pending_htlc_adds.0 != 0 || pending_htlc_claims.0 != 0 || pending_htlc_fails.0 != 0 || pending_cell_htlc_claims.0 != 0 || pending_cell_htlc_fails.0 != 0 {
let commitment_update = chan_msgs.2.unwrap();
if pending_htlc_adds.0 != -1 { // We use -1 to denote a response commitment_signed
assert_eq!(commitment_update.update_add_htlcs.len(), pending_htlc_adds.0 as usize);
assert!(commitment_update.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
}
assert_eq!(commitment_update.update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), pending_htlc_claims.0 + pending_cell_htlc_claims.0);
- assert_eq!(commitment_update.update_fail_htlcs.len(), pending_cell_htlc_fails.0);
+ assert_eq!(commitment_update.update_fail_htlcs.len(), pending_htlc_fails.0 + pending_cell_htlc_fails.0);
assert!(commitment_update.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
for update_add in commitment_update.update_add_htlcs {
node_a.node.handle_update_add_htlc(&node_b.node.get_our_node_id(), &update_add);
} else {
assert!(chan_msgs.1.is_none());
}
- if pending_htlc_adds.1 != 0 || pending_htlc_claims.1 != 0 || pending_cell_htlc_claims.1 != 0 || pending_cell_htlc_fails.1 != 0 {
+ if pending_htlc_adds.1 != 0 || pending_htlc_claims.1 != 0 || pending_htlc_fails.1 != 0 || pending_cell_htlc_claims.1 != 0 || pending_cell_htlc_fails.1 != 0 {
let commitment_update = chan_msgs.2.unwrap();
if pending_htlc_adds.1 != -1 { // We use -1 to denote a response commitment_signed
assert_eq!(commitment_update.update_add_htlcs.len(), pending_htlc_adds.1 as usize);
}
- assert_eq!(commitment_update.update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), pending_htlc_claims.0 + pending_cell_htlc_claims.0);
- assert_eq!(commitment_update.update_fail_htlcs.len(), pending_cell_htlc_fails.0);
+ assert_eq!(commitment_update.update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), pending_htlc_claims.1 + pending_cell_htlc_claims.1);
+ assert_eq!(commitment_update.update_fail_htlcs.len(), pending_htlc_fails.1 + pending_cell_htlc_fails.1);
assert!(commitment_update.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
for update_add in commitment_update.update_add_htlcs {
node_b.node.handle_update_add_htlc(&node_a.node.get_our_node_id(), &update_add);
use ln::channelmanager::{ChannelManager, ChannelManagerReadArgs, RAACommitmentOrder, PaymentSendFailure, BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT, MIN_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA};
use ln::channel::{Channel, ChannelError};
use ln::{chan_utils, onion_utils};
-use routing::router::{Route, RouteHop, RouteHint, RouteHintHop, get_route};
+use ln::chan_utils::HTLC_SUCCESS_TX_WEIGHT;
+use routing::router::{Route, RouteHop, RouteHint, RouteHintHop, get_route, get_keysend_route};
use routing::network_graph::RoutingFees;
use ln::features::{ChannelFeatures, InitFeatures, InvoiceFeatures, NodeFeatures};
use ln::msgs;
use ln::msgs::{ChannelMessageHandler,RoutingMessageHandler,HTLCFailChannelUpdate, ErrorAction};
use util::enforcing_trait_impls::EnforcingSigner;
use util::{byte_utils, test_utils};
-use util::events::{Event, MessageSendEvent, MessageSendEventsProvider};
+use util::events::{Event, MessageSendEvent, MessageSendEventsProvider, PaymentPurpose};
use util::errors::APIError;
use util::ser::{Writeable, ReadableArgs};
use util::config::UserConfig;
use prelude::*;
use alloc::collections::BTreeSet;
use core::default::Default;
-use std::sync::{Arc, Mutex};
+use sync::{Arc, Mutex};
use ln::functional_test_utils::*;
use ln::chan_utils::CommitmentTransaction;
let cur_height = nodes[1].node.best_block.read().unwrap().height() + 1;
let onion_keys = onion_utils::construct_onion_keys(&secp_ctx, &route.paths[0], &session_priv).unwrap();
- let (onion_payloads, htlc_msat, htlc_cltv) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(&route.paths[0], 3460001, &Some(payment_secret), cur_height).unwrap();
+ let (onion_payloads, htlc_msat, htlc_cltv) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(&route.paths[0], 3460001, &Some(payment_secret), cur_height, &None).unwrap();
let onion_packet = onion_utils::construct_onion_packet(onion_payloads, onion_keys, [0; 32], &payment_hash);
let msg = msgs::UpdateAddHTLC {
channel_id: chan.2,
// sending any above-dust amount would result in a channel reserve violation.
// In this test we check that we would be prevented from sending an HTLC in
// this situation.
- chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(6000) };
- chanmon_cfgs[1].fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(6000) };
+ let feerate_per_kw = 253;
+ chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(feerate_per_kw) };
+ chanmon_cfgs[1].fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(feerate_per_kw) };
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
- let _ = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
- let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 4843000);
+ let mut push_amt = 100_000_000;
+ push_amt -= feerate_per_kw as u64 * (COMMITMENT_TX_BASE_WEIGHT + COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000 * 1000;
+ push_amt -= Channel::<EnforcingSigner>::get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(100_000) * 1000;
+
+ let _ = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100_000, push_amt, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+
+ // Sending exactly enough to hit the reserve amount should be accepted
+ let (_, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 1_000_000);
+
+ // However one more HTLC should be significantly over the reserve amount and fail.
