use lightning::ln::features::{ChannelFeatures, InitFeatures, NodeFeatures};
use lightning::ln::msgs::{CommitmentUpdate, ChannelMessageHandler, DecodeError, UpdateAddHTLC, Init};
use lightning::ln::script::ShutdownScript;
-use lightning::util::enforcing_trait_impls::{EnforcingSigner, INITIAL_REVOKED_COMMITMENT_NUMBER};
+use lightning::util::enforcing_trait_impls::{EnforcingSigner, EnforcementState};
use lightning::util::errors::APIError;
use lightning::util::events;
use lightning::util::logger::Logger;
struct KeyProvider {
node_id: u8,
rand_bytes_id: atomic::AtomicU32,
- revoked_commitments: Mutex<HashMap<[u8;32], Arc<Mutex<u64>>>>,
+ enforcement_states: Mutex<HashMap<[u8;32], Arc<Mutex<EnforcementState>>>>,
}
impl KeysInterface for KeyProvider {
type Signer = EnforcingSigner;
channel_value_satoshis,
[0; 32],
);
- let revoked_commitment = self.make_revoked_commitment_cell(keys.commitment_seed);
+ let revoked_commitment = self.make_enforcement_state_cell(keys.commitment_seed);
EnforcingSigner::new_with_revoked(keys, revoked_commitment, false)
}
let mut reader = std::io::Cursor::new(buffer);
let inner: InMemorySigner = Readable::read(&mut reader)?;
- let revoked_commitment = self.make_revoked_commitment_cell(inner.commitment_seed);
-
- let last_commitment_number = Readable::read(&mut reader)?;
+ let state = self.make_enforcement_state_cell(inner.commitment_seed);
Ok(EnforcingSigner {
inner,
- last_commitment_number: Arc::new(Mutex::new(last_commitment_number)),
- revoked_commitment,
+ state,
disable_revocation_policy_check: false,
})
}
}
impl KeyProvider {
- fn make_revoked_commitment_cell(&self, commitment_seed: [u8; 32]) -> Arc<Mutex<u64>> {
- let mut revoked_commitments = self.revoked_commitments.lock().unwrap();
+ fn make_enforcement_state_cell(&self, commitment_seed: [u8; 32]) -> Arc<Mutex<EnforcementState>> {
+ let mut revoked_commitments = self.enforcement_states.lock().unwrap();
if !revoked_commitments.contains_key(&commitment_seed) {
- revoked_commitments.insert(commitment_seed, Arc::new(Mutex::new(INITIAL_REVOKED_COMMITMENT_NUMBER)));
+ revoked_commitments.insert(commitment_seed, Arc::new(Mutex::new(EnforcementState::new())));
}
let cell = revoked_commitments.get(&commitment_seed).unwrap();
Arc::clone(cell)
macro_rules! make_node {
($node_id: expr, $fee_estimator: expr) => { {
let logger: Arc<dyn Logger> = Arc::new(test_logger::TestLogger::new($node_id.to_string(), out.clone()));
- let keys_manager = Arc::new(KeyProvider { node_id: $node_id, rand_bytes_id: atomic::AtomicU32::new(0), revoked_commitments: Mutex::new(HashMap::new()) });
+ let keys_manager = Arc::new(KeyProvider { node_id: $node_id, rand_bytes_id: atomic::AtomicU32::new(0), enforcement_states: Mutex::new(HashMap::new()) });
let monitor = Arc::new(TestChainMonitor::new(broadcast.clone(), logger.clone(), $fee_estimator.clone(), Arc::new(TestPersister{}), Arc::clone(&keys_manager)));
let mut config = UserConfig::default();
use lightning::util::config::UserConfig;
use lightning::util::errors::APIError;
use lightning::util::events::Event;
-use lightning::util::enforcing_trait_impls::EnforcingSigner;
+use lightning::util::enforcing_trait_impls::{EnforcingSigner, EnforcementState};
use lightning::util::logger::Logger;
use lightning::util::ser::Readable;
(ctr >> 8*7) as u8, (ctr >> 8*6) as u8, (ctr >> 8*5) as u8, (ctr >> 8*4) as u8, (ctr >> 8*3) as u8, (ctr >> 8*2) as u8, (ctr >> 8*1) as u8, 14, (ctr >> 8*0) as u8]
}
- fn read_chan_signer(&self, data: &[u8]) -> Result<EnforcingSigner, DecodeError> {
- EnforcingSigner::read(&mut std::io::Cursor::new(data))
+ fn read_chan_signer(&self, mut data: &[u8]) -> Result<EnforcingSigner, DecodeError> {
+ let inner: InMemorySigner = Readable::read(&mut data)?;
+ let state = Arc::new(Mutex::new(EnforcementState::new()));
+
+ Ok(EnforcingSigner::new_with_revoked(
+ inner,
+ state,
+ false
+ ))
}
fn sign_invoice(&self, _invoice_preimage: Vec<u8>) -> Result<RecoverableSignature, ()> {
/// Note that the commitment number starts at (1 << 48) - 1 and counts backwards.
