use prelude::*;
use core::{cmp,mem,fmt};
use core::ops::Deref;
-#[cfg(any(test, feature = "fuzztarget"))]
-use std::sync::Mutex;
+#[cfg(any(test, feature = "fuzztarget", debug_assertions))]
+use sync::Mutex;
use bitcoin::hashes::hex::ToHex;
use bitcoin::blockdata::opcodes::all::OP_PUSHBYTES_0;
#[cfg(debug_assertions)]
/// Max to_local and to_remote outputs in a locally-generated commitment transaction
- holder_max_commitment_tx_output: ::std::sync::Mutex<(u64, u64)>,
+ holder_max_commitment_tx_output: Mutex<(u64, u64)>,
#[cfg(debug_assertions)]
/// Max to_local and to_remote outputs in a remote-generated commitment transaction
- counterparty_max_commitment_tx_output: ::std::sync::Mutex<(u64, u64)>,
+ counterparty_max_commitment_tx_output: Mutex<(u64, u64)>,
last_sent_closing_fee: Option<(u32, u64, Signature)>, // (feerate, fee, holder_sig)
monitor_pending_failures: Vec::new(),
#[cfg(debug_assertions)]
- holder_max_commitment_tx_output: ::std::sync::Mutex::new((channel_value_satoshis * 1000 - push_msat, push_msat)),
+ holder_max_commitment_tx_output: Mutex::new((channel_value_satoshis * 1000 - push_msat, push_msat)),
#[cfg(debug_assertions)]
- counterparty_max_commitment_tx_output: ::std::sync::Mutex::new((channel_value_satoshis * 1000 - push_msat, push_msat)),
+ counterparty_max_commitment_tx_output: Mutex::new((channel_value_satoshis * 1000 - push_msat, push_msat)),
last_sent_closing_fee: None,
monitor_pending_failures: Vec::new(),
#[cfg(debug_assertions)]
- holder_max_commitment_tx_output: ::std::sync::Mutex::new((msg.push_msat, msg.funding_satoshis * 1000 - msg.push_msat)),
+ holder_max_commitment_tx_output: Mutex::new((msg.push_msat, msg.funding_satoshis * 1000 - msg.push_msat)),
#[cfg(debug_assertions)]
- counterparty_max_commitment_tx_output: ::std::sync::Mutex::new((msg.push_msat, msg.funding_satoshis * 1000 - msg.push_msat)),
+ counterparty_max_commitment_tx_output: Mutex::new((msg.push_msat, msg.funding_satoshis * 1000 - msg.push_msat)),
last_sent_closing_fee: None,
if !self.is_outbound() {
// Check that we won't violate the remote channel reserve by adding this HTLC.
let counterparty_balance_msat = self.channel_value_satoshis * 1000 - self.value_to_self_msat;
- let holder_selected_chan_reserve_msat = Channel::<Signer>::get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(self.channel_value_satoshis);
+ let holder_selected_chan_reserve_msat = Channel::<Signer>::get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(self.channel_value_satoshis) * 1000;
let htlc_candidate = HTLCCandidate::new(amount_msat, HTLCInitiator::LocalOffered);
let counterparty_commit_tx_fee_msat = self.next_remote_commit_tx_fee_msat(htlc_candidate, None);
if counterparty_balance_msat < holder_selected_chan_reserve_msat + counterparty_commit_tx_fee_msat {
feerate_per_kw,
#[cfg(debug_assertions)]
- holder_max_commitment_tx_output: ::std::sync::Mutex::new((0, 0)),
+ holder_max_commitment_tx_output: Mutex::new((0, 0)),
#[cfg(debug_assertions)]
- counterparty_max_commitment_tx_output: ::std::sync::Mutex::new((0, 0)),
+ counterparty_max_commitment_tx_output: Mutex::new((0, 0)),
last_sent_closing_fee,
use bitcoin::hashes::sha256::Hash as Sha256;
use bitcoin::hashes::Hash;
use bitcoin::hash_types::{Txid, WPubkeyHash};
- use std::sync::Arc;
+ use sync::Arc;
use prelude::*;
struct TestFeeEstimator {
use ln::channelmanager::{ChannelManager, ChannelManagerReadArgs, RAACommitmentOrder, PaymentSendFailure, BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT, MIN_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA};
use ln::channel::{Channel, ChannelError};
use ln::{chan_utils, onion_utils};
+ use ln::chan_utils::HTLC_SUCCESS_TX_WEIGHT;
use routing::router::{Route, RouteHop, RouteHint, RouteHintHop, get_route};
use routing::network_graph::RoutingFees;
use ln::features::{ChannelFeatures, InitFeatures, InvoiceFeatures, NodeFeatures};
use prelude::*;
use alloc::collections::BTreeSet;
use core::default::Default;
-use std::sync::{Arc, Mutex};
+use sync::{Arc, Mutex};
use ln::functional_test_utils::*;
use ln::chan_utils::CommitmentTransaction;
// sending any above-dust amount would result in a channel reserve violation.