+ let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 1_000_000);
unwrap_send_err!(nodes[1].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &Some(our_payment_secret)), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send value that would put counterparty balance under holder-announced channel reserve value"));
assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
let session_priv = SecretKey::from_slice(&[42; 32]).unwrap();
let cur_height = nodes[1].node.best_block.read().unwrap().height() + 1;
let onion_keys = onion_utils::construct_onion_keys(&secp_ctx, &route.paths[0], &session_priv).unwrap();
- let (onion_payloads, htlc_msat, htlc_cltv) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(&route.paths[0], 1000, &Some(payment_secret), cur_height).unwrap();
+ let (onion_payloads, htlc_msat, htlc_cltv) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(&route.paths[0], 1000, &Some(payment_secret), cur_height, &None).unwrap();
let onion_packet = onion_utils::construct_onion_packet(onion_payloads, onion_keys, [0; 32], &payment_hash);
let msg = msgs::UpdateAddHTLC {
channel_id: chan.2,
fn test_chan_reserve_dust_inbound_htlcs_outbound_chan() {
// Test that if we receive many dust HTLCs over an outbound channel, they don't count when
// calculating our commitment transaction fee (this was previously broken).
- let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
+ let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
+ let feerate_per_kw = 253;
+ chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(feerate_per_kw) };
+ chanmon_cfgs[1].fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(feerate_per_kw) };
+
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
// Set nodes[0]'s balance such that they will consider any above-dust received HTLC to be a
// channel reserve violation (so their balance is channel reserve (1000 sats) + commitment
// transaction fee with 0 HTLCs (183 sats)).
- create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 98817000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+ let mut push_amt = 100_000_000;
+ push_amt -= feerate_per_kw as u64 * (COMMITMENT_TX_BASE_WEIGHT) / 1000 * 1000;
+ push_amt -= Channel::<EnforcingSigner>::get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(100_000) * 1000;
+ create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, push_amt, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
- let dust_amt = 329000; // Dust amount
+ let dust_amt = crate::ln::channel::MIN_DUST_LIMIT_SATOSHIS * 1000
+ + feerate_per_kw as u64 * HTLC_SUCCESS_TX_WEIGHT / 1000 * 1000 - 1;
// In the previous code, routing this dust payment would cause nodes[0] to perceive a channel
// reserve violation even though it's a dust HTLC and therefore shouldn't count towards the
// commitment transaction fee.
let (_, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], dust_amt);
+
+ // One more than the dust amt should fail, however.
+ let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], dust_amt + 1);
+ unwrap_send_err!(nodes[1].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &Some(our_payment_secret)), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
+ assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send value that would put counterparty balance under holder-announced channel reserve value"));
}
#[test]
let session_priv = SecretKey::from_slice(&[42; 32]).unwrap();
let cur_height = nodes[0].node.best_block.read().unwrap().height() + 1;
let onion_keys = onion_utils::construct_onion_keys(&secp_ctx, &route_2.paths[0], &session_priv).unwrap();
- let (onion_payloads, htlc_msat, htlc_cltv) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(&route_2.paths[0], recv_value_2, &None, cur_height).unwrap();
+ let (onion_payloads, htlc_msat, htlc_cltv) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(&route_2.paths[0], recv_value_2, &None, cur_height, &None).unwrap();
let onion_packet = onion_utils::construct_onion_packet(onion_payloads, onion_keys, [0; 32], &our_payment_hash_1);
let msg = msgs::UpdateAddHTLC {
channel_id: chan.2,
let events = nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
match events[0] {
- Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, ref payment_preimage, ref payment_secret, amt, user_payment_id: _ } => {
+ Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, ref purpose, amt } => {
assert_eq!(our_payment_hash_21, *payment_hash);
- assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
- assert_eq!(our_payment_secret_21, *payment_secret);
assert_eq!(recv_value_21, amt);
+ match &purpose {
+ PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, payment_secret, .. } => {
+ assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
+ assert_eq!(our_payment_secret_21, *payment_secret);
+ },
+ _ => panic!("expected PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment")
+ }
},
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
}
match events[1] {
- Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, ref payment_preimage, ref payment_secret, amt, user_payment_id: _ } => {
+ Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, ref purpose, amt } => {
assert_eq!(our_payment_hash_22, *payment_hash);
- assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
- assert_eq!(our_payment_secret_22, *payment_secret);
assert_eq!(recv_value_22, amt);
+ match &purpose {
+ PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, payment_secret, .. } => {
+ assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
+ assert_eq!(our_payment_secret_22, *payment_secret);
+ },
+ _ => panic!("expected PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment")
+ }
},
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
}
let current_height = nodes[1].node.best_block.read().unwrap().height() + 1;
let net_graph_msg_handler = &nodes[1].net_graph_msg_handler;
let route = get_route(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 50_000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV, &logger).unwrap();
- let (onion_payloads, _amount_msat, cltv_expiry) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(&route.paths[0], 50_000, &Some(payment_secret), current_height).unwrap();
+ let (onion_payloads, _amount_msat, cltv_expiry) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(&route.paths[0], 50_000, &Some(payment_secret), current_height, &None).unwrap();
let onion_keys = onion_utils::construct_onion_keys(&secp_ctx, &route.paths[0], &session_priv).unwrap();
let onion_routing_packet = onion_utils::construct_onion_packet(onion_payloads, onion_keys, [0; 32], &payment_hash);
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (1, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (1, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
}
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (true, true), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (true, true), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
let payment_preimage_1 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 1000000).0;
let payment_hash_2 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 1000000).1;
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
let payment_preimage_3 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 1000000).0;
let payment_preimage_4 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 1000000).0;
claim_payment_along_route(&nodes[0], &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]]], true, payment_preimage_3);
fail_payment_along_route(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], true, payment_hash_5);
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (1, 0), (1, 0), (false, false));
+ reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (1, 0), (1, 0), (false, false));
{
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
}
// Even if the funding_locked messages get exchanged, as long as nothing further was
// received on either side, both sides will need to resend them.