// TODO: return a Result so we can signal a validation error
fn release_commitment_secret(&self, idx: u64) -> [u8; 32];
+ /// Validate the counterparty's signatures on the holder commitment transaction and HTLCs.
+ ///
+ /// This is required in order for the signer to make sure that releasing a commitment
+ /// secret won't leave us without a broadcastable holder transaction.
+ /// Policy checks should be implemented in this function, including checking the amount
+ /// sent to us and checking the HTLCs.
+ fn validate_holder_commitment(&self, holder_tx: &HolderCommitmentTransaction) -> Result<(), ()>;
/// Gets the holder's channel public keys and basepoints
fn pubkeys(&self) -> &ChannelPublicKeys;
/// Gets an arbitrary identifier describing the set of keys which are provided back to you in
/// Create a signature for a counterparty's commitment transaction and associated HTLC transactions.
///
/// Note that if signing fails or is rejected, the channel will be force-closed.
+ ///
+ /// Policy checks should be implemented in this function, including checking the amount
+ /// sent to us and checking the HTLCs.
//
// TODO: Document the things someone using this interface should enforce before signing.
fn sign_counterparty_commitment(&self, commitment_tx: &CommitmentTransaction, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<secp256k1::All>) -> Result<(Signature, Vec<Signature>), ()>;
+ /// Validate the counterparty's revocation.
+ ///
+ /// This is required in order for the signer to make sure that the state has moved
+ /// forward and it is safe to sign the next counterparty commitment.
+ fn validate_counterparty_revocation(&self, idx: u64, secret: &SecretKey) -> Result<(), ()>;
/// Create a signatures for a holder's commitment transaction and its claiming HTLC transactions.
/// This will only ever be called with a non-revoked commitment_tx. This will be called with the
chan_utils::build_commitment_secret(&self.commitment_seed, idx)
}
+ fn validate_holder_commitment(&self, _holder_tx: &HolderCommitmentTransaction) -> Result<(), ()> {
+ Ok(())
+ }
+
fn pubkeys(&self) -> &ChannelPublicKeys { &self.holder_channel_pubkeys }
fn channel_keys_id(&self) -> [u8; 32] { self.channel_keys_id }
Ok((commitment_sig, htlc_sigs))
}
+ fn validate_counterparty_revocation(&self, _idx: u64, _secret: &SecretKey) -> Result<(), ()> {
+ Ok(())
+ }
+
fn sign_holder_commitment_and_htlcs(&self, commitment_tx: &HolderCommitmentTransaction, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<secp256k1::All>) -> Result<(Signature, Vec<Signature>), ()> {
let funding_pubkey = PublicKey::from_secret_key(secp_ctx, &self.funding_key);
let funding_redeemscript = make_funding_redeemscript(&funding_pubkey, &self.counterparty_pubkeys().funding_pubkey);
self.counterparty_funding_pubkey()
);
+ self.holder_signer.validate_holder_commitment(&holder_commitment_tx)
+ .map_err(|_| ChannelError::Close("Failed to validate our commitment".to_owned()))?;
+
// Now that we're past error-generating stuff, update our local state:
let funding_redeemscript = self.get_funding_redeemscript();
self.counterparty_funding_pubkey()
);
+ self.holder_signer.validate_holder_commitment(&holder_commitment_tx)
+ .map_err(|_| ChannelError::Close("Failed to validate our commitment".to_owned()))?;
+
let funding_redeemscript = self.get_funding_redeemscript();
let funding_txo = self.get_funding_txo().unwrap();
);
let next_per_commitment_point = self.holder_signer.get_per_commitment_point(self.cur_holder_commitment_transaction_number - 1, &self.secp_ctx);
+ self.holder_signer.validate_holder_commitment(&holder_commitment_tx)
+ .map_err(|_| (None, ChannelError::Close("Failed to validate our commitment".to_owned())))?;
let per_commitment_secret = self.holder_signer.release_commitment_secret(self.cur_holder_commitment_transaction_number + 1);
// Update state now that we've passed all the can-fail calls...
