Matt Corallo [Mon, 19 Sep 2022 09:11:11 +0000 (09:11 +0000)]
Add a `MutexGuard` wrapper for the bindings-only `LockableScore`
In the bindings, we don't directly export any `std` types. Instead,
we provide trivial wrappers around them which expose only a
bindings-compatible API (and which is code in-crate, where the
bindings generator can see it).
We never quite finished this for `MultiThreadedLockableScore` - due
to some limitations in the bindings generator and the way the
scores are used in `lightning-invoice`, the scoring API ended up
being further concretized in patches for the bindings. Luckily the
scoring interface has been rewritten somewhat, and it so happens
that we can now generate bindings with the upstream code.
The final piece of the puzzle is done here, where we add a struct
which wraps `MutexGuard` so that we can expose the lock for
`MultiThreadedLockableScore`.
Matt Corallo [Thu, 22 Sep 2022 14:07:25 +0000 (14:07 +0000)]
Downgrade `hashbrown` to meet MSRV
`hashbrown` depends on `ahash` which depends on `once_cell`. Sadly,
in https://github.com/matklad/once_cell/issues/201 the `once_cell`
maintainer decided they didn't want to do the work of having an
MSRV policy for `once_cell`, making `ahash`, and thus `hashbrown`
require the latest compiler. I've reached out to `ahash` to suggest
they drop the dependency (as they could trivially work around not
having it), but until then we simply downgrade `hashbrown`.
`rust-bitcoin` also requires an older `hashbrown` so we're actually
reducing our total `no-std` code here anyway.
Matt Corallo [Sun, 18 Sep 2022 13:55:08 +0000 (13:55 +0000)]
Avoid returning a reference to a u64.
In c353c3ed7c40e689a3b9fb6730c6dabbd3c92cc5 an accessor method was
added which returns an `Option<&u64>`. While this allows Rust to
return an 8-byte object, returning a reference to something
pointer-sized is a somewhat strange API.
Instead, we opt for a straight `Option<u64>`, which is sadly
somewhat larger on the stack, but is simpler and already supported
in the bindings generation.
Matt Corallo [Sun, 18 Sep 2022 13:34:39 +0000 (13:34 +0000)]
Swap `Vec<&RouteHop>` parameters for slices
In c353c3ed7c40e689a3b9fb6730c6dabbd3c92cc5, new scorer-updating
methods were added to the `Router` object, however they were
passed as a `Vec` of references. We use the list-of-references
pattern to make bindings simpler (by not requiring allocations per
entry), however there's no reason prefer to passing a `Vec` over
a slice, given the `Vec` doesn't hold ownership of the objects
anyway.
Jurvis Tan [Thu, 15 Sep 2022 21:58:08 +0000 (14:58 -0700)]
Move Scorer requirement away from Router trait
We do this to enable users to create routers that do not need a scorer.
This can be useful if they are running a node the delegates pathfinding.
* Move `Score` type parameterization from `InvoicePayer` and `Router` to
`DefaultRouter`
* Adds a new field, `scorer`, to `DefaultRouter`
* Move `AccountsForInFlightHtlcs` to `DefaultRouter`, which we
will use to wrap the new `scorer` field, so scoring only happens in
`DefaultRouter` explicitly.
* Add scoring related functions to `Router` trait that we used to call
directly from `InvoicePayer`.
* Instead of parameterizing `scorer` in `find_route`, we replace it with
inflight_map so `InvoicePayer` can pass on information about inflight
HTLCs to the router.
* Introduced a new tuple struct, InFlightHtlcs, that wraps functionality
for querying used liquidity.
Matt Corallo [Mon, 12 Sep 2022 15:20:37 +0000 (15:20 +0000)]
Encrypt+MAC most P2P messages in-place
For non-gossip-broadcast messages, our current flow is to first
serialize the message into a `Vec`, and then allocate a new `Vec`
into which we write the encrypted+MAC'd message and header.
This is somewhat wasteful, and its rather simple to instead
allocate only one buffer and encrypt the message in-place.
Matt Corallo [Mon, 12 Sep 2022 15:16:41 +0000 (15:16 +0000)]
Fix encryption of broadcasted gossip messages
In 47e818f198abafba01b9ad278582886f9007dac2, forwarding broadcasted
gossip messages was split into a separate per-peer message buffer.
However, both it and the original regular-message queue are
encrypted immediately when the messages are enqueued. Because the
lightning P2P encryption algorithm is order-dependent, this causes
messages to fail their MAC checks as the messages from the two
queues may not be sent to peers in the order in which they were
encrypted.
The fix is to simply queue broadcast gossip messages unencrypted,
encrypting them when we add them to the regular outbound buffer.