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (true, true), (0, 1), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (true, true), (0, 1), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
} else if messages_delivered == 3 {
// nodes[0] still wants its RAA + commitment_signed
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (-1, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (true, false));
+ reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (-1, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (true, false));
} else if messages_delivered == 4 {
// nodes[0] still wants its commitment_signed
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (-1, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (-1, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
} else if messages_delivered == 5 {
// nodes[1] still wants its final RAA
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, true));
+ reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, true));
} else if messages_delivered == 6 {
// Everything was delivered...
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
}
let events_1 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
nodes[1].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
let events_2 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(events_2.len(), 1);
match events_2[0] {
- Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, ref payment_preimage, ref payment_secret, amt, user_payment_id: _ } => {
+ Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, ref purpose, amt } => {
assert_eq!(payment_hash_1, *payment_hash);
- assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
- assert_eq!(payment_secret_1, *payment_secret);
assert_eq!(amt, 1000000);
+ match &purpose {
+ PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, payment_secret, .. } => {
+ assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
+ assert_eq!(payment_secret_1, *payment_secret);
+ },
+ _ => panic!("expected PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment")
+ }
},
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
}
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
if messages_delivered < 2 {
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (1, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (1, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
if messages_delivered < 1 {
let events_4 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(events_4.len(), 1);
}
} else if messages_delivered == 2 {
// nodes[0] still wants its RAA + commitment_signed
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, -1), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, true));
+ reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, -1), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, true));
} else if messages_delivered == 3 {
// nodes[0] still wants its commitment_signed
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, -1), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, -1), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
} else if messages_delivered == 4 {
// nodes[1] still wants its final RAA
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (true, false));
+ reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (true, false));
} else if messages_delivered == 5 {
// Everything was delivered...
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
}
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
// Channel should still work fine...
let net_graph_msg_handler = &nodes[0].net_graph_msg_handler;
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
}
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, true), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, true), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
};
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (true, true), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (true, true), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
nodes[0].node.handle_funding_locked(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &funding_locked);
nodes[0].node.handle_announcement_signatures(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_announcement_sigs);
nodes[0].node = &nodes_0_deserialized;
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
// as_announcement should be re-generated exactly by broadcast_node_announcement.
nodes[0].node.broadcast_node_announcement([0, 0, 0], [0; 32], Vec::new());
let events_5 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(events_5.len(), 1);
match events_5[0] {
- Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, ref payment_preimage, ref payment_secret, amt: _, user_payment_id: _ } => {
+ Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, ref purpose, .. } => {
assert_eq!(payment_hash_2, *payment_hash);
- assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
- assert_eq!(payment_secret_2, *payment_secret);
+ match &purpose {
+ PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, payment_secret, .. } => {
+ assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
+ assert_eq!(payment_secret_2, *payment_secret);
+ },
+ _ => panic!("expected PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment")
+ }
},
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
}
// Use the utility function send_payment_along_path to send the payment with MPP data which
// indicates there are more HTLCs coming.
let cur_height = CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1; // route_payment calls send_payment, which adds 1 to the current height. So we do the same here to match.
- nodes[0].node.send_payment_along_path(&route.paths[0], &our_payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret), 200000, cur_height).unwrap();
+ nodes[0].node.send_payment_along_path(&route.paths[0], &our_payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret), 200000, cur_height, &None).unwrap();
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
// Now do the relevant commitment_signed/RAA dances along the path, noting that the final
// hop should *not* yet generate any PaymentReceived event(s).
- pass_along_path(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 100000, our_payment_hash, payment_secret, events.drain(..).next().unwrap(), false);
+ pass_along_path(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 100000, our_payment_hash, Some(payment_secret), events.drain(..).next().unwrap(), false, None);
our_payment_hash
} else {
route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 100000).1
nodes[0].node = &nodes_0_deserialized;
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
fail_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], our_payment_hash);
claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], our_payment_preimage);
nodes[0].node = &nodes_0_deserialized;
// nodes[1] and nodes[2] have no lost state with nodes[0]...
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[2], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[2], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
//... and we can even still claim the payment!