return Err(ChannelError::Close("Peer sent revoke_and_ack after we'd started exchanging closing_signeds".to_owned()));
}
+ let secret = secp_check!(SecretKey::from_slice(&msg.per_commitment_secret), "Peer provided an invalid per_commitment_secret".to_owned());
+
if let Some(counterparty_prev_commitment_point) = self.counterparty_prev_commitment_point {
- if PublicKey::from_secret_key(&self.secp_ctx, &secp_check!(SecretKey::from_slice(&msg.per_commitment_secret), "Peer provided an invalid per_commitment_secret".to_owned())) != counterparty_prev_commitment_point {
+ if PublicKey::from_secret_key(&self.secp_ctx, &secret) != counterparty_prev_commitment_point {
return Err(ChannelError::Close("Got a revoke commitment secret which didn't correspond to their current pubkey".to_owned()));
}
}
*self.next_remote_commitment_tx_fee_info_cached.lock().unwrap() = None;
}
+ self.holder_signer.validate_counterparty_revocation(
+ self.cur_counterparty_commitment_transaction_number + 1,
+ &secret
+ ).map_err(|_| ChannelError::Close("Failed to validate revocation from peer".to_owned()))?;
+
self.commitment_secrets.provide_secret(self.cur_counterparty_commitment_transaction_number + 1, msg.per_commitment_secret)
.map_err(|_| ChannelError::Close("Previous secrets did not match new one".to_owned()))?;
self.latest_monitor_update_id += 1;
let chan_lock = nodes[0].node.channel_state.lock().unwrap();
let local_chan = chan_lock.by_id.get(&chan.2).unwrap();
let chan_signer = local_chan.get_signer();
+ // Make the signer believe we validated another commitment, so we can release the secret
+ chan_signer.get_enforcement_state().last_holder_commitment -= 1;
+
let pubkeys = chan_signer.pubkeys();
(pubkeys.revocation_basepoint, pubkeys.htlc_basepoint,
chan_signer.release_commitment_secret(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER),
// commitment transaction, we would have happily carried on and provided them the next
// commitment transaction based on one RAA forward. This would probably eventually have led to
// channel closure, but it would not have resulted in funds loss. Still, our
- // EnforcingSigner would have paniced as it doesn't like jumps into the future. Here, we
+ // EnforcingSigner would have panicked as it doesn't like jumps into the future. Here, we
// check simply that the channel is closed in response to such an RAA, but don't check whether
// we decide to punish our counterparty for revoking their funds (as we don't currently
// implement that).