Matt Corallo [Sun, 11 Sep 2022 21:18:01 +0000 (21:18 +0000)]
Drop unused type parameter on `BlindedRoute::new`
I'm not sure why rustc didn't complain about the unused parameter
or why we're allowed to get away without explicitly bounding the
`Sign` in the `KeysInterface`, but the current code requires all
`BlindedPath` construction to explicitly turbofish an unused type.
Matt Corallo [Sat, 10 Sep 2022 20:31:52 +0000 (20:31 +0000)]
Inline generic bounds rather than using the `where` clause
The bindings generator is pretty naive in its generic resolution
and doesn't like `where` clauses for bounds that are simple traits.
This should eventually change, but for now its simplest to just
inline the relevant generic bounds.
Matt Corallo [Sat, 10 Sep 2022 20:31:42 +0000 (20:31 +0000)]
Do not use blanket impls when building for `c_bindings`
The C bindings generator isn't capable of figuring out if a blanket
impl applies in a given context, and instead opts to always write
out any relevant impl's for a trait. Thus, blanket impls should be
disabled when building with `#[cfg(c_bindings)]`.
OR InitFeatures and NodeFeatures from onion message handler
Similar to how we OR our InitFeaures and NodeFeatures across both our channel
and routing message handlers, we also want to OR the features of our onion
message handler.
Add a new NodeFeatures constructor to capture the types of flags
When ChannelMessageHandler implementations wish to return a NodeFeatures which
contain all the known flags that are relevant to channel handling, but not
gossip handling, they currently need to do so by manually constructing a
NodeFeatures with all known flags and then clearing the ones they don't want.
Instead of spreading this logic across the codebase, this consolidates such
construction into one place in features.rs.
OR NodeFeatures from both Channel and Routing message handlers
When we broadcast a node announcement, the features we support are really a
combination of all the various features our different handlers support. This
commit captures this concept by OR'ing our NodeFeatures across both our channel
and routing message handlers.
Matt Corallo [Fri, 9 Sep 2022 19:30:30 +0000 (19:30 +0000)]
Correct `get_claimable_balance` version info
5a8ede09fb3c8bbcd8694d94c12dac9ea7485537 updated the documentation
on `get_claimable_balance` to note that if a channel went on-chain
with an LDK version older than 0.0.108 some
counterparty-revoked-output claimable balances my be missing.
However, this failed to account for the fact that we rely on the
entirely-new-in-0.0.111
`confirmed_commitment_tx_counterparty_output` field for some
balances as well.
Thus, the comment should have been in terms of 0.0.111, not
0.0.108.
Matt Corallo [Mon, 29 Aug 2022 18:42:34 +0000 (18:42 +0000)]
Fix spurious panic on receipt of a block while awaiting funding
When we receive a block we always test if we should send our
channel_ready via `check_get_channel_ready`. If the channel in
question requires confirmations, we quickly return if the funding
transaction has not yet confirmed (or even been defined), however
for 0conf channels the checks are necessarily more involved.
In any case, we wish to panic if the funding transaction has
confirmations prior to when it should have been broadcasted. This
is useful as it is easy for users to violate our broadcast-time
invariants without noticing and the panic gives us an opportunity
to catch it.
Sadly, in the case of 0conf channels, if we hadn't yet seen the
funding transaction at all but receive a block we would hit this
sanity check as we don't check whether there are actually funding
transaction confirmations prior to panicing.
Matt Corallo [Wed, 7 Sep 2022 17:55:01 +0000 (17:55 +0000)]
Add a new InitFeatures constructor to capture the types of flags
When `ChannelMessageHandler` implementations wish to return an
`InitFeatures` which contain all the known flags that are relevant
to channel handling, but not gossip handling, they currently need
to do so by manually constructing an InitFeatures with all known
flags and then clearing the ones they dont want.
Instead of spreading this logic out across the codebase, this
consolidates such construction to one place in features.rs.
Matt Corallo [Wed, 7 Sep 2022 17:35:50 +0000 (17:35 +0000)]
OR InitFeatures from both Channel and Routing message handlers
When we go to send an Init message to new peers, the features we
support are really a combination of all the various features our
different handlers support. This commit captures this concept by
OR'ing our InitFeatures across both our Channel and Routing
handlers.
Note that this also disables setting the `initial_routing_sync`
flag in init messages, as was intended in e742894492c55802b241eebc585bbd28aa16481b, per the comment added on
`clear_initial_routing_sync`, though this should not be a behavior
change in practice as nodes which support gossip queries ignore the
initial routing sync flag.
Matt Corallo [Wed, 7 Sep 2022 17:51:16 +0000 (17:51 +0000)]
Fetch our `InitFeatures` from `ChannelMessageHandler`
Like we now do for `NodeFeatures`, this converts to asking our
registered `ChannelMessageHandler` for our `InitFeatures` instead
of hard-coding them to the global LDK known set.