claim_payment(&nodes[2], &[&nodes[0], &nodes[1]], our_payment_preimage);
let cur_height = nodes[0].node.best_block.read().unwrap().height() + 1;
let onion_keys = onion_utils::construct_onion_keys(&Secp256k1::signing_only(), &route.paths[0], &session_priv).unwrap();
- let (onion_payloads, _htlc_msat, htlc_cltv) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(&route.paths[0], 3999999, &Some(our_payment_secret), cur_height).unwrap();
+ let (onion_payloads, _htlc_msat, htlc_cltv) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(&route.paths[0], 3999999, &Some(our_payment_secret), cur_height, &None).unwrap();
let onion_packet = onion_utils::construct_onion_packet(onion_payloads, onion_keys, [0; 32], &our_payment_hash);
let mut msg = msgs::UpdateAddHTLC {
let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
match events[0] {
- Event::PaymentReceived { payment_preimage, user_payment_id, .. } => {
- assert_eq!(user_payment_id, 42);
- claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage.unwrap());
+ Event::PaymentReceived { ref purpose, .. } => {
+ match &purpose {
+ PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, user_payment_id, .. } => {
+ assert_eq!(*user_payment_id, 42);
+ claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage.unwrap());
+ },
+ _ => panic!("expected PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment")
+ }
},
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
}
let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
match events[0] {
- Event::PaymentReceived { payment_preimage, payment_secret, user_payment_id, .. } => {
+ Event::PaymentReceived { purpose: PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, payment_secret, user_payment_id }, .. } => {
assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
assert_eq!(user_payment_id, 42);
assert_eq!(payment_secret, our_payment_secret);
expect_payment_failure_chan_update!(nodes[0], chan_announce.contents.short_channel_id, true);
}
}
+
#[test]
fn test_tx_confirmed_skipping_blocks_immediate_broadcast() {
do_test_tx_confirmed_skipping_blocks_immediate_broadcast(false);
do_test_tx_confirmed_skipping_blocks_immediate_broadcast(true);
}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_keysend_payments_to_public_node() {
+ let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
+ let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
+ let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
+ let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+
+ let _chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 10001, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+ let network_graph = nodes[0].net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap();
+ let payer_pubkey = nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id();
+ let payee_pubkey = nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id();
+ let route = get_route(&payer_pubkey, &network_graph, &payee_pubkey, None,
+ None, &vec![], 10000, 40,
+ nodes[0].logger).unwrap();
+
+ let test_preimage = PaymentPreimage([42; 32]);
+ let payment_hash = nodes[0].node.send_spontaneous_payment(&route, Some(test_preimage)).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+ let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ let event = events.pop().unwrap();
+ let path = vec![&nodes[1]];
+ pass_along_path(&nodes[0], &path, 10000, payment_hash, None, event, true, Some(test_preimage));
+ claim_payment(&nodes[0], &path, test_preimage);
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_keysend_payments_to_private_node() {
+ let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
+ let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
+ let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
+ let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+
+ let payer_pubkey = nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id();
+ let payee_pubkey = nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id();
+ nodes[0].node.peer_connected(&payee_pubkey, &msgs::Init { features: InitFeatures::known() });
+ nodes[1].node.peer_connected(&payer_pubkey, &msgs::Init { features: InitFeatures::known() });
+
+ let _chan = create_chan_between_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+ let network_graph = nodes[0].net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap();
+ let first_hops = nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels();
+ let route = get_keysend_route(&payer_pubkey, &network_graph, &payee_pubkey,
+ Some(&first_hops.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>()), &vec![], 10000, 40,
+ nodes[0].logger).unwrap();
+
+ let test_preimage = PaymentPreimage([42; 32]);
+ let payment_hash = nodes[0].node.send_spontaneous_payment(&route, Some(test_preimage)).unwrap();
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
+ let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ let event = events.pop().unwrap();
+ let path = vec![&nodes[1]];
+ pass_along_path(&nodes[0], &path, 10000, payment_hash, None, event, true, Some(test_preimage));
+ claim_payment(&nodes[0], &path, test_preimage);
+}
mod fuzzy_internal_msgs {
use prelude::*;
- use ln::PaymentSecret;
+ use ln::{PaymentPreimage, PaymentSecret};
// These types aren't intended to be pub, but are exposed for direct fuzzing (as we deserialize
// them from untrusted input):
},
FinalNode {
payment_data: Option<FinalOnionHopData>,
+ keysend_preimage: Option<PaymentPreimage>,
},
}
(6, short_channel_id, required)
});
},
- OnionHopDataFormat::FinalNode { ref payment_data } => {
+ OnionHopDataFormat::FinalNode { ref payment_data, ref keysend_preimage } => {
if let Some(final_data) = payment_data {
if final_data.total_msat > MAX_VALUE_MSAT { panic!("We should never be sending infinite/overflow onion payments"); }
}
encode_varint_length_prefixed_tlv!(w, {
(2, HighZeroBytesDroppedVarInt(self.amt_to_forward), required),
(4, HighZeroBytesDroppedVarInt(self.outgoing_cltv_value), required),
- (8, payment_data, option)
+ (8, payment_data, option),
+ (5482373484, keysend_preimage, option)
});
},
}
let mut cltv_value = HighZeroBytesDroppedVarInt(0u32);
let mut short_id: Option<u64> = None;
let mut payment_data: Option<FinalOnionHopData> = None;
+ let mut keysend_preimage: Option<PaymentPreimage> = None;
+ // The TLV type is chosen to be compatible with lnd and c-lightning.