let channel_id = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()).2;
let mut guard = nodes[0].node.channel_state.lock().unwrap();
- let keys = &guard.by_id.get_mut(&channel_id).unwrap().get_signer();
+ let keys = guard.by_id.get_mut(&channel_id).unwrap().get_signer();
+
const INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER: u64 = (1 << 48) - 1;
+
+ // Make signer believe we got a counterparty signature, so that it allows the revocation
+ keys.get_enforcement_state().last_holder_commitment -= 1;
let per_commitment_secret = keys.release_commitment_secret(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER);
+
// Must revoke without gaps
+ keys.get_enforcement_state().last_holder_commitment -= 1;
keys.release_commitment_secret(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - 1);
+
+ keys.get_enforcement_state().last_holder_commitment -= 1;
let next_per_commitment_point = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&Secp256k1::new(),
&SecretKey::from_slice(&keys.release_commitment_secret(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - 2)).unwrap());
pub funding_txid: Txid,
/// The specific output index funding this channel
pub funding_output_index: u16,
- /// The signature of the channel initiator (funder) on the funding transaction
+ /// The signature of the channel initiator (funder) on the initial commitment transaction
pub signature: Signature,
}
pub struct FundingSigned {
/// The channel ID
pub channel_id: [u8; 32],
- /// The signature of the channel acceptor (fundee) on the funding transaction
+ /// The signature of the channel acceptor (fundee) on the initial commitment transaction
pub signature: Signature,
}
use ln::{chan_utils, msgs};
use chain::keysinterface::{Sign, InMemorySigner, BaseSign};
-use io;
use prelude::*;
use core::cmp;
use sync::{Mutex, Arc};
+#[cfg(test)] use sync::MutexGuard;
use bitcoin::blockdata::transaction::{Transaction, SigHashType};
use bitcoin::util::bip143;
use bitcoin::secp256k1;
use bitcoin::secp256k1::key::{SecretKey, PublicKey};
use bitcoin::secp256k1::{Secp256k1, Signature};
-use util::ser::{Writeable, Writer, Readable};
+use util::ser::{Writeable, Writer};
use io::Error;
-use ln::msgs::DecodeError;
/// Initial value for revoked commitment downward counter
pub const INITIAL_REVOKED_COMMITMENT_NUMBER: u64 = 1 << 48;
/// - When signing, the holder transaction has not been revoked
/// - When revoking, the holder transaction has not been signed
/// - The holder commitment number is monotonic and without gaps
+/// - The revoked holder commitment number is monotonic and without gaps
+/// - There is at least one unrevoked holder transaction at all times
/// - The counterparty commitment number is monotonic and without gaps
/// - The pre-derived keys and pre-built transaction in CommitmentTransaction were correctly built
///
/// Eventually we will probably want to expose a variant of this which would essentially
/// be what you'd want to run on a hardware wallet.
///
+/// Note that counterparty signatures on the holder transaction are not checked, but it should
+/// be in a complete implementation.
+///
/// Note that before we do so we should ensure its serialization format has backwards- and
/// forwards-compatibility prefix/suffixes!
#[derive(Clone)]
pub struct EnforcingSigner {
pub inner: InMemorySigner,
- /// The last counterparty commitment number we signed, backwards counting
- pub last_commitment_number: Arc<Mutex<Option<u64>>>,
- /// The last holder commitment number we revoked, backwards counting
- pub revoked_commitment: Arc<Mutex<u64>>,
+ /// Channel state used for policy enforcement
+ pub state: Arc<Mutex<EnforcementState>>,
pub disable_revocation_policy_check: bool,
}
impl EnforcingSigner {
/// Construct an EnforcingSigner
pub fn new(inner: InMemorySigner) -> Self {
+ let state = Arc::new(Mutex::new(EnforcementState::new()));
Self {
inner,
- last_commitment_number: Arc::new(Mutex::new(None)),
- revoked_commitment: Arc::new(Mutex::new(INITIAL_REVOKED_COMMITMENT_NUMBER)),
+ state,
disable_revocation_policy_check: false
}
}
/// Construct an EnforcingSigner with externally managed storage
///
/// Since there are multiple copies of this struct for each channel, some coordination is needed
- /// so that all copies are aware of revocations. A pointer to this state is provided here, usually
- /// by an implementation of KeysInterface.
- pub fn new_with_revoked(inner: InMemorySigner, revoked_commitment: Arc<Mutex<u64>>, disable_revocation_policy_check: bool) -> Self {
+ /// so that all copies are aware of enforcement state. A pointer to this state is provided
+ /// here, usually by an implementation of KeysInterface.