This allows handlers to set different feature bits based on what
our configuration actually supports rather than what LDK supports
in aggregate.
Matt Corallo [Tue, 6 Sep 2022 22:34:29 +0000 (22:34 +0000)]
Move `broadcast_node_announcement` to `PeerManager`
Some `NodeFeatures` will, in the future, represent features which
are not enabled by the `ChannelManager`, but by other message
handlers handlers. Thus, it doesn't make sense to determine the
node feature bits in the `ChannelManager`.
The simplest fix for this is to change to generating the
node_announcement in `PeerManager`, asking all the connected
handlers which feature bits they support and simply OR'ing them
together. While this may not be sufficient in the future as it
doesn't consider feature bit dependencies, support for those could
be handled at the feature level in the future.
This commit moves the `broadcast_node_announcement` function to
`PeerHandler` but does not yet implement feature OR'ing.
Matt Corallo [Tue, 6 Sep 2022 21:30:33 +0000 (21:30 +0000)]
Send channel_{announcement,update} msgs on connection, not timer
When we connect to a new peer, immediately send them any
channel_announcement and channel_update messages for any public
channels we have with other peers. This allows us to stop sending
those messages on a timer when they have not changed and ensures
we are sending messages when we have peers connected, rather than
broadcasting at startup when we have no peers connected.
Matt Corallo [Wed, 7 Sep 2022 21:39:17 +0000 (21:39 +0000)]
Dont use PaymentPathFailed a probe fails without making it out
When we fail to forward a probe HTLC at all and immediately fail it
(e.g. due to the first hop channel closing) we'd previously
spuriously generate only a `PaymentPathFailed` event. This violates
the expected API, as users expect a `ProbeFailed` event instead.
This fixes the oversight by ensuring we generate the correct event.
Matt Corallo [Wed, 7 Sep 2022 21:09:50 +0000 (21:09 +0000)]
Drop redundant code in `fail_holding_cell_htlcs`
`fail_holding_cell_htlcs` calls through to
`fail_htlc_backwards_internal` for HTLCs that need to be
failed-backwards but opts to generate its own payment failure
events for `HTLCSource:;OutboundRoute` HTLCs. There is no reason
for that as `fail_htlc_backwards_internal` will also happily
generate (now-)equivalent events for `HTLCSource::OutboundRoute`
HTLCs.
Thus, we can drop the redundant code and always call
`fail_htlc_backwards_internal` for each HTLC in
`fail_holding_cell_htlcs`.
Matt Corallo [Tue, 6 Sep 2022 22:51:29 +0000 (22:51 +0000)]
Add missing deserialization of Event::HTLCHandlingFailed
17e6c374c513f2eca810fa4e931be65f0d4fc29f added the
`HTLCHandlingFailed` event, including serialization thereof,
however failed to add corresponding deserialization. This corrects
that oversight by adding said deserialization.
The `rejected_by_dest` field of the `PaymentPathFailed` event has
always been a bit of a misnomer, as its really more about retry
than where a payment failed. Now is as good a time as any to
rename it.
Matt Corallo [Wed, 7 Sep 2022 20:02:04 +0000 (20:02 +0000)]
Mark failed counterparty-is-destination HTLCs retryable
When our counterparty is the payment destination and we receive
an `HTLCFailReason::Reason` in `fail_htlc_backwards_internal` we
currently always set `rejected_by_dest` in the `PaymentPathFailed`
event, implying the HTLC should *not* be retried.
There are a number of cases where we use `HTLCFailReason::Reason`,
but most should reasonably be treated as retryable even if our
counterparty was the destination (i.e. `!rejected_by_dest`):
* If an HTLC times out on-chain, this doesn't imply that the
payment is no longer retryable, though the peer may well be
offline so retrying may not be very useful,
* If a commitment transaction "containing" a dust HTLC is
confirmed on-chain, this definitely does not imply the payment
is no longer retryable
* If the channel we intended to relay over was closed (or
force-closed) we should retry over another path,
* If the channel we intended to relay over did not have enough
capacity we should retry over another path,
* If we received a update_fail_malformed_htlc message from our
peer, we likely should *not* retry, however this should be
exceedingly rare, and appears to nearly never appear in practice
Thus, this commit simply disables the behavior here, opting to
treat all `HTLCFailReason::Reason` errors as retryable.
Note that prior to 93e645daf46f85949ae0edf60d36bf21e9fde8af this
change would not have made sense as it would have resulted in us
retrying the payment over the same channel in some cases, however
we now "blame" our own channel and will avoid it when routing for
the same payment.
Matt Corallo [Tue, 6 Sep 2022 20:56:24 +0000 (20:56 +0000)]
Clarify and consolidate event handling requirements
We've seen a bit of user confusion about the requirements for event
handling, largely because the idempotency and consistency
requirements weren't super clearly phrased. While we're at it, we
also consolidate some documentation out of the event handling
function onto the trait itself.