decode_tlv_stream!(&mut rd, {
(2, amt, required),
(4, cltv_value, required),
(6, short_id, option),
(8, payment_data, option),
+ (5482373484, keysend_preimage, option)
});
rd.eat_remaining().map_err(|_| DecodeError::ShortRead)?;
let format = if let Some(short_channel_id) = short_id {
}
}
OnionHopDataFormat::FinalNode {
- payment_data
+ payment_data,
+ keysend_preimage,
}
};
(format, amt.0, cltv_value.0)
let mut msg = msgs::OnionHopData {
format: OnionHopDataFormat::FinalNode {
payment_data: None,
+ keysend_preimage: None,
},
amt_to_forward: 0x0badf00d01020304,
outgoing_cltv_value: 0xffffffff,
let target_value = hex::decode("1002080badf00d010203040404ffffffff").unwrap();
assert_eq!(encoded_value, target_value);
msg = Readable::read(&mut Cursor::new(&target_value[..])).unwrap();
- if let OnionHopDataFormat::FinalNode { payment_data: None } = msg.format { } else { panic!(); }
+ if let OnionHopDataFormat::FinalNode { payment_data: None, .. } = msg.format { } else { panic!(); }
assert_eq!(msg.amt_to_forward, 0x0badf00d01020304);
assert_eq!(msg.outgoing_cltv_value, 0xffffffff);
}
payment_secret: expected_payment_secret,
total_msat: 0x1badca1f
}),
+ keysend_preimage: None,
},
amt_to_forward: 0x0badf00d01020304,
outgoing_cltv_value: 0xffffffff,
payment_data: Some(FinalOnionHopData {
payment_secret,
total_msat: 0x1badca1f
- })
+ }),
+ keysend_preimage: None,
} = msg.format {
assert_eq!(payment_secret, expected_payment_secret);
} else { panic!(); }
let session_priv = SecretKey::from_slice(&[3; 32]).unwrap();
let cur_height = nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + 1;
let onion_keys = onion_utils::construct_onion_keys(&Secp256k1::new(), &route.paths[0], &session_priv).unwrap();
- let (mut onion_payloads, _htlc_msat, _htlc_cltv) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(&route.paths[0], 40000, &None, cur_height).unwrap();
+ let (mut onion_payloads, _htlc_msat, _htlc_cltv) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(&route.paths[0], 40000, &None, cur_height, &None).unwrap();
let mut new_payloads = Vec::new();
for payload in onion_payloads.drain(..) {
new_payloads.push(BogusOnionHopData::new(payload));
let session_priv = SecretKey::from_slice(&[3; 32]).unwrap();
let cur_height = nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + 1;
let onion_keys = onion_utils::construct_onion_keys(&Secp256k1::new(), &route.paths[0], &session_priv).unwrap();
- let (mut onion_payloads, _htlc_msat, _htlc_cltv) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(&route.paths[0], 40000, &None, cur_height).unwrap();
+ let (mut onion_payloads, _htlc_msat, _htlc_cltv) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(&route.paths[0], 40000, &None, cur_height, &None).unwrap();
let mut new_payloads = Vec::new();
for payload in onion_payloads.drain(..) {
new_payloads.push(BogusOnionHopData::new(payload));
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
nodes[2].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
}, true, Some(UPDATE|20), Some(msgs::HTLCFailChannelUpdate::ChannelUpdateMessage{msg: ChannelUpdate::dummy()}));
- reconnect_nodes(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
+ reconnect_nodes(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
run_onion_failure_test("expiry_too_far", 0, &nodes, &route, &payment_hash, &payment_secret, |msg| {
let session_priv = SecretKey::from_slice(&[3; 32]).unwrap();
let height = nodes[2].best_block_info().1;
route.paths[0][1].cltv_expiry_delta += CLTV_FAR_FAR_AWAY + route.paths[0][0].cltv_expiry_delta + 1;
let onion_keys = onion_utils::construct_onion_keys(&Secp256k1::new(), &route.paths[0], &session_priv).unwrap();
- let (onion_payloads, _, htlc_cltv) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(&route.paths[0], 40000, &None, height).unwrap();
+ let (onion_payloads, _, htlc_cltv) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(&route.paths[0], 40000, &None, height, &None).unwrap();
let onion_packet = onion_utils::construct_onion_packet(onion_payloads, onion_keys, [0; 32], &payment_hash);
msg.cltv_expiry = htlc_cltv;
msg.onion_routing_packet = onion_packet;
// You may not use this file except in accordance with one or both of these
// licenses.
-use ln::{PaymentHash, PaymentSecret};
+use ln::{PaymentHash, PaymentPreimage, PaymentSecret};
use ln::channelmanager::HTLCSource;
use ln::msgs;
use routing::router::RouteHop;
}
/// returns the hop data, as well as the first-hop value_msat and CLTV value we should send.
-pub(super) fn build_onion_payloads(path: &Vec<RouteHop>, total_msat: u64, payment_secret_option: &Option<PaymentSecret>, starting_htlc_offset: u32) -> Result<(Vec<msgs::OnionHopData>, u64, u32), APIError> {
+pub(super) fn build_onion_payloads(path: &Vec<RouteHop>, total_msat: u64, payment_secret_option: &Option<PaymentSecret>, starting_htlc_offset: u32, keysend_preimage: &Option<PaymentPreimage>) -> Result<(Vec<msgs::OnionHopData>, u64, u32), APIError> {
let mut cur_value_msat = 0u64;
let mut cur_cltv = starting_htlc_offset;
let mut last_short_channel_id = 0;
total_msat,
})