+ pub fn new_with_revoked(inner: InMemorySigner, state: Arc<Mutex<EnforcementState>>, disable_revocation_policy_check: bool) -> Self {
Self {
inner,
- last_commitment_number: Arc::new(Mutex::new(None)),
- revoked_commitment,
+ state,
disable_revocation_policy_check
}
}
+
+ #[cfg(test)]
+ pub fn get_enforcement_state(&self) -> MutexGuard<EnforcementState> {
+ self.state.lock().unwrap()
+ }
}
impl BaseSign for EnforcingSigner {
fn release_commitment_secret(&self, idx: u64) -> [u8; 32] {
{
- let mut revoked = self.revoked_commitment.lock().unwrap();
- assert!(idx == *revoked || idx == *revoked - 1, "can only revoke the current or next unrevoked commitment - trying {}, revoked {}", idx, *revoked);
- *revoked = idx;
+ let mut state = self.state.lock().unwrap();
+ assert!(idx == state.last_holder_revoked_commitment || idx == state.last_holder_revoked_commitment - 1, "can only revoke the current or next unrevoked commitment - trying {}, last revoked {}", idx, state.last_holder_revoked_commitment);
+ assert!(idx > state.last_holder_commitment, "cannot revoke the last holder commitment - attempted to revoke {} last commitment {}", idx, state.last_holder_commitment);
+ state.last_holder_revoked_commitment = idx;
}
self.inner.release_commitment_secret(idx)
}
+ fn validate_holder_commitment(&self, holder_tx: &HolderCommitmentTransaction) -> Result<(), ()> {
+ let mut state = self.state.lock().unwrap();
+ let idx = holder_tx.commitment_number();
+ assert!(idx == state.last_holder_commitment || idx == state.last_holder_commitment - 1, "expecting to validate the current or next holder commitment - trying {}, current {}", idx, state.last_holder_commitment);
+ state.last_holder_commitment = idx;
+ Ok(())
+ }
+
fn pubkeys(&self) -> &ChannelPublicKeys { self.inner.pubkeys() }
fn channel_keys_id(&self) -> [u8; 32] { self.inner.channel_keys_id() }
self.verify_counterparty_commitment_tx(commitment_tx, secp_ctx);
{
- let mut last_commitment_number_guard = self.last_commitment_number.lock().unwrap();
+ let mut state = self.state.lock().unwrap();
let actual_commitment_number = commitment_tx.commitment_number();
- let last_commitment_number = last_commitment_number_guard.unwrap_or(actual_commitment_number);
+ let last_commitment_number = state.last_counterparty_commitment;
// These commitment numbers are backwards counting. We expect either the same as the previously encountered,
// or the next one.
assert!(last_commitment_number == actual_commitment_number || last_commitment_number - 1 == actual_commitment_number, "{} doesn't come after {}", actual_commitment_number, last_commitment_number);
- *last_commitment_number_guard = Some(cmp::min(last_commitment_number, actual_commitment_number))
+ // Ensure that the counterparty doesn't get more than two broadcastable commitments -
+ // the last and the one we are trying to sign
+ assert!(actual_commitment_number >= state.last_counterparty_revoked_commitment - 2, "cannot sign a commitment if second to last wasn't revoked - signing {} revoked {}", actual_commitment_number, state.last_counterparty_revoked_commitment);
+ state.last_counterparty_commitment = cmp::min(last_commitment_number, actual_commitment_number)
}
Ok(self.inner.sign_counterparty_commitment(commitment_tx, secp_ctx).unwrap())
}
+ fn validate_counterparty_revocation(&self, idx: u64, _secret: &SecretKey) -> Result<(), ()> {
+ let mut state = self.state.lock().unwrap();
+ assert!(idx == state.last_counterparty_revoked_commitment || idx == state.last_counterparty_revoked_commitment - 1, "expecting to validate the current or next counterparty revocation - trying {}, current {}", idx, state.last_counterparty_revoked_commitment);
+ state.last_counterparty_revoked_commitment = idx;
+ Ok(())
+ }
+
fn sign_holder_commitment_and_htlcs(&self, commitment_tx: &HolderCommitmentTransaction, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<secp256k1::All>) -> Result<(Signature, Vec<Signature>), ()> {
let trusted_tx = self.verify_holder_commitment_tx(commitment_tx, secp_ctx);
let commitment_txid = trusted_tx.txid();
let holder_csv = self.inner.counterparty_selected_contest_delay();
- let revoked = self.revoked_commitment.lock().unwrap();
+ let state = self.state.lock().unwrap();
let commitment_number = trusted_tx.commitment_number();
- if *revoked - 1 != commitment_number && *revoked - 2 != commitment_number {
+ if state.last_holder_revoked_commitment - 1 != commitment_number && state.last_holder_revoked_commitment - 2 != commitment_number {
if !self.disable_revocation_policy_check {
panic!("can only sign the next two unrevoked commitment numbers, revoked={} vs requested={} for {}",
- *revoked, commitment_number, self.inner.commitment_seed[0])
+ state.last_holder_revoked_commitment, commitment_number, self.inner.commitment_seed[0])
}
}
impl Writeable for EnforcingSigner {
fn write<W: Writer>(&self, writer: &mut W) -> Result<(), Error> {
+ // EnforcingSigner has two fields - `inner` ([`InMemorySigner`]) and `state`
+ // ([`EnforcementState`]). `inner` is serialized here and deserialized by
+ // [`KeysInterface::read_chan_signer`]. `state` is managed by [`KeysInterface`]
+ // and will be serialized as needed by the implementation of that trait.