// In this test we check that we would be prevented from sending an HTLC in
// this situation.
- chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(6000) };
- chanmon_cfgs[1].fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(6000) };
+ let feerate_per_kw = 253;
+ chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(feerate_per_kw) };
+ chanmon_cfgs[1].fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(feerate_per_kw) };
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
- let _ = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
- let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 4843000);
+ let mut push_amt = 100_000_000;
+ push_amt -= feerate_per_kw as u64 * (COMMITMENT_TX_BASE_WEIGHT + COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000 * 1000;
+ push_amt -= Channel::<EnforcingSigner>::get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(100_000) * 1000;
+
+ let _ = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100_000, push_amt, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+
+ // Sending exactly enough to hit the reserve amount should be accepted
+ let (_, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 1_000_000);
+
+ // However one more HTLC should be significantly over the reserve amount and fail.
+ let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 1_000_000);
unwrap_send_err!(nodes[1].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &Some(our_payment_secret)), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send value that would put counterparty balance under holder-announced channel reserve value"));
assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
fn test_chan_reserve_dust_inbound_htlcs_outbound_chan() {
// Test that if we receive many dust HTLCs over an outbound channel, they don't count when
// calculating our commitment transaction fee (this was previously broken).
- let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
+ let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
+ let feerate_per_kw = 253;
+ chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(feerate_per_kw) };
+ chanmon_cfgs[1].fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(feerate_per_kw) };
+
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
// Set nodes[0]'s balance such that they will consider any above-dust received HTLC to be a
// channel reserve violation (so their balance is channel reserve (1000 sats) + commitment
// transaction fee with 0 HTLCs (183 sats)).
- create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 98817000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+ let mut push_amt = 100_000_000;
+ push_amt -= feerate_per_kw as u64 * (COMMITMENT_TX_BASE_WEIGHT) / 1000 * 1000;
+ push_amt -= Channel::<EnforcingSigner>::get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(100_000) * 1000;
+ create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, push_amt, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
- let dust_amt = 329000; // Dust amount
+ let dust_amt = crate::ln::channel::MIN_DUST_LIMIT_SATOSHIS * 1000
+ + feerate_per_kw as u64 * HTLC_SUCCESS_TX_WEIGHT / 1000 * 1000 - 1;
// In the previous code, routing this dust payment would cause nodes[0] to perceive a channel
// reserve violation even though it's a dust HTLC and therefore shouldn't count towards the
// commitment transaction fee.
let (_, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], dust_amt);
+
+ // One more than the dust amt should fail, however.
+ let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], dust_amt + 1);
+ unwrap_send_err!(nodes[1].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &Some(our_payment_secret)), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
+ assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send value that would put counterparty balance under holder-announced channel reserve value"));
}
#[test]
projects / rust-lightning / commitdiff