} else { None },
+ keysend_preimage: *keysend_preimage,
}
} else {
msgs::OnionHopDataFormat::NonFinalNode {
use prelude::*;
use alloc::collections::LinkedList;
use alloc::fmt::Debug;
-use std::sync::{Arc, Mutex};
+use sync::{Arc, Mutex};
use core::sync::atomic::{AtomicUsize, Ordering};
use core::{cmp, hash, fmt, mem};
use core::ops::Deref;
return Err(PeerHandleError{ no_connection_possible: false }.into());
}
- log_info!(
- self.logger, "Received peer Init message: data_loss_protect: {}, initial_routing_sync: {}, upfront_shutdown_script: {}, gossip_queries: {}, static_remote_key: {}, unknown flags (local and global): {}",
- if msg.features.supports_data_loss_protect() { "supported" } else { "not supported"},
- if msg.features.initial_routing_sync() { "requested" } else { "not requested" },
- if msg.features.supports_upfront_shutdown_script() { "supported" } else { "not supported"},
- if msg.features.supports_gossip_queries() { "supported" } else { "not supported" },
- if msg.features.supports_static_remote_key() { "supported" } else { "not supported"},
- if msg.features.supports_unknown_bits() { "present" } else { "none" }
- );
+ log_info!(self.logger, "Received peer Init message: {}", msg.features);
if msg.features.initial_routing_sync() {
peer.sync_status = InitSyncTracker::ChannelsSyncing(0);
use bitcoin::secp256k1::key::{SecretKey, PublicKey};
use prelude::*;
- use std::sync::{Arc, Mutex};
+ use sync::{Arc, Mutex};
use core::sync::atomic::Ordering;
#[derive(Clone)]
use prelude::*;
use alloc::collections::{BTreeMap, btree_map::Entry as BtreeEntry};
use core::{cmp, fmt};
-use std::sync::{RwLock, RwLockReadGuard};
+use sync::{RwLock, RwLockReadGuard};
use core::sync::atomic::{AtomicUsize, Ordering};
-use std::sync::Mutex;
+use sync::Mutex;
use core::ops::Deref;
use bitcoin::hashes::hex::ToHex;
use bitcoin::secp256k1::{All, Secp256k1};
use prelude::*;
- use std::sync::Arc;
+ use sync::Arc;
fn create_net_graph_msg_handler() -> (Secp256k1<All>, NetGraphMsgHandler<Arc<test_utils::TestChainSource>, Arc<test_utils::TestLogger>>) {
let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
}
}
+/// Gets a keysend route from us (payer) to the given target node (payee). This is needed because
+/// keysend payments do not have an invoice from which to pull the payee's supported features, which
+/// makes it tricky to otherwise supply the `payee_features` parameter of `get_route`.
+pub fn get_keysend_route<L: Deref>(our_node_id: &PublicKey, network: &NetworkGraph, payee:
+ &PublicKey, first_hops: Option<&[&ChannelDetails]>, last_hops: &[&RouteHint],
+ final_value_msat: u64, final_cltv: u32, logger: L) -> Result<Route,
+ LightningError> where L::Target: Logger {
+ let invoice_features = InvoiceFeatures::for_keysend();
+ get_route(our_node_id, network, payee, Some(invoice_features), first_hops, last_hops,
+ final_value_msat, final_cltv, logger)
+}
+
/// Gets a route from us (payer) to the given target node (payee).
///
/// If the payee provided features in their invoice, they should be provided via payee_features.
htlc_maximum_msat: hop.htlc_maximum_msat,
fees: hop.fees,
};
- if add_entry!(hop.short_channel_id, hop.src_node_id, payee, directional_info, None::<u64>, &empty_channel_features, 0, path_value_msat, 0) {
+ // We assume that the recipient only included route hints for routes which had
+ // sufficient value to route `final_value_msat`. Note that in the case of "0-value"
+ // invoices where the invoice does not specify value this may not be the case, but
+ // better to include the hints than not.
+ if add_entry!(hop.short_channel_id, hop.src_node_id, payee, directional_info, Some((final_value_msat + 999) / 1000), &empty_channel_features, 0, path_value_msat, 0) {
// If this hop connects to a node with which we have a direct channel,
// ignore the network graph and, if the last hop was added, add our
// direct channel to the candidate set.
use bitcoin::secp256k1::{Secp256k1, All};
use prelude::*;
- use std::sync::Arc;
+ use sync::{self, Arc};
fn get_channel_details(short_channel_id: Option<u64>, node_id: PublicKey,
features: InitFeatures, outbound_capacity_msat: u64) -> channelmanager::ChannelDetails {
}
}
- fn build_graph() -> (Secp256k1<All>, NetGraphMsgHandler<std::sync::Arc<test_utils::TestChainSource>, std::sync::Arc<crate::util::test_utils::TestLogger>>, std::sync::Arc<test_utils::TestChainSource>, std::sync::Arc<test_utils::TestLogger>) {
+ fn build_graph() -> (Secp256k1<All>, NetGraphMsgHandler<sync::Arc<test_utils::TestChainSource>, sync::Arc<crate::util::test_utils::TestLogger>>, sync::Arc<test_utils::TestChainSource>, sync::Arc<test_utils::TestLogger>) {
let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
let logger = Arc::new(test_utils::TestLogger::new());
let chain_monitor = Arc::new(test_utils::TestChainSource::new(Network::Testnet));
--- /dev/null
+pub use ::alloc::sync::Arc;
+use core::ops::{Deref, DerefMut};
+use core::time::Duration;
+use core::cell::{RefCell, Ref, RefMut};
+
+pub type LockResult<Guard> = Result<Guard, ()>;
+
+pub struct Condvar {}
+
+impl Condvar {
+ pub fn new() -> Condvar {
+ Condvar { }
+ }
+
+ pub fn wait<'a, T>(&'a self, guard: MutexGuard<'a, T>) -> LockResult<MutexGuard<'a, T>> {
+ Ok(guard)
+ }
+
+ #[allow(unused)]
+ pub fn wait_timeout<'a, T>(&'a self, guard: MutexGuard<'a, T>, _dur: Duration) -> LockResult<(MutexGuard<'a, T>, ())> {
+ Ok((guard, ()))
+ }
+
+ pub fn notify_all(&self) {}
+}
+
+pub struct Mutex<T: ?Sized> {
+ inner: RefCell<T>
+}
+
+#[must_use = "if unused the Mutex will immediately unlock"]
+pub struct MutexGuard<'a, T: ?Sized + 'a> {
+ lock: RefMut<'a, T>,
+}
+
+impl<T: ?Sized> Deref for MutexGuard<'_, T> {
+ type Target = T;
+
+ fn deref(&self) -> &T {
+ &self.lock.deref()
+ }
+}
+
+impl<T: ?Sized> DerefMut for MutexGuard<'_, T> {
+ fn deref_mut(&mut self) -> &mut T {
+ self.lock.deref_mut()
+ }
+}
+
+impl<T> Mutex<T> {
+ pub fn new(inner: T) -> Mutex<T> {
+ Mutex { inner: RefCell::new(inner) }
+ }
+
+ pub fn lock<'a>(&'a self) -> LockResult<MutexGuard<'a, T>> {
+ Ok(MutexGuard { lock: self.inner.borrow_mut() })
+ }
+
+ pub fn try_lock<'a>(&'a self) -> LockResult<MutexGuard<'a, T>> {
+ Ok(MutexGuard { lock: self.inner.borrow_mut() })
+ }
+}
+
+pub struct RwLock<T: ?Sized> {
+ inner: RefCell<T>
+}
+
+pub struct RwLockReadGuard<'a, T: ?Sized + 'a> {
+ lock: Ref<'a, T>,
+}
+
+pub struct RwLockWriteGuard<'a, T: ?Sized + 'a> {
+ lock: RefMut<'a, T>,
+}
+
+impl<T: ?Sized> Deref for RwLockReadGuard<'_, T> {
+ type Target = T;
+
+ fn deref(&self) -> &T {
+ &self.lock.deref()
+ }
+}
+
+impl<T: ?Sized> Deref for RwLockWriteGuard<'_, T> {
+ type Target = T;
+
+ fn deref(&self) -> &T {
+ &self.lock.deref()
+ }
+}
+
+impl<T: ?Sized> DerefMut for RwLockWriteGuard<'_, T> {
+ fn deref_mut(&mut self) -> &mut T {
+ self.lock.deref_mut()
+ }
+}
+
+impl<T> RwLock<T> {
+ pub fn new(inner: T) -> RwLock<T> {
+ RwLock { inner: RefCell::new(inner) }
+ }
+
+ pub fn read<'a>(&'a self) -> LockResult<RwLockReadGuard<'a, T>> {
+ Ok(RwLockReadGuard { lock: self.inner.borrow() })
+ }
+
+ pub fn write<'a>(&'a self) -> LockResult<RwLockWriteGuard<'a, T>> {
+ Ok(RwLockWriteGuard { lock: self.inner.borrow_mut() })
+ }
+
+ pub fn try_write<'a>(&'a self) -> LockResult<RwLockWriteGuard<'a, T>> {
+ // There is no try, grasshopper - only used for tests and expected to fail
+ Err(())
+ }
+}
use prelude::*;
use core::cmp;
-use std::sync::{Mutex, Arc};
+use sync::{Mutex, Arc};
use bitcoin::blockdata::transaction::{Transaction, SigHashType};
use bitcoin::util::bip143;
use core::time::Duration;
use core::ops::Deref;
+/// Some information provided on receipt of payment depends on whether the payment received is a
+/// spontaneous payment or a "conventional" lightning payment that's paying an invoice.
+#[derive(Clone, Debug)]
+pub enum PaymentPurpose {
+ /// Information for receiving a payment that we generated an invoice for.
+ InvoicePayment {
+ /// The preimage to the payment_hash, if the payment hash (and secret) were fetched via
+ /// [`ChannelManager::create_inbound_payment`]. If provided, this can be handed directly to
+ /// [`ChannelManager::claim_funds`].
+ ///
+ /// [`ChannelManager::create_inbound_payment`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::create_inbound_payment
+ /// [`ChannelManager::claim_funds`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::claim_funds
+ payment_preimage: Option<PaymentPreimage>,
+ /// The "payment secret". This authenticates the sender to the recipient, preventing a
+ /// number of deanonymization attacks during the routing process.
+ /// It is provided here for your reference, however its accuracy is enforced directly by
+ /// [`ChannelManager`] using the values you previously provided to
+ /// [`ChannelManager::create_inbound_payment`] or
+ /// [`ChannelManager::create_inbound_payment_for_hash`].
+ ///
+ /// [`ChannelManager`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager
+ /// [`ChannelManager::create_inbound_payment`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::create_inbound_payment
+ /// [`ChannelManager::create_inbound_payment_for_hash`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::create_inbound_payment_for_hash
+ payment_secret: PaymentSecret,
+ /// This is the `user_payment_id` which was provided to
+ /// [`ChannelManager::create_inbound_payment_for_hash`] or
+ /// [`ChannelManager::create_inbound_payment`]. It has no meaning inside of LDK and is
+ /// simply copied here. It may be used to correlate PaymentReceived events with invoice
+ /// metadata stored elsewhere.
+ ///
+ /// [`ChannelManager::create_inbound_payment`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::create_inbound_payment
+ /// [`ChannelManager::create_inbound_payment_for_hash`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::create_inbound_payment_for_hash
+ user_payment_id: u64,
+ },
+ /// Because this is a spontaneous payment, the payer generated their own preimage rather than us
+ /// (the payee) providing a preimage.
+ SpontaneousPayment(PaymentPreimage),
+}
+
/// An Event which you should probably take some action in response to.
///
/// Note that while Writeable and Readable are implemented for Event, you probably shouldn't use
PaymentReceived {
/// The hash for which the preimage should be handed to the ChannelManager.
payment_hash: PaymentHash,
- /// The preimage to the payment_hash, if the payment hash (and secret) were fetched via
- /// [`ChannelManager::create_inbound_payment`]. If provided, this can be handed directly to
- /// [`ChannelManager::claim_funds`].
- ///
- /// [`ChannelManager::create_inbound_payment`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::create_inbound_payment
- /// [`ChannelManager::claim_funds`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::claim_funds
- payment_preimage: Option<PaymentPreimage>,
- /// The "payment secret". This authenticates the sender to the recipient, preventing a
- /// number of deanonymization attacks during the routing process.
- /// It is provided here for your reference, however its accuracy is enforced directly by
- /// [`ChannelManager`] using the values you previously provided to
- /// [`ChannelManager::create_inbound_payment`] or
- /// [`ChannelManager::create_inbound_payment_for_hash`].
- ///
- /// [`ChannelManager`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager
- /// [`ChannelManager::create_inbound_payment`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::create_inbound_payment
- /// [`ChannelManager::create_inbound_payment_for_hash`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::create_inbound_payment_for_hash
- payment_secret: PaymentSecret,
/// The value, in thousandths of a satoshi, that this payment is for. Note that you must
/// compare this to the expected value before accepting the payment (as otherwise you are
/// providing proof-of-payment for less than the value you expected!).
amt: u64,
- /// This is the `user_payment_id` which was provided to
- /// [`ChannelManager::create_inbound_payment_for_hash`] or
- /// [`ChannelManager::create_inbound_payment`]. It has no meaning inside of LDK and is
- /// simply copied here. It may be used to correlate PaymentReceived events with invoice
- /// metadata stored elsewhere.
- ///
- /// [`ChannelManager::create_inbound_payment`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::create_inbound_payment
- /// [`ChannelManager::create_inbound_payment_for_hash`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::create_inbound_payment_for_hash
- user_payment_id: u64,
+ /// Information for claiming this received payment, based on whether the purpose of the
+ /// payment is to pay an invoice or to send a spontaneous payment.
+ purpose: PaymentPurpose,
},
/// Indicates an outbound payment we made succeeded (ie it made it all the way to its target
/// and we got back the payment preimage for it).
// We never write out FundingGenerationReady events as, upon disconnection, peers
// drop any channels which have not yet exchanged funding_signed.
},
- &Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, ref payment_preimage, ref payment_secret, ref amt, ref user_payment_id } => {
+ &Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, ref amt, ref purpose } => {
1u8.write(writer)?;
+ let mut payment_secret = None;
+ let mut user_payment_id = None;
+ let payment_preimage;
+ match &purpose {
+ PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage: preimage, payment_secret: secret, user_payment_id: id } => {
+ payment_secret = Some(secret);
+ payment_preimage = *preimage;
+ user_payment_id = Some(id);
+ },
+ PaymentPurpose::SpontaneousPayment(preimage) => {
+ payment_preimage = Some(*preimage);
+ }
+ }
write_tlv_fields!(writer, {
(0, payment_hash, required),
- (2, payment_secret, required),
+ (2, payment_secret, option),
(4, amt, required),
- (6, user_payment_id, required),
+ (6, user_payment_id, option),
(8, payment_preimage, option),
});
},
let f = || {
let mut payment_hash = PaymentHash([0; 32]);
let mut payment_preimage = None;
- let mut payment_secret = PaymentSecret([0; 32]);
+ let mut payment_secret = None;
let mut amt = 0;
- let mut user_payment_id = 0;
+ let mut user_payment_id = None;
read_tlv_fields!(reader, {
(0, payment_hash, required),
- (2, payment_secret, required),
+ (2, payment_secret, option),
(4, amt, required),
- (6, user_payment_id, required),
+ (6, user_payment_id, option),
(8, payment_preimage, option),
});
+ let purpose = match payment_secret {
+ Some(secret) => PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment {
+ payment_preimage,
+ payment_secret: secret,
+ user_payment_id: if let Some(id) = user_payment_id {
+ id
+ } else { return Err(msgs::DecodeError::InvalidValue) }
+ },
+ None if payment_preimage.is_some() => PaymentPurpose::SpontaneousPayment(payment_preimage.unwrap()),
+ None => return Err(msgs::DecodeError::InvalidValue),
+ };
Ok(Some(Event::PaymentReceived {
payment_hash,
- payment_preimage,
- payment_secret,
amt,
- user_payment_id,
+ purpose,
}))
};
f()
mod tests {
use util::logger::{Logger, Level};
use util::test_utils::TestLogger;
- use std::sync::Arc;
+ use sync::Arc;
#[test]
fn test_level_show() {
}
fn sigrec_decode(sig_rec: Vec<u8>) -> Result<RecoverableSignature, Error> {
+ // Signature must be 64 + 1 bytes long (compact signature + recovery id)
+ if sig_rec.len() != 65 {
+ return Err(Error::InvalidSignature);
+ }
+
let rsig = &sig_rec[1..];
let rid = sig_rec[0] as i32 - 31;
use prelude::*;
use std::io::{Read, Write};
use core::hash::Hash;
-use std::sync::Mutex;
+use sync::Mutex;
use core::cmp;
use bitcoin::secp256k1::Signature;
use prelude::*;
use core::time::Duration;
-use std::sync::{Mutex, Arc};
+use sync::{Mutex, Arc};
use core::sync::atomic::{AtomicBool, AtomicUsize, Ordering};
use core::{cmp, mem};
use chain::keysinterface::InMemorySigner;
projects / rust-lightning / commitdiff