self.inner.write(writer)?;
- let last = *self.last_commitment_number.lock().unwrap();
- last.write(writer)?;
Ok(())
}
}
-impl Readable for EnforcingSigner {
- fn read<R: io::Read>(reader: &mut R) -> Result<Self, DecodeError> {
- let inner = Readable::read(reader)?;
- let last_commitment_number = Readable::read(reader)?;
- Ok(EnforcingSigner {
- inner,
- last_commitment_number: Arc::new(Mutex::new(last_commitment_number)),
- revoked_commitment: Arc::new(Mutex::new(INITIAL_REVOKED_COMMITMENT_NUMBER)),
- disable_revocation_policy_check: false,
- })
- }
-}
-
impl EnforcingSigner {
fn verify_counterparty_commitment_tx<'a, T: secp256k1::Signing + secp256k1::Verification>(&self, commitment_tx: &'a CommitmentTransaction, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<T>) -> TrustedCommitmentTransaction<'a> {
commitment_tx.verify(&self.inner.get_channel_parameters().as_counterparty_broadcastable(),
.expect("derived different per-tx keys or built transaction")
}
}
+
+/// The state used by [`EnforcingSigner`] in order to enforce policy checks
+///
+/// This structure is maintained by KeysInterface since we may have multiple copies of
+/// the signer and they must coordinate their state.
+#[derive(Clone)]
+pub struct EnforcementState {
+ /// The last counterparty commitment number we signed, backwards counting
+ pub last_counterparty_commitment: u64,
+ /// The last counterparty commitment they revoked, backwards counting
+ pub last_counterparty_revoked_commitment: u64,
+ /// The last holder commitment number we revoked, backwards counting
+ pub last_holder_revoked_commitment: u64,
+ /// The last validated holder commitment number, backwards counting
+ pub last_holder_commitment: u64,
+}
+
+impl EnforcementState {
+ /// Enforcement state for a new channel
+ pub fn new() -> Self {
+ EnforcementState {
+ last_counterparty_commitment: INITIAL_REVOKED_COMMITMENT_NUMBER,
+ last_counterparty_revoked_commitment: INITIAL_REVOKED_COMMITMENT_NUMBER,
+ last_holder_revoked_commitment: INITIAL_REVOKED_COMMITMENT_NUMBER,
+ last_holder_commitment: INITIAL_REVOKED_COMMITMENT_NUMBER,
+ }
+ }
+}
use ln::msgs;
use ln::msgs::OptionalField;
use ln::script::ShutdownScript;
-use util::enforcing_trait_impls::{EnforcingSigner, INITIAL_REVOKED_COMMITMENT_NUMBER};
+use util::enforcing_trait_impls::{EnforcingSigner, EnforcementState};
use util::events;
use util::logger::{Logger, Level, Record};
use util::ser::{Readable, ReadableArgs, Writer, Writeable};
fn get_channel_signer(&self, _inbound: bool, _channel_value_satoshis: u64) -> EnforcingSigner { unreachable!(); }
fn get_secure_random_bytes(&self) -> [u8; 32] { [0; 32] }
- fn read_chan_signer(&self, reader: &[u8]) -> Result<Self::Signer, msgs::DecodeError> {
- EnforcingSigner::read(&mut io::Cursor::new(reader))
+ fn read_chan_signer(&self, mut reader: &[u8]) -> Result<Self::Signer, msgs::DecodeError> {
+ let inner: InMemorySigner = Readable::read(&mut reader)?;
+ let state = Arc::new(Mutex::new(EnforcementState::new()));
+
+ Ok(EnforcingSigner::new_with_revoked(
+ inner,
+ state,
+ false
+ ))
}
fn sign_invoice(&self, _invoice_preimage: Vec<u8>) -> Result<RecoverableSignature, ()> { unreachable!(); }
}
pub override_session_priv: Mutex<Option<[u8; 32]>>,
pub override_channel_id_priv: Mutex<Option<[u8; 32]>>,
pub disable_revocation_policy_check: bool,
- revoked_commitments: Mutex<HashMap<[u8;32], Arc<Mutex<u64>>>>,
+ enforcement_states: Mutex<HashMap<[u8;32], Arc<Mutex<EnforcementState>>>>,
expectations: Mutex<Option<VecDeque<OnGetShutdownScriptpubkey>>>,
}
fn get_channel_signer(&self, inbound: bool, channel_value_satoshis: u64) -> EnforcingSigner {
let keys = self.backing.get_channel_signer(inbound, channel_value_satoshis);
- let revoked_commitment = self.make_revoked_commitment_cell(keys.commitment_seed);
- EnforcingSigner::new_with_revoked(keys, revoked_commitment, self.disable_revocation_policy_check)
+ let state = self.make_enforcement_state_cell(keys.commitment_seed);
+ EnforcingSigner::new_with_revoked(keys, state, self.disable_revocation_policy_check)
}
fn get_secure_random_bytes(&self) -> [u8; 32] {
let mut reader = io::Cursor::new(buffer);
let inner: InMemorySigner = Readable::read(&mut reader)?;
- let revoked_commitment = self.make_revoked_commitment_cell(inner.commitment_seed);
-
- let last_commitment_number = Readable::read(&mut reader)?;
+ let state = self.make_enforcement_state_cell(inner.commitment_seed);
- Ok(EnforcingSigner {
+ Ok(EnforcingSigner::new_with_revoked(
inner,
- last_commitment_number: Arc::new(Mutex::new(last_commitment_number)),
- revoked_commitment,
- disable_revocation_policy_check: self.disable_revocation_policy_check,
- })
+ state,
+ self.disable_revocation_policy_check
+ ))
}
fn sign_invoice(&self, invoice_preimage: Vec<u8>) -> Result<RecoverableSignature, ()> {
override_session_priv: Mutex::new(None),
override_channel_id_priv: Mutex::new(None),
disable_revocation_policy_check: false,
- revoked_commitments: Mutex::new(HashMap::new()),
+ enforcement_states: Mutex::new(HashMap::new()),
expectations: Mutex::new(None),
}
}
pub fn derive_channel_keys(&self, channel_value_satoshis: u64, id: &[u8; 32]) -> EnforcingSigner {
let keys = self.backing.derive_channel_keys(channel_value_satoshis, id);
- let revoked_commitment = self.make_revoked_commitment_cell(keys.commitment_seed);
- EnforcingSigner::new_with_revoked(keys, revoked_commitment, self.disable_revocation_policy_check)
+ let state = self.make_enforcement_state_cell(keys.commitment_seed);
+ EnforcingSigner::new_with_revoked(keys, state, self.disable_revocation_policy_check)
}
- fn make_revoked_commitment_cell(&self, commitment_seed: [u8; 32]) -> Arc<Mutex<u64>> {
- let mut revoked_commitments = self.revoked_commitments.lock().unwrap();
- if !revoked_commitments.contains_key(&commitment_seed) {
- revoked_commitments.insert(commitment_seed, Arc::new(Mutex::new(INITIAL_REVOKED_COMMITMENT_NUMBER)));
+ fn make_enforcement_state_cell(&self, commitment_seed: [u8; 32]) -> Arc<Mutex<EnforcementState>> {
+ let mut states = self.enforcement_states.lock().unwrap();
+ if !states.contains_key(&commitment_seed) {
+ let state = EnforcementState::new();
+ states.insert(commitment_seed, Arc::new(Mutex::new(state)));
}
- let cell = revoked_commitments.get(&commitment_seed).unwrap();
+ let cell = states.get(&commitment_seed).unwrap();
Arc::clone(cell)
}
}
projects / rust-lightning / commitdiff