Matt Corallo [Fri, 2 Sep 2022 21:10:43 +0000 (21:10 +0000)]
Correct payment resolution after on chain failure of dust HTLCs
Previously, we wouldn't mark a dust HTLC as permanently resolved if
the commitment transaction went on chain. This resulted in us
always considering the HTLC as pending on restart, when we load the
pending payments set from the monitors.
Matt Corallo [Mon, 5 Sep 2022 16:28:11 +0000 (16:28 +0000)]
Ensure we log private channel_updates at a non-GOSSIP log level
If we receive a channel_update for one of our private channels, we
will not log the message at the usual TRACE log level as the
message falls into the gossip range. However, for our own channels
they aren't *just* gossip, as we store that info and it changes
how we generate invoices. Thus, we add a log in `ChannelManager`
here at the DEBUG log level.
Matt Corallo [Tue, 9 Aug 2022 04:15:21 +0000 (04:15 +0000)]
Add a `Future` which can receive manager persistence events
This allows users who don't wish to block a full thread to receive
persistence events.
The `Future` added here is really just a trivial list of callbacks,
but from that we can build a (somewhat ineffecient)
std::future::Future implementation and can (at least once a mapping
for Box<dyn Trait> is added) include the future in no-std bindings
as well.
Matt Corallo [Fri, 2 Sep 2022 21:57:32 +0000 (21:57 +0000)]
Handle monotonic clock going backwards during runtime
We've had some users complain that `duration_since` is panic'ing
for them. This is possible if the machine being run on is buggy and
the "monotonic clock" goes backwards, which sadly some ancient
systems can do.
Rust addressed this issue in 1.60 by forcing
`Instant::duration_since` to not panic if the machine is buggy
(and time goes backwards), but for users on older rust versions we
do the same by hand here.
jurvis [Sun, 28 Aug 2022 06:07:50 +0000 (23:07 -0700)]
Make payment tests more realistic
Made sure that every hop has a unique receipient. When we simulate
calling `channel_penalty_msat` in `TestRouter`’s find route, use
actual previous node ids instead of just using the payer’s.
jurvis [Tue, 30 Aug 2022 05:50:44 +0000 (22:50 -0700)]
Keep track of inflight HTLCs across payments
Added two methods, `process_path_inflight_htlcs` and
`remove_path_inflight_htlcs`, that updates that `payment_cache` map with
path information that may have failed, succeeded, or have been given up
on.
Introduced `AccountForInflightHtlcs`, which will wrap our user-provided
scorer. We move the `S:Score` type parameterization from the `Router` to
`find_route`, so we can use our newly introduced
`AccountForInflightHtlcs`.
`AccountForInflightHtlcs` keeps track of a map of inflight HTLCs by
their short channel id, direction, and give us the value that is being
used up.
This map will in turn be populated prior to calling `find_route`, where
we’ll use `create_inflight_map`, to generate a current map of all
inflight HTLCs based on what was stored in `payment_cache`.
jurvis [Tue, 30 Aug 2022 05:49:24 +0000 (22:49 -0700)]
Change `payment_cache` to accept `PaymentInfo`
Introduces a new `PaymentInfo` struct that contains both the previous
`attempts` count that was tracked as well as the paths that are also
currently inflight.
In this commit, we check if a peer's outbound buffer has room for onion
messages, and if so pulls them from an implementer of a new trait,
OnionMessageProvider.
Makes sure channel messages are prioritized over OMs, and OMs are prioritized
over gossip.
The onion_message module remains private until further rate limiting is added.
Add boilerplate for sending and receiving onion messages in PeerManager
Adds the boilerplate needed for PeerManager and OnionMessenger to work
together, with some corresponding docs and misc updates mostly due to the
PeerManager public API changing.
Separate gossip broadcasts into their own queue in PeerManager
This allows us to better prioritize channel messages over gossip broadcasts and
lays groundwork for rate limiting onion messages more simply, since they won't
be competing with gossip broadcasts for space in the main message queue.
Matt Corallo [Wed, 17 Aug 2022 20:15:23 +0000 (20:15 +0000)]
Expose a `Balance` for inbound HTLCs even without a preimage
If we don't currently have the preimage for an inbound HTLC, that
does not guarantee we can never claim it, but instead only that we
cannot claim it unless we receive the preimage from the channel we
forwarded the channel out on.
Thus, we cannot consider a channel to have no claimable balances if
the only remaining output on the commitment ransaction is an
inbound HTLC for which we do not have the preimage, as we may be
able to claim it in the future.
This commit addresses this issue by adding a new `Balance` variant
- `MaybePreimageClaimableHTLCAwaitingTimeout`, which is generated
until the HTLC output is